╌>

Ed. Dept. Out-of-Office Emails Changed to Blame Democrats for Shutdown, Staff Say

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hallux  •  last year  •  16 comments

By:   Brooke Schultz - Education Week

Ed. Dept. Out-of-Office Emails Changed to Blame Democrats for Shutdown, Staff Say

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Staff furloughed from the U.S. Department of Education say their out-of-office emails blaming Democratic senators for the   federal government shutdown   were set up without their permission—and they raise concerns about violations of the federal law that prohibits government employees from using their positions for political activities.

The department’s actions also coincide with several federal agencies—though not the Education Department—promoting partisan messages on their websites that have blamed Democrats and the “radical left” for the first government shutdown in nearly seven years, after lawmakers couldn’t come to an agreement to extend funding beyond the Sept. 30 end of the fiscal year.

Shortly before the shutdown, Education Department employees said the agency sent them a uniform, nonpartisan out-of-office message for all staff to use for automatic email responses while agency operations are mostly on hold. That message explained there was a temporary shutdown, and it directed people to the department’s website for more information. Such messages are standard when shutdowns are on the horizon, staff say.

But then the department changed the messaging unilaterally, without staff’s knowledge or permission, to say:

“Thank you for contacting me. On September 19, 2025, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 5371, a clean continuing resolution. Unfortunately, Democrat Senators are blocking passage of H.R. 5371 in the Senate which has led to a lapse in appropriations. Due to the lapse in appropriations I am currently in furlough status. I will respond to emails once government functions resume.”

Some staff said they were unaware their out-of-office messages had been changed. Others, who have been on   paid administrative leave for months as part of a broad effort to shed staff , had no access to their email accounts to post the messages.

“This administration took away funding for low-income schools, special education students, and school-based mental health services,” one staffer, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation, told Education Week on Thursday. “Now, making every federal worker a partisan pawn for their own ends is again about power, not students.”

Sheria Smith, president of the union that represents the Education Department staff, said the partisan messaging was unprecedented.

512

“Certainly we have been impacted by government shutdowns before, and we’ve been instructed previously to put out-of-office messages regarding the shutdown, but none of it was ever partisan; none of it ever placed blame on one particular party over the other, which makes sense because our workforce is apolitical,” she said. “These out-of-office messages are yet another example of a disturbing politicizing of what should be independent federal workers.”

Smith said the union is worried its members could be disciplined for violating the Hatch Act, the 1939 law that prohibits federal employees from engaging in some forms of political activity and restricts the use of taxpayer money for partisan actions.

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel, which enforces the Hatch Act and has found violations by high-ranking officials over time in both   Republican   and   Democratic   administrations,   can seek disciplinary   against an employee who violates the law.

The out-of-office messages appear to be a “back-door violation of the Hatch Act as well as an invasion of employee civil rights,” said Craig Holman, a government affairs expert who lobbies for Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy organization.

The organization has filed Hatch Act complaints against two agencies, the  U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development  and the  Small Business Administration , for messages on their homepages blaming the “Radical Left” and “Senate Democrats” for causing the shutdown.

The Hatch Act protects employees from partisan political pressure influencing how they do their jobs, and aims to keep taxpayer dollars from funding partisan efforts, Holman said in an email.

“Changing employee out-of-office messages with or without their consent for partisan gain violates these objectives,” he added. “For employers to pressure employees to post partisan messages by asking them to do so violates the Hatch Act. And in secretly changing employee voice messages for partisan purposes, the Education Department is putting words in the mouths of the employees to influence voters for partisan purposes. Either way, this is unacceptable political behavior by those in charge of the Education Department.”

The Education Department did not respond to a request for comment Thursday. The out-of-office message from the agency’s press office contained similar language to the individual employees’ out-of-office messages blaming Democrats for the shutdown.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    last year

Not to worry, in order to save democracy it needs to be 'temporarily' shut down.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    last year

Smith said the union is worried its members could be disciplined for violating the Hatch Act, the 1939 law that prohibits federal employees from engaging in some forms of political activity and restricts the use of taxpayer money for partisan actions.

Is that what the union is really worried about?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    last year

Tell you what Vic, before you post anymore seeds, etc., pass them through me for editing.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
2.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    last year

Well, we know Trump would never throw anybody under the bus for breaking the law at his behest, right?

And he'd lose the support of his sycophants if he did, right?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.2    last year

It sounds like projection

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
2.2.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.1    last year

You know it's true.  That's why this weak-ass response is the best you could come up with.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2.3  seeder  Hallux  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.2.2    last year
You know it's true.

That's debatable and not the true part.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.3  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    last year

Face it Vic, Trump is a con-man and his administration is corrupt to the core (because he is corrupt and surrounded himself with corrupt sycophants).

We are living in a time where arguably the most corrupt, most unfit person ever to occupy the office is now the sitting PotUS.   And his continued damage to this nation is a function of people continuing (inexplicably and irrationally) to support and defend him.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.3.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.3    last year

He would have to be to out due the Biden administration 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.3.2  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.1    last year

Another puerile response.

Clearly you lack an argument, so why keep trying to defend Trump?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3  Ozzwald    last year
Ed. Dept. Out-of-Office Emails Changed to Blame Democrats for Shutdown, Staff Say

Trump's extreme and unchecked narcissism does not allow him taking blame for anything that goes wrong, and the incompetent boot lickers that he appoints know this and do anything to push the blame elsewhere because of it.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
4  sandy-2021492    last year

The Small Business Administration website has a header with a similar message.

Stupid, petty, and illegal.

Our local sheriff is plugging Republicans for the next state election on the taxpayer dime.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1    last year

Sweeping Generalization [Perrie Halpern R.A.]  

When did this joint get rugs?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5  Trout Giggles    last year
Smith said the union is worried its members could be disciplined for violating the Hatch Act, the 1939 law that prohibits federal employees from engaging in some forms of political activity and restricts the use of taxpayer money for partisan actions.

I think the concern is genuine. But the employees should be able to fight it since it was done without their permission or knowledge

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6  Hal A. Lujah    last year

The only people who would agree with such garbage statements are not swayed by them, they are already in the bag for Bruisy Cankles.  This is textbook preaching to a choir.  Nobody with a thinking brain is swayed by such idiocy.

 
 

Who is online




135 visitors