╌>

Removal of 'Ruby Bridges' film from Pinellas school sparks outrage

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  21 comments

By:   Tampa Bay Times

Removal of 'Ruby Bridges' film from Pinellas school sparks outrage
A parent complained that the movie might teach white children to hate Black children.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


I thought banning material from schools was supposed to be related to "critical race theory".

Banning the Ruby Bridges movie is just white parents not wanting to face reality. Their parents and grandparents may have been at that school in New Orleans in 1960 screaming at that little 6 year old girl. 


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The Disney movie "Ruby Bridges," which tells the tale of a 6-year-old who integrated New Orleans schools in the 1960s, has been a staple of Pinellas County Black History Month lessons for years.

It never caused a stir until this year, as parents across Florida exert increasedpowers to question what children can see and read in schools.

A North Shore Elementary parent who would not allow her child to watch the filmwhen it was shownin early March later complained that it wasn't appropriate for second graders. In a formal challenge dated March 6, Emily Conklin wrote that the use of racial slurs and scenes of white people threatening Ruby as she entered a school might result in students learning that white people hate Black people.

Pinellas school officials responded by banning the movie from use by all students at the St. Petersburg school until a review committee can assess it. While it remains available for other schools to use, the step is drawing strong opposition.

A countywidegroup that represents the interests of Black children in Pinellas public schools has sent an open letter to the communityquestioning why one parent's complaint resulted in actions that affect all families at North Shore.

"Many from historically marginalized communities are asking whether this so-called integrated education system in Pinellas County can even serve the diverse community fairly and equitably," wrote Ric Davis, president of Concerned Organization for Quality Education for Black Students. The group has been active for years, often working with school district officials and at times battling them in court.

Ric Davis (center, holding a microphone) speaks at a meeting on school discipline and segregation in Pinellas County public schools in 2015 at Bethel Community Baptist Church in St. Petersburg. [DIRK SHADD | Times (2015)]

The controversy follows a heated dispute earlier this year over the banning of Toni Morrison's "The Bluest Eye" from all district high schools after one parent complained about a two-page rape scene. District officials cited new state law and a rule telling them to "err on the side of caution" when considering whether books should be used in classrooms and libraries.

The state's guidelines, which some have called vague, have led to book challenges and bans by the dozens throughout Florida.

"The (Pinellas) district's leadership appears to fear the potential consequences of not acting in the way they have on these two decisions," Davis wrote in the open letter. "This approach to challenging times in education in our state raises serious questions about Superintendent (Kevin) Hendrick's leadership."

Davis acknowledged the political climate in Florida has educators second-guessing themselves about what materials to use in classes. Lawmakers have made clear that they don't want books, movies or lessons about race to create student discomfort, though they also have said they want facts presented honestly.

The scenes depicted in "Ruby Bridges," released in 1998, are historically accurate, Davis said, adding that the truth will not change because someone doesn't like it.

"At the highest level of decision-making in the district, they have to have more sensitivity to the diversity of the community they serve, and not overreact because one white person objected to something," he said, quickly adding that they should not overreact to a Black person's objection either.

"At the end of the day, we're one total community and we have to figure out how we work together to make decisions that serve everyone."

Enrollment in Pinellas district schools is 51% white, 20% Hispanic, 19% Black and 4% Asian, according to state enrollment records. The remaining 6% are students of Native American or Pacific Islander descent or are classified as belonging to two or more races.

North Shore Elementary is about 57% white, 24% Black and 12% Hispanic.

Former St. Petersburg police chief and deputy mayor Goliath Davis first raised the issue of the film's removal in a March 19 column in the Weekly Challenger. He too criticized the district's action, calling it a ban, and contended that the policy allowing for such decisions needs more clarity.

He noted that a single complaint can lead to a book or movie being removed pending review, yet the policy sets forth no time frame for considering the challenge and rendering a decision. In the case of "The Bluest Eye," he said, that has meant censoring the novel for months.

If the decision ultimately is to keep the material, Davis said, "then look at the damage that has been done."

Davis also questioned the validity of the challenge. Conklin, development director for the YMCA of Greater St. Petersburg, has asked for "Ruby Bridges" to be removed from the district's list of approved films for elementary schools.

Conklin was one of two North Shore parents who declined to let their children watch the movie after the school sent out permission slips, including a link to a trailer, two weeks before showing the film to classes. She did not respond to calls and emails seeking comment.

"Think about it. A 6-year-old girl (Ruby Bridges) can go to school every day with armed guards, but second graders can't learn about it?" Davis said. "It doesn't make any sense."

School board member Eileen Long has complained about the district's attempts to ban "The Bluest Eye" and "Ruby Bridges," and has asked for a list of other materials that might have been pulled during the year. She said she's getting few answers.

"I agree with Dr. (Ric) Davis," she said. "We're going backward."

The Florida Freedom to Read Project also has its eye on the district. Local parent Raegan Miller, a leader in the statewide organization, offered support for getting "Ruby Bridges" back into full circulation.

"It is distressing to me that one parent has, again, been able to have a resource removed from our schools when the vast majority of parents consented to their children seeing the film," Miller said.

The district has not yet scheduled times to review either "Ruby Bridges" or "The Bluest Eye."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
"At the highest level of decision-making in the district, they have to have more sensitivity to the diversity of the community they serve, and not overreact because one white person objected to something," he said, quickly adding that they should not overreact to a Black person's objection either. "At the end of the day, we're one total community and we have to figure out how we work together to make decisions that serve everyone."
 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Really not appropriate for or any value to second graders

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  pat wilson  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    3 years ago
"Think about it. A 6-year-old girl (Ruby Bridges) can go to school every day with armed guards, but second graders can't learn about it?" Davis said. "It doesn't make any sense."
 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  pat wilson @1.1.1    3 years ago

Didn't Disney recommend this film for 5th grade and up?  Do you really want our schools exposing children to strong Christian messages of the power of faith and belief in Jesus?

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  pat wilson  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.2    3 years ago
Didn't Disney recommend this film for 5th grade and up?

You tell me, you're the Google master.

Do you really want our schools exposing children to strong Christian messages of the power of faith and belief in Jesus?

Huh ?

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
3  bbl-1    3 years ago

It isn't the books the autocrats want to remove, rather it is the possibility of thought and understanding the autocrats abhor.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

Burning books, shouting down speakers.  The American left has gone international 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    3 years ago

What does that have to do with the Ruby bridges movie?  And what does the Ruby Bridges movie have to do with "leftists" ? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
In a formal challenge dated March 6, Emily Conklin wrote that the use of racial slurs and scenes of white people threatening Ruby as she entered a school might result in students learning that white people hate Black people.

Using this poor excuse for logic we couldnt teach about the struggles of the working man because it would make students think that company owners hate them. We couldnt teach about women's suffrage because students would get the impression that there was prejudice against women in the past. We couldnt teach about world war two because students would learn that there were people in other countries that wanted to kill Americans. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.1  Thomas  replied to  JohnRussell @5    3 years ago

...And Americans wanted to kill them.  Oh, the shame!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
...the idea that white children shouldn't have to learn about racism just because black children have to live with it is a popular one and has been for a long time. Eight years after Ruby Bridges's first day at school, after Dr. Martin Luther King was assassinated, a white Iowa teacher conducted an experiment with her third grade class in which she told the brown-eyed students they were better and smarter than the blue-eyed students, and then reversed the experiment the next day, so that students could understand how discrimination felt.
After the teacher, Jane Elliot, appeared on "The Tonight Show" to discuss the experiment with Johnny Carson, hate mail poured in, accusing Elliot of teaching "white self-contempt" and calling her experiment "Orwellian."

"How dare you try this cruel experiment out on white children," said one. "Black children grow up accustomed to such behavior, but white children, there's no way they could possibly understand it. It's cruel to white children and will cause them great psychological damage."

Strangely, the difference between now and then is that angry white parents did not, ultimately, have the power that Emily Conklin does. Jane Elliot did that same experiment every year until she retired, despite the fact that the entire town hated her guts for doing it and for drawing that kind of attention to them. The white parents who wanted to shield their children from having to go to school with a six-year-old Black girl did not have the power to stop that. But Emily Conklin does. Because Florida.

The same thing has been going on all over the state,   as a state law enacted last year   allows parents to issue a challenge to any book or lesson they don't like and have that book or lesson pulled immediately from the curriculum or the entire school until a review committee can assess it. The Pinellas County School district has also pulled Toni Morrison's   The Bluest Eye   for review, supposedly due to a two-page rape scene, all because a parent complained.

There is a reason parents have not previously been given this kind of power — because kids need to learn, teachers need to be able to feel free to teach, and if you let every parent have a say over what kids learn and teachers teach, there are going to be so many conflicting viewpoints that eventually nothing will be allowed to be taught or learned. The parents who want to keep   Ruby Bridges   vastly outnumber the Emily Conklins, and it's not possible to please both sides here.

Everything can't be about making parents happy. Sometimes it has to be about what is best for the children, and a movie like this is great for children to see. It is the kind of movie that will help them make good choices about what kind of people they want to be, that will show them that even kids their own age can make a difference. And that's a lot more important than how it makes Emily Conklin, a grown-ass woman, feel.

 
 
 
TOM PA
Freshman Silent
7  TOM PA    3 years ago

384

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TOM PA @7    3 years ago

Says a lot

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.1    3 years ago

makes me shake my head, too. Do they even think about what that statement says?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
7.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  TOM PA @7    3 years ago

Bury?  I thought that we wanted to expose our heritage.

 
 

Who is online


385 visitors