╌>

Senator Claire McCaskill Says She Will Not Vote to Confirm Brett Kavanaugh

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  8 years ago  •  5 comments

Senator Claire McCaskill Says She Will Not Vote to Confirm Brett Kavanaugh

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T










Politics

Senator Claire McCaskill Says She Will Not Vote to Confirm Brett Kavanaugh



b358fbc0-94ba-11e6-a1f5-2995baec1fef_Ox2   Opheli Garcia Lawler, The Cut   12 hours ago






996ce15a41cebcabf514b58265677535

Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill announced on Wednesday night that she will vote “no” on Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh is President Donald Trump’s   Supreme Court nominee , who could replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the bench.   Kavanaugh’ s   already controversial nomination   was made even more so when a woman named   Christine Blasey Ford   accused him of   sexual assault .

Sen. McCaskill shared in a statement posted to Twitter that while the allegations made against Kavanaugh are disturbing and merit a full and thorough investigation, that is not why she is choosing to vote no.She then outlined the dangers of anonymous cash funding campaign platforms and “issue ads” that can “interfere and influence” elections. Kavanaugh previously voted that monitoring or regulating these types of ads is unconstitutional, which Sen. McCaskill did not agree with.

“It is his allegiance to the position that unlimited donations and dark anonymous cash, from even foreign interests, should be allowed to swamp the voices of individuals that has been the determining factor in my decision to vote no on his nomination,” she concluded.

Sen. McCaskill’s announcement that she will not   vote to confirm Kavanaugh   is in line with her Democrat colleagues. At this time, no Senate Democrats have publicly ann ounced that they will vote to confirm Trump’s nominee, though five remain undecided.











Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    8 years ago

Wow. She's lost confidence in White.  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3  Ronin2    8 years ago
Sen. McCaskill shared in a statement posted to Twitter that while the allegations made against Kavanaugh are disturbing and merit a full and thorough investigation, that is not why she is choosing to vote no.She then outlined the dangers of anonymous cash funding campaign platforms and “issue ads” that can “interfere and influence” elections. Kavanaugh previously voted that monitoring or regulating these types of ads is unconstitutional, which Sen. McCaskill did not agree with.

“It is his allegiance to the position that unlimited donations and dark anonymous cash, from even foreign interests, should be allowed to swamp the voices of individuals that has been the determining factor in my decision to vote no on his nomination,” she concluded.

Sen. McCaskill’s announcement that she will not vote to confirm Kavanaugh is in line with her Democrat colleagues. At this time, no Senate Democrats have publicly ann ounced that they will vote to confirm Trump’s nominee, though five remain undecided.

I am shocked, shocked I tell you! Shocked that the Dems are against dark money; when they benefit from it as much as the Republicans do. I am sure she and the rest of the Dems will be the first to rush to vote a bill ending all dark money in politics./S

 
 

Who is online




123 visitors