Jan. 6 Committee Announces Surprise Hearing Tomorrow For ‘Recently Obtained Evidence’
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
JUST IN: Jan. 6 Committee Announces Surprise Hearing Tomorrow For ‘Recently Obtained Evidence’
2-2 minutes Invalid Date
T he January 6 Committee announced plans to hold a last-minute hearing on Tuesday after they were previously expected to take a break for the next two weeks.
The Committee sent out a media notice announcing a new hearing for 1:00 p.m. ET, saying it will be used to “present recently obtained evidence and receive witness testimony.” The precise nature of this evidence and testimony is currently unknown at this time.
The new hearing comes as a surprise since Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS) previously said there wouldn’t be any more hearings until mid-July. POLITICO’s Kyle Cheney observed that the evidence the committee alludes too “must be time sensitive,” given the hearing’s sudden formation.
Despite the cryptic nature of the announcement, it’s possible the evidence will come from the documentary footage the January 6 Committee recently received from filmmaker Alex Holder , who recently provided them with unseen footage of ex-President Donald Trump and his family. The hearing comes after the committee’s last proceeding heard from Justice Department officials who testified on Trump’s attempts to pressure them into backing up his “rigged” election claims.
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Tags
Who is online
272 visitors
I expect this to be at least a semi-bombshell. The committee has not messed around so far and I doubt they would start now.
Nah...they'll just present old news warmed over..
[deleted]
removed for context
That's what Nixon said of John Dean's testimony!
Do you recognize that you were wrong? This is quite new news.
" ‘Recently Obtained Evidence’ "
It's even in quotes - PT Barnum would be proud of it all.
[deleted]
So all the normal pomp and circumstance for yet another failure. What are they up to now, 60 "bombshells" and "smoking guns?
Ho hum. Another alleged "bombshell" from the liberal left. I can hardly wait. Yawwnnn...
They're up to what, 40 or 50 now? And every previous one resulted in zero actionable "evidence". You would think that after so many years of "investigating" they would have something.
At least that and probably more, and still have not/cannot accomplished anything.
Now that you have heard the testimony, what is your informed opinion?
What is your opinion regarding a sitting PotUS who knew that his supporters were armed and demanded that they be allowed past the metal detectors so that his audience would look bigger?
What about a PotUS who knew he was talking to an armed crowd yet encouraged them to march on the Capitol?
What about a PotUS whose supporters engaged in an attack on the Capitol; breaking and entering and communicating an intent to kill the V.P.?
What about a PotUS who knew his supporters threatened to kill Pence and whose response was that 'he deserves it'?
What about a PotUS who allowed his supporters to continue their attack for three hours and who refused to listen to the pleas of staff, family and 'friends' advising him to stop them?
Seems to me that this testimony provided insight that, while not entirely surprising, is new and devastating.
Let's assume the testimony under oath by the R aid to Trump's chief of staff is accurate.
What is your informed opinion now?
I understand there's going to be testimony from a witness who needs protection.
I'm glad the hearing doesn't start until 1PM.
I need more popcorn....
As the 'Right' declares, wihout seeing, nothing to see here, whilst even after seeing in your face evidence that they would CRUCIFY, a Dem for, their answer to ANYTHING they DO SEE DONE B 4 their very eyes, by Trump, Will NEVER be enough for those too far gone
So sayeth those that supported the Clintons blindly; and still do.
That deride any findings that come forth from the Hunter Biden laptop.
That still insist Trump colluded with Russia; that Hillary's campaign didn't pay for the Steele dossier; that the special prosecutor didn't staff his investigation with Clinton and Obama sycophants; and that the Democrat impeachments that violated every rule in the House were clean.
The left aren't just gone; they have left the planet.
Much like your cut n' paste.
I think you touched a raw nerve there.
Thanks for something new.
I don't think so, but I'm not the one who feels the need to tell somebody else to F@#k off am I?
The secret witness is Cassidy Hutchinson , who was Mark Meadows chief of staff, and was in numerous meetings regarding the upcoming Jan 6th.
She supposedly knows "where the bodies are buried".
Maybe she'll be their John Dean.
Breathlessly awaiting this latest "bombshell"
You're going to be waiting a very long time.
I know I sure will not be holding my breath waiting.
If Trump is the Republican nominee in 2024 and the Dem nominee is Biden, will you vote for Trump?
Regardless of what some on NT may think, I am not a big Trump fan. I did not vote for him the first time and it is highly unlikely that I would vote for him a second time. I voted 3rd party in the last two elections. I did/do not like Trump much, but I disliked HRC and Biden even more. It is time for newer and fresher younger blood in the White House.
Then AOC it is.
So after hearing he is a traitor who sent armed supporters up to the Capitol you still have doubts.
i feel sorry for you.
How did you infer that from 7.2.4?
I said fresher and younger, not brain dead!
As a conservative, I tried to give you a polite response, but apparently that is a foreign concept to you. I never said I have doubts. That is your perception. I made my position perfectly clear, but you refuse to accept that and just cannot stand the idea that other people do no share your particular political worldview. It simply has to be your way or not at all. I respect your right to your views and opinions, but it seems you are unable to reciprocate. You would rather hate any and all Republicans and/or right leaning conservatives that are not leftist liberal Democrats.
I feel sorry for you even more.
Just for fun, let me quote you
"it is highly unlikely that I would vote for him a second time."
Highly unlikely is not "no". In fact, highly unlikely things happen all the time.
It sounds like you are waiting to see if Biden is the opponent.
I should not need to clarify this for you but I will. My meaning was that if he chose to run a second time, it is highly unlikely that I would vote for him. Please cease trying to play word games with my quotes.
Wish fulfillment I guess.