What the Russian Internet Research Agency Actually did in the Election...

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  s  •  one month ago  •  18 comments

What the Russian Internet Research Agency Actually did in the Election...
The Reality is Too Much for Some to Handle...

As has been known for years now, the IRA's meddling in the 2016 election, was amateurish, ineffective, and almost non existent.   About half of its spending actually occurred after the election. Its most signal accomplishment was promoting  a post Election anti Trump rally that drew thousands.  As detailed in the recent account by the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Jeff Gerth


Facebook data submitted to Congress about the IRA’s ads on its site further diminished their impact: more than half of the impressions associated with the IRA’s Facebook ads came after the election.

Porter, writing in   Consortium News , said the   Times’   use of the 126 million audience number, plus the piece’s failure to reflect that Facebook users were exposed to 33 trillion news feeds during the relevant period, “should vie in the annals of journalism as one of the most spectacularly misleading use of statistics of all time.”

As for the IRA’s supposed “efficiency,” noted in the article, the   Times   piece didn’t include Facebook submissions to Congress that called the IRA’s targeting “relatively rudimentary,” with only a small fraction having anything to do with the election or specific geographic targets.

Court filings in 2019 showed that the total value of the IRA’s Facebook ads that were deemed election-related amounted to $2,930, in a political cycle where billions of dollars were spent. The only reporter to write about that finding was Sperry, of Real Clear Investigations.

As for the extent of the troll farm’s activity, Mueller’s report cites a review by Twitter of tweets from accounts “associated with the IRA,” in the ten weeks before the 2016 election, which found that “approximately 8.4%” were “election related.” Only the St. Louis Post Dispatch covered that part of the report, according to a Nexis search.

https://www.cjr.org/special_report/trumped-up-press-versus-president-part-4.php

This information is scary to some. They have their narrative and being confronted with reality causes too much pain.  It's sad. 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
1  author  Sean Treacy    one month ago

 Apparently ,In an assault on the English language and honesty,  IRA activities during the 2016 election are off topic on articles discussing the IRA's actions in 2016, so here's a place to discuss what actually happened in 2016.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    one month ago

It seems someone doesn't want you to talk about it here either.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
2  author  Sean Treacy    one month ago

The twitter operation was also amateurish and ineffective:

We demonstrate, first, that exposure to Russian disinformation accounts was heavily concentrated: only 1% of users accounted for 70% of exposures..The NYU study found that Russia’s Twitter campaign had no effect in part because barely anyone saw it. Moreover, to the extent anyone ever saw the Russian tweets, it was people who weren’t going to be easily influenced anyway: “[T]hose who identified as ‘Strong Republicans’ were exposed to roughly nine times as many posts from Russian foreign influence accounts than were those who identified as Democrats or Independents.”

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    one month ago

Are the idiots suggesting again that some Democrats were too stupid and allowed themselves to base their precious vote on social media posts?

"Brilliant" people like that are allowed to vote, unfortunately.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1    one month ago

“.. "Brilliant" people like that are allowed to vote, unfortunately.”

Your remedy? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    one month ago
Your remedy? 

That all learn to recognize sarcasm even without a little tag telling you it is.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.3  afrayedknot  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.2    one month ago

“…recognize sarcasm…”

….or recognize one unwilling and thus unable to back up a claim? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.3    one month ago

17e84b1d7c2ff5e62f53058300037f8654a7745fc5f6c270fcdef3471bb9f9ee_1.jpg

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.5  afrayedknot  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.4    one month ago

Nothing like being blessed with self awareness. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.5    one month ago
Nothing like being blessed with self awareness.

Okay, I'll play.

"Irony" for $1000, Alex"

Ohh, The Daily Double!!"

"I'll wager my life, Alex"

"What is "Something else you are unfamiliar with" Alex'

"Yes!"

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.7  afrayedknot  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.6    one month ago

Perhaps ‘wheel of misfortune’ is more your speed. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.7    one month ago

jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
3  George    one month ago

This can't be true, the moronic left has been bleating for years Putin got Trump elected! Please don't tell me that they got taken by a bag of magic beans again. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
3.1  author  Sean Treacy  replied to  George @3    one month ago

This can't be true, the moronic left has been bleating for years Putin got Trump elected

And they will cling to that belief come hell or high water.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1    one month ago
And they will cling to that belief come hell or high water.  

I give them a little pass on that one.

You have to admit it is hard for them to explain how Hillary snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  Vic Eldred    one month ago

In the 2016 election Twitter became the vehicle Trump used to get around a biased media. It wasn't anything Russia did, but what Trump was able to do for himself. The WSJ took a look back:

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
5  Right Down the Center    one month ago

"This information is scary to some. They have their narrative and being confronted with reality causes too much pain.  It's sad."

It is good to see you put this out there to counter the misinformation being promoted. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1  Texan1211  replied to  Right Down the Center @5    one month ago
It is good to see you put this out there to counter the misinformation being promoted. 

"Promoted" is a very apt term for what is occurring.

 
 

Who is online



JBB


31 visitors