╌>

House approves long-awaited stock trading ban — here’s who the largest traders are

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  4 months ago  •  18 comments

By:   Story by Ryan King

House approves long-awaited stock trading ban — here’s who the largest traders are
“Republicans are trying to pull a trick this week. They say we are voting on an ‘insider trading’ bill but have snuck in massive SAVE Act-style voter suppression measures to it,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) declared. “This is a GOP effort to sabotage national mail-in voting, disguised as a trading ban.” “I’m voting NO.”

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


WASHINGTON — The House passed a sweeping set of restrictions on stock trades by lawmakers and their spouses that was paired with a voter ID provision that scared off many Democrats. 

The “Stop Insider Trading Act” cleared the House 232 to 198, with the full support of Republicans and 13 Democrats on board.

This includes Reps. Kathy Castor of Florida, Henry Cuellar of Texas, Don Davis of North Carolina, Jared Golden of Maine, Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, Marcy Kaptur of Ohio, Susie Lee of Nevada, Jared Moskowitz of Florida, Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, Darren Soto of Florida, and Derek Tran of California.

Complicating things for Democrats was the voter ID provision in the bill, which would’ve required photo identification to cast a ballot. 

Given that dynamic, there appears to be little appetite for the “Stop Insider Trading Act” in its current form in the Senate, which is subject to the 60-vote filibuster.

“Republicans are trying to pull a trick this week. They say we are voting on an ‘insider trading’ bill but have snuck in massive SAVE Act-style voter suppression measures to it,”  Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) declared . “This is a GOP effort to sabotage national mail-in voting, disguised as a trading ban.”

“I’m voting NO.”

Still, the measure is among the most significant attempts to police and stamp out the risk of insider trading by lawmakers since the  passage of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act in 2012.

Under the bill, lawmakers, their spouses, and dependent children are restricted from purchasing individual stocks of publicly traded companies, with few exceptions, such as certain investment funds, while in office.

The bill also stipulates that lawmakers, their spouses, and dependent children can’t sell stock without filing notice between 7–14 days in advance. Violators will get hit with a fee and be subject to ethics scrutiny.

Critics argue that, despite proponents’ characterizations of the bill, it’s not a true ban on congressional stock trading, because lawmakers will still have the ability to sell their assets.

Here’s who could be impacted the most if the bill were to ever become law,  based on data from Quiver Quantitative . Notably, calculating exact numbers is tricky because lawmakers are only required to give ranges in their financial disclosures.

Ro Khanna

AA28twHu.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=463&y=107&s=152&d=152

Rep. Ro Khanna’s (D-Calif.) household traded the most frequently  — 4,772 times — and the most expensive assets last year, totaling $65.9 million, per Quiver Quantitative.

The Silicon Valley-based rep’s portfolio of trades appears to be heavily diversified across industrial, tech, financial, health care, and other sectors.

“I do not own or trade stocks and have led the fight to ban stock trading,” Khanna  claimed on social media  last month.

“My household’s only investments are in a trust that my in-laws set up before marriage, managed independently by a third party trustee in full compliance with the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) and House Rules.”

Khanna also penned a  detailed Substack  explaining his family’s finances and underscoring that his “household’s compliance has been independently verified by the watchdogs who track congressional trading.”

Nancy Pelosi

AA28tO3T.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=427&y=150&s=172&d=172

Perhaps the  most notorious sitting lawmaker for stock trades is Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.),  whose husband, Paul, made a fortune over the practice.

Pelosi’s household is listed as having made $52,525,000 worth of trades over the past year, spanning 21 occasions.

“Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,” her spokesperson, Ian Krager, told The Post.

The former speaker has  publicly backed efforts  to restrict congressional stock trading  since 2022  after initially defending the practice.

“We are a free market economy. They should be able to participate in that,” the former House speaker told a reporter five years ago when pressed on the fortune her husband has amassed trading stocks while she’s in office.

Michael McCaul

AA28twHy.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=369&y=171&s=296&d=296

The  retiring former Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee , Rep. Michael McCaul’s (R-Texas) family, moved some $48 million worth of assets across 980 different trades.

McCaul’s team has  previously addressed controversy  over his family’s stock trading, noting that his “wife has assets she solely owns, and a third-party manager” makes purchases “without her direction.”

The Post reached out to the congressman’s office for comment.

Most of the stocks in his portfolio appear to be significantly diversified, including in the financial, tech, and health care sectors.

Tony Wied

AA28sZZS.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=438&y=186&s=181&d=181

Rep. Tony Wied’s (R-Wis.) household moved some $25.9 million across 19 different trades, with most of the assets coming from the tech sector.

Wied has backed the Stop Insider Trading Act, but argued it should’ve gone further to prevent potential corruption on Capitol Hill.

“I plan to support this symbolic gesture when it comes to a vote, but let’s be real — insider trading is already entirely illegal,” Wied told The Post.


“If my colleagues on both sides of the aisle were serious about solving the actual problem, we would have gone much further with this legislation and addressed the real issue plaguing the swamp: career politicians using their connections and insider knowledge to enrich themselves as lobbyists and federal contractors after leaving office.”

Gil Cisneros

AA28tBCJ.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=442&y=251&s=152&d=152

Rep. Gil Cisneros (D-Calif.) and his family were listed as moving some $12 million on over 1,128 occasions, which included investments in tech, health care and industrials.

“My wife and I have always employed outside financial advisors who have a fiduciary responsibility to maintain a diverse portfolio,” Cisneros told The Post. “We do not manage the day-to-day trading of our investment portfolio, nor have we ever suggested a trade while serving in Congress or at the Department of Defense.”


Cisneros further stressed that he has “always complied with all rules and regulations regarding stock trading and financial disclosures” and backs stronger ethics measures.

Notable mentions

Quiver Quantitative listed Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) as a top trader in Congress, but his office has attributed that to an error in his financial disclosures.

Rounding out the top 10 on the list for sitting lawmakers moving the largest volume of trades last year are: Reps. Cleo Fields (D-La.), Lisa McClain (R-Mich.), Tim Moore (R-NC), Gottheimer and Kevin Hern (R-Okla.), according to data from Quiver Quantitative.

“Chairwoman McClain’s investments are a matter of public record. They have been made in line with all House rules and applicable laws,” House GOP communications director Joe Buccino told The Post about McClain.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    4 months ago

Gee, Ro Khanna leads the list!

Ro says It isn't his fault ... his trust fund managers make all the investments for him .... and he never, ever communicates with them!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 months ago

funny how the biggest inside trader in DC isn't mentioned, you know, the guy that has the power to manipulate the market from the bully pulpit ... here's a hint - 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 months ago

What's makes this sad is that there are people dumb enough to defend him.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2    4 months ago

Or deflect away from him and pretend he doesn't exist.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.2.1    4 months ago

In one way, the deflection would mean something if it weren't always to the same shit.  Every.  Time.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.2    4 months ago

Boring is an understatement 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2    4 months ago

Always!

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2  evilone    4 months ago

It's dead in the Senate because they attached voting requirements to it.

“We are voting on a stock trading ban for members of Congress… BUT Republicans added voter-ID in the legislation,” Mr. Massie wrote in a social media post. “Not to get Dems to vote for voter-ID, but to get them to vote against the stock trading ban, so they can use it in the Nov. election.”
 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  evilone @2    4 months ago

the newest maga poison pill used to hobble their legislative duties ...

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1.1  evilone  replied to  devangelical @2.1    4 months ago

Yes, it was a popular bill without the voting measures, but the Freedom Caucus wouldn't allow any bill to reach the floor without them.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.2  devangelical  replied to  evilone @2.1.1    4 months ago

another maga solution in search of an imaginary problem ...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  evilone @2    4 months ago

Yes, Massie is correct. Let the dems vote against it. If only they didn't hate voter verification so much!  The question is WHY? Especially since democrat voters want voter ID.

If you combine the fact that the same democrat officials want all the illegal migrants that Biden let in to stay, it becomes clear and 2+2=4

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    4 months ago

185 votes by democrats to support insider trading and vote fraud….

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  devangelical  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    4 months ago

185 votes by democrats to deter maga traitors from their assault on the constitution, again ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    4 months ago

Are you surprised they want to keep doing it?  

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.2.1  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2    4 months ago
Are you surprised they want to keep doing it?  

Most of them want to be the next Pelosi

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @3.2.1    4 months ago

I'm kind of amazed she does all that with the amount of alcohol in her system.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
4  Mark in Wyoming     4 months ago

I forget who said it , but the old quote of " whoever becomes rich while working for the federal government , is likely a crook ." not word for word , but close enough .

 
 

Who is online









116 visitors