╌>

Where the American Dream goes to die - UnHerd

  
Via:  John Russell  •  11 months ago  •  15 comments

By:   Ian Birrell (UnHerd)

Where the American Dream goes to die - UnHerd
One in 15 US citizens lives in a trailer park — and now predatory speculators are moving in too

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks

this article, from a british news site, is 3 years old. i am seeding it anyway because there is nothing in it that depends on a specific time frame, and because it points out an ongoing and constant problem in the united states, housing affordibility


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Ian Birrell is an award-winning foreign reporter and columnist. He is also the founder, with Damon Albarn, of Africa Express.

March 2, 2020


For a few years at the start of this century, Juan Nevarez tasted the American dream. Having moved a few miles across the border from Tijuana when he was nine-years old, his close-knit family of Mexican migrants slogged away to make a better life for themselves. They were working people: his dad was a welder, his mum worked in shops and Juan, after leaving school, built a small concrete-pumping business. They did not have much money, but they were content and the future looked bright.

Soon after the arrival of the new millennium, the family ploughed all their savings into a four-bedroom house in a nice neighbourhood in southern California. No deposit was required — banks wanted customers, everyone was buying property and prices were rising — but monthly payments were tight. They hoped to refinance after a year to ease the pressures, as promised by the salespeople, but somehow that never happened since the house was never worth enough for such a deal.

Then came the crash. Prices began to falter in 2006, then plummeted as panic set into property markets. Little did this family know their humble mortgage was the sort of sub-prime loan being passed around by sharks in the financial sector. Banks chopped up such loans and sold them in complex mortgage-backed packages to investors who thought they were buying safe products. Instead, these 100% mortgages, often flogged to low-income citizens, helped spark a financial contagion that is still resonating around the world today.

"We thought we were upgrading," said Juan, 40. But the house that his family had bought so proudly for $500,000 went under the hammer at an auction for $225,000, losing them about $150,000 — money they had worked so hard to save in order to clamber onto the lower rungs of the property ladder. "We never knew that prices would collapse and we'd lose all our money. It was very difficult for us all."

Today, Juan lives in the 'Siesta' trailer park in Imperial Beach, barely 10 miles but a world away from his birthplace on the other side of the border. He showed me his mobile home — white with a maroon stripe along the side — which sits among 103 spaces on the tidy five-acre site filled with rows of similar vehicles. One resident has been settled there for four decades while many others have spent years on the site. "I like it here," said Juan, though he admitted it was cramped. "These parks are one of the last places where you can live in a good community. In my big house I never knew my neighbours, but here we all talk."

His new home costs $650 a month. This is about one-third of average rental prices in Imperial Beach, where rents are rising fast and at a higher rate than the national average. Little wonder that amid a housing crisis that spans the United States, there are 22 million Americans — an astonishing one in 15 of the population — living in what is politely termed 'manufactured housing'. Most own their trailers but rent the land beneath them. Some sites look like the dishevelled Hollywood stereotypes, filled with noisy families and tatty trailers, but many are neat and homely.

Trailer parks reflect affordability rather than mobility these days, with most residents earning under $50,000 a year. I visited another one near Los Angeles that looked like the sweetest suburbia, filled with lovingly-tended plants and even white picket fences. Yet as Juan's story shows, they also reflect the gaping inequalities of the world's richest nation — along with the continuing impact of a financial crisis that left many working people so embittered against elites, fuelling a sense of dislocation that led to Donald Trump's election.

Increasingly, trailer parks reflect something more sinister as well: the rapacious nature of unchecked capitalism that sees the homes of poor people as an asset to be bled, rather than pockets of humanity that deserve protection. Private equity firms, hedge funds and rich speculators are muscling in on the parks, sensing higher returns than on many other property investments. They are buying out traditional 'mom and pop' operators — a state of affairs that alarmingly echoes the sub-prime crisis that forced many families from their homes. And it is sparking loud claims of exploitation as low-income tenants complain angrily of rising rents and reduced maintenance.

Many residents have been left terrified. They fear that if rising rents force them to move out, they might end up among the bedraggled armies of homeless people on the streets or, at best, squeezing into the homes of siblings or parents. Inevitably, this is becoming a hot political issue seized upon by progressives. Senator Elizabeth Warren, for instance, visited one site in Iowa where people were fighting a 70% hike in their rents after it was taken over by an investment firm. "They come into parks like this with a vacuum and see how much money they can take out," said the Democratic presidential candidate.

Last year, the tranquillity of Siesta — which lies less than one mile from the Pacific waves — was shattered by the news that their owner was planning to sell the land for condominiums. "We were given a letter saying they wanted everyone to attend a meeting," said Juan. "When we got to the meeting there was a lawyer who said the park was being sold and you guys must all leave. He said we had six to 12 months to get our stuff and go. He had no feeling about how this would affect our lives. No feeling for the people in wheelchairs, with families or the elderly people."

They were offered relocation assistance, including $500 in costs. Yet while it is called a mobile home park, the average age of its trailers is 25 years old and many parks will not take a vehicle older than five years. New ones can cost $100,000 and fresh arrivals often face higher rents. "We were all so scared," said Tricia Harrelson, 59, who has lived there more than two decades after moving from Boston due to her former husband's military service. "Some people think everyone living in these parks are stupid, that they're idiots, because they are lower class citizens. But it's been like a family here."

Tricia Harrelson

Harrelson — like many of those at the park — is on federal benefits, since she suffers severe health problems sparked by trauma. She faced two armed robberies in quick succession when working as a supervisor at a credit union. She told me her rent had surged $300 in seven years after rising just $50 over the previous 18 years, while also claiming the site had become run down prior to its proposed sale. "We wanted to fight back but didn't know how to do it," she said.

Juan decided to try. He organised a meeting and, to his surprise, 42 other residents turned up. "Everyone felt angry and the same way," he said. "People were telling me I would be kicked out of the park but I thought I'd nothing to lose since we were going to be thrown out anyway." They started to enlist support from local politicians, attending city hall meetings to press their case, and made enough noise that shortly before Christmas the owner's plans for redevelopment were withdrawn.

We've won a battle but I do not think the war is over," said Juan. I was not surprised when he told me later that he wants to see Bernie Sanders win the presidency for he thinks their struggle is symptomatic of important wider issues confronting the United States:

"Rich people are out of sync with the rest of the country. They should see that without the working class, the people in these parks, they would not be able to afford all the good things they possess. These finance firms want to put poor people out on the streets so they can replace them with middle-class properties. But if the rich woke up, they would see that we are not bad people just because we are poor."

Many other residents on the site share his distaste for predatory capitalism — but some prefer an alternative brand of political populism. "I don't like big corporations buying land and tearing down trailer parks where people live. I also don't like what rich people do when they have money," said Maria Hirneisen, 57, who has lived in Siesta for 22 years, having moved from New Jersey. But she is a fan of Donald Trump. "I like what he is doing. Trump does not care what people think. People wanted something different to the usual politics and he has stirred up a few dust clouds."

To appreciate the scale of the US housing crisis, consider this finding from a survey last year, quoted in the Financial Times: median-priced homes are too expensive for average wage earners in three-quarters of the country. In Imperial Beach, the median sale price last year was more than $620,000. Meanwhile mobile home sites are often sitting in prime real estate locations; many started as housing for returning troops after the Second World War, and were built on the outskirts of towns and cities before becoming enveloped by urban sprawl over subsequent years. Thousands are situated near the sea, lakes or other desirable attractions.

Analysts believe the need for more affordable housing is increasing, especially among millennials and pensioners. It is estimated 10,000 Americans retire each day — half of them without savings and with average social security benefits of about $1,300 a month. Yet Mobile Home University, run by one of the biggest investors, advises how to boost profits in "the hottest arena in real estate" by raising rents and cutting back amenities. "With 20 per cent of Americans trying to live on $20,000 or less, the demand for mobile homes has never been higher — and the big winners are the owners of mobile home parks in which these customers reside."

Frank Rolfe, the body's founder, boasts that trailer parks have the highest yields in commercial property, as he churns out publicity promoting such investments. "One reason that mobile home parks have long held their value is the simple fact that virtually no city or town in the US will allow new parks to be built," said one article. "Why? Nobody wants a mobile home park as a neighbour, and their vocal dislike eliminates any chance of political approval. In the entire United States, it is estimated that less than 10 new parks are built each year — below the number torn down for re-development."

In a couple of states — South Carolina and New Mexico — mobile homes comprise about one in six housing units. The three biggest owners have more than 50,000 sites each, while private equity firms such as Blackstone and Carlyle and sovereign wealth funds have been snapping up sites — to the alarm of activist groups such as Manufactured Housing Action. "We exist to counteract predatory investor schemes," said Kevin Borden, the executive director. "They usually increase rents and decrease maintenance. These people are making profits of 20 to 22 per cent from some of the poorest people in our country."

Borden believes trailer parks are vital to national well-being — at a time when gentrification and rising house prices are driving low-income citizens from city centres. "If you look at our country's housing situation you can see that we've not figured out a strategy since the 2008 crisis for people to have decent and affordable homes. Mobile home communities offer something good for all those people getting pushed out of urban areas."

One man who shares his concerns is Qui Vuong, 57, who came to the US after the fall of Saigon and today lives in a community largely filled with elderly Vietnamese migrants, beside a Catholic church in Santa Ana. The sleek Mercedes parked by his three-bedroom home indicates a prosperous past. He tells me over coffee how he thrived in finance in Texas before costly heart surgery, followed by a promise to care for his terminally-ill partner, landed him in a Californian mobile home park.

"I had no concept of what a trailer park was because I could always afford homes, especially in Houston where the cost of living is so low," said Vuong. "There is a stigma associated with them because they are for people who can't afford houses. But these are not bad people, just people with limited resources or scaling down. Yet you seem to have no rights and no laws to protect you because mobile home owners are seen differently to the rest of society."

Qui Vuong

During his time running pension funds he was at one point approached to invest in trailer parks. "They saw it as another source of excess returns to beat the market." Now he is fighting to protect residents from price-gouging after seeing typical rents at his park rise from $600 to $800 in just four years. "People here are scared," he said. "There are people on the final edge of the safety net for survival. If they face another $50 in rent, they must turn to their families for help."

Vuong nurses ambitions to set up a fund to protect rather than exploit such places. "I think I'm in the right place for a reason," he said. He is highly critical of the predatory owners of trailer parks. "They say it is the market and that it is capitalism but they are too stupid to see how it is hurting their own self-interest since it is simply not sustainable."

Then this affable man takes a sip of his coffee before adding: "This shows how capitalism has lost its soul." As I walked around the homes in his community, many with neat little gardens and wheels hidden by fake brick facades, it was hard to argue.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    11 months ago
Increasingly, trailer parks reflect something more sinister as well: the rapacious nature of unchecked capitalism that sees the homes of poor people as an asset to be bled, rather than pockets of humanity that deserve protection. Private equity firms, hedge funds and rich speculators are muscling in on the parks, sensing higher returns than on many other property investments. They are buying out traditional 'mom and pop' operators — a state of affairs that alarmingly echoes the sub-prime crisis that forced many families from their homes. And it is sparking loud claims of exploitation as low-income tenants complain angrily of rising rents and reduced maintenance.
 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    11 months ago

To bad that our current migrants didn't read this before starting their hard journey, it could have save them a lot of trouble.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    11 months ago

This article, as I read it, has virtually nothing to do with migrants, per se. Any further comment that is solely about migrants will be deleted. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
1.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    11 months ago

I wrote nothing about soley.  My only point is the incoming probably don't understand how bad it is here.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2  Greg Jones    11 months ago

So...do you have any ideas as to how to fix this state of affairs? It's one thing to complain about an issue, which you seem to imply is capitalism, but another thing to offer solutions. So what steps should we take, as a nation, to resolve the problem 

As far as migrants are concerned....where are the jobs for these mostly unskilled people? Where are they going to live? Their ever increasing numbers simply add to the demand without increasing supply.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2.1  George  replied to  Greg Jones @2    11 months ago

It’s always the rich capitalist fault and the solution is always the same, steal more money from the successful to give to those incapable of supporting themselves.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.2  Nerm_L  replied to  Greg Jones @2    11 months ago
So...do you have any ideas as to how to fix this state of affairs? It's one thing to complain about an issue, which you seem to imply is capitalism, but another thing to offer solutions. So what steps should we take, as a nation, to resolve the problem  As far as migrants are concerned....where are the jobs for these mostly unskilled people? Where are they going to live? Their ever increasing numbers simply add to the demand without increasing supply.

Just a few ideas:  These communities could seek to incorporate as a city which would allow the residents to institute zoning limitations and requirements.  As a city, the residents would be able to utilize eminent domain, too.  State corporate law and regulation and the Federal Trade Commission could become involved to regulate these corporate investments.  Venture capital investments could be investigated and prosecuted under racketeering laws.  There are Federal regulations and most states have laws that make price gouging illegal.

There are a number of things that could be done if government wasn't run by crooks, swindlers, fraudsters, neoliberals, and libertarians.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
3  mocowgirl    11 months ago

Tiny homes are being used as a source of affordable housing or to give homeless people shelter.  It will be interesting to see if this will prove to be a viable solution to affordable housing and/or homelessness in some areas of the US.

Tiny houses are cropping up around the country to give shelter to the homeless : Shots - Health News : NPR

After Cox got divorced in 2009, he bounced around rentals before living in his van for a year. He tried a local men's shelter. He lasted only two nights.

Then in 2014, he heard about this community being planned by   Occupy Madison , a spinoff of the national movement against income inequality. Cox started helping with gardening, one of his passions. A few months later, he moved into one of its 99-square-foot houses (echoing the "99%" of the population that Occupy aimed to represent).

With housing costs rising, tiny homes are   spreading as a solution   to homelessness in California, Indiana, Missouri, Oregon, and beyond. Arnold Schwarzenegger garnered considerable publicity in December when he   donated money for 25 tiny houses   for homeless veterans in Los Angeles. It reflects a growing interest in outside-the-box ideas to get unhoused people off the streets, especially during winter in cold climates and   amid the covid-19 pandemic .

"Anything that increases the supply of affordable housing is a good thing," said   Nan Roman , CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness. "We have a huge shortage of housing — around 7 million   fewer affordable housing units   than there are households that need them."

Housing and health are inextricably linked. In a   2019 study   of 64,000 homeless people, individuals living on the streets were more likely to report chronic health conditions, trauma, substance misuse, and mental health issues than those who were temporarily sheltered.

But not all tiny homes are created equal. They range from cabins with a cot and a heater to miniature houses with kitchens and bathrooms.
 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1  Ender  replied to  mocowgirl @3    11 months ago

I read an article where people were having a hard time with those. Some people don't know local codes and the like and get stuck with a tiny home that the city will not let them park or hook up.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
3.1.1  Thomas  replied to  Ender @3.1    11 months ago
Some people don't know local codes and the like and get stuck with a tiny home that the city will not let them park or hook up.

The blame goes both ways depending on the case. Some is property owners not checking local codes, some is housing codes meant to keep smaller or less permanent dwellings out of the neighborhood. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4  Ender    11 months ago

Rent is unbelievable. Around here an apartment is usually about 1200 a month. For like a 1500 sq ft house about 1800 to 2k.

My mortgage payment is not even that much. It is actually cheeper to buy a home than rent one around here. As far as the monthly payment anyway.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
4.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Ender @4    11 months ago

Some of the causes of high rent:

  • more previous home owners now renting increasing demand
  • local politics making zoning for development of multiple dwellings difficult
  • excessive delays in obtaining building permits
  • gentrification has wealthy folks moving back the city and renting
  • landlords trying to recoup COVID losses
 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
4.2  mocowgirl  replied to  Ender @4    11 months ago
Rent is unbelievable. Around here an apartment is usually about 1200 a month. For like a 1500 sq ft house about 1800 to 2k.

It is like that in my area also and few vacancies.  As long as the market will thrive at those prices, then that is what the market will be and always has been for the most valued locations throughout the US.  Farmers have lost their farms to suburban sprawl for decades.  This will continue as the US adds millions of more people to house every year so everyone can live the American Dream.

US lost 11 million acres of farmland to development in past 2 decades | The World from PRX

The United States has lost more than 11 million of acres of farmland to development over the last 20 years, according to a new report.

A series of studies by the   American Farmland Trust   shows that agricultural land is increasingly being converted, fragmented, or paved over — threatening the integrity of local and regional food systems. Of special concern, the report notes, are the loss of farmland to low-density residential development at the edge of urban and suburban areas.

The   Farms Under Threat   project studied the quality of land both for local food suppliers and the larger agriculture system, explains Julia Freedgood, a senior adviser with American Farmland Trust and a co-author the report. It identified the highest quality land in each state and then “tracked what happened to the land in terms of development patterns.”

“We had become aware that there was this insidious pattern of fragmentation in rural communities and nobody was measuring it or tracking it,” she explains. “So, we came up with a methodology that [would enable use to] see the impact of lower density kinds of development happening across the countryside.”

It’s a kind of sprawl, she says, but less concentrated than the suburban sprawl we’re accustomed to seeing.

“What you'll see is one house per maybe five or 10 acres in an area, and maybe they're having some horses or some llamas or something like that,” Freedgood explains. “It looks kind of like a farm if you're in outer space and looking down for spatial mapping, but in terms of a farm economy, you suddenly have a different kind of an enterprise happening. It's not a commercial enterprise.”

Related Can this radical approach to dairies save US farms?

Ultimately, the infrastructure that supports local agriculture, things like feed and supply stores, for example, starts to move out and gets replaced by “people [who] have a couple of horses in their backyard,” Freedgood says. “So, it's not exactly sprawl as we think of it, as urban sprawl with malls and everything around the city, but it still can have a detrimental impact on the agricultural community and economy.”

Often, these metro-adjacent farms do direct-to-consumer marketing or supply local farmers' markets and other community-supported agriculture, Freedgood says. But as the suburban economy grows up around them, land values often rise beyond what a local farmer can afford to pay and pressure grows to develop for something other than a farm.

“We had become aware that there was this insidious pattern of fragmentation in rural communities and nobody was measuring it or tracking it,” she explains. “So, we came up with a methodology that [would enable use to] see the impact of lower density kinds of development happening across the countryside.”

It’s a kind of sprawl, she says, but less concentrated than the suburban sprawl we’re accustomed to seeing.

“What you'll see is one house per maybe five or 10 acres in an area, and maybe they're having some horses or some llamas or something like that,” Freedgood explains. “It looks kind of like a farm if you're in outer space and looking down for spatial mapping, but in terms of a farm economy, you suddenly have a different kind of an enterprise happening. It's not a commercial enterprise.”

“The pandemic has really showed the fault lines and how overly consolidated [our agricultural system] has become,” Freedgood says. “It’s not that we have a supply problem right now. What we have is a distribution problem, a supply chain problem. So, you see this awful juxtaposition of farmers having to euthanize their animals or dumping milk or leaving crops unpicked while at the same time we have these really long lines for food banks ... and food security has become a really serious issue.”

Freedgood hopes that people start to take seriously some of the things she and others have been warning about for decades: the consolidation in the agricultural industry — and in cropland, in particular — and the importance of farmers, ranchers and farmworkers to the food system and the overall economy in the US.

“I think we need to really look at what we are going to do to make sure that we're protecting farmland in our states and in our communities,” she insists. “I think we need to start looking at how we incentivize that kind of production so that we have this kind of resiliency so that we're ready for everything that comes, whether it's a pandemic or whether it's climate change.”

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Ender  replied to  mocowgirl @4.2    11 months ago

The spread happening here is detrimental Imo. Places that use to be just rural land are now full of subdivisions. Of course then all these people want a gas station near by etc.

The places being left behind are starting to look like crap with older vacant buildings and not as much traffic in those areas to make being there profitable.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
4.2.2  mocowgirl  replied to  Ender @4.2.1    11 months ago
The places being left behind are starting to look like crap with older vacant buildings

Home ownership requires regular maintenance that some people either ignore or can't afford.  The ratty houses/apartments then provide cheap housing to people who can't afford regular maintenance until the building are no longer habitable and should be bulldozed.   Then the issue is to find cheap housing for people who can't afford to live on the local economy.  This is especially difficult for senior citizens who have rented the majority of their lives and rely chiefly on social security for income.  Is anyone in US government talking about a plan to provide affordable housing for senior citizens?

 
 

Who is online








JBB


93 visitors