╌>

The Implosion of Ro Khanna Is Complete

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  s  •  9 months ago  •  21 comments

The Implosion of Ro Khanna Is Complete

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


I was once asked by my father—a couple of years ago—if there was a single Democrat in office whom I respected. 


The answer was easy: Ro Khanna. 

Obviously, I agree with Khanna on very few things and strongly oppose his positions on most public policy issues. But I thought Khanna was smart, honest, and well-meaning, and one of the few politicians who didn't lie his arse off all the time. I could see having a conversation with him without feeling the need for a long, hot shower. 


Welp. Another one bites the dust.

Now that Khanna is obviously preparing to run for president, he has sold his soul to the devil, and he makes my skin crawl. Perhaps even more than Gavin Newsom, who has always been a sociopath. Khanna, I thought, was better than that. 

Khanna, who has always been a man of the left, made his political career representing Silicon Valley. He was a perfect fit for the Valley because he made all the right social justice noises while also being very entrepreneur-friendly. So it surprised his constituents, whose entire business model is bet big, fail often, and then strike it rich with a hit, to see their representative become an enthusiastic promoter of the wealth seizure initiative that would impose a 5% tax on wealth, including unrealized capital gains. 

This was not only a betrayal of Khanna's constituents and a reversal of his support for entrepreneurism, but it was also a horrific economic policy that has driven $2 trillion of wealth out of California. Not even Gavin Newsom was dumb enough to support it, and there is no way in hell that Khanna thinks it is smart policy, let alone fair.  Unrealized capital gains can disappear overnight, and taxing them would also take some companies out of founders' control, forcing them to sell shares to pay the tax. 

But at least that was just playing to the populist base, and not outright immoral. Khanna is now descending into the gutter to get some populist cred. 


Khanna's big dive into the gutter has been his histrionics over the Epstein files. He has slandered four innocent men on the floor of the House for no other reason than he wanted attention. He named them as wealthy and powerful Epstein buddies, when in fact they didn't even know the guy. 


OMG 🤣 I think the DOJ set a trap for Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna

Remember when Rep Ro Khanna announced the names of several individuals who were basically Epstein pedophiles.. the Trump admin was “hiding”? Massie did too.

Turns out, they had absolutely no idea who they were,…   pic.twitter.com/eDopvTN76A

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra)   February 14, 2026

Having done so on the floor of the House, Khanna is protected by the Speech and Debate Clause, so he can't be sued for defamation, but had he made his accusations anywhere else, Khanna would be in settlement talks already. He tossed innocent men to the wolves for attention, which is about as slimy a move as you can imagine. At least when Harry Reid lied about Mitt Romney's taxes and smiled about it, Romney wasn't a poor schlub with no ability to defend himself. 


So one of the four men that Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna falsely accused of being apart the Epstein Ring was a Brooklyn auto-mechanic who was fired when Khanna read his name on the house floor. I’d imagine he’s also lost all his friends as well.

Thankfully after it came out that…   pic.twitter.com/tdrrySTiW4

— Jacktron (@jacktronprime)   February 15, 2026



So one of the four men that Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna falsely accused of being apart the Epstein Ring was a Brooklyn auto-mechanic who was fired when Khanna read his name on the house floor. I’d imagine he’s also lost all his friends as well.

Thankfully after it came out that he was just involved in a FBI lineup they hired him back. 

Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna almost destroyed this innocent man’s life because they were too stupid to do their homework.

Worse than Harry Reid. How low can you go?

This low:


First, he read the names of four completely random people on the House floor and claimed they were complicit in Epstein's crimes.

Now, his guest to SOTU is the woman who recruited underage girls for Epstein and compared herself to the Heidi Fleiss of Palm Beach.   https://t.co/bs2QyCn7wI

— Greg Price (@greg_price11)   February 24, 2026

Khanna is bringing an "Epstein victim" to the State of the Union and throwing accusations about Trump running interference for child abusers. As Democrat after Democrat gets exposed as an Epstein associate and co-conspirator, and Trump was revealed to have assisted the investigation into Epstein, the Democrats are doing their usual "invert the truth" move and accusing Trump of being a pedophile. 


Have you spoken to co-sponsor Ro Khanna about the $31,100 he’s taken from Reid Hoffman—who’s named in the Epstein files—over the last decade? $7,000 was donated just a month before Khanna wrote the 'privacy clause' now being used to redact names. Why the conflict?   pic.twitter.com/FqD8KEoNoJ
— Horsch 🇺🇸 (@_UFOs_R_Real_)   February 16, 2026


As part of this incredibly slimy sewer politics, Khanna is bringing an Epstein RECRUITER to the State of the Union, and calling her a "victim."


Ro Khanna is bringing a sex trafficker to the State of the Union.

This person spent two years recruiting girls for Epstein. She was an adult for at least some of the time that she was recruiting. She sent her friends to Epstein.

Anything for some political theater, right Ro?   pic.twitter.com/38VcCvHJjj

— MAZE (@mazemoore)   February 24, 2026

Haley Robson, the "heroic survivor" of Epstein's abuse,   actually was paid to recruit girls for Epstein's pleasure . She was actually pretty proud of doing so, calling herself the "Heidi Fleiss" of Palm Beach. 


During a 2005 interview with Palm Beach police, Robson said she first met Epstein in approximately 2003, just after she turned 17, according to an affidavit the police department prepared while investigating the financier and others. 

A friend told her she could earn $200 by giving Epstein a massage, Robson told the police investigators. She decided to go. But Robson, who told the police she was naked when she massaged Epstein, became uncomfortable. "He tried to touch me and I stopped him," she told the police.

"After the massage, Epstein stated to Robson that he understood she was not comfortable, but he would pay her if she brought over some girls," the police affidavit summary of Robson's interview stated. "He told her the younger the better."

Tempted by the financial offer, Robson said she agreed.

In all, Robson said she brought at least six girls between the ages of 14 to 16 to Epstein. According to the police affidavit, Robson said she briefed each girl about what to expect: "They were told they would provide a massage, possibly naked, and allow some touching."

At the conclusion of the interview, a police sergeant entered the room "and explained to Robson that based on her own statements, she had implicated herself by bringing underage girls to Epstein's house," the police affidavit said.


That, to me, is not the testimony of a heroic survivor, but of a girl who aspired to become a madam, providing young, fresh meat to a man she knew would sexually abuse young girls. 


This is Haley Robinson.

“I’m a Heidi Fleiss.”

She’s not a victim. This is the hoax part.   https://t.co/XfSB0Qd1oZ   pic.twitter.com/lxuBHZbKxK

— Erikaaa (@ErikaC47)   February 24, 2026


"The 14-year-old victim told police she was terrified to come forward because she feared Robson would retaliate against her or her family."

I am absolutely appalled that Representative Ro Khanna is bringing Haley Robson as his guest to the upcoming State of the Union address!…   https://t.co/CtN5uBDF8x   pic.twitter.com/tqA0mNwsoa

— Apple Lamps (@lamps_apple)   February 21, 2026

And Khanna is, apparently, proud to associate himself with her acts, calling them "heroic." Who is he, Scott Weiner? 

Khanna is selling his soul for a shot at the presidency. It is gross, and it will not even pay any dividends, unless he believes he will gain a cabinet position in a Newsom administration. 

It's not only power that corrupts. It is the lust for power itself that does. 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Bringing a  sex trafficker to the State of Union after defaming an  innocent auto mechanic as an Epstein accomplice....

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    9 months ago
Bringing a  sex trafficker to the State of Union

who do you think is giving the SOTU speech? oh wait, trump didn't traffic those victims, he only took them for test drives ...

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
1.2  Gazoo  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    9 months ago

Are you surprised? I’m not. For years the dem party has given the impression they care more about illegals and criminals than they do about law abiding citizens.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.1  bugsy  replied to  Gazoo @1.2    9 months ago
[deleted][✘]
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    9 months ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again: the Epstein Files have absolutely destroyed just about anyone who had any kind of association with him.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3    9 months ago

that would explain the massive cover up by the DOJ to redact trump's name, which appears over 38K times ...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

"The 14-year-old victim told police she was terrified to come forward because she feared Robson would retaliate against her or her family"

And Robson gets rewarded.....

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Even as Democrats are reduced to naming random car mechanics as Epstein co-conspirators and parading around his co-conspirators as "victims" there are still a sizeable portion of Democrats who still believe in some massive conspiracy.  It's just another unfalsifiable conspiracy theory.  No matter how much evidence comes forward, and no matter what  the FBI and other police departments have concluded over the last 15 years, there's always some imaginary evidence that's being withheld that would fulfill all their partisan desires. 

Epstein and Maxwell abused minor women. That's it.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    9 months ago
It's just another unfalsifiable conspiracy theory.  No matter how much evidence comes forward, and no matter what  the FBI and other police departments have concluded over the last 15 years, there's always some imaginary evidence that's being withheld that would fulfill all their partisan desires.

The problem is, ALL the evidence is quite obviously not being released. Just out today, the FBI apparently interviewed a young teenage girl, 13 or 14 years of age, who along with a witness have claimed Trump abused her. Only a portion of one out of the four interviews can be found, wonder why ?/ How much more of that do you suppose somehow got overlooked in the 3.5 million MORE pages of Epstein/TRUMP files ?

This girl was 17 when she was recruited to be a recruiter. Barely able to drive a car, too young to buy alcohol, too young to vote, but possibly not too young to be corrupted by rich and powerful people such as Epstein and Maxwell. 

  Trumps' actions scream 'I'm GUILTY" and I do believe him, you should as well. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.1  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Igknorantzruls @3.1    9 months ago
Just out today, the FBI apparently interviewed a young teenage girl, 13 or 14 years of age, who along with a witness have claimed Trump abused her.

Let's say that's true. do you imagine the FBI covered it up for years? That numerous agents lied on their reports about what they found?  That all these agents just forgot about her?

OR maybe, just maybe, they found her claims to be inconsistent with reality, easily falsifiable or otherwise not credible? And of course, nothing is stopped this girl from coming forward and telling the public her story, using lawyers to recoup millions etc... 

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3.1.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.1    9 months ago
Let's say that's true. do you imagine the FBI covered it up for years? That numerous agents lied on their reports about what they found?  That all these agents just forgot about her?

I believe it IS True. 

There are four separate interviews with this victim.

I don't believe the FBI agents really have a say in it, but with frat boy Kash, no Pateling what isn't being released. Between him and couldn't even look at the victims blondi Bondi, there was little chance of this getting out till some investigative reporting apparently turned it up.

  She was interviewed from July 2019 till October 2019, then suddenly disappeared or chose not to press charges further or  something.

  I'm sure it had NOTHING at all to do with the 'suicide' of Jeffry Epstein in prison on August 10th 2019 I believe, while on suicide watch yet, cause I know I'd feel safe having career ending evidence on arguably the most powerful 'man' in the world....  

What could possibly sway her to not pursue this...?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.3  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Igknorantzruls @3.1.2    9 months ago
There are four separate interviews with this victim

I don't believe the FBI agents really have a say in it, 

Of course they do. They wrote the summaries that were released.

 frat boy Kash, no Pateling what isn't being released

Right. All the agents who said "we have a legitimate victim" are keeping quiet and knew to keep quiet before Trump was elected becasue they knew Trump would be elected and appoint Patel. It's a massive conspiracy involving FBI agents with the gift of knowing the future. 

She was interviewed from July 2019 till October 2019, then suddenly disappeared or chose not to press charges further or  something

So the Biden DOJ covered up this shocking story to protect Trump.  That's where we are at. 

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3.1.4  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.3    9 months ago
She was interviewed from July 2019 till October 2019, then suddenly disappeared or chose not to press charges further or  something So the Biden DOJ covered up this shocking story to protect Trump.  That's where we are at. 

Slow down there fellow. Trump was the POS potUS in 2019!

Epstein somehow committed suicide while on suicide watch. The victim did not want to pursue her accusations for fear of having the sudden urge to kill herself, like Epstein, and a few others in this mess. 

 That pussy Garland slow walked investigating Trump leading to him never making it to court on stuff he admitted to in the documents case, besides the mountains of evidence from Jan 6th. So pursuing Trump with a scared shitless reluctant victim probably wasn't top priority, and Biden didn't push Garland around like Bondi the heartless Trump lackey

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.5  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Igknorantzruls @3.1.4    9 months ago
low down there fellow. Trump was the POS potUS in 2019!

Who was President from 2021-2025? Why did they cover it up?

he victim did not want to pursue her accusations for fear of having the sudden urge to kill herself, like Epstein, and a few others in this mess. 

Now you are unashamedly making things up.

This is why it's unfalsifiable. No matter what, you'll just come up some story to explain why all these people with obvious motivations to expose Trump, (including the supposed victim) decided to cover up evidence that would have put away. 

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3.1.6  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.5    9 months ago

We'll soon see who is correct.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.7  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Igknorantzruls @3.1.6    9 months ago

It took two seconds of looking at this story to realize it's made  up..

The woman who directly named Trump in her abuse allegation claimed that around 1983, when she was around 13 years old, Epstein introduced her to Trump, "who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out."

Just start with the date. Epstein and Trump didn't know each other in 1983. A simple google search debunked it.  I bet numerous other details she provided don't make any sense either. 

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
3.1.8  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.7    9 months ago

In a 2002 interview with New York Magazine, Trump said he had known Epstein for 15 years, placing the beginning of their relationship to around 1987.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.9  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Igknorantzruls @3.1.2    9 months ago
  She was interviewed from July 2019 till October 2019, then suddenly disappeared or chose not to press charges further or  something.

I guess you didn't read the story.  She did file suit against Epstein's estate and then withdrew it. Her suit didn't even mention Trump.

In the December 2019 filing, "Jane Doe 4" does not mention Trump, and the woman voluntarily dismissed her claims against Epstein's estate in December 2021.
 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3.1.10  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.9    9 months ago
She did file suit against Epstein's estate and then withdrew it. Her suit didn't even mention Trump.

This story has been out for some time as I recall. In the FBI files it is said that she didn't to mention Trump for fear of retaliation. Then in the time frame (3 months) she is being interviewed, Jeffrey Epstein , while under suicide watch, suddenly commits suicide, with video tape time missing....

Do you think this victim wasn't threatened ? Trump, the guy that threatens about everyone (except Putin) including Judges on our courts, former presidents, and SOS's while sometimes finding evidence, that has now been proven many times to be insufficient.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  seeder  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

You know things are going to bad for Democrats when they take to the pages of the NYT to argue realizing the Epstein files was a mistake. All they've accomplished is making asses of themselves. 

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
4.1  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    9 months ago
making asses of themselves. 

Again.

 
 

Who is online




Dismayed Patriot


124 visitors