╌>

Rutgers Reportedly Paid Snooki More for a Speech Than Hillary Clinton, Which Actually Makes Sense?!

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  badbunny  •  8 years ago  •  19 comments

Rutgers Reportedly Paid Snooki More for a Speech Than Hillary Clinton, Which Actually Makes Sense?!

hk54zw7c53yj9ooqgbht.jpg

By far the stupidest part of my morning (and that’s saying a lot) is the 90 seconds I spend scrolling through the stories published by Radar Online while I was asleep. Their posting schedule is truly wild—and most mornings I find roughly 10 inflammatory, incendiary, and impossible-to-believe stories in my feed. But this morning I saw one so out of left field that I had to click through and read the entire thing.

In the story, they write that   Hillary Clinton   headlined an event held Thursday night at   Rutgers University   (which was   filled to capacity ), where she reportedly discussed “American democracy and its institutions, her political career and her role in the women’s political movement.”   They claim she was paid $25,000 for the appearance.   Not bad! But they also report that   the university paid Nicole Polizzi (aka   Jersey Shore ’s Snooki) $32,000 way   back in 2011 .

Radar’s interpretation of this is expectedly hard on Clinton. They   write :

After losing the presidency to billionaire Donald Trump and fracturing her wrist in India, the controversial democrat has now been shamed by Rutgers University, who paid her $7K less for her speech than they paid Jersey Shore star, Snooki!

There are many ways to interpret this, and none of them (in my view) read as insulting toward Hillary Clinton. While I have no data in front of me to back this up, it’s hard for me to believe that the former Presidential candidate—one of the most famous women, no,   people   on the planet—would not be able to demand more money than someone known for binge drinking and pickle juice on any given day, at any given venue. Perhaps $25k is her minimum! Perhaps she just took their first offer because she didn’t want a public university to pay her   typical fee !


But even if—and this is a huge if—she   demanded   more than Snooki and was vehemently   denied   by the good (?) folks at Rutgers, can we   really blame them for putting Snooki first? Let Ms. Polizzi, a New Jersey hero and icon, have this little victory, you know? I’m sure that even Hillary, if given a moment to consider the pay disparity, would agree.   “I totally get it,” she’d say, putting a hand on the shoulder of the Rutgers administrator. “I’ll take the $25k.”

I’ve reached out to Rutgers University and will update this post if they respond. Per usual, I’m not expecting them to!

Link


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2  Dismayed Patriot    8 years ago

Well obviously they are expecting Snooki to approve their purchase of Uranius Two, the source of all Jersey Shores "mojo" supplies, because paying people speaking fees is never just paying them for the speech, it's always something nefarious, at least according to Alex Jones, Breitbart and the rest of the insane right wing media empire.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    8 years ago

Clinton's value as a speaker has plummeted since she can't sell access to power anymore. Her "speeches" were basically legal bribes and once her power evaporated, so did demand for her pedestrian thoughts. If her thoughts were actually valuable, corporations would still be paying the same rate she was when she had a chance to be President. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    8 years ago

That seems to almost always be the case. If a president still has influence withing their party they can command a decent fee, if not then...

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
4  Thrawn 31    8 years ago

I don't much care what either of them have to say to be honest. 

 
 

Who is online