╌>

As far as you know, is the person who shot Charlie Kirk...?

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  s  •  last year  •  32 comments

As far as you know, is the person who shot Charlie Kirk...?

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


24% percent of Americans believe Charlie Kirk’s shooter, Tyler Robinson, was a Republican, compared to 21% who think he was a Democrat, according to a new YouGov poll. This comes after a concerted media effort across Facebook, Reddit, and X, amplified by Bill Maher and outlets such as Reuters and the New York Times, to convince the public that Robinson, who attacked Kirk as a fascist and lived with a transgender boyfriend, was a right-wing follower of Nick Fuentes.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Sean Treacy    last year

Misinformation works.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
1.1  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    last year
Misinformation works.

And the people they are pandering too are stupid and not willing to check the facts, those stupid bastards are so Gullible they think Jussie Smollet was attacked by MAGA hat wearing rednecks in Chicago, Hands up don't shoot is still real, George Brown was beat to death, and that Kirk thinks Murder is good for the 2nd amendment and Black women don't have the brain power to compete.  You can't fix stupid, and you can't educate it either. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  George @1.1    last year

256

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  George @1.1    last year

And don’t forget that Hunter Biden was running the WH!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  George @1.1    last year

Flood social media with lies to the point LLM's pick it up, let it go viral and their work is done.  It will percolate to the low information citizen and the die hards who once given a talking point to parrot, will never, ever admit it's false no matter what information is presented.  Corrections, if made  at all, will only get a tiny fraction of the virality the original lies get. By the time the goldfish move onto the next shiny thing the "shooter was republican" is all they'll remember. 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.4  Nerm_L  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.1.2    last year
And don’t forget that Hunter Biden was running the WH!

At least it has been verified that Kamala Harris was not running the Biden WH.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.5  Ozzwald  replied to  Nerm_L @1.1.4    last year
At least it has been verified that Kamala Harris was not running the Biden WH.

Because Obama was!!!! <sarc>

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
1.1.6  George  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.1.2    last year

When you can't make a counter point, Deflect.  

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
1.1.7  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.3    last year
Flood social media with lies to the point LLM's pick it up, let it go viral and their work is done.

Yea,okay. It is a damn good thing that the GOP and Trump along with influencers on the 'right', deal exclusively in the 'truth' then isn't it ?

WTF already. It is a fact that politicians' lie, but none to the extent of Trump, who continues to LIE daily, about N E an N E THING ! His lies are not even forced, it is just who he is. A POS , potUS, who instead of attempting to bring US All together in these times of turmoil, no, instead he just keeps distracting the public from his ONVIOUS complete guilt in the Epstein coverup. Keep supporting and believing the pedophile protecting President, you know, the president that ran on TRANSPARENCY and specifically about releasing ALL the Epstein file info, until it incriminated him. 

   Next, Trump will be against Transparency, because he hates trannys', and wasn't the alledged Kirk suspect cohabitating with one. Yet the trans dater was living in sin after supposedly being raised in a 'right' conservative family home. Were his parents really transparent raising imposters...?  Maybe they'd better check the rosters.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.8  Nerm_L  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.5    last year
Because Obama was!!!! <sarc>

Are you sure it wasn't HRC?

256

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.9  Hallux  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.1    last year

Curb Your Enthusiasm

(have not yet watched a single episode)

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.10  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.1.2    last year

oh no, the maga civil war carnage is the fault of leftist transgenders ... /s

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Silent
1.1.11  afrayedknot  replied to  devangelical @1.1.10    last year

“…the maga civil war carnage…”

to paraphrase “The End”…

…the hate you take is equal to the hate you make…

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.12  Hallux  replied to  devangelical @1.1.10    last year

and you wonder why Trump appointed a drudgery of dominatrix wannabees?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.13  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.1.2    last year

Nope, that was actually Liz. Hunter was just the errand boy...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2  cjcold  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    last year

Misinformation has always been a tool of right-wing fascism.

Fox News went to court to be allowed to "entertain" with it.

Trump says "I can say anything I want." The worst liar ever!

Fuck all sub 80 IQ Trump supporting fascists.

My USA won't allow another Hitler Germany!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.1  bugsy  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year
Misinformation has always been a tool of right-wing fascism.

Your proof?

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
1.2.2  George  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year

See 1.1

The Fox News Channel won a 2004 court case allowing the cable channel to lie to viewers.
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.3  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  George @1.2.2    last year

A perfect example of  the point.  It doesn't matter how many times you post the truth . Once a lie has  been accepted by the fringe  left as canon, it will be repeated forever. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.4  Ozzwald  replied to  bugsy @1.2.1    last year
Your proof?

How about 787 Million pieces of evidence as proof?
1.

1200px-US_one_dollar_bill%2C_obverse%2C_series_2009.jpg

2.

1200px-US_one_dollar_bill%2C_obverse%2C_series_2009.jpg

3.

1200px-US_one_dollar_bill%2C_obverse%2C_series_2009.jpg

Etc....etc....etc....

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year
Fox News went to court to be allowed to "entertain" with it.

Technically they went to court recently to defend their right to lie about Dominion voting machines and they lost, bigly. They had to pay almost a billion dollars and were forced to admit they aren't real news, and as their owner admitted under oath that Fox News is "spewing conspiracy theories".

They're now being sued by Smartmatic for $2.7 billion and will in all likelihood, lose again.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
1.2.6  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.5    last year

thank you for supporting cj and Halux with FACTS ! I had just stereotyped a rather lengthy reply to shove into iii's, when it was lost, and there is not duplicating my juvenile rants as i know in advance, i cannot even plagiarize myself, my thoughts are too easily escaped, and it is fckn frustrating to accidentally lose something i had almost fiv minutes invested in. 

And the fact that so many use Fox as their 'news' information of choice is why they believe that stupid White Power House voice, that LIES day in, and day out, without a doubt.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.7  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year

In other words, anybody that is not a liberal Dem and does not agree with your particular point of view fall into those categories right? 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2  Mark in Wyoming     last year

I shall choose door C......

a very fucked up in the head individual.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1  Hallux  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2    last year

that's no fun.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2    last year

Immensely so.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3  TᵢG    last year
24% percent of Americans believe Charlie Kirk’s shooter, Tyler Robinson, was a Republican, compared to 21% who think he was a Democrat, according to a new YouGov poll. 

What difference does this make?   He obviously held extremely strong views counter to Kirk's.   But this is one individual who does not represent anyone but himself.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @3    last year
What difference does this make

If it makes no difference, why are so many democrats lying about it? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1    last year

As if to answer my question, your post demonstrates that this is (disgustingly) exploiting a tragedy for partisan purposes.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  seeder  Sean Treacy    last year

I’m just in  shock anyone could think it doesn’t matter that such a large percentage of Americans could be made to believe Such a blatant falsehood so easily. 

and yes, if you don’t think it matters , you should probably ask yourself why democrats engaged in a campaign to lie about it.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    last year

The need to assign this guy to a group that might include millions of people - and hold them all responsible - is the real sickness in this country.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1  TᵢG  replied to  Tacos! @5    last year

Exactly.   It is blind, hyper-partisanship.

 
 

Who is online





150 visitors