╌>

The Late Great (Again) Planet Earth

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  heartland-american  •  8 years ago  •  29 comments

The Late Great (Again) Planet Earth
while the climate-change freaks are ostensibly secular, their approach to their unalterable dogma has all the hallmarks of a particularly nutty faith. Never mind that the data to which they so fearfully cling is either bogus or misinterpreted; combine that with the natural human tendency to think that the world as we know it began, and will end, with us -- that everything is, to use one of their favorite words, "unprecedented" (if you pay no attention to history) -- and you have a rich field...

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




George Monbiot, the man who gave his name to the term "moonbat," is back, like some hair-shirted lunatic screaming on a street corner, saying that we're all doomed :

It was a moment of the kind that changes lives. At a press conference held by climate activists  Extinction Rebellion  last week, two of us journalists pressed the organisers on whether their aims were realistic. They have called, for example, for UK carbon emissions to be reduced to net zero by 2025. Wouldn’t it be better, we asked, to pursue some  intermediate aims ?

A young woman called Lizia Woolf stepped forward. She hadn’t spoken before, but the passion, grief and fury of her response  was utterly compelling . “What is it that you are asking me as a 20-year-old to face and to accept about my future and my life? … This is an emergency. We are facing extinction. When you ask questions like that, what is it you want me to feel?” We had no answer.

Softer aims might be politically realistic, but they are physically unrealistic. Only shifts commensurate with the scale of our existential crises have any prospect of averting them. Hopeless realism, tinkering at the edges of the problem, got us into this mess. It will not get us out.

Now that there is some prime moonbattery, even by Monbiot's soaring standards. What a 20-year-old female knows about anything is moot, but her notion that she is "facing extinction" is beyond delusional; in fact, it's the product of having her head stuffed with the most self-evidently arrant nonsense of the modern era: "climate change."

Since at least 1970, when the not-yet-late great Hal Lindsey told us we were all going to die in  The Late Great Planet Earth , snake-oil salesmen and Chicken Littles around the world have joined forces to convince the rubes and the suckers that the Earth is, so to speak, on her last legs unless we do something  right now.  Lindsey's book employed Bible "prophecy" to limn our destruction at the hands of the Antichrist and the return of Jesus sometime in the 1980s.


Well, you can't go wrong betting against religious crackpots, and while the climate-change freaks are ostensibly secular, their approach to their unalterable dogma has all the hallmarks of a particularly nutty faith. Never mind that the data to which they so fearfully cling is either bogus or misinterpreted ; combine that with the natural human tendency to think that the world as we know it began, and will end, with us -- that everything is, to use one of their favorite words, "unprecedented" (if you pay no attention to history) -- and you have a rich field for superstition wedded to calls for (what else?) immediate governmental action.



Okay, George, who's to blame?

The oligarchic control of wealth, politics, media and public discourse explains the comprehensive institutional failure now pushing us towards disaster. Think of Donald Trump and his cabinet of multi-millionaires; the influence of the  Koch brothers  in funding rightwing organisations; the Murdoch empire and its massive  contribution to climate science denial ; or the oil and motor companies whose lobbying prevents a faster shift to new technologies.

Sort of gives the game away, doesn't it?

Two tasks need to be performed simultaneously: throwing ourselves at the possibility of averting collapse, as  Extinction Rebellion is doing , slight though this possibility may appear; and preparing ourselves for the likely failure of these efforts, terrifying as this prospect is. Both tasks require a complete revision of our relationship with the living planet.
Because we cannot save ourselves without contesting oligarchic control, the fight for democracy and justice and the fight against environmental breakdown are  one and the same . Do not allow those who have caused this crisis to define the limits of political action. Do not allow those whose magical thinking got us into this mess to tell us what can and cannot be done.

In other words, the sky is falling so we need nothing short of a Leftist political revolution to save ourselves, and even then it may be too late. As I often say on Twitter, I never take political advice from small children, and certainly not from 20-year-old hysterics. Besides, the world has weathered worse patches than this before:


Bubonic plague, famine, war and flu pandemics have made some periods of human history infamous for death and suffering but one year stands above the rest in terms of misery; 536 AD.  According to research from a Harvard professor, it is a prime candidate for the unfortunate accolade of the worst year in the entirety of recorded history .

Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Asia were plunged into 18 months of solid darkness by a mysterious fog. It caused snowfall in  China , continental-scale crop failure, extreme drought, famine and disease throughout most of the northern hemisphere. The bleak year was triggered by a cataclysmic Icelandic eruption, scientists say, and was an ominous omen for a bleak century of suffering and death.

The eerie fog created a drab world with darkness residing over the northern hemisphere for 18 months, with an unrelenting dusk persevering through day and night. Effects on the climate were so severe that the Irish chronicles tell of 'a failure of bread from the years 536–539'. Temperatures in the summer of 536 fell between 1.5°C (2.7°F) and 2.5°C (4.5°F), initiating the coldest decade in the past 2,300 years.

And nary an SUV or a fossil fuel to blame, unless you count wood and turf. The blackout seems to have been caused (as subsequent, similar events like the 1816 " year without a summer " were) by a volcanic eruption, this one in Iceland. Amazing what climatological havoc Gaia can wreak when she puts her mind to it.



God knows whom or what the poor sods living in the ruins of the Roman Empire in the 6th century blamed for the weather -- probably God, possible cow farts -- but today's True Believers no longer believe in God; rather, they believe in Man, as both the root of all evil and the last best hope of Earth, if only Man would have the decency to kill himself. Or at least kill the conservatives, so that poor little Lizia Woolf may thrive without fear of imminent extinction or another Orson Welles documentary.



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    8 years ago

Look at all the Government funded research Grants on "climate change":



If a scientist says "whatever change there is dosen't happen to be man made" he/she gets nothing. How about the forecasts and the model created by these climate change scientists?  Has the climate change followed the predictions?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  Vic Eldred    8 years ago

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4  Ender    8 years ago

The truth is humans are polluting and destroying the planet. Ecosystems and plant and animal life are often in peril with many going extinct. 

In Indonesia a dead whale washed ashore with a lot of plastic bottles in its stomach. Even a pair of flip flops.

China has cities covered in toxic smog.

One cannot deny that people have an impact on the environment and the climate in general.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     8 years ago

I've always considered myself to be pretty logical, I look at climate change this way, If we throw a bunch of garbage into anything we alter it and there is a price to be paid for doing so. pollute the water it changes it, the land too why would the atmosphere be any different ? 

Like putting black plastic over anything outside in the sun, the darker a surface is the more heat it absorbs, I doubt our air (atmosphere)acts any differently. I also doubt the people who profit from doing so willingly stop.  

512

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
5.1  Ender  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @5    8 years ago

We know we can have an impact on the atmosphere. Like when the feds banned fluorocarbons in the late seventies.

Contrary to what some people say, capitalism will never solve any such problems and as you stated, they are only in it to make a buck.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
5.1.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Ender @5.1    8 years ago
capitalism will never solve any such problems

It may but it would be probably accidental.

IF it is/was profitable to solve a problem they would and will. 

Hell they almost invent problems to sell drugs for .. daily it seems. 

Got this problem ? We got the pill for you ! 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
6  charger 383    8 years ago

Overpopulation is the problem, I've said that many times here

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
6.1  Ender  replied to  charger 383 @6    8 years ago

That is one I don't see how to change. Other than trying to alter the way people think and feel. When we have some organizations saying birth control is wrong and some thinking they need to have multiple wives and children with each one or some people think they need to have 20 children.

Thought and ego would need to be changed.

 
 

Who is online

Right Down the Center
devangelical


104 visitors