Population growth and a global food crisis
Category: History & Sociology
Via: bob-nelson • 9 months ago • 11 commentsBy: Dave Borlace - Just Have a Think
This is for charger383.
I kinda hammered him for repeating for the zillionth time that "the problem isn't gobal warming - it's overpopulation".
Well... guess what?
It's BOTH!
Minnesota Dems Ready To Make 2026 Senate And Governor's Races Their Bovino, We Mean Bitch
Tina Smith's retiring, and Goopers thought 'fraud' might put the seat in play. Hmmm.
Doktor Zoom
Minnesota judge orders ICE chief to appear in court
Judge orders head of ICE to explain agency’s handling of bond hearings for immigrants it has detained.
Mariamne Everett and AP
How long can ICE keep ignoring federal courts?
A federal judge just threatened to hold the agency’s leader in contempt.
Ian Millhiser
The president’s advisers stink. That’s not the problem.
He’s being undermined by his own accomplices. They’re doling out “bad advice.”
Frank Bruni
Nice Times Are Bigger In Texas: Tabs, Mon., Feb. 2, 2026
News and things to read and watch!
Marcie Jones
Do you live in one of the 14 states Trump plans to hold hostage? Your life may be at risk.
A plan to shut off federal money to Blue States would — without a doubt — meet the standard the Founders set for impeachment.
Miles Taylor
Alex Pretti’s Gun Rights
Many Trump administration claims conflict with reality.
Stephen Gutowski
Trump Closing Kennedy Center So No More Artists Can Embarrass Him By Refusing To Perform There
Isn't that what 'renovations' really mean?
Gary Legum
Whatever
Tags
Who is online
88 visitors

I guess my perception of world food production was a few years old. It did not integrate the damage to food production that will be done by global warming.
I figured it was caused by both. Overpopulation leads to more climate change which leads to famines.
Thank you, I have been concerned about this for a long time
The reality- As population as surged, starvation has dramatically dropped.
No theory has ever been more comprehensively debunked by reality than the population bomb written almost 60 years ago and people still cling to it because it suits their world view. It's as bad as the climate doomerism claiming we are always 5-10 aways from an environmental apocalypse for the last 40 years and people still fall for it.
It's really amazing to see...
The problem with making a claim that overpopulation is negatively impacting the human race, the implication is that the population needs to be reduced. That is obviously a very controversial statement. You can reduce the population of the chickens on your farm … there are shelters that are forced to reduce the population of their unwanted pets … when the deer population is too high there are hunting solutions. If someone is going to claim there are too many humans and just let that assertion dangle, then we can only imagine what the asserter’s solution is.
free birth control
problem solving, reduces worry and cost effective
That has some value for the future, but the problem is when people say it’s a present problem.
yep
Population has to be reduced gradually not immediately. Tho I know there's a conspiracy theory out there that says some global group like the Illuminati have a plan to reduce Earth's population to 7 million. Which is impractical because there would be no more society
The video overlooks the compounding problem of commoditization of food to obtain profit from trade. That has driven food crops toward monoculture farming amenable to automated harvesting to maximize profit. Comingled polyculture farming would be more resilient to a changing climate and much less water intensive but the necessary labor to harvest becomes enormous. (AI and robotics may be able to address the labor intensity.)
The discussion about lab grown proteins (cultured meat) is pretty bogus. Cultured meat production is extraordinarily water intensive; for operating the culture reactors and for sanitation. The claims depend upon best case predictions for recycling and purifying water. Cultured meat is still a factory farm that requires large amounts of energy and water.
Climate change causing a drier environment would actually favor a shift toward forage grasses and a different selection of food animal. Goats, sheep, bison, deer, llamas & alpacas, rabbits, and even swine have evolved to survive and thrive in drier environments using foods (forage grasses, shrubs, etc.) that humans cannot process as food. Grazing animals naturally recycle their waste. Grazing animals also tend to improve both carbon and water retention by the land. There is growing interest in Regenerative Rewilding which looks at a more natural diversification of food resources.