╌>

Trump says he’ll ban bump stocks through executive order

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  kavika  •  8 years ago  •  3 comments

Trump says he’ll ban bump stocks through executive order

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Friday that his administration was drafting an executive order that would   ban rapid-fire gun bump stocks , during a free-wheeling, hour-long discussion on school safety with a bipartisan group of lawmakers at the White House.

Cameras were allowed in to capture Trump's negotiations with key members of Congress in real time, where he chastised some in attendance for being too "afraid" of   the National Rifle Association   to take action after past mass shootings and positioned himself as the person to finally herald legislation that could tighten America's background checks system. At several points, Trump seemed to side against not just his conservative counterparts but the NRA, which   spent millions of dollars supporting Trump's 2016 presidential bid .

At one point, Trump's stated desire to turn tragedy into "something that’s beautiful, that works" was countered with a reminder about the power of the gun lobby — especially over Republicans. But Trump seemed unfazed, offering his conviction that the NRA was on board with some gun control measures. He also said that while the organization might hold sway over some lawmakers, it has less power over him.

The first step starts with Trump himself, he said Wednesday, when he promised to "essentially, write [bump stocks] out" with an executive order, instructing lawmakers that they won't have to include the measure in future gun and school safety legislation coming out of the Hill. "The lawyers" are working on this executive order "right now," he said.

"Shortly," Trump assured of bump stocks, "that'll be gone."







n_msnbc_brk_trump_bumpstocks_180228_1920

Play




  Trump says he plans to sign executive order outlawing bump stocks   0:39



The move comes just over a week   after Trump directed his attorney general, Jeff Sessions, to propose regulations that ban bump stocks   and similar devices "that turn legal weapons into machine guns."

When Trump first announced the move, Trump called the new regulations "critical" and predicted they'd be finalized by the Department of Justice soon. That Trump is now undertaking this effort himself after delegating it to the DOJ is notable, as   Trump has been critical of Sessions on Twitter recently for the way he's handled other   issues.

But regardless of who does the regulating, questions still stand about whether the move is legal.

The Trump administration is not the first to look at bump stocks — something the president pointed out in a memo to the DOJ this month.

"Although the Obama administration repeatedly concluded that particular bump stock type devices were lawful to purchase and possess, I sought further clarification of the law restricting fully automatic machine guns," a memo said.

The Obama administration did not regulate bump stocks in the aftermath of the deadly shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, but that was because the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives decided at the time that   it could not legally regulate bump stocks . The Trump administration may be trying to come at the issue with an executive order, but it's unclear how they will avoid similar questions about the legality of such an action.

This latest push to regulate bump stocks comes in response to America's deadliest mass shooting, in Las Vegas last year, where a   gunman used the devices   to kill 58 people.

Trump has called for action on school safety after the mass shooting at a Parkland, Florida, high school on Feb. 14 — repeatedly advocating for "hardening" schools and arming some gun-adept teachers to deter would-be shooters from attacking schools. He has also   floated giving teachers who can carry guns in classrooms "a little bit of a bonus."

While Trump has expressed support for concealed carry in schools, he threw cold water on similar measures when Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., pressed for them Wednesday. The president urged lawmakers to huddle together to create one bill on guns and school safety — repeatedly urging for one bill as opposed to several   —   andexplaining that he didn’t think a bill with background checks could pass if a concealed carry component was attached to it.

"Maybe that bill will someday pass, but it should pass as a separate," Trump advised Scalise, the House majority whip. "If you’re going to put concealed carry between states into this bill, we’re talking about a whole new ballgame. And you know, I’m with you but let it be a separate bill. You’ll never get this passed. If you add concealed carry to this, you’ll never get it passed."

Throughout the president's numerous conversations with stakeholders in the gun control and school safety debate, he was reminded of his close ties to the NRA — even if some of his proposals, like a rise in the legal age limit to purchase semi-automatic weapons, to 21 from 18, buck their desires.

Trump had lunch with top officials from the NRA this past weekend, during which he says he told them: "It's time. We got to stop this nonsense. It's time."

It's unclear, however, what proposals he told them it was "time" for.

"They have great power over you people. They have less power over me," Trump told lawmakers Wednesday. However, Trump said the NRA is "there" and "want[ing] to do what's right" on guns in the aftermath of the latest school shooting to shake America

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-says-he-ll-ban-bump-stocks-through-executive-order-n852021


CORRECTION (Feb. 28, 2018, 5:50 p.m. ET): An earlier version of this article misstated the year of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. It was in 2012, not 2013.  


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Kavika     8 years ago

Will he or won't he?

 
 
 
TOM PA
Freshman Silent
2  TOM PA    8 years ago

  Why an E.O.?  If he were really serious, he'ed try to pass a law that would be his and the R's downfall!  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  TOM PA @2    8 years ago

I doubt at this time any type of ban would get through congress, thus the EO.

 
 

Who is online