╌>

Dems use video to justify U.S. response to school board protests

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  6 comments


Dems use video to justify U.S. response to school board protests
In September 2022, Trump-appointed federal judge Dabney Friedrich dismissed a claim by a group of Virginia parents who claimed that the DOJ, in a memo responding to threats against school officials, created a response that illegally silenced parents. At the center of the case was an Oct. 4, 2021, memo from Garland that cited "a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers, and (school) staff" across the nation....

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



House Democrats are preparing a library of videos showing threats and assaults against school officials — and looking to a ruling by a Trump-appointed judge — to counter GOP claims that the Biden administration has treated school board protesters unfairly.

Why it matters: Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee have subpoenaed three top administration officials as part of a GOP probe into U.S. agencies' actions as protesters and parents, many organized by conservative groups, were disrupting school board meetings across the country in 2021.

The protests targeted a range of issues and school policies, including mask and vaccine mandates, sex education, LGBTQ issues and teaching about racism.

Reuters documented 220 instances of death threats and harassment against school board members. Such threats led school board associations to ask federal and state officials for help and protection.

Republicans have argued that the threats were overstated and that authorities' responses — which included at least one arrest — amounted to an effort to silence conservatives.

What we're watching: The subpoenas Judiciary sent to Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Chris Wray and Education Secretary Miguel Cardona demanded a response by March 1.

Now House Democrats, in support of the Biden administration, are preparing to make their case with visual evidence and an argument wrapped in legal precedent, people familiar with the matter tell Axios.

The Department of Homeland Security also is producing documents in response to previous oversight requests by House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).

The details: Democrats will argue that the question of whether Garland and the Justice Department stifled parents' right to free speech has been decided in court — with a resounding "no."

In September 2022, Trump-appointed federal judge Dabney Friedrich dismissed a claim by a group of Virginia parents who claimed that the DOJ, in a memo responding to threats against school officials, created a response that illegally silenced parents.

At the center of the case was an Oct. 4, 2021, memo from Garland that cited "a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers, and (school) staff" across the nation.

Freidrich ruled that the memo simply announced a “series of measures” directing authorities to address increasing threats, and that parents have the right to “spirited debate about policy matters.” He noted the memo “does not label anyone a domestic terrorist,” as some parents — and their Republican sympathizers — have claimed.

The big picture: Ahead of the 2024 elections, Republicans are focusing on schools and education, often in an effort to appeal to voters on race and gender issues.

Many Democrats and education officials see the school board conflicts as symbolic of conservative efforts to bully educators and unnecessarily restrict what can be taught in schools.

What they're saying: Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.), told Axios: "We are very aware of the First Amendment and we're aware of the beauty and the necessity for the public to speak at public meetings, whether they are Congress or a school board."

"However, there's no place for violent threats against public officials, teachers, principals, so forth," said Garamendi, a member of Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, where Democrats are tasked with responding to GOP accusations about federal law enforcement agencies.

"We want to be careful not to get drawn into BS arguments, and at the same time, to be clear that Democrats are the party of family," Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told Axios.

The other side: Russell Dye, a spokesperson for Jordan, told Axios that the House Judiciary staff last week "spoke at length with DOJ about what precisely the committee is looking for, why we were interested in those documents, and our priorities going forward."

"We expect full compliance with our subpoenas," he said.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

Address the topic. Any comments about Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Beau Biden, the squad, or wokeism will be deleted. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
At the center of the case was an Oct. 4, 2021, memo from Garland that cited "a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers, and (school) staff" across the nation. Freidrich ruled that the memo simply announced a “series of measures” directing authorities to address increasing threats
 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3  Ronin2    3 years ago

I am sure the one arrest they are talking about is this one. 

Go ahead Democrats/Leftists- hang your argument on this one. 

A Virginia father who was arrested at a school board meeting has ripped Attorney General Merrick Garland for painting him as a domestic terrorist — saying he’d just been trying to raise the alarm about his daughter getting “sexually assaulted” in a school bathroom.

Scott Smith, 48, became a symbol of angry parents confronting school officials when he went viral at a June 22 meeting of the Loudoun County School Board as he was wrestled to the floor and arrested.

But on Tuesday, Smith told Fox News that he had been trying to raise the alarm about his daughter’s sexual assault — and only flipped out when officials and then another parent denied it.

It appears to be backed up by video of an arrest, which captured his wife shouting, “My child was raped at school and this is what happens!”

Smith told Laura Ingraham that he finally decided to speak publicly about his daughter’s ordeal because he says the same alleged attacker was charged with another similar attack — and because the AG suggested angry parents like him were “domestic terrorists.”

“That’s really scary, that our government will weaponize themselves against parents and they’re using my video across the nation to spread fear,” he said.

“That’s wrong. I am not a bully. I am not a racist. I love everyone. I love this country. I want better stuff for it,” he insisted of his passionate appearance at his first-ever school board meeting.

Smith was charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. His attorney, Elizabeth Lancaster, told the Daily Wire that the rush to judgment completely ignored the devastating message he was trying to share.

“If someone would have sat and listened for 30 seconds to what Scott had to say, they would have been mortified and heartbroken,” Lancaster said.

Smith told the Daily Wire that his daughter was attacked at Stone Bridge High School on May 28 by a boy “wearing in a skirt” who took advantage of transgender rules “to get into the bathrooms.”

“This has been a crazy three months but basically my daughter was sexually assaulted at the end of school, in May,” the dad said.

He insisted to Ingraham that he went to the June school board meeting to “find out why our children weren’t safe.”

He flipped when a “parent-activist” wearing a rainbow-colored skirt started “antagonizing” him and his wife, threatening to ruin them and denying the alleged assault of his daughter.

“The next thing I know … the police are grabbing me and I’m tackled to the ground,” he said of the now-viral video of his arrest.

“I was just shocked and horrified,” he said of his arrest. “This could have been handled a lot differently.”

Lancaster told the Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio related to an incident that day at that school. However, the records are sealed because they involve a juvenile suspect.

The sheriff’s office told Fox, “This case is still pending court proceedings.”

Smith insists it is the same 15-year-old boy who was charged Oct. 7 for a similar attack at neighboring Broad Run High School.

“The investigation determined on the afternoon of October 6, the 15-year-old suspect forced the victim into an empty classroom where he held her against her will and inappropriately touched her,” the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office said. He was not named because of his age, but was initially held at the Loudoun County Juvenile Detention Center.

It was not immediately clear how the suspect was in a different school, or what, if any, action was taken against him by school officials.

Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) Superintendent Scott Ziegler had told the June meeting there were no records at the time of “assaults occurring in our restrooms,” as in Smith’s daughter’s case.

He also insisted that rumors of “the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist.”

This week, a spokesperson for Ziegler told Fox that the alleged attacks “were reported immediately to the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office, and LCPS cooperated fully with the investigations.”

“Any information related to student information is confidential under state and federal laws regarding student privacy,” the spokesperson said.

Smith was charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest at the board meeting. In August he was sentenced to 10 days in jail, all suspended, contingent on a year of good behavior, but said he would appeal, Loudoun Now reported.

The school board however was completely lying.

A judge has ruled that a Loudoun County teen sexually assaulted a girl in a school bathroom at Stone Bridge High School in Ashburn.

The incident first came to light back in June, when the girl’s father, Scott Smith, was arrested at a school board meeting after speaking out about his daughter’s rape at Stone Bridge High School.

According to The Stanley Law Group, which represents the Smith family, the judge found sufficient facts to support the defendant committed forcible sodomy and fellatio.

The law firm released a statement on behalf of the family on Monday about the ruling.

“We are relieved that justice was served today for the Smith’s daughter. This horrible incident has deeply affected the Smith family, and they are grateful for today’s outcome. No one should have to endure what this family has endured, and now their focus is completely upon their daughter’s health and safety as she progresses forward with her life. She is a very smart and strong young woman, and she is deeply loved by her parents. Both Jessica and Scott Smith will continue to do everything in their power to protect her, and help her through this difficult time in her life. The Smith’s daughter is a survivor, and a fighter, and we are confident that she will grow even stronger with each passing day ,” read the release.

A second charge against the student for another incident at Broad Run High School is pending. According to The Stanley Law Group, the sentencing decision will come in November.

On Tuesday, students across Loudoun County staged multiple walkouts in support of sexual assault victims and to demand safety from the school district.

Wear it loud and proud. Democrat policies caused this. The father had every right to be outraged at the school board. 

At least a judge dropped the charges against the father.

Labeling parents as "terrorists" takes a lot of gall. Unfortunately nothing less is to be expected from the Brandon administration; and the partisan POS AG Garland..

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @3    3 years ago

Trump appointed judge RULED that no one was labeled a "terrorist". 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4  Greg Jones    3 years ago

You can't dispute the fact that the left want's to silence any criticism of the progressives promotion of inappropriate indoctrination of radical racial and sexual views onto minor children.

 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

The Department of Justice and the FBI are not "leftist". 

 
 

Who is online



253 visitors