╌>

Leftists Contradict Their Own Propaganda

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  heartland-american  •  8 years ago  •  50 comments

Leftists Contradict Their Own Propaganda

Following are a few examples of positions liberal Democrats claim are core principles to them, and then explanations of how the positions they claim to hold are either wrong or are not even believed and practiced by their own party (which means that they are even lying to themselves as they deceive the nation):

1.Democrats would have us believe that President Trump’s suggestion that we establish a tariff to protect American manufacturers against cheap foreign aluminum and steel is outrageous, according to the anti-Trump crowd, and will cost more money than consumers can bear. But never mind the borrowing and infinite national debt that doubled during the Obama administration, which debt will raise taxes to the sky eventually, for our children and grand-children to pay for.

2. A few years ago Obama got a ruling from the Supreme Court that blocked Arizona from enforcing any immigration laws to prevent the flood of illegal immigrants who were crossing our southern border and burdening the frontier states in the Southwest. And then, having obtained the ruling from the Supremes that would block Arizona’s attempts to enforce the law and halt illegal entry into America, Obama refused to enforce even the weakest immigration law and told the Border Patrol to stand down and let the illegal inundation continue.

3. Liberals tell us that Americans should give up their guns and let the police protect us from attacks on our schools, our person or our property, but even the police readily tell us that they are unable to be on the scene of an attack quickly enough to make much difference, and state that they are reactive-only to an outbreak of violence, and they further advise us that we should arm ourselves if we want immediate, constant protection.

4. Elite colleges are outlawing personal pronouns from their lexicon and are claiming that the usage of “he” and “she” are discriminatory and that such old-fashioned words have no place in 21st century America. Yet these same liberals not only continue to use the racially divisive descriptors of “black” and “white“, but the Democrat leader of the United States Senate just a few days ago stated that he could not support President Trump’s latest federal court appointment because the appointee was “white”. You see, dividing the nation along racial lines is still a very large and growing part of the Democrat game plan to gain back power, and the white, brown and black thing will be used even more by these America-hating racists as they attempt to build civil walls that will destroy the America our constitution built.

5. Liberals defend their sanctuary city scheme by pretending that illegals hiding in Democrat-controlled American cities are better-off when they are left unidentified, because decent, non-violent illegal aliens would otherwise be reluctant to expose themselves to the danger of deportation if they had to contact the police to report a physical attack or a robbery or if they had to call 911 for illness or injury. The truth is that any decent, non-violent illegal alien hiding in a sanctuary city is doubly at risk from attack from a criminal illegal alien because the criminal alien is being protected and hidden from punishment by members of the Democrat party under the banner of offering “sanctuary“ from the evil, duly passed laws of our nation, and are shielded from punishment for any violent crimes they may have committed in the past, or will commit in the future. Non-violent immigrants have no protection from violent crime in cities run by radical Democrats, or to state it in the terms of a liberal, they have no “sanctuary” from the violent immigrants that liberal mayors and governors allow to run free and attack whomever they please.    https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2018/03/leftists-contradict-their-own-propaganda/


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
lib50
Professor Silent
3  lib50    8 years ago
3. Liberals tell us that Americans should give up their guns and let the police protect us from attacks on our schools, our person or our property, but even the police readily tell us that they are unable to be on the scene of an attack quickly enough to make much difference, and state that they are reactive-only to an outbreak of violence, and they further advise us that we should arm ourselves if we want immediate, constant protection.

That is not true.  Who is telling Americans to give up their guns?  Don't conflate that with a discussion about guns in schools and open carry, they aren't the same issue.  This is what the NRA and republicans always do, conflate and confuse the issue.  Stop.  Regulations are constitutional and necessary.  NOBODY has the right to whatever weapon they  want at any time and to carry it around with them.  FFS, can conservatives manage to live without being in constant fear?  Fear based decisions are never wise, especially when you have a weapon.  And police do NOT advise you to arm at will as a general rule.  Its complicated.

They’re not alone among top state law enforcement officers calling for lawmakers to tighten gun control and reverse decades of bidding by the powerful National Rifle Association. The Florida Police Chiefs Association has called for an emergency meeting Monday night that Florida Gov. Rick Scott is expected to attend. Exactly what suggestions might emerge, is not yet clear.


Read more here:

I'll address another one later.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2  Greg Jones  replied to  lib50 @3    8 years ago

Some oldies but goodies:  thumbs up

When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
3.2.1  lib50  replied to  Greg Jones @3.2    8 years ago

One day you all might be brave enough to face the world with your bare hands. 

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
3.2.3  Randy  replied to  Greg Jones @3.2    8 years ago
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

The outlaws in the end, will be those who think that they are "Patriots" when they'll find themselves to be just mis-led traitors. I feel sorry for them when their small and sad rebellion is crushed. Don't be fooled into being one of them. Think before you act.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.4  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Randy @3.2.3    8 years ago
Don't be fooled into being one of them. Think before you act.

Misled 'taken' fools

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Quiet
3.2.7  Randy  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.5    8 years ago
Gun owners need not take any action when or if the 2A is ever reinterpreted by a future Supreme Court.

The 2nd Amendment, like all of them, are subject interpretation and none of them are absolute (really not that good of a vodka). Which is why we have classic rulings such as screaming fire in a crowded theater in not freedom of speech. Personally I lean toward someday the SCOTUS interpreting the 2nd as meaning that only a "Well Regulated Militia" such as a state National Guard counts as what the founding fathers meant. However I am pragmatic enough to know that will not happen in my lifetime and am hoping to see before I die a ban on all civilian use of any and all automatic weapons. That will probably never happen either, but one can hope.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2.8  Greg Jones  replied to  Randy @3.2.3    8 years ago

Illogical response.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4  Dismayed Patriot    8 years ago

1. Democrats were upset by the apparent announcement of blanket tariffs on steel and aluminium fearing it would harm our close relationships with Canada, Europe & Mexico possibly starting a trade war. They were right, and the President has changed his tune saying that there would be carve outs for our allies to prevent what Democrats were worried about. We have no problem punishing the countries who have been dumping their cheap steel on us like China.

2. The only laws that were prevented in Arizona were the laws legalizing profiling. They did not block "enforcing any immigration laws" as stated.

3. No, liberals are NOT telling you to give up all your guns. They support sensible restrictions such as universal background checks and bans on certain types of military style weapons, bump stocks and large capacity magazines.

4. Universities are NOT outlawing the use of "he" and "she". Such a claim is ridiculous on the face of it. Are there teachers or professors who examine the origins and use of such words? I'm sure there are, but apparently the poorly educated insist that any discussions that they don't understand must be elitists and therefore must be "evil". The only ones dividing America along racial lines are the tiki torch wielding Trump supporters and Trump saying there are "good people on both sides".

5. It utter nonsense to claim that undocumented immigrants are somehow more at risk due to sanctuary cities that have removed the onus of local police to do ICE's job for them. There is zero evidence of this false claim, in fact the evidence shows that undocumented immigrants are half as likely to commit crimes than legal residents.

"Conservative daily news" should relabel themselves "Conservative Daily Nonsense".

 
 

Who is online