╌>

Bringing It: Judicial Watch Files Ethics Complaint Against Cory Booker

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  8 years ago  •  11 comments

Bringing It: Judicial Watch Files Ethics Complaint Against Cory Booker
I willfully violate these sham rules. I fully accept any consequences that might arise from my actions including expulsion.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



ba67c393-5591-4106-9bad-7720f6779191.jpg


Government watchdog Judicial Watch has filed an ethics complaint against Democrat Senator Cory Booker for deliberately breaking Senate rules and releasing confidential Senate Judiciary Committee documents for political gain. Booker did so during the confirmation hearing for Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

"By publicly releasing Committee Confidential records, Sen. Booker appears to have violated provisions 5 and/or 6 of Rule 29 of the Standing Rules of the Senate (Rev. Jan. 24, 2013)," Judicial Watch details in a   letter delivered to to the chairman and co-chairman of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics
Wednesday. "We hereby request that the Senate Ethics Committee conduct a preliminary investigation into whether Sen. Booker violated Senate Rules by releasing Committee Confidential records through his social media accounts."

Here's what the rules state: 


5. Any Senator, officer or employee of the Senate who shall disclose the secret or confidential business or proceedings of the Senate, including the business and proceedings of the committees, subcommittees and offices of the Senate shall be liable, if a Senator, to suffer expulsion from the body; and if an officer or employee, to dismissal from the service of the Senate, and to punishment for contempt.
6. Whenever, by the request of the Senate or any committee thereof, any documents or papers shall be communicated to the Senate by the President or the head of any department relating to any matter pending in the Senate, the proceedings in regard to which are secret or confidential under the rules, said documents and papers shall be considered as confidential, and shall not be disclosed without leave of the Senate.

Judicial Watch has also provided a series of admissions by Booker to prove he indeed broke the rules.

“Senator Booker, in an absurd invocation of ‘Spartacus,’ explicitly invited his expulsion from the Senate in his egregious violation of the rules and contempt for the rule of law and the Constitution,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton released in a statement. “Will the Senate assert the rule of law in the Booker case or allow mob rule to be the new standard?”



Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    8 years ago

This must be the part where Spartacus gets nailed to the cross

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2  Mark in Wyoming     8 years ago

you mean spartacus gropalotus ?   say it aint so.....

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2    8 years ago

I'm afraid I wasn't aware of his full name. My memory of my Ancient History was that he led a slave rebellion against the Roman Republic and paid the ultimate price. A courageous man I would say, unlike the modern day wannabe.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
3  Rmando    8 years ago

Reading the title I wasn't sure if the ethics violation was for this or groping girls. Of course I'm sure the same double standard will apply to him that it does to all Democrats. Otherwise Mueller would be investigating him too.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
4  Ed-NavDoc    8 years ago

Hope they nail him to a proverbial cross, unlike the real and courageous original!

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
5  bbl-1    8 years ago

"Judicial Watch."  A subversive tax exempt organization funded by a handful of billionaires whose goal is to destroy justice, democracy and the prosperity of America.

Putin smiles.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  bbl-1 @5    8 years ago

Um hum, exactly how Obama would describe transparency

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
5.2  Rmando  replied to  bbl-1 @5    8 years ago

Actually they are the conservative version of the ACLU. They stick up for civil liberties like the left used to.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
6  Cerenkov    8 years ago

He should be ejected. 

 
 

Who is online





86 visitors