╌>

Ann Coulter Likened to Rat Jumping 'Sinking Ship' After Turning on Trump

  
Via:  John Russell  •  4 years ago  •  29 comments


Ann Coulter Likened to Rat Jumping 'Sinking Ship' After Turning on Trump
"Trump fans are having a lot of fun, but it isn't indicative of a movement that's sweeping the nation," she said on the podcast. "It's not the party of Trump. It's safe to come back, and it's safe for Republicans to stand up and run without Donald Trump." Responding to an article about Coulter's comments, Twitter user @HazelEros wrote: "Oh my, the rats leaving the sinking ship?"

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


www.newsweek.com   /ann-coulter-likened-rat-jumping-sinking-ship-after-turning-trump-1738660

Ann Coulter Likened to Rat Jumping 'Sinking Ship' After Turning on Trump






After conservative commentator Ann Coulter  declared former President  Donald Trump 's political reign in the Republican Party to be "done," some social media users compared her to a "rat" abandoning a "sinking ship."



In a recent podcast episode titled   Trump's Done   that Coulter tweeted out Tuesday,   she said   the segment of Americans that remain supportive of the former president does not reflect a nationwide pattern.

"Trump fans are having a lot of fun, but it isn't indicative of a movement that's sweeping the nation," she said on the podcast. "It's not the party of Trump. It's safe to come back, and it's safe for   Republicans   to stand up and run without Donald Trump."

Responding to an article about Coulter's comments,   Twitter   user @HazelEros   wrote : "Oh my, the rats leaving the sinking ship?"

Trump has yet to officially announce whether he will seek re-election in 2024 after his loss to President   Joe Biden   in 2020. But even as the former president deals with the aftermath of the   FBI's raid   at his Mar-a-Lago home and the ongoing   House committee investigation   into the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot,   recent polls   indicate that Trump would still be the top pick for Republican voters in the next election.

coulter-compared-rat-jumping-ship.jpg?w=790&f=eece3ec682de54d52ba8d577a2f031fa

Ann Coulter speaks during Politicon 2018 at the Los Angeles Convention Center on October 20, 2018. After Coulter declared former President Donald Trump's political reign in the Republican party to be "done," some social media users compared her to a "rat" abandoning a "sinking ship."   Rich Polk/Getty Images for Politicon

The podcast was not the first time Coulter—who once praised the former president in her 2016 book   In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!— has criticized Trump.

In November of 2021, Coulter said that   Trump was "abjectly stupid"   and accused him of "betraying" his base over failing to follow through on his promise to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. While hundreds of miles of border wall was built, U.S. News reported, the project was not completed before Trump left office and Biden halted construction.

"I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was," she said during an interview on Andrew Sullivan's Dishcast. "That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all, is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is."

She also called Trump   a "liar and con man"   this year after he criticized politicians who wouldn't say if they'd received a COVID-19 vaccine booster in an apparent dig at Florida Governor   Ron DeSantis .

But on Tuesday, a   tweet   from Dash Dobrofsky noted that Coulter's declaration about Trump being "done" stated that the "establishment is turning on [Trump] before his indictment."

"Rats scurrying off the sinking MAGA ship," it added.

While Trump has not been indicted in connection with the Mar-a-Lago raid, the former president's ex-attorney   told   Newsweek   that the unsealed affidavit supporting the   FBI 's search of Mar-a-Lago gives the Justice Department enough evidence to indict him.

Another user, Richard Lee, tweeted on Tuesday that Coulter "is the latest rat to abandon the USS Trump."

Newsweek   was unable to find a way to contact Coulter for comment by publication time.





Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    4 years ago

She "turns on" Trump in a very fickle way. As soon as he says something she likes she will be back having his back. 

The lady is pretty much washed up so she tries to stay relevant. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 years ago

 "I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was," she said during an interview on Andrew Sullivan's Dishcast. "That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all, is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is."

Same here. Couldn't stand the loud mouthed fool. Didn't realize he had no filter between brain and  mouth, or the political instincts to know when to shut up. Still a better choice than Hillary or Biden

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
1.1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago

WHY ?

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
1.2  pat wilson  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 years ago

Ann who ?

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
1.3  squiggy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 years ago

This would have worked for anybody but you, John. You beat the republimagaturds here every day. Now that one turns - you beat that, too. You aren't going to gain any converts with that strategy.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2  Trout Giggles    4 years ago

I got nothing. Which is pretty much what Ann Coulter is...nothing. When was the last time she wrote a book?

However, I don't think calling her Man Coulter is very nice

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Trout Giggles @2    4 years ago
However, I don't think calling her Man Coulter is very nice

Ever go to a Halloween Party with Ann...talk about bobbing for Adams Apples....

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1    4 years ago

Ya know...she might have an enlarged thyroid....

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
2.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.1    4 years ago
Ya know...she might have an enlarged thyroid....

Is that what's in her pocket...?  I just thought she was happy to see me !

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.2    4 years ago

you're killing me here

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1.4  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1    4 years ago

Oh, good! Casual Misogyny has arrived. That didn't take long.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
2.1.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.4    4 years ago

put a sock in it, Ann does

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1.6  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.1.5    4 years ago

No, no please. Defend misogyny. Don’t let me stop you. I’ll get popcorn.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3  Tacos!    4 years ago
Twitter user @HazelEros wrote

a      tweet      from Dash Dobrofsky

Who? Like who gives a shit what a couple of randos say on Twitter? Why does this continue to be the basis for journalism these days? Wouldn't it be enough to for the writer to maybe (call me crazy) have their own take on Colter and what she is saying? Or maybe get a quote from someone whose opinion matters? Ask a politician. Or a political science professor. Would that be so hard?

compared her to a "rat" abandoning a "sinking ship

OK, well, a rat is being smart when it does this. It's not as if the rat boarded the ship knowing it was going to sink.

If Coulter is seeing the light on Trump, then that is all to the good. It's so childish in our political discussions the way we attack people for abandoning something we disagreed with in the first place. So many times when a politician in the other party votes against party and for the way we might want, we still mock them for flip-flopping, selling out, or weakly giving-in. Too many Americans are bullies, especially in politics.

If Republicans are abandoning Trump, shouldn't the rest of the world be glad? Or are people only capable of hate, even when their opponents agree with them?

"I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was," she said during an interview on Andrew Sullivan's Dishcast. "That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all, is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is."

Yeah this is the thought process I think a lot of people have gone through. It's not as if Trump's bombast and lack of couth was a big secret in 2016. It was part of the discussion, and something voters had to weigh. A lot of people looked around at their situation and thought maybe he's competent enough through real world experience - in spite of everything personal we know about him - to actually break through all the obstacles in Washington and get something positive done.

If Washington were working , this wouldn't even be something people would need to consider. Remember that in spite of everything, and as bad as Trump's approval ratings were, Congress still had - and maintains - a worse approval rating than anyone.

So millions of people all held their noses and voted for Trump for president. Turns out, though, that not only does he suck at the job, but he'll go through any charade to hold onto it. So knowing what we know now, even someone like Coulter has to admit that he's not worth it. 

Good!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @3    4 years ago

This is not the first time she has "had it' with Trump. Although I wish she , and everyone else, was sincere about dumping him, it is more likely she will be back with him as soon as he says he will build the wall in his second term. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    4 years ago
it is more likely she will be back with him as soon as he says he will build the wall in his second term. 

Well, let's hope not. I think a lot more people have had time to recalculate the known factors, so I think he would have a very hard time getting elected again.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @3    4 years ago
So millions of people all held their noses and voted for Trump for president. Turns out, though, that not only does he suck at the job, but he'll go through any charade to hold onto it. So knowing what we know now, even someone like Coulter has to admit that he's not worth it. 

Ridiculous!   "held their noses and voted for Trump" is an absurd excuse for being taken by all the BUllShit pushed by the 'right' and Russian propaganda. Bots pushing "Evil Hillary" when Don the Con was the REAL THREAT. Yea, Hillary sucked as a candidate and i'm not a big fan, but please, any thinking individua; SHOULD have been able to see through who and what, Trump was, is , and will always be. A POS Person and even bigger Piece of SHIT President of the US 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.2.1  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2    4 years ago
Ridiculous!  . . . any thinking individua

Yes yes. I've heard it all before. We see it every day. "Anyone who thinks differently from me cannot be a rational, thinking individual." Blah blah blah. And anyone willing to analyze a decision I disagree with is "making excuses." That adds SO much to the discourse.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
3.2.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @3.2.1    4 years ago

Sorry Tacos, Trump was a DISASTER long before he entered politix me off how allegedly intelligent individuals could not see this. Hear watt you want to hear here, does not excuse letting that piece of SHIT desecrate our Country. A Country so many sacrificed So Much for, as we all witnessed Trump piss and shit on it all, without ANY respect for established respectful behavior, or our rule of Law, cause this foregone conclusion, NEVER should have been one to drop someone's jaw, just leaving so many in awe, cause so many could and should, have foresaw !

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.2.3  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.2    4 years ago
Hear watt you want to hear here

That has no connection to anything I wrote.

does not excuse letting that piece of SHIT desecrate our Country

I didn’t suggest anyone should excuse Trump, so whatever fantasy is in your mind when you write that, it has nothing to do with me.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
3.3  Ender  replied to  Tacos! @3    4 years ago

Imo she has criticized him before and is doing so again, though it looks to me that the reason she criticizes him is because she didn't get what she wanted. Basically calls him weak because her agenda was not fulfilled. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.3.1  Tacos!  replied to  Ender @3.3    4 years ago

Yeah that’s a strong point. He clearly had no specific plan for implementing any agenda when he ran in 16, but that doesn’t seem to hurt candidates too much. They just say they’re going to do shit and it’ll be great.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4  Hal A. Lujah    4 years ago

She didn’t know how abjectly stupid Trump was?!  Every time that asshole’s voice comes on the tv even my cat rolls her eyes.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
5  Ender    4 years ago

Seems she is not the only one.

Fox host Steve Doocy cuts through GOP clutter: 'Why did he have all that secret stuff at Mar-a-Lago?'

None of those arguments matter, Doocy said, because Trump and his team have never justified any reason to take those from the White House when his presidency ended.
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    4 years ago

Coulter has been attacking Trump for years.  Is the author ignorant or just knows his gullible readers will fall for clickbait over and over and over and exploiting their ignorance? 

That's the interesting question. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @6    4 years ago
"It's not the party of Trump. It's safe to come back, and it's safe for Republicans to stand up and run without Donald Trump."

Do you think that will happen within this decade? 

Name as many successful GOP candidates as you can who have denounced Donald Trump. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1    4 years ago

Wait until after the midterms...his cult base is continuing to shrink

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7  TᵢG    4 years ago

I will graciously invite all ex-Trump supporters into the world of rationality.    I applaud all those who break free of Trump.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
7.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  TᵢG @7    4 years ago
I will graciously invite all ex-Trump supporters into the world of rationality.    I applaud all those who break free of Trump.

I as well, would "applaud all those who break free of Trump", as i actually know i would get along with many i don't do the morning . afternoon, and or , evening very well with, or without, so many layers baked & caked on to the slippery icing i skate a cross whence feel like rolling along the path jointly, smoking a paper, clipped to what some refer to as reefer, shelved in assaulted waters that run deep cleaner than many, other pipes, not so much, but, so much more.... piped through the pipes that pie eyed people possibly gravitate too perpetuate the predictable instability because who had the disability, to possess, that possessed disabilitytrying to disengage effort, cause it takes know, to achieve   innocense

that i've always bin stored out inn and found guilty of outstaying my storying lines incongruent width my outsourcing, of sources, where at the height of times, disengage rhymes width, redisengage , and i couldn't really name another, unless i wanted too long have we been in confrontational mode due towon whom lost So MUCH more than just an election 4 US, ,

but not with out being unable to Win, that same lost election

 
 

Who is online



CB


359 visitors