Jan. 6 Committee Announces Surprise Hearing Tomorrow For ‘Recently Obtained Evidence’

  
Via:  John Russell  •  2 months ago  •  66 comments


Jan. 6 Committee Announces Surprise Hearing Tomorrow For ‘Recently Obtained Evidence’
Despite the cryptic nature of the announcement, it’s possible the evidence will come from the documentary footage the January 6 Committee recently received from filmmaker Alex Holder, who recently provided them with unseen footage of ex-President Donald Trump and his family.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



www.msn.com   /en-us/news/politics/just-in-jan-6-committee-announces-surprise-hearing-tomorrow-for-recently-obtained-evidence/ar-AAYV6dR

JUST IN: Jan. 6 Committee Announces Surprise Hearing Tomorrow For ‘Recently Obtained Evidence’


2-2 minutes   Invalid Date




T he January 6 Committee announced plans to hold a last-minute hearing on Tuesday after they were previously expected to take a break for the next two weeks.

The Committee sent out a media notice announcing a new hearing for 1:00 p.m. ET, saying it will be used to “present recently obtained evidence and receive witness testimony.” The precise nature of this evidence and testimony is currently unknown at this time.

The new hearing comes as a surprise since Committee Chairman   Bennie Thompson   (D-MS)   previously said   there wouldn’t be any more hearings until mid-July. POLITICO’s   Kyle Cheney   observed that the evidence the committee alludes too “must be time sensitive,” given the hearing’s sudden formation.

Despite the cryptic nature of the announcement, it’s possible the evidence will come from the documentary footage the January 6 Committee   recently received   from filmmaker   Alex Holder , who recently provided them with unseen footage of ex-President   Donald Trump   and his family. The hearing comes after the committee’s last proceeding heard from Justice Department officials who   testified   on Trump’s attempts to pressure them into backing up his “rigged” election claims.




Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 months ago

I expect this to be at least a semi-bombshell. The committee has not messed around so far and I doubt they would start now. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Guide
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 months ago

Nah...they'll just present old news warmed over..

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    2 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Guide
1.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    2 months ago

removed for context

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.1.3  JBB  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    2 months ago

That's what Nixon said of John Dean's testimony!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.4  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    2 months ago
Nah...they'll just present old news warmed over..

Do you recognize that you were wrong?    This is quite new news.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 months ago
I expect this to be at least a semi-bombshell.

So we have evolved from smoking guns to semi-bombshells now.

Swell.

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Expert
1.2.1  Nowhere Man  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2    2 months ago
So we have evolved from smoking guns to semi-bombshells now.

[deleted

 
 
 
squiggy
Sophomore Quiet
1.3  squiggy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 months ago

" ‘Recently Obtained Evidence’ "

It's even in quotes - PT Barnum would be proud of it all.

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 months ago
I expect this to be at least a semi-bombshell.

So all the normal pomp and circumstance for yet another failure.  What are they up to now, 60 "bombshells" and "smoking guns?  

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Freshman Expert
2  magicschoolbusdropout    2 months ago

Despite the cryptic nature of the announcement, it’s possible the evidence will come from the documentary footage the January 6 Committee recently received from filmmaker Alex Holder,

ooooo, shiver, I can't wait. It's just like what hearing an advertising for a sequel to the bestest of the best  movie on the planet does to me.

Even Bernie Thompson is suprised.

SUPRISE !

Definitely nothing more than another "TV Sitcom" this Committe has become.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @2    2 months ago
Definitely nothing more than another "TV Sitcom" this Committe has become.

Only to those who don't care about the facts and the dozens of Republicans testimonies that prove beyond a shadow of doubt that Trump did in fact knowingly try to illegally overturn a free and fair election he knew he lost which went as far as instigating a mob to attack the capital in an attempt to stop the certification. To anyone who doesn't give a shit about the constitution and our system of government it's just another TV sitcom.

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Freshman Expert
2.1.1  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1    2 months ago
Only to those who don't care about the facts

Still waiting for Shifty Schiffs irrefutable Facts on "Russia, Russia, Russia" !

The "Facts" you know, are coming from a TV Production being helped by an NBC person, to help boost Ratings !

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1    2 months ago

On one side we have those who know the facts, post links and quotes, and understand the evidence that has been presented. On the other side we have those who use phrases like "Shifty Schiff" to no avail.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Sophomore Expert
2.1.3  al Jizzerror  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1    2 months ago

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.4  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.2    2 months ago

Your side knows facts? jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

This is the reason Democrats will be out on their ears after midterms. Complete disconnection with reality.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.2    2 months ago

Moronic.  Hillary was off by half.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
2.1.6  pat wilson  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.2    2 months ago
phrases like "Shifty Schiff"

Junk bumper sticker phrases. Feeble attempts at some sort of intellectual discourse.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3  Ed-NavDoc    2 months ago

Ho hum. Another alleged "bombshell" from the liberal left. I can hardly wait. Yawwnnn...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3    2 months ago

I'm sure you felt the same way about the Benghazi hearings or any Hunter Biden stories

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
3.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3    2 months ago
Another alleged "bombshell"

They're up to what, 40 or 50 now?  And every previous one resulted in zero actionable "evidence".  You would think that after so many years of "investigating" they would have something.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2    2 months ago

At least that and probably more, and still have not/cannot accomplished anything.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.3  TᵢG  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3    2 months ago

Now that you have heard the testimony, what is your informed opinion?

What is your opinion regarding a sitting PotUS who knew that his supporters were armed and demanded that they be allowed past the metal detectors so that his audience would look bigger?

What about a PotUS who knew he was talking to an armed crowd yet encouraged them to march on the Capitol?

What about a PotUS whose supporters engaged in an attack on the Capitol; breaking and entering and communicating an intent to kill the V.P.?

What about a PotUS who knew his supporters threatened to kill Pence and whose response was that 'he deserves it'?

What about a PotUS who allowed his supporters to continue their attack for three hours and who refused to listen to the pleas of staff, family and 'friends' advising him to stop them?

Seems to me that this testimony provided insight that, while not entirely surprising, is new and devastating.   

Let's assume the testimony under oath by the R aid to Trump's chief of staff is accurate.  

What is your informed opinion now?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Sophomore Expert
3.3.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  TᵢG @3.3    2 months ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Sophomore Expert
4  al Jizzerror    2 months ago

I understand there's going to be testimony from a witness who needs protection.

I'm glad the hearing doesn't start until 1PM.

I need more popcorn....

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
5  igknorantzrulz    2 months ago

As the 'Right' declares, wihout seeing, nothing to see here, whilst even after seeing in your face evidence that they would CRUCIFY, a Dem for, their answer to ANYTHING they DO SEE DONE B 4 their very eyes, by Trump, Will NEVER be enough for those too far gone 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1  Ronin2  replied to  igknorantzrulz @5    2 months ago

So sayeth those that supported the Clintons blindly; and still do.

That deride any findings that come forth from the Hunter Biden laptop. 

That still insist Trump colluded with Russia; that Hillary's campaign didn't pay for the Steele dossier; that the special prosecutor didn't staff his investigation with Clinton and Obama sycophants; and that the Democrat impeachments that violated every rule in the House were clean.

The left aren't just gone; they have left the planet.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @5.1    2 months ago

Your projection, deflection, denial, and delusion are so freaking tiresome.  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
5.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.1    2 months ago

Much like your cut n' paste.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.1.2    2 months ago

Fuck off

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
5.1.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.1.2    2 months ago

jrSmiley_28_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.1.2    2 months ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1.6  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.1.2    2 months ago

I think you touched a raw nerve there.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
5.1.7  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.3    2 months ago

Thanks for something new.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.8  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5.1.6    2 months ago

Nope.  You may follow the same advice though.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
5.1.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.1.2    2 months ago

jrSmiley_28_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1.10  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.8    2 months ago

I don't think so, but I'm not the one who feels the need to tell somebody else to F@#k off am I?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5.1.10    2 months ago

He didn't touch a raw nerve. [deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2  Tessylo  replied to  igknorantzrulz @5    2 months ago

There really is nothing to see here regarding Hunter Biden.

So desperate, deplorable, and pathetic that all they have to rebut is - Hillary Clinton, or the Clintons.  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
5.2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @5.2    2 months ago
There really is nothing to see here regarding Hunter Biden.

Au contraire, there is plenty to see.  Hunter  is devoting his energies to the visual arts, bringing his vast  experiences to bear. The results are powerful, impactful, lasting paintings ranging from photogenic to mixed media to the abstract. His chosen substrates are canvas, YUPO paper, wood, and metal on which he affixes oil, acrylic, ink along with the written word; all of which creates a unique experience that has become the Hunter signature. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Guide
5.2.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @5.2    2 months ago

The investigation into Hunter Biden is just getting started. It will be going full blast after the midterms.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @5.2.2    2 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Hallux
Junior Principal
5.2.4  Hallux  replied to  Greg Jones @5.2.2    2 months ago
The investigation into Hunter Biden is just getting started.

Oh goody, another 25 year drag it out Clinton redux frenzy.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Sophomore Expert
5.2.5  al Jizzerror  replied to  Greg Jones @5.2.2    2 months ago
The investigation into Hunter Biden is just getting started.

Oh, good.

Hunter Biden should be impeached!

That's a high priority for Trumpanzees.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6  Tessylo    2 months ago

290796984_159043343326069_1512821525297929335_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296&_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=Hm1CY5LiZUQAX9TqiX1&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=00_AT_1cghrvX5opcupSWOdxZFb1e4KaCDeoHNS4sFANVxaAQ&oe=62BFD8B6

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @6    2 months ago

Before Hunter Thompson, we had Jean Paul,  Annie Cohen-Solal’s Sartre biography described Sartre's daily drug consumption as: two packs of cigarettes, several tobacco pipes, over a quart of alcohol (wine, beer, vodka, whisky etc.), two hundred milligrams of amphetamines, fifteen grams of aspirin, a boat load of barbiturates, some coffee, and tea.

 
 
 
Hallux
Junior Principal
6.1.1  Hallux  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @6.1    2 months ago

Pffft! You should try a biography of Arthur Rimbaud.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Sophomore Expert
6.1.2  al Jizzerror  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @6.1    2 months ago
two packs of cigarettes, several tobacco pipes, over a quart of alcohol (wine, beer, vodka, whisky etc.), two hundred milligrams of amphetamines, fifteen grams of aspirin, a boat load of barbiturates, some coffee, and tea.

Breakfast....

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
6.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @6.1.1    2 months ago

Thanks, I understand that he liked to par-tay.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  seeder  JohnRussell    2 months ago

The secret witness is Cassidy Hutchinson , who was Mark Meadows chief of staff, and was in numerous meetings regarding the upcoming Jan 6th. 

She supposedly knows "where the bodies are buried". 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
7.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @7    2 months ago

Maybe she'll be their John Dean.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Sophomore Expert
7.1.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @7.1    2 months ago
Maybe she'll be their John Dean.

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Guide
7.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @7    2 months ago

Breathlessly awaiting this  latest "bombshell"

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
7.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Greg Jones @7.2    2 months ago

You're going to be waiting a very long time.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Greg Jones @7.2    2 months ago

I know I sure will not be holding my breath waiting.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @7.2.2    2 months ago

If Trump is the Republican nominee in 2024 and the Dem nominee is Biden, will you vote for Trump? 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.2.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.3    2 months ago

Regardless of what some on NT may think, I am not a big Trump fan. I did not vote for him the first time and it is highly unlikely that I would vote for him a second time. I voted 3rd party in the last two elections. I did/do not like Trump much, but I disliked HRC and Biden even more. It is time for newer and fresher younger blood in the White House.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Sophomore Expert
7.2.5  al Jizzerror  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @7.2.4    2 months ago
It is time for newer and fresher younger blood in the White House.

Then AOC it is.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.6  Texan1211  replied to  al Jizzerror @7.2.5    2 months ago
Then AOC it is.

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @7.2.4    2 months ago

So after hearing he is a traitor who sent armed supporters up to the Capitol you still have doubts. 

i feel sorry for you. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Freshman Principal
7.2.8  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.7    2 months ago
you still have doubts.

How did you infer that from 7.2.4?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.2.9  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  al Jizzerror @7.2.5    2 months ago

I said fresher and younger, not brain dead!

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.2.10  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.7    2 months ago

As a conservative, I tried to give you a polite response, but apparently that is a foreign concept to you. I never said I have doubts. That is your perception. I made my position perfectly clear, but you refuse to accept that and just cannot stand the idea that other people do no share your particular political worldview. It simply has to be your way or not at all. I respect your right to your views and opinions, but it seems you are unable to reciprocate. You would rather hate any and all Republicans and/or right leaning conservatives that are not leftist liberal Democrats.

I feel sorry for you even more.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.11  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @7.2.10    2 months ago

Just for fun, let me quote you

"it is highly unlikely that I would vote for him a second time."

Highly unlikely is not "no". In fact, highly unlikely things happen all the time. 

It sounds like you are waiting to see if Biden is the opponent. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.2.12  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.11    2 months ago

I should not need to clarify this for you but I will. My meaning was that if he chose to run a second time, it is highly unlikely that I would vote for him. Please cease trying to play word games with my quotes.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
7.2.13  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @7.2.8    2 months ago

Wish fulfillment I guess.

 
 

Who is online

Tacos!


35 visitors