╌>

Democrats Want a Lame-Duck Spending Blowout

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  vic-eldred  •  2 years ago  •  5 comments

By:   The Editorial Board (WSJ)

Democrats Want a Lame-Duck Spending Blowout
And the Senate GOP might go along to get more defense dollars.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



When is $5 trillion still not enough? Answer: When you're a progressive about to lose your grip on total power. That's how to read Democrats' attempt to jam Republicans into one last, lame-duck, spending hurrah.

Congress is marching toward a Dec. 16 expiration of government funding. Democrats want to stuff all 12 of Congress's annual, overdue spending bills into a giant "omnibus" to finance government through September 2023. According to their media note-takers, the failure to pass an omnibus bill will result in one of two apocalyptic scenarios: a government shutdown, or the ruin of federal agencies forced to maintain spending at current levels.

That’s a convenient ultimatum, given Democrats are angling to use the omnibus as a final spending spree before Republicans retake the House in January. Including the American Rescue Plan, an infrastructure bill, last year’s omnibus, a veteran’s fund, food-stamp and healthcare increases, semiconductor subsidies, the Inflation Reduction Act, and student-loan forgiveness, Democrats have added close to $5 trillion in new spending in two years. They now want more, as well as the chance to add pork and policy riders.

Congressional sources tell us Democrats are asking for $150 billion in additional spending, split roughly between defense and non-defense. That’s not counting the White House’s separate demand for $9 billion more in Covid funding; a bipartisan push for $38 billion in Ukrainian aid; the annual “tax extender” dance; or the left’s child-tax credit expansion (at least $100 billion annually).

The additional $75 billion for nondefense would by our calculations be a 10.3% increase, on top of last year’s omnibus increase of 6.7%. The left’s answer to the inflation its spending ignited is to spend even more.

Democrats hope to lure Republican to sign onto all this with what would equal a 9.6% increase in military spending, on top of last year’s increase of 5.6%. This investment is long overdue, and stop-gap bills known as continuing resolutions are no way to manage long-term defense planning. Yet each year Democrats hold the defense of the country hostage to ever-higher spending for their domestic constituencies.

Republicans are fighting among themselves, with Senate leader Mitch McConnell favoring an omnibus while House Republicans prefer a short-term continuing resolution that funds the government until they take power in the New Year.





One message from the midterm election is that voters want divided government to impose a pause on the Biden spending spree. A majority GOP House will have more leverage over priorities, assuming they can stay united. Senate Republicans don’t think GOP House leader Kevin McCarthy can deliver, but why pre-empt his chance to try?





Taxpayers also deserve better than another rushed backroom deal as lawmakers sprint home for Christmas. Democrats ran all of government for two years but focused on their special spending causes rather than pass individual bills to finance the government. Now with three weeks left in a lame duck, they want to jam the GOP again.

Total federal spending in fiscal 2022, which ended on Sept. 30, was still 25.1% of GDP despite the fading pandemic. That’s well above the 50-year average of 21%. Revenues were 19.6% of GDP, the second highest percentage in history. Democrats want to build in baseline outlays that keep spending that high and maintain pressure to keep raising taxes.

The GOP campaigned on a return to regular fiscal order, and why not start now? Democrats can threaten a government shutdown, but they’d own it as the party in control. If Republicans aren’t going to use their power to enforce some fiscal discipline, they might as well stay in the minority.

The risk here is that retiring GOP appropriators like Alabama Senator Richard Shelby see the omnibus as a last chance to pave his Birmingham streets in earmark gold. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell—a spender at heart—emerged from a Tuesday meeting with Washington leaders to declare “widespread agreement” on the need for an omnibus. Cue the Democratic high-fives.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 years ago


It is exactly what they did to Trump. Republicans will have to give up on being the saviours of the military. They need to get the message out as this article does and vote against any such bill. Show some backbone!

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2  Nerm_L    2 years ago

Here we are facing another government shut down because Democrats failed to do their jobs while they were in charge. 

And it's always interesting to watch Democrats shift their priorities after an election.  Before an election Democrats focus attention on 'culture issues' but after an election Democrats seem to shift attention to money matters.  What we're seeing are Democrats' real priorities.  It's all about the money.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3  TᵢG    2 years ago

One of the things the GoP of old (very old) had going for it was fiscal discipline (except for defense spending).   It might be politically wise to revitalize that property of the party.   It certainly would be good for the nation to have a counterbalance to incessant spending (writ large:  debt).

Although I do not see this happening any time soon, government needs to manage its resources (like the private sector must do) rather than simply acquire more resources when needed or —worse— desired.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4  Ronin2    2 years ago
a bipartisan push for $38 billion in Ukrainian aid

The bottomless pit that is the war in Ukraine continues to drain US tax payers dry. Our government doesn't care how much this war costs the rest of us; or how much we have to suffer due to inflation and shortages. Putin must be put down at all costs!

I will ask again what the US is gaining out of this war? Other than rewarding the military industrial complex; and South Korea with increased arms, ammo, equipment, and spare parts sales. Also soothing butt hurt Democrats from 2016; not that it seems to be working. 

They had better at least put in that any of the aide money that gets funneled back to either political party must be replaced by that party! This isn't a taxpayer paid for campaign slush fund for either side. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.1  JBB  replied to  Ronin2 @4    2 years ago

Guns and ammo for Ukraine - A few billion $

Whooping Vlad Putin's white ass? Priceless!

 
 

Who is online




Ronin2
GregTx


68 visitors