╌>

Senate takes swipe at Trump with 97-2 pro-NATO vote

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  krishna  •  8 years ago  •  21 comments

Senate takes swipe at Trump with 97-2 pro-NATO vote

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




trumpnato.jpg

The Senate took a bipartisan swipe at President Donald Trump on Tuesday when it overwhelmingly approved a motion of support for NATO.


The 97-2 vote reflects the broad concerns on Capitol Hill over Trump's seeming ambivalence about the alliance and his commitment to it.


The vote came the same day Trump arrived in Brussels, Belgium, for a summit of NATO nations and shortly before he heads to Helsinki, Finland, for a one-on-one session with Russian President Vladimir Putin.


In an interview on CNN, Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the third-ranking Senate GOP leader, explained why the motion was needed. "I think it is important that we demonstrate a strong commitment to the NATO alliance," Thune said. "I mean this is something that has served freedom-loving countries well for half a century."



The motion also called on the administration to "urgently prioritize the completion of a comprehensive, whole-of-government strategy to counter malign activities of Russia that seek to undermine faith in democratic institutions in the United States and around the world."



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Krishna    8 years ago
Sen. Jack Reed, the Rhode Island Democrat who authored the nonbinding motion, spoke on the Senate floor.
"No one should ever doubt the United States' resolve in meeting its commitments to the mutual defense of the NATO alliance," Reed said.
"Unfortunately, this motion has become necessary because some of our closest allies have come to question the US commitment to collective self-defense. President Trump has at times called the alliance 'obsolete.' Our allies are starting to wonder whether they can rely on the United States to come to their defense in a crisis."
 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Krishna @1    8 years ago
Our allies are starting to wonder whether they can rely on the United States to come to their defense in a crisis."

cant blam em

trump is so F'n pathetic

the fact he still has such defenders from such a devout following...

iz watt is truly disturbing

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
1.4  It Is ME  replied to  Krishna @1    8 years ago
Our allies are starting to wonder whether they can rely on the United States to come to their defense in a crisis."

These little "I notice you" votes in the Senate are such a waste of company time.

Wondering too much causes Stress, Hypertension and high blood pressure. I would think "Stepping up" to protect themselves would be a better strategy on their part. Or.....(wondering).....maybe they'll just wonder some more.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.5  Greg Jones  replied to  Krishna @1    8 years ago

Trump isn't anti-NATO....he's simply insisting that some of the other members make a larger commitment to their own defense, which is what they signed up to do.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1.5.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Greg Jones @1.5    8 years ago
Trump isn't anti-NATO....

He certainly sounds anti-NATO. oh wait, I forgot... We're not supposed to take any count of what he says...

... make a larger commitment to their own defense, which is what they signed up to do.

No. Not true. France and the UK combined, spend 150% of what Russia spends. Germany should spend more, but for operational reasons, not for any speechifying from a blowhard who knows zero about the military.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1.5.3  Bob Nelson  replied to  XDm9mm @1.5.2    8 years ago
How much do they spend to protect their own asses compared to what AMERICA spends to protect them?

America doesn't spend a penny to protect them. America spends a huge bundle of money to protect itself.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1.5.5  Bob Nelson  replied to  XDm9mm @1.5.4    8 years ago

I repeat: France and the UK spend 150% of what Russia spends. Europe doesn't need the US.

America wants to be present in Europe, and NATO is the means. America pays for the privilege.

It would be better for all for America to withdraw.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2  Bob Nelson    8 years ago

Two GOP senators, Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky, voted against the measure. "Why is the U.S. Senate pushing to expand NATO when most of them aren't even paying their fair share? I stand with @realDonaldTrump," Paul said in a tweet.

Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for an explanation why the Utah senator voted against the measure.

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3  luther28    8 years ago

Well surprise, surprise Congress finally grew a spine, if only for a moment or two.

 
 

Who is online




93 visitors