╌>

Steve Bannon found guilty on contempt of Congress charges : NPR

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  2 years ago  •  12 comments

By:   NPR. org

Steve Bannon found guilty on contempt of Congress charges : NPR
Bannon had refused to testify or produce documents for the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. His lawyers say he just made a mistake about the subpoena dates

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Updated July 22, 20223:40 PM ET Originally published July 22, 20222:53 PM ETC Carrie Johnson

Former White House strategist Steve Bannon, center, speaks with reporters as he departs federal court on Friday, July 22, 2022, in Washington. Accompanying Bannon are his attorneys David Schoen, left, and M. Evan Corcoran. Bannon, a one-time adviser to former President Donald Trump, was found guilty of criminal contempt of Congress charges. Alex Brandon/AP hide caption

Former White House strategist Steve Bannon, center, speaks with reporters as he departs federal court on Friday, July 22, 2022, in Washington. Accompanying Bannon are his attorneys David Schoen, left, and M. Evan Corcoran. Bannon, a one-time adviser to former President Donald Trump, was found guilty of criminal contempt of Congress charges.

A federal jury has convicted former Trump political adviser Steve Bannon of two counts of criminal contempt of Congress for intentionally defying a subpoena related to the assault on the U.S. Capitol last year.

Bannon put on no defense in the case, which featured testimony from just two government witnesses, including the deputy staff director of the House Select Committee investigating the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

The Justice Department told jurors the case was black and white - as simple as the words on the subpoena to Bannon last autumn.

"The defendant chose allegiance to Donald Trump over compliance with the law," Assistant U.S. Attorney Molly Gaston said in closing arguments.

gettyimages-1408287043_sq-cba42e0bf5c990b9c7fba6efbfdd0498d6799de9-s100-c15.jpg

Law


Steve Bannon goes on trial for defying Jan. 6 panel subpoena


Bannon had broadcast his defiance on the social media site Gettr, prosecutors said, posting that he told lawmakers he would "NOT comply" on Oct. 8, 2021, after the first committee deadline had passed.

The chief government witness, Kristin Amerling of the Jan. 6 committee, told jurors the panel wanted to know more about Bannon's contacts with former President Trump, his presence with others at the Willard Hotel in early 2021, and his statement on the War Room podcast that "all hell is going to break loose" a day before the Capitol siege.

gettyimages-1242044124-4ede15a34f461e5dbaabebd5a8e5a2ccde168c94-s1100-c50.jpg Enlarge this image

A video of former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon is displayed on a screen during a hearing by the House Select Committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the US Capitol in the Cannon House Office Building in Washington, DC, on July 21, 2022. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

A video of former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon is displayed on a screen during a hearing by the House Select Committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the US Capitol in the Cannon House Office Building in Washington, DC, on July 21, 2022.

SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Bannon's lawyers said he made a mistake with subpoena dates, alleged political bias


The one-time White House chief strategist has become a force in Republican politics, thanks to his right-wing media stardom and his relationship with Trump.

Bannon provided no documents to theDemocrat-ledcommittee and failed to show up for a deposition last year, claiming he was barred from appearing because Trump had asserted executive privilege.

U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols cast doubt on the privilege claim and Trump's own lawyer suggested that it would not cover Bannon's wholesale refusal to cooperate with the House Select Committee.

ap22203443540691-ec0841c053a0b80e59977a8203234ac6d24f3492-s1100-c50.jpg Enlarge this image

Former White House strategist Steve Bannon arrives at the federal court in Washington on Friday. Bannon was brought to trial on a pair of federal charges for criminal contempt of Congress after refusing to cooperate with the House committee investigating the U.S. Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021. Jose Luis Magana/AP hide caption

toggle caption Jose Luis Magana/AP

Former White House strategist Steve Bannon arrives at the federal court in Washington on Friday. Bannon was brought to trial on a pair of federal charges for criminal contempt of Congress after refusing to cooperate with the House committee investigating the U.S. Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021.

Jose Luis Magana/AP

Defense attorney Evan Corcoran argued Bannon had made a mistake with the subpoena dates, which he called "placeholders." Corcoran also asserted that government witness Amerling had donated to Democratic political candidates and had been part of the same book club as prosecutor Gaston.

"The thing about bias is that sometimes people become blind to it," Corcoran told jurors.

Prosecutors said the effort to inject politics in the case amounted to a smokescreen to confuse the jury.

"The only person who is making this case about politics is the defendant and he is doing it to distract and confuse you," Gaston said. "Don't let him."

Bannon had sought to delay the case, making a nearly last-minute offer on the eve of trial to testify before Congress in a public hearing. The Justice Department described that offer as a ploy, "and not even a good one," prosecutors said, because it did not address the panel's demand for documents.

Prosecutors left the courthouse quietly without comment after the verdict. In a written statement, U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves said, "Mr. Bannon had an obligation to appear before the House Select Committee to give testimony and provide documents. His refusal to do so was deliberate and now a jury has found that he must pay the consequences."

gettyimages-1242012050_sq-1a22d2cdac9c4fcbf458843700dade5ffad5edfc-s100-c15.jpg

House Jan. 6 committee hearings


Prosecution rests its case in Steve Bannon trial


Outside the building, Bannon thanked the judge and jurors for their service but blasted members of the House Select Committee for conducting what he called a "show trial." Bannon also vowed to appeal, saying the legal conflict was nowhere near complete.

His attorney David Schoen pointed out that Judge Nichols had disagreed with legal precedent that cut off some of Bannon's trial defenses, but said the appeals court could well take another look when the case arrived there. Schoen said it would be a "bullet-proof appeal" and there were an "astounding" number of appellate issues.

House Select Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Mississippi, and vice chair Liz Cheney, R-Wyoming, said in a written statement that "the conviction of Steve Bannon is a victory for the rule of law and an important affirmation of the Select Committee's work."

Criminal contempt prosecutions are rare, but so is a decision by a witness to fully reject congressional demands. Bannon faces the prospect of jail time and monetary fines when he is sentenced October 21.

Another key Trump aide, Peter Navarro, is scheduled to go to trial in November on contempt charges. Navarro has pleaded not guilty.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    2 years ago

Lock Him Up!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2  Dulay    2 years ago

Now he'll have plenty of time on his hands to do a video deposition with the Committee. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
3  Drinker of the Wry    2 years ago

I don't agree with Bannon any much of anything except we both have contempt of Congress.

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
3.1  Hallux  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3    2 years ago

So, unlike Bannon you are not a Trotsky Nihilist?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
4  Drinker of the Wry    2 years ago

No, but i do love Kamchatka or Red King crab, and blini with caviar.  But I prefer them with Champagne to vodka.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4    2 years ago

Sure you do. You and your neighbor the President of the IMF probably eat caviar and drink champagne at your yacht club all the time. And, the Queen of England and I had caviar with our tea just this afternoon! 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
4.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @4.1    2 years ago

President of the IMF? No, some executive that had his rental address leaked.  I don't own a yacht, but had a wonderful vacation on a rented 4 bedroom catamaran. I make my own blini, a New Years Eve tradition (there easy to make), but I do splurge on good caviar occasionally (you only live once).  Next time you see Liz, say hi for me.

If you ever leave the Bronx, try the Champagne and caviar at the Russian Tea Room near Carnegie Hall.  You can get a bottle Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin 2008 Brut & Two ounce of Russian Osetra for about $400,

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.1.2  seeder  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.1    2 years ago

Nobody cares and you are off topic. Get serious or get gone!

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
4.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @4.1.2    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5  CB    2 years ago

Bannon supporters/enablers should sue him for not putting on the promised, "Misdemeanor from Hell" if they forked over donations.  Bannon the lightweight. :(

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6  Ender    2 years ago

I got the dates wrong...

Yeah right asshole.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7  seeder  JBB    2 years ago

"I would have lied my fat ass off about everything anyway" - Bannon 

 
 

Who is online


75 visitors