╌>

Dear Trump Administration Official: History Is Full of Loyal Men Who Thought They’d Be Protected

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  bob-nelson  •  9 months ago  •  10 comments

By:   Thom Hartmann

Dear Trump Administration Official: History Is Full of Loyal Men Who Thought They’d Be Protected



A historical warning about how presidents escape, aides go to prison, and “just following orders” has never saved anyone...


original




February 4, 2026 - Heather Cox Richardson
On the heels of last weekend’s special election in Texas, President Donald J. Trump has called for his administration to take over the polls before the 2026 midterm elections.

Trump’s New “Prison Camp” Threat Unleashes Fury Even in MAGA Country
The next phase of ICE’s big ramp-up: a nationwide network of vast detention facilities. But guess what? Even parts of Red America are saying no.
The New Republic and Greg Sargent

GOP senator opposes planned ICE detention facility in home state
Alexander Bolton, The Hill

Tom Homan Demands ICE Agents Return Their Signing Bonuses to Him in Paper Bag
Andy Borowitz

Hobbs launches know-your-rights website for ICE encounters
Saying there have been “abuses of power,’’ Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday created a web site designed to tell Arizonans their rights when they’re stopped by agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement or when officers approach their homes.
By Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services, via The Yuma Sun

The Media Really Doesn’t Know What To Do With Trump’s Lies
The Wall St. Journal steps into a steaming pile of Trumpian nonsense.
Jared Bernstein

Uh Oh, Sounds Like Eagle Ed Martin Done Tainted Up DOJ’s Revenge Cases!
Lucky break, Adam Schiff!
Marcie Jones

Arizonans react to the Pentagon’s latest move against Sen. Mark Kelly
Tensions between the Pentagon and US Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona continue this week, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announcing that he is issuing a letter of censure against the Democratic congressman.
Arizona Copper Courier

Judge sees Hegseth bid to demote Sen. Mark Kelly as assault on free speech of veterans
At a hearing Tuesday, a federal judge cast Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s effort to demote Sen. Mark Kelly in retirement as an unprecedented attack on the free speech rights of military veterans.
Arizona Copper Courier

“It’s not a crime to party with Jeffrey Epstein.”
Lucian K. Truscott IV

Donald Trump Says He Wants To Seize State Elections, Probably Just Kidding Again Because He's Such A Kidder
Just joking, only serious.
Doktor Zoom

The Real Reason Trump Is Skipping the Super Bowl on Sunday
Trump claimed the big game is ‘too far away.’ Privately, his advisers warned he’d likely get booed if he went, sources tell Zeteo.
Asawin Suebsaeng and Andrew Perez

No Republicans Show Up For Joint House-Senate Hearing On ICE Murders, Brutality. Big Surprise.
Wouldn't want to give the impression that victims of ICE violence are human, after all.
Doktor Zoom

Gee, It Doesn't Seem Like This Raw Milk Thing Is Going So Well, Part 4,279,327,934
A New Mexico newborn has likely died from listeria.
Robyn Pennacchia

Trump’s spy chief accidentally gave Congress a roadmap to investigate him.
Tulsi Gabbard over-explained why she was in Georgia at an FBI raid of an election office, and — in the process — she implicated her boss.
Miles Taylor

what the fuck, Jeff Bezos?
democracy — and the Washington Post — dies up the oligarchy’s ass
Jeff Tiedrich

ICE agents in Oregon cannot arrest people without warrants, judge rules
US federal judge issued a preliminary injunction barring warrantless arrests unless there is a likelihood of escape
Associated Press via The Guardian



S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F15d320c3-a7cc-4d4c-b400-a620a391d16f_1536x1024.heic



Dear Trump Administration Official,

I’m writing to you not as a political opponent, but as a historian who’s spent a lifetime studying what happens when democracies flirt with strongmen and otherwise decent people convince themselves that loyalty to Dear Leader today will be rewarded by safety and protection tomorrow.

It almost never is.

You’re out there defending Donald Trump’s lawbreaking, cheering his attacks on judges, prosecutors, immigrants, journalists, and even the Constitution itself. You defend his bribe-taking, the jet from Qatar, the violence of ICE, and his hotel and crypto grifts. You say it’s necessary for him to abuse power to “get things done,” that the other side is worse, that he’s strong and that’s what the American people need.

History is littered with people who believed the same things: let’s start close to home.

Richard Nixon didn’t go to prison: his loyalists did.

His attorney general John Mitchell did hard time in a federal prison. His chief of staff H.R. Haldeman did hard time, as did John Ehrlichman, Charles Colson, and his White House attorney John Dean. The burglars did time, as did the fixers. The forty Nixon officials who went to prison even included two members of Nixon’s cabinet, AG Mitchell and Commerce Secretary Maurice Stans.

The people who “just followed orders” or egged Nixon on — like you’re doing now with Trump — were the ones who went to jail, while Nixon walked away to a quiet retirement.

That’s the pattern history shows us over and over, all the way back to the Roman Republic: the boss either dies or escapes while his helpers become the long-term fall guys.

Every authoritarian system runs on the same fuel you’re today giving Trump: people who believe that by protecting the leader they’re protecting themselves and their families. Tragically, at least for them, it never works out that way.

When Hitler’s regime collapsed, he was dead but his inner circle faced tribunals, prison cells, and even the gallows.

The men who signed orders, ran ministries, moved trains, seized property, and “made it all legal” discovered that when corrupt administrations fall, their paperwork trail lasts longer than their leader’s loyalty. Their defense of “I was serving my country” or “just taking orders” didn’t save them: it convicted them.

Mussolini’s story is even darker. As his own crimes caught up with him, his own allies turned and ran. He was executed by people horrified by his excesses. His son-in-law, once his foreign minister and a loyal insider, was put up against a wall and shot after a show trial. Dictators never go down alone: they take their flunkies with them and it’s typically the flunkies who bear the harshest punishments.

Chile’s Pinochet managed to dodge some justice himself, but the men who ran his torture chambers and death squads didn’t. Years later they were dragged into court, convicted, and sent to prison. Time didn’t save them, and neither did politics or the loyalty they expected from the good general. And it won’t save you.

The same happened after Saddam Hussein fell; his henchmen were tried and executed or died in prison. In Romania, the Ceauşescus were hunted down and shot but their senior officials faced courts, disgrace, and decades in prison. Across history, when the music stops, the people closest to the guy at the top inevitably find there aren’t enough chairs.

Here’s the uncomfortable (for you) truth: authoritarian leaders like Trump and Putin treat loyalty like a disposable resource. Just look at all the Republicans who served in Trump’s first term and he’s now trying to throw into prison. Loyalty, for narcissists and authoritarians like Trump, is  always  a one-way street.

So long as you’re useful, you’re protected, but the moment Dear Leader no longer commands power you’ll become a liability, an offering to be thrown out to appease the angry mob.

And when the prosecutors come calling for you after Trump’s gone, they won’t start with your elegant speeches or proclamations that Renee Good and Alex Pretti were “domestic terrorists.” They start with your memos, phone calls, pressure campaigns, documents, and quiet threats; they’ll go after your “find the votes” activities, the cooked reports, the arrests without cause, the orders that violated others’ civil rights.

They’ll start, in other words, with the people who made Trump’s crimes happen: people like you. That’s how conspiracies are proven in a court of law: not by vibes, but by nailing the insiders.

Right now you may feel powerful. You’re on TV, retweeted, and praised by Trump. The base cheers, the fundraising money pours in, the billionaires are chummy, and it feels like history is being written by your side.

But history has a funny way of circling back:

— Nixon’s aides told themselves they were protecting the presidency, but they destroyed their own lives instead.

— The seniormost Nazis told themselves they were saving Germany, but they were prosecuted as war criminals.

— Mussolini’s ministers told themselves they were stabilizing Italy, but they ended up dead or disgraced.

— Pinochet’s enforcers told themselves they were fighting communism, but they ended up in prison.

There’s a simple and perennial reason why prosecutors always say, “Follow the money” and “follow the paper trail”: abusive power always leaves fingerprints.

And there’s no statute of limitations on some of the crimes you’re now waving away.

Obstruction of justice. Conspiracy. Civil rights violations. Election interference. Murder under color of authority. Bribery. Abuse of power. False statements. Unlawful detention. Retaliation against whistleblowers. Collusion with foreign enemies.

These aren’t political talking points that I’m trying to wave around to score with public opinion or scare you, they’re criminal statutes.

You may tell yourself — like all those people before you told themselves — that Trump will protect you. But Nixon didn’t protect his people; he left the White House and never looked back to watch his underlings fall. History’s strongmen never look back. When the heat gets intense enough, they point at others, not themselves.

Already we’re seeing this pattern with dozens of people who’ve left Trump’s first term employ, from his Attorney General, CIA director, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Defense Secretary, and FBI Director all the way down to functionaries in the Oval Office: “I didn’t know he was that crazy.” “They acted on their own.” “I was advised incorrectly.” “They went too far.”

Every authoritarian uses the same script and Trump has already proven that he’s no different. Do you think he’s suddenly going to decide to protect  you  rather than run off with the goodies? If so, I have a bridge to sell you.

Seriously, here’s the part nobody in the cheering crowd has bothered to tell you: when regimes fall — or even just lose power, like Nixon did — the leader’s efforts become solely about his own personal survival. Your life, as a disposable underling, becomes a tool he can use to redirect blame and avoid accountability.

The courts won’t ask whether you believed in the cause: they’ll ask what you did.

Did you pressure an official? Did you sign that order? Did you participate in killing those fishermen with a missile? Did you move the funds? Did you authorize those deportations to foreign torture centers? Did you look the other way? Did you help cover up the child rapes?

That’s when you’ll discover the very real difference between a political appointee and the defendant you’ll become.

I’m not asking you to become a Democrat, to abandon your “conservative” principles, or even to leave your party. Instead, I want you to realize that the Constitution is older than Donald Trump and far more durable than any cult of personality.

There’s a reason the Founders feared concentrated power and split it among three branches of government: like their advisor Montesquieu, they’d also studied history.

Strongmen always promise protection to the people they con into doing their dirty work. What they deliver to those folks, though, is  always  collateral damage.

Right now you’re standing close to a light that feels bright and powerful. History suggests, however, that it’ll end by burning the people nearest to it. Including you.

Presidents can walk away, but staffers, lawyers, deputies, agency heads, cabinet officials, and enablers can’t.

You still have time to choose which side of history you’re on, and which side of a courtroom you never want to sit in.

Because the lesson of every fallen strongman is the same: abusive power-by-association today becomes criminal liability tomorrow.


Red Box Rules

Whatever


 

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    9 months ago

If the fascists win, you're safe. If they lose...... Nuremburg.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
1.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Bob Nelson @1    9 months ago

So many deserve to be in Prison, it's down right nutz

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Igknorantzruls @1.1    9 months ago
So many deserve to be in Prison, it's down right nutz

They have to remain in a good relationship with Trump so he will pardon them before leaving.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Silent
1.2  afrayedknot  replied to  Bob Nelson @1    9 months ago

And as some are fond of quoting scripture… ‘nothing new under the sun’.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2  Jack_TX    9 months ago
I’m writing to you not as a political opponent,

Why do I think that's a lie?

These aren’t political talking points that I’m trying to wave around to score with public opinion or scare you

Honesty is just a theoretical concept to Thom here, isn't it?

but as a historian 

Really?  I suspect we're all about to read something moronic that no competent historian would say.

Mussolini’s ministers told themselves they were stabilizing Italy, but they ended up dead or disgraced. — Pinochet’s enforcers told themselves they were fighting communism, but they ended up in prison.

There it is. 

Out of curiosity, did ol' Thom here make the same comparisons about the last Republican president?  Why yes.... yes he did.

So just to be clear, any president he doesn't like is the reincarnation of Hitler, Mussolini, Pinochet or whatever bogeyman he happens to be fixated on that day.

I’m not asking you to become a Democrat, to abandon your “conservative” principles, 

Riiiiiiight.  This is different from all the bullshit you've been writing for the last 20+ years.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1  JBB  replied to  Jack_TX @2    9 months ago

How lame is, "We're not exactly bad as Nazis"?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Jack_TX  replied to  JBB @2.1    9 months ago
How lame is, "We're not exactly bad as Nazis"?

Not as lame as comparing American presidents to Nazis.  Anyone seriously making that type of comparison is so stupid I wonder who ties their shoes in the morning.  

The closest thing we have to Nazis today is in Iran.  Both interesting and conspicuous how the SJWs don't seem bothered by those particular mass executions.

  

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1.2  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.1    9 months ago

Trump runs a secret police that invades homes and arrests people without a warrant. And kills people. He is building "detention centers" to hold those illegal arrests. He violates the law every day.

Clearly fascist.

The only thing separating Trump from nazism is the gas chambers. They weren't immediate in Germany, either.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Jack_TX  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.1.2    9 months ago
Trump runs a secret police that invades homes and arrests people without a warrant.

You mean people that a judge has said to arrest and remove?

He is building "detention centers" 

Like Obama did? 

The only thing separating Trump from nazism is the gas chambers.

Riiiiiight. 

Other than invading Poland, you mean. 

Or persecuting citizens on religious grounds.  

Or rounding up and "re-educating" political opponents. 

Or suppressing free speech.  

Or limiting citizenship to one race. 

Or outlawing interracial marriage. 

Or sterilizing the disabled.  

Hmmmm.......maybe there isn't that much similarity after all.  Maybe those accusations are actually as moronic as they sound.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1.4  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.3    9 months ago

Bye.

 
 

Who is online





68 visitors