╌>

Op/Ed The Narcissism Of Woke Totalitarianism

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  s  •  last year  •  17 comments

Op/Ed The Narcissism Of Woke Totalitarianism

“Anyone who thinks the terrifying trend of posthumous censure will end with Roald Dahl is dreaming”


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The publisher of the late British children’s author, Roald Dahl, has changed hundreds of words and passages in his books to make them politically correct. “Language related to weight, mental health, violence, gender, and race has been cut and rewritten,”  reported   The Telegraph , whose journalists compared 10 of Dahl’s books from 2022 to their 2001 versions. “Remember the Cloud-Men in  James and the Giant Peach ? They are now the Cloud-People. The Small Foxes in  Fantastic Mr. Fox  are now female. In  Matilda , a mention of Rudyard Kipling has been cut, and Jane Austen added.”

The racially sensitive censors even removed the word “black” as a descriptor of inanimate objects. “In Fantastic  Mr. Fox , a description of tractors, saying that ‘the machines were both black,’ has been cut. In the new Dahl world, it seems, neither machines nor animals can be described with a colour.”

The censorship by  Puffin, which   Penguin Publishing Group owns, drew a sharply critical response from journalists and authors. “Roald Dahl was no angel,”  tweeted  Salman Rushdie, “but this is absurd censorship. Puffin Books and the Dahl estate should be ashamed.”  Seethed  Brendan O’Neill in  The Spectator , “If you weren’t worried about cancel culture before, surely this egregious assault on some of the best-known children’s books of the modern era, this posthumous purging of an author’s output, will change your mind.”

Many on Twitter posted a quote from George Orwell’s  1984 , his famous novel about a future totalitarian dystopia. “Every record has been destroyed or falsified,” the novel’s main character says, “every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered.”

Totalitarianism is a strong word for the censorship of children’s books. The  changing  of “The old hag” to “the old crow,” “Chambermaid” to “cleaner,” and “You must be mad, woman!” to “You must be out of your mind!” in some kiddie books is hardly on par with the censorship of totalitarian regimes. And Dahl himself made his books less offensive, re-writing the Oompa-Loompa characters in  Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory  so they were no longer African.

But Dahl would have been horrified by the hundreds of changes made by Puffin. “His relationships with his editors included marked fractiousness on Dahl’s part,” said his biographer. “He resisted interference.” Re-writing an author’s books without his consent, whether for legal reasons or because he is dead, violates the trust between authors and publishers everywhere. That such censorship is coming from within media, educational, and research institutions, in addition to governmental ones, doesn’t make it less dangerous, and may make it more so.

The Dahl censorship is occurring against the backdrop of an increasingly censorious Wokeism. Over the last few weeks, we have seen  a witch hunt  against psychologist Jordan Peterson, an open letter from 1,000 writers, authors, and journalists  demanding that   The New York Times   not  report on problems with prescribing gender dysphoric children puberty blockers, and a State Department-funded “Disinformation Index,” which  slandered   The New York Post, Reason , and other reputable publications as fonts of disinformation, and urged corporations to redirect their advertising spending to publications including  Huffington Post .

Two years ago, when activists were tearing down statutes of historical figures, people quoted from Orwell, above (“every statue and street and building has been renamed”). Since then, Woke activists have, with Dahl, started down the road of realizing another clause in that sentence: “every book has been rewritten.” Warns O’Neill, “Anyone who thinks the terrifying trend of posthumous censure will end with Dahl is dreaming.”

Totalitarianism is characterized by efforts to completely remake every aspect of society, including cultural life, and Wokeism today is re-writing texts, de-certifying disfavored individuals, cutting off funding, getting people fired, and pressuring social media platforms to deny access or secretly censor. Woke totalitarians are plainly seeking the total reorganization of society along the lines of a racist “hierarchy of oppression” that puts black and indigenous people above other “people of color,” (i.e., Latinos and Asians) as a single “BIPOC” ruling class. This is ostensibly to create the reverse of past hierarchies and is thus transparently vengeful and racist.

It is worth reminding ourselves that freedom of speech is not just “another issue;” it is the foundation of democracy. Without it, we can’t address any other problem, particularly sensitive ones concerning race and sex. And without it, we cannot truly live as free, dignified, and civilized humans.

We are not doomed to a dystopian  1984  future. But the 20th Century proves that we are not guaranteed a free and democratic one. What can be done to stop creeping Woke totalitarianism? To answer that question, we must first understand what’s driving it.

This article is not from a publication that is on our metric, Media Bias/ Fact Check. Please do not use it again.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Sean Treacy    last year

Two years ago, when activists were tearing down statutes of historical figures, people quoted from Orwell, above (“every statue and street and building has been renamed”). Since then, Woke activists have, with Dahl, started down the road of realizing another clause in that sentence: “every book has been rewritten.” Warns O’Neill, “Anyone who thinks the terrifying trend of posthumous censure will end with Dahl is dreaming.”

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    last year
Two years ago, when activists were tearing down statutes of historical figures

statutes? I think you mean statues of civil war traitors in the last white supremacist insurrection, previous to 1/6/21.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.1  Nerm_L  replied to  devangelical @1.1    last year
... civil war traitors of the last white supremacist insurrection.

Andrew Jackson (a founder of the Democratic Party) fought in the War of 1812; not the Civil War.  Abraham Lincoln wasn't a traitor.  And Christopher Columbus died in 1506; over a century before 1619.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.1    last year

they're all dead and none of them care.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  devangelical @1.1.2    last year
they're all dead and none of them care.

So, woke politics is all about beating dead horses?  

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
1.1.4  GregTx  replied to  devangelical @1.1.2    last year

We all will be someday. Are you suggesting that we shouldn't care?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.5  devangelical  replied to  GregTx @1.1.4    last year

no, I'm suggesting that you won't care after you're dead, along with billions of others...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.6  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  devangelical @1.1.2    last year

that’s what you want to go with.  Lol,

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.7  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.3    last year
all about beating dead horses

no, that would be me regularly replying to your commentary.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.8  Nerm_L  replied to  devangelical @1.1.7    last year
no, that would be me regularly replying to your commentary.

Yup, the dead stay in their place and don't talk back.  The perfect woke audience.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Sean Treacy    last year

Is shel Silverstein next on the chopping block?

Or will they just skip to Shakespeare, since Shakespeare is 'far right literature"

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    last year

Who knows? The leftist, Marxist woke have already altered/censored the classics of Mark Twain, Harper Lee, and Margaret Mitchell, so Silverstein might also be on their chopping block soon for his contributions to music and literature.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.1    last year

Democrats destroying art, just like the Taliban. 

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    last year

If one lives in ignorance, s/he lives in darkness, and it's happening in the US today by radicals destroying statues, artwork, and literature.

Yes, Democrats who want to destroy and censor our history are no different than the ignorant, neanderthal Taliban.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.3  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.1.2    last year

It seems like people should keep and retain paper copies of any book they particularly enjoy. Who knows what the censors will do it in the future.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
3  Jasper2529    last year
Some characters are now gender neutral, such as the Oompa Loopas in  Charlie and the Chocolate Factory , who were previously described as "small men" but are now "small people".
In the pages of James and the Giant Peach , the Cloud-Men - ancient threatening giant humanoids who live up in the Earth's atmosphere - are now presented to readers as "Cloud-People".
While in  Matilda , the description of Mrs Trunchbull's "great horsey face" has been changed to just "face".

Do you think the language in Roald Dahl's books should have been changed?

Yes
4%
868
No
96%
22025
 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1  JBB  replied to  Jasper2529 @3    last year

The Horror! /S...

 
 

Who is online

George
MonsterMash
Right Down the Center
Veronica
bugsy
JBB
Hallux
Freefaller


84 visitors