╌>

Judge who helped illegal immigrant evade ICE walks away with $5,000 fine, no prison time

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  4 months ago  •  1 comments

By:   Story by Paris Apodaca

Judge who helped illegal immigrant evade ICE walks away with $5,000 fine, no prison time
“Former Wisconsin state judge Hannah Dugan betrayed her oath and the people she served when she obstructed federal law enforcement during an immigration enforcement operation,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche posted on X. “Today, a federal jury of her peers found her guilty and sent a clear message: the American people respect law and order.”

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


A former Wisconsin judge received only a $5,000 fine after a jury found her guilty of helping illegal immigrants evade federal agents.

The jury found former Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan guilty of obstruction with the judge fining her $5,000 determined Wednesday during sentence hearing,  according  to Spectrum News 1.

Dugan spoke for the first time during the trials explaining that she upheld “decorum” and “safety,” aspects that the “public deserve.”

Dugan’s defense team used character witnesses to demonstrate that Dugan acted as a good public servant and Christian by helping illegal immigrants, the outlet reported. “I am a public servant who’s just trying to do my job.”

She was also a member of the League of Women Voters, the Milwaukee Turners and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored people, and the immigration Catholic Charities, DCNF  reported .

Earlier this year, Dugan retired after Republican law makers prepared impeachment A spokesperson for Evers said the governor received the letter and will move quickly to appoint her replacement,  according  the DCNF.

Dugan’s defense team and Judge Lynn Adelman didn’t immediately respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

“Former Wisconsin state judge Hannah Dugan betrayed her oath and the people she served when she obstructed federal law enforcement during an immigration enforcement operation,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche posted on X. “Today, a federal jury of her peers found her guilty and sent a clear message: the American people respect law and order.”

Prosecutors  said  Dugan confronted Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and FBI agents outside her courtroom protecting and leading 31-year-old Mexican national Eduardo Flores-Ruiz to a private jury door, but agents followed him outside arresting him.

Border Patrol agents has already arrested Flores-Ruiz prior in Nogales, Ariz., sending him to Mexico, DCNF  reported .

ICE removed Flores-Ruiz November 13, 2025,  according  to a Homeland Security Press Release.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    4 months ago

The judge in this case, who allowed this fellow activist to walk with no jail time is a Clinton appointee with an activist record.

OIP.L7mGyewuNsnHC_NG7l2f-wHaE8?r=0&cb=thfc1falcon4&rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain&o=7&rm=3
 Judge Lynn Adelman

Judge Adelman is most famous for ruling that the Wisconsin Voter ID law was unconstitutional.

Adelman was overturned on appeal with the Appeals Court offering a particularly stunning rebuke:

“the district judge found as a fact that the majority of the Supreme Court was wrong about benefits such as better record keeping and promoting public confidence. Maybe that testimony will eventually persuade the Justices themselves, but in our hierarchical judicial system a district court cannot declare a statute unconstitutional just because he thinks (with or without the support of a political scientist) that the dissent was right and the majority wrong.” [Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744, 750 (7th Cir. 2014)] The Panel continued: “The district judge heard from one political scientist, whose view may or may not be representative of the profession's. After a majority of the Supreme Court has concluded that photo ID requirements promote confidence, a single district judge cannot say as a “fact” that they do not, even if 20 political scientists disagree with the Supreme Court.” [ Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744, 750 (7th Cir. 2014)]

Lynn Adelman - Wikipedia
 
 

Who is online










95 visitors