‘Mask is off’: Michelle Malkin eviscerates brutal ‘barbarism’ of late-term-abortion Dems and their media cohorts
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Political commentator Michelle Malkin said the mask of the Democratic party is slipping to reveal the brutal “barbarism” of their views on abortion.
Malkin was discussing Virginia’s Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam on “Fox & Friends” Thursday and said his support of a late-term abortion law would perpetuate murder.
“This is murder. This is brutal. And the mask is off,” Malkin said. “We’re finally seeing the face of barbarism that the pro-abortion Democrats really represent. And there’s so much that’s chilling about the video clip that cannot be walked back.”
Northam appeared on WTOP radio Wednesday and supported post-birth abortions saying, “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
Malkin claimed a story like this reveals Democrats’ true motives and helps balance the scales to make up for the unfair demonization of the pro-life movement.
“I think that the general public now is really seeing the honest face of it and it’s about time. The pro-life movement has been demonized for so long and there’s a reason why you can connect the dots,” she said.
“The callousness with which the mainstream media treats the March for life protesters, we saw the anti-Catholic bias of the mainstream media in the Kavanaugh hearings and most recently just in the last weeks with the Covington boys who were at the March For Life.”
You can Follow Nick on Twitter
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience.Tags
Who is online
228 visitors
Grab your pearls girls and boys because Fox News wants you to clutch them to show your outrage because woman have control over our reproductive lives. Id have slightly more respect for conservatives if they would stop referring to themselves as pro-life and instead admit to being pro-birth because their concern for that child's health and well-being ends at the start of the 4th trimester.
Ah yes, another political commentator crawls out to try to boost his ratings. Now some of the ultra-conservatives will have someone who'll tell them what they want to hear rather then the truth, like from someone who actually knows something about the subject. I wonder if the guy in N.Y. can sue this guy for stealing his script?
It has the same misinformation, out right lies, straw man arguments and the exact same talking points and buzz words.
Probably a standard form script from Heritage Foundation.
People who are "pro-life" just think that's a sweeter title then the more accurate "anti-abortion" but these people aren't pro anything, but have a long, long list of anti.
I listened to this governors words on the news radio this afternoon. YES he said that AFTER the child is born, if the mother wants it killed, this law will allow it.......
His own words......
I'm pro choice all the way up to a live child being produced....
Once the child is born and living, it is a helpless human being and deserves protection. it is no longer part of the mother it is a separate human...
What they are describing is allowable under this law is murder plain and simple in my opinion.
What surprises me, is he admitted in on an open mike.....
And they say we are the cruel and heartless bastards.....
The law says they can kill babies.... Straight from the governors mouth....
I can bet that is going to make the campaign advertisements....
What he said was truly bizarre. WTF?
As I understood it, he was speaking of babies born with severe health issues which might not be compatible with life, who would be delivered if an abortion had not been performed before the woman began laboring. In those cases, it would be up to the mother and family if extraordinary measures would be taken to prolong life, much as it would be up to the next of kin if an adult were terminally ill and hadn't left an advanced directive.
I didn't understand this to be about allowing healthy babies or babies with minor health issues to die after birth.
It isn't a case of taking the baby out back and shooting them or stabbing them in the back of the head, at worst it's just a unplugging of very expensive life support machines or they'd refer to that baby as viable and then there would be no such discussion because it's either her baby or up for adoption.
The idea that while giving birth the woman can decide at that moment to have a abortion or have a "post birth" abortion are such outrageous and idiotic claims that it may have thrown the Gov. off his stride a bit, because the answer to both stupid statements is NO, she CAN'T!!!
Wasn't what he said was more on the lines of that the woman and Doctors have to have a discussion about the fate of the baby, which I take means she keeps it or put it up for a adoption, but I don't imagine execution is one of the options.
He didn't actually say "kill the little bastards if mama don't care" or something like that, did he?
[Deleted]
I've noticed it's pretty easy to eviscerate something when you don't bother with facts and don't invite the other side to the debate
If you can't look at it.....maybe, just maybe, you shouldn't do it !
[Deleted]
[This site is largely funded by ad clicks. We can't keep advertisers when members post NSFW images.]
[Removed]
[Removed]
I assume that since you post in here, you want people to read your comments and think about them. It's kind of difficult when you refuse to use actual sentences and you jump all over the place with capital letters and punctuation. It makes people think that your opinions are as random as your typing, and blow them off.
I don't tumble for anyone. "It Is Me" says what needs to be said and "It Is Me" damn sure won't say what some "Want" to hear !
If you don't understand one of my comments..... Ask before making comment 5.1.4 .
by the way Tessylo ……. Doesn't KNOW !
If you truly think something needs to be said, why not use English?
Heh! "When the Warriors are hungry ... they eat!"
Que' ?
Said the "Fly" to the "Spider".
And then who pays the bills?
These sites aren't free to run.
We see how Palin's pay site worked out...
This has been done to death the last few days but I think the debate has crystallized how little the casual pro-choicer understands about the reality of abortion law. The reality is that America already has one of the most liberal abortion standards in the world. America, with North Korea, China and a few others are only countries in the world that permit elective abortions after 20 weeks. We are already among the abortion extremists of the world.
But that's not good enough, so liberals are pushing for more. Look at Virginia, where abortion is already legal after 24 weeks, and the mother doesn't even have to show her life is at risk. But that bar is too high for the pro abortion extremists, so they want it lowered even further so an abortion can proceed up until birth if a woman merely claims any temporary impairment of her mental health. Yet, whether out of ignorance or dishonesty, the pro choicers falsely claim the mother's life needs to be in danger for a late term abortion. The very words of the statutes we have been discussing destroy that claim. Yer they persist in telling falsehoods that make them feel better. No wonder, the reality of late term abortions is abhorrent, and they don't want to deal with reality.
One of the other little talking points you see is the claim that late term abortions are so rare as to not be worth discussing. The reality is that more abortions are performed after 20 weeks than American are killed in by gun homicides. Tell a liberal so few people are killed by guns that gun control isn't worth talking about. See how well that plays.
Ok, to take this in the correct context her is the complete quote from the governor.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/lawmaker-at-center-of-abortion-bill-firestorm-elected-as-part-of-democratic-wave-that-changed-richmond/2019/01/31/d4f76ecc-2565-11e9-90cd-dedb0c92dc17_story.html?utm_term=.69e1908173dc
My real qualm with what he said is “done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s not viable." What constitutes a severe deformity, and not viable? Is a missing limb considered a severe deformity, and would constitute a fetus not being viable? What about if it has the wrong color eyes? Slightly misshapen features? Wrong sex? Has both sexes? The devil is in the details.
Note, there are cases where they can tell in advance that the baby will be born still born; or w/o fully developed organs that will allow it them to exist outside of the womb. In these instances the woman should not have to carry the pregnancy to term. To do so would be inhumane.
Well stated.
There is no reason for abortion to be regulated by the law
There's also no reason for a woman's abortion rights to be curtailed either.
This 'olde debate' over pregnancy termination has reached a new zenith at this particular time. Courts are being 'weighed' with more conservative/more restrictive ideals as to the interpretations of basic everyday freedoms or choices.
Also there is this. The current debate is waged with little consideration of the debate itself. Instead centering on the flamboyances of the innocent, not quite innocent and the never were innocent.
The real bottom line here is the stark reality that there are men on the right wing who deeply desire to assure the true status of 'the woman' is " the incubator of seed. " Truly amazing that the Malkins', Blackburns', Cheneys', and other so called conservative GOP women humbly tip their heads in subservient acquiesces.
Stepford?
Quislings
talking about little consideration for the actual issue........
Nice piece of partisan hate rhetoric there that doesn't have anything to actually do with the debate does it.....
Preacher heal thyself....
What is it that you have issue with?
Of course 'discounting' the expected knee jerk "Partisan hate rhetoric," spiel?
Your partisan caricature of all republicans..... both male and female...
How many third trimester procedures are performed annually and what are the reasons those procedures are done?
You really think Planned Parenthood is going to make that public?
All medical procedures are documented. All of them. Names, dates, procedure performed, attending physicians, devices and drugs utilized.
The rewards of fear/suspicion are few.
Not as bitter or vitriolic as the right wings desire of 'forced childbirth' for those who have no desire, interest, financial or personal need.
"Pro Life Females?" Well, get pregnant and have the kid. Show your colors bright and wide.
Maybe if pro-abortion fans didn't defend the concept of murdering an infant moments before birth because they suddenly "have no desire, interest, financial or personal need", we could take them seriously.
Elective abortion ends at 24 weeks and instead of moments before natural birth.
Abortion is not murder, despite your emotional hyperbole.
What ever it is you're trying to prove has little weight.
"Pregnancy termination moments before birth." When and where has this taken place within the United States?
Really can't take the conservatives too seriously. Fetus worship. But cut the children's healthcare, nutrition subsidies, housing, education and the conservatives even relax the rules on clean air and water. Hell, the conservatives just tore up another nuclear treaty.
I personally believe conservatism is disingenuous and dangerous.
More emotionally driven tripe and of course erroneous too, as abortion is not murder, nor is an unborn fetus an infant.
Not according to the law it's not!
It's only an infant after it's born. Before then, it's a fetus. Simple scientific fact. Look it up! Preferably without your obvious emotional blinders.
Perhaps talking to parents that made a 3rd trimester decision would enlighten those who applaud Michelle Malkin's opinion.
Their non-viable baby is delivered (aborted), allowing them time to look upon their child, to hold them, begin the gut retching process of grief.
Unless you've been there or your wife or partner has been how can you have a factual opinion?