╌>

Why AI Will Save The World - Marc Andreessen

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  8 comments

By:   Marc Andreessen

Why AI Will Save The World - Marc Andreessen
And this isn't just about intelligence! Perhaps the most underestimated quality of AI is how humanizing it can be. AI art gives people who otherwise lack technical skills the freedom to create and share their artistic ideas. Talking to an empathetic AI friend really does improve their ability to handle adversity. And AI medical chatbots are already more empathetic than their human counterparts. Rather than making the world harsher and more mechanistic, infinitely patient and sympathetic AI...

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks

This article is quite long. I excerpted a few parts of it. The entire thing can be read at the link. 


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Marc Andreessen


The era of Artificial Intelligence is here, and boy are people freaking out.

Fortunately, I am here to bring the good news: AI will not destroy the world, and in fact may save it.

First, a short description of what AI is: The application of mathematics and software code to teach computers how to understand, synthesize, and generate knowledge in ways similar to how people do it. AI is a computer program like any other - it runs, takes input, processes, and generates output. AI's output is useful across a wide range of fields, ranging from coding to medicine to law to the creative arts. It is owned by people and controlled by people, like any other technology.

A shorter description of what AI isn't: Killer software and robots that will spring to life and decide to murder the human race or otherwise ruin everything, like you see in the movies.

An even shorter description of what AI could be: A way to make everything we care about better.

Why AI Can Make Everything We Care About Better

The most validated core conclusion of social science across many decades and thousands of studies is that human intelligence makes a very broad range of life outcomes better. Smarter people have better outcomes in almost every domain of activity: academic achievement, job performance, occupational status, income, creativity, physical health, longevity, learning new skills, managing complex tasks, leadership, entrepreneurial success, conflict resolution, reading comprehension, financial decision making, understanding others' perspectives, creative arts, parenting outcomes, and life satisfaction.

Further, human intelligence is the lever that we have used for millennia to create the world we live in today: science, technology, math, physics, chemistry, medicine, energy, construction, transportation, communication, art, music, culture, philosophy, ethics, morality. Without the application of intelligence on all these domains, we would all still be living in mud huts, scratching out a meager existence of subsistence farming. Instead we have used our intelligence to raise our standard of living on the order of 10,000X over the last 4,000 years.

What AI offers us is the opportunity to profoundly augment human intelligence to make all of these outcomes of intelligence - and many others, from the creation of new medicines to ways to solve climate change to technologies to reach the stars - much, much better from here.

AI augmentation of human intelligence has already started - AI is already around us in the form of computer control systems of many kinds, is now rapidly escalating with AI Large Language Models like ChatGPT, and will accelerate very quickly from here - if we let it.

In our new era of AI:

  • Every child will have an AI tutor that is infinitely patient, infinitely compassionate, infinitely knowledgeable, infinitely helpful. The AI tutor will be by each child's side every step of their development, helping them maximize their potential with the machine version of infinite love.

  • Every person will have an AI assistant/coach/mentor/trainer/advisor/therapist that is infinitely patient, infinitely compassionate, infinitely knowledgeable, and infinitely helpful. The AI assistant will be present through all of life's opportunities and challenges, maximizing every person's outcomes.

  • Every scientist will have an AI assistant/collaborator/partner that will greatly expand their scope of scientific research and achievement. Every artist, every engineer, every businessperson, every doctor, every caregiver will have the same in their worlds.

  • Every leader of people - CEO, government official, nonprofit president, athletic coach, teacher - will have the same. The magnification effects of better decisions by leaders across the people they lead are enormous, so this intelligence augmentation may be the most important of all.

  • Productivity growth throughout the economy will accelerate dramatically, driving economic growth, creation of new industries, creation of new jobs, and wage growth, and resulting in a new era of heightened material prosperity across the planet.

  • Scientific breakthroughs and new technologies and medicines will dramatically expand, as AI helps us further decode the laws of nature and harvest them for our benefit.

  • The creative arts will enter a golden age, as AI-augmented artists, musicians, writers, and filmmakers gain the ability to realize their visions far faster and at greater scale than ever before.

  • I even think AI is going to improve warfare, when it has to happen, by reducing wartime death rates dramatically. Every war is characterized by terrible decisions made under intense pressure and with sharply limited information by very limited human leaders. Now, military commanders and political leaders will have AI advisors that will help them make much better strategic and tactical decisions, minimizing risk, error, and unnecessary bloodshed.

  • In short, anything that people do with their natural intelligence today can be done much better with AI, and we will be able to take on new challenges that have been impossible to tackle without AI, from curing all diseases to achieving interstellar travel.

  • And this isn't just about intelligence! Perhaps the most underestimated quality of AI is how humanizing it can be. AI art gives people who otherwise lack technical skills the freedom to create and share their artistic ideas. Talking to an empathetic AI friend really does improve their ability to handle adversity. And AI medical chatbots are already more empathetic than their human counterparts. Rather than making the world harsher and more mechanistic, infinitely patient and sympathetic AI will make the world warmer and nicer.

The stakes here are high. The opportunities are profound. AI is quite possibly the most important - and best - thing our civilization has ever created, certainly on par with electricity and microchips, and probably beyond those.

The development and proliferation of AI - far from a risk that we should fear - is a moral obligation that we have to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.

We should be living in a much better world with AI, and now we can.

So Why The Panic?

In contrast to this positive view, the public conversation about AI is presently shot through with hysterical fear and paranoia.

We hear claims that AI will variously kill us all, ruin our society, take all our jobs, cause crippling inequality, and enable bad people to do awful things.

What explains this divergence in potential outcomes from near utopia to horrifying dystopia?

Historically, every new technology that matters, from electric lighting to automobiles to radio to the Internet, has sparked a moral panic - a social contagion that convinces people the new technology is going to destroy the world, or society, or both. The fine folks at Pessimists Archive have documented these technology-driven moral panics over the decades; their history makes the pattern vividly clear. It turns out this present panic is not even the first for AI.

Now, it is certainly the case that many new technologies have led to bad outcomes - often the same technologies that have been otherwise enormously beneficial to our welfare. So it's not that the mere existence of a moral panic means there is nothing to be concerned about.

But a moral panic is by its very nature irrational - it takes what may be a legitimate concern and inflates it into a level of hysteria that ironically makes it harder to confront actually serious concerns.

And wow do we have a full-blown moral panic about AI right now.

This moral panic is already being used as a motivating force by a variety of actors to demand policy action - new AI restrictions, regulations, and laws. These actors, who are making extremely dramatic public statements about the dangers of AI - feeding on and further inflaming moral panic - all present themselves as selfless champions of the public good.

But are they?

And are they right or wrong?

.....What Is To Be Done?

I propose a simple plan:

  • Big AI companies should be allowed to build AI as fast and aggressively as they can - but not allowed to achieve regulatory capture, not allowed to establish a government-protect cartel that is insulated from market competition due to incorrect claims of AI risk. This will maximize the technological and societal payoff from the amazing capabilities of these companies, which are jewels of modern capitalism.

  • Startup AI companies should be allowed to build AI as fast and aggressively as they can. They should neither confront government-granted protection of big companies, nor should they receive government assistance. They should simply be allowed to compete. If and as startups don't succeed, their presence in the market will also continuously motivate big companies to be their best - our economies and societies win either way.

  • Open source AI should be allowed to freely proliferate and compete with both big AI companies and startups. There should be no regulatory barriers to open source whatsoever. Even when open source does not beat companies, its widespread availability is a boon to students all over the world who want to learn how to build and use AI to become part of the technological future, and will ensure that AI is available to everyone who can benefit from it no matter who they are or how much money they have.

  • To offset the risk of bad people doing bad things with AI, governments working in partnership with the private sector should vigorously engage in each area of potential risk to use AI to maximize society's defensive capabilities. This shouldn't be limited to AI-enabled risks but also more general problems such as malnutrition, disease, and climate. AI can be an incredibly powerful tool for solving problems, and we should embrace it as such.

  • To prevent the risk of China achieving global AI dominance, we should use the full power of our private sector, our scientific establishment, and our governments in concert to drive American and Western AI to absolute global dominance, including ultimately inside China itself. We win, they lose.

And that is how we use AI to save the world.

It's time to build.

Legends and Heroes

I close with two simple statements.

The development of AI started in the 1940's, simultaneous with the invention of the computer. The first scientific paper on neural networks - the architecture of the AI we have today - was published in 1943. Entire generations of AI scientists over the last 80 years were born, went to school, worked, and in many cases passed away without seeing the payoff that we are receiving now. They are legends, every one.

Today, growing legions of engineers - many of whom are young and may have had grandparents or even great-grandparents involved in the creation of the ideas behind AI - are working to make AI a reality, against a wall of fear-mongering and doomerism that is attempting to paint them as reckless villains. I do not believe they are reckless or villains. They are heroes, every one. My firm and I are thrilled to back as many of them as we can, and we will stand alongside them and their work 100%.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
  • Every person will have an AI assistant/coach/mentor/trainer/advisor/therapist that is infinitely patient, infinitely compassionate, infinitely knowledgeable, and infinitely helpful. The AI assistant will be present through all of life's opportunities and challenges, maximizing every person's outcomes.

This seems like insanity to me.

Are computers here to serve us or are we here to serve computers?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Are computers here to serve us or are we here to serve computers?

As an IT tech, I can pretty much assure you that we are here to serve them.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    3 years ago

Should everyone have a robot "life coach"?

Sounds like a sci fi satire to me. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    3 years ago

In a country as divided as this one is right now, can you imagine what that would even look like?  You’d have AI coaches marketed from every segment of the sociopolitical spectrum, simply accelerating the discord that we see today.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    3 years ago

Sounds like Alexa, Siri, "Hey Google", to me.  Combine those with TikTok, Facebook, InstaGram, etc., and you have your life coach.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

Marc Andreessen has a plan to use 'AI to save the world' – and it doesn't involve regulation

Marc Andreessen writes that AI can "make everything we care about better" in a new blog post.
He believes AI companies should be able to build fast and aggressively without regulation.
This will help society benefit from companies that are the "jewels of capitalism," he writes.
The current AI wave wouldn't be complete without a pithy missive from famed venture-capitalist and entrepreneur Marc Andreessen. 

The cofounder of namesake VC firm Andreessen Horowitz, or a16z as it's commonly known, dispelled fears about AI's risks to humanity – both tangible and imagined  – in a lengthy blog post, insisting AI can "make everything we care about better."

Tucked within his philosophical examination on the perceived perils and potential of AI, Andreessen reveals why he's a staunch supporter of the technology and what needs to be done in order to "drive AI into our economy and society as fast and hard as we possibly can, in order to maximize its gains for economic productivity and human potential."

 

"It's almost like a bit of a productivity boost that some of these occupations might get," Anu Madgavkar, a partner at economic research firm McKinsey Global Institute, told Insider.

The buzzy conversational chatbot – which attracted one million users soon after its launch last November – has been used to generate real estate advice, provide tips on how to start a business, and even write music in the style of individual artists, all with varying levels of success. 

Investors have been pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into industry-specific generative AI tools out of the belief that these have the potential to solve problems that, say, hospitals and marketing departments may encounter.

Sam Altman, the CEO of the firm behind ChatGPT, would agree, as he previously said that "generative text is something we all need to adapt to." 

"We adapted to calculators and changed what we tested for in math class, I imagine," Altman said during an interview with StrictlyVC in January. "This is a more extreme version of that, no doubt, but also the benefits of it are more extreme, as well."

Mark Muro, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute who has researched the impact of AI on the workforce, echoes the sentiment. 

"It's absolutely true that AI applications like ChatGPT can very much improve workers' lives," Muro told Insider.

Workers should be careful when using AI tools, as the tech can be prone to misinformation, and it can remove the human touch from tasks like writing. Most companies also haven't established formal rules around employee use of the AI tool, though firms like Microsoft – a major partner and investor of ChatGPT's parent Open AI – have recently given employees the green light to use the chatbot for work purposes, as long as they don't share sensitive information with the site.

 
To that end, he believes AI companies of all stripes should be able to build "as fast and aggressively as they can," but without the involvement of the US government either through regulation or through an agency that insulates them from market competition.

 
AI regulation, particularly after the explosion in generative AI and the startups building out the technology, has been on the minds of many these days including lawmakers in Congress, about how to address the fast-growing technology in light of potential misinformation, copyright violations, and threats to jobs. 

Sam Altman, cofounder and CEO of OpenAI, the startup behind ChatGPT, urged US Senators last month to regulate AI, saying that it was "critical to mitigate the risks of increasingly powerful models."

Altman has become the posterboy for AI after his company's wide scale release of ChatGPT last fall. Despite knowing AI's vast potential and wanting it to thrive, he's also keenly aware of the risks it poses. To help avert those risks, Altman recommended to lawmakers that a new agency should be created to police AI projects, particularly ones that operate at higher levels of capabilities. And that agency should be able to hand out licenses for advanced AI work, and also have the power to take them away should they break any established safety rules. 

But Andreessen thoroughly disagrees with Altman. He believes that the future of AI should be decided by the free market.  He argues that open source AI – projects like MindsDB, which recently raised $25 million – should be allowed to spread freely and, because they tend to offer free versions of their wares, they can compete with commercial AI companies and startups. And even if open source projects don't end up beating companies, the mere availability of such software will allow a generation of willing students to learn how to build and use AI, he argues. 

To offset the risks of AI being used for nefarious purposes and to block China from becoming an AI superpower, the private sector needs to work with governments to come up with solutions. "AI can be an incredibly powerful tool for solving problems, and we should embrace it as such," Andreeseen wrote. 

He also says his firm is eager to fund AI startup founders.

Andreessen Horowitz has already made a splash there, recently leading a $50 million seed round alongside General Catalyst for Hippocratic AI, a healthcare focused, large language model startup, coleading a $10.4 million Series A in Coactive, and also coleading a seed round into London-based AI startup ElevenLabs with ex-GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, Insider previously reported. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3  Hal A. Lujah    3 years ago

I think that the people who write this stuff simply live in a bubble outside of the harshest side of the world we live in.  AI isn’t going to raise a child from birth, humans will.  If those “caretakers” are part of a generational cycle of bad parenting, any AI intervention on that child will be too late.  Children of alcoholics and domestic violence tend to reflect their upbringing, and aren’t likely to be influenced by some goody two shoes AI algorithm, imo.  Growing up, I knew too many kids from shitty homes, and I can just imagine their adolescent reaction to a nonhuman trying to guide them on a moral path.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    3 years ago

AI is currently a class of methods for creating algorithms that can learn and can engage in extremely powerful pattern recognition (beyond what human minds can do).

AI is, in a word, a tool (today).  It can be used for great good and can be abused.  Just like non-AI software and pretty much any other tool we have invented.

 
 

Who is online




162 visitors