Omnibus Spending Bill Is Held Up by Title 42 Border Fight

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  one month ago  •  11 comments

By:   Natalie Andrews, Lindsay Wise and Michelle Hackman (WSJ)

Omnibus Spending Bill Is Held Up by Title 42 Border Fight
Republicans seek a vote on the immigration measure as weekend deadline nears to fund the government and avert a shutdown

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



WASHINGTON—Senate Democratic leaders hope to break an impasse Thursday morning over a sprawling spending bill that has put the federal government on the precipice of a partial shutdown just before the Christmas holiday.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) closed Wednesday's legislative day without an agreement on the terms for cutting off debate and proceeding to a vote on a $1.65 trillion government funding bill for fiscal 2023. The bill, which would keep the government funded beyond Dec. 23, also carries $45 billion in aid for Ukraine and NATO allies, and would finance big increases in military and domestic spending, including military pay raises.

“It is my expectation that we will be able to lock in an agreement on the omnibus tomorrow morning,” Mr. Schumer said around 2 a.m. Thursday. “We are very close but we’re not there yet.”

Lawmakers said the hold up in negotiations centered on Republican efforts to get an amendment vote on  Title 42 , the pandemic-era public-health measure allowing migrants to be expelled back to Mexico after crossing the U.S. border illegally. The policy was set to end this week but has been kept in place temporarily by the  Supreme Court .

Sen. Mike Lee (R., Utah) said he was demanding a vote on preserving Title 42 at a simple majority threshold as a condition for allowing votes on the omnibus bill to proceed. Quick action will depend on whether all 100 senators can agree to forgo the debate time built into Senate procedures and proceed to a final vote, giving senators leverage to negotiate for amendment votes.

“Title 42 is the one thing standing between us and utter chaos,” Mr. Lee said on Fox News. He predicted that such an amendment would pass and warned Democrats: “If they don’t give us an up-or-down vote, this is going to be very difficult for them and will cost them the omnibus.”

The policy, first rolled out by the Trump administration as Covid-19 was starting to spread, is believed to have acted as a deterrent for some migrants seeking asylum because they could be turned back even if they asked for protection in the U.S.

Most border analysts expect lifting the policy will lead to at least a temporary spike in illegal border crossings. In anticipation of the policy’s expiration, which had been set for Wednesday, some border cities were seeing surges. In El Paso, Texas, migrants primarily from Nicaragua slept on the streets in near-freezing temperatures because bus or plane tickets to leave the city were booked up.

Mr. Schumer initially said lawmakers were working on an agreement to vote on amendments and pass the omnibus by late Wednesday, but the standoff scuttled those hopes. Shortly before midnight, he said he was “very hopeful we will lock in an agreement shortly.” Once the Senate passes the measure, it would move to the House, which had been expected to approve it quickly.

A Senate Democratic leadership aide said that the Title 42 amendment would pass the evenly divided Senate if offered at a 50-vote threshold and that its passage would act as a poison pill that would kill the omnibus bill in the House.

On Tuesday, congressional appropriators unveiled the  wide-ranging spending bill  for fiscal 2023 with sharp increases in military and domestic funding, with the aim to get it passed before the deadline and to go home before Christmas. 

The bipartisan legislation cleared its first procedural hurdle on Tuesday, with a 70-25 vote to proceed to the bill. The bill needs 60 votes to clear procedural hurdles in the Senate and a simple majority to pass. All senators must agree to give back debate time to hurry the process along. 

The spending package drew objections from some Republicans in the Senate and House who said it was bloated and full of unnecessary spending. Critics said that the leadership should have released the bill sooner rather than forcing lawmakers to vote after just days to review it. 

“They have the audacity to hold off on this thing deliberately by design, and release it in the early-morning hours of Dec. 20 having scheduled a shutdown the day before Christmas Eve, and then tell us that it’s somehow on us unless we eagerly jump onto it and read it,” Sen. Lee said earlier.

The bill includes $858 billion in military spending, $45 billion more than President Biden had requested and up about 10% from $782 billion the prior year. Senate negotiators said it also includes $772.5 billion in nondefense discretionary spending, up almost 6% from $730 billion in the prior year. The overall discretionary price tag works out to about $1.65 trillion, compared with $1.5 trillion the prior fiscal year.

The product of months of behind-the-scenes haggling, the legislation carries an additional $44.9 billion in  aid to help Ukraine  and North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies, $40.6 billion for disasters such as drought and hurricanes, and funds earmarked for projects in lawmakers’ home districts. It includes changes to the  1887 Electoral Count Act  that would make it harder to block the certification of a presidential election,  widens a ban  on TikTok on government devices, and extends a Dec. 27 deadline for  Boeing  Co. to secure federal safety approvals for two new versions of the 737 MAX airplane.

Lawmakers from both parties expressed disappointment over items that weren’t included and sought to amend the legislation. Sen. Bob Menendez (D., N.J.) is pushing to add in a bill that would increase compensation payments to thousands of 9/11 victims, spouses and their dependents who were excluded from the U.S. Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund. 

Sen. Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) was seeking an amendment to the bill that would exclude earmarks, or projects requested by members of Congress for their states and districts. Other spending hawks sought to curtail the bill through changes to the legislation. 

“Amendments are being considered on both sides,” said Sen. Dick Durbin (D., Ill.). Generally last-minute amendments are unsuccessful.  

But it was Mr. Lee’s Title 42 amendment that bogged down the bill Wednesday night. Legal and political fights have kept the policy in place for months longer than the Biden administration intended when it moved to end its use last May. More than a dozen GOP states sued to keep it in place, and a federal judge in Louisiana extended the policy’s use indefinitely on the grounds that the Biden administration didn’t use the proper administrative procedure to end it.

In November, a federal court in Washington ruled in a separate lawsuit that the policy’s use was illegal from the start as it violates federal refugee laws by denying migrants at the border a chance to ask for asylum.

Meanwhile, in the lead-up to November’s midterms, some vulnerable Democrats running for re-election started expressing concerns about lifting Title 42 without an adequate border plan to replace it. In August, Congress voted down an amendment that would have indefinitely kept the policy in place pending the end of a declared national public-health emergency. The measure was sponsored by a Democrat, Sen. Jon Tester (D., Mont.), and won support from five of his Democratic caucus colleagues, Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (D., Nev.), Maggie Hassan (D., N.H.), Mark Kelly (D., Ariz.), Kyrsten Sinema (I., Ariz.) and Raphael Warnock (D., Ga.).


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    one month ago



Believe it or not, I'm seeing some backbone!

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    one month ago

Hopefully they lock McConnell and his 10 disciples that were going to vote for the Omnibus in a sound proof, cell phone proof, storage closet for the duration; and give the only key to the first homeless person they see in NY.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1    one month ago

If one more Senator can step up and hold this thing up we may just kill it.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
2  Sean Treacy    one month ago

It’s insane that title 42, as thin a stopgap as it is, can’t pass unanimously.

Opponents want an open border and the end of the us as a nation state.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    one month ago
Opponents want an open border and the end of the us as a nation state.

Their refusal to include it makes that fact obvious.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    one month ago

And it breeds shit like this................

Authorities say deputies assigned to the Criminal Enforcement Unit (CEU) on I-95 observed a vehicle speeding in the north bound lane at near the 157 mile marker. 

Upon conducting a traffic stop, a probable cause search of the vehicle led to the discovery of 54 kilos of cocaine, approximately $182,000.00 in cash and a handgun. 

The driver, Sheldon Junior Alexander, a native of Trinidad and in the country illegally, was arrested and charged with trafficking in cocaine, unlawful carrying of a pistol, possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime and possession of a firearm by an illegal alien. 

At the time of his arrest, deputies say Alexander was out on bond for a murder charge arising out of California.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.1    one month ago

Yup, that's right. He's not an American citizen or a white Christian and therefore he is a victim to be set free over & over again!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Vic Eldred    one month ago

THIS JUST IN:

"WASHINGTON—Senators broke an immigration-related impasse Thursday morning, reaching a deal on amendments that clears the way to pass  a $1.65 trillion spending bill  just ahead of the Christmas holiday and a looming winter storm.

“We will vote on all of the amendments in order and then vote on final passage,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said on the Senate floor Thursday. Mr. Schumer said that an immigration amendment from Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I., Ariz.) and Jon Tester (D., Mont.) would be added to the list of amendment votes ahead of final passage, alongside one by Sen. Mike Lee (R., Utah) that had frozen Senate business as Senate Democrats scrambled to keep it from passing.

Mr. Schumer told senators to remain close by and try to remain in the chairs so that the Senate could vote quickly, rather than the more leisurely pace typical of chamber votes. In all, there are more than a dozen planned amendments.

Senators had been trying to reach an agreement on the terms for cutting off debate and proceeding to a vote on the government funding bill for fiscal 2023. The bill, which would keep the government funded beyond Dec. 23, also carries $45 billion in aid for Ukraine and NATO allies, and would finance big increases in military and domestic spending, including military pay raises."

im-690796?width=860&height=573
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer asked lawmakers to stay close to the Senate floor so that they could vote quickly.
PHOTO:   J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/ASSOCIATED PRESS

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    one month ago

 GOP senators who voted for Omnibus are not answering their office phones. Straight to voicemail.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Sophomore Principal
3.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    one month ago

GOP Senators didn't trust the 2023 House to get it down.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.1    one month ago

Evidently they rather do business with democrats.

 
 

Who is online



Kavika


23 visitors