This appeared on Fox News shortly before the Sean Hannity program began. This would seem to be a fireable offense for any so called "journalist", which means the person who put it on screen will probably get a pay bonus at Fox.
I realize the banners used to be simply non-partisan epithets, (CNN changed all that) but you might have at least heard the arguments being made for that label.
A chyron of that sort is the equivalent of an editorial position taken by the network. Fox is responsible this morning for actively promoting the idea that Biden is a dictator. To call this lower than a snake "journalism" would be a vast understatement.
Your idea that something in the Hannity program justified this chyhron is ridiculous.
What else would you call a President that allows his administration to charge his main political opponent with bullshit charges?
Do you know how a grand jury works? It's a panel of ordinary citizens who hear the evidence and they then vote on weather to prosecute a person for a crime. While, normally, it only requires a simple majority of the grand jury to prosecute, this time it was unanimous. The President has no say in any of it.
I don't know who "critical thinker" is. The President has no control over the grand jury indictment process. Anybody who says he does is either lying or just plain stupid.
What else would you call a President that allows his administration to charge his main political opponent with bullshit charges?
The scenario you reference is not what is happening. The scenario that is occurring is more like a dog (Trump, if you aren't following) running and running till it finally runs out of lead and is brought up short, choking and sputtering while slobber runs over his face in great greasy gobs.
I hope he goes down in a mass of metaphorical flames. He deserves it, the wretched piece of lying wasted sperm that the traitor Trump is.
What else would you call a President that allows his administration to charge his main political opponent with bullshit charges?
So Trump did not have the documents? He did not repeatedly tell the National Archives to fuck off in regards to those documents, did not have them sitting around his dumpy ass golf club, and did not order his staff to move and try to hide them shits?
Donald Trump's words last night were a declaration of repudiation against reality, democracy and the rule of law. They were the ravings of a thug, who should be taken literally and seriously. Donald Trump aims to burn down the American republic: https:// bit.ly/3X4SGoQ
How low can they go?
Did you watch Hannity last night?
Why would I do that?
I realize the banners used to be simply non-partisan epithets, (CNN changed all that) but you might have at least heard the arguments being made for that label.
What else would you call a President that allows his administration to charge his main political opponent with bullshit charges?
I would have used "tin horn dictator" instead. But given how feeble Brandon is these days- "wannabe" works as well.
A chyron of that sort is the equivalent of an editorial position taken by the network. Fox is responsible this morning for actively promoting the idea that Biden is a dictator. To call this lower than a snake "journalism" would be a vast understatement.
Your idea that something in the Hannity program justified this chyhron is ridiculous.
Do you know how a grand jury works? It's a panel of ordinary citizens who hear the evidence and they then vote on weather to prosecute a person for a crime. While, normally, it only requires a simple majority of the grand jury to prosecute, this time it was unanimous. The President has no say in any of it.
Joe Biden did that to himself starting with his covid mandates. All based on stuff that Dr Fauci and other government"experts" spitballed on.
It's quite different from a trial jury. That is another question I wanted to ask our "critical thinker." I guess I'll have to wait for him.
Your comments are ridiculous. Are news channel chyrons supposed to be used for editorializing by the network, with no indication it is an editorial?
No.
A man that allows the DOJ to do their job?
Did I say otherwise? I did say CNN started it. All the cable news networks now do it, but you only noticed it at Fox.
Got it!
I don't know who "critical thinker" is. The President has no control over the grand jury indictment process. Anybody who says he does is either lying or just plain stupid.
what are you so angry about? who are you mad at?
you'll need to be more specific. that request only eliminates most trump supporters...
Who's that? Iggy?
The scenario you reference is not what is happening. The scenario that is occurring is more like a dog (Trump, if you aren't following) running and running till it finally runs out of lead and is brought up short, choking and sputtering while slobber runs over his face in great greasy gobs.
I hope he goes down in a mass of metaphorical flames. He deserves it, the wretched piece of lying wasted sperm that the traitor Trump is.
I liked it when they just gave the weather forecast and community events...
Why on earth would we do that? That's precisely the foolishness that you keep going on about.
So Trump did not have the documents? He did not repeatedly tell the National Archives to fuck off in regards to those documents, did not have them sitting around his dumpy ass golf club, and did not order his staff to move and try to hide them shits?
The DOJ is just totally making it all up?
You are aware that Hannity is not nor has he ever claimed to be a journalist. What he is is a commentator and gives his opinions on the air.
Ever watch Joy Reid or all the other clowns on MSNBC?
The bigger question is, why do you watch FOX News?
I dont. I do see clips of it show up in my news feed.
And what biased sourced would that be?
Actually, he wants to rescue the American republic from the radical leftists, who are trying to destroy it.
On January 6th, when thousands of people were trying to tear apart this country's republic, how many were leftists trying to install Trump as POTUS?
There was that one person holding a Canadian flag ... I figure he was a snowblind lost trucker in search of a pet peeve.
Maybe he was Instacart delivering some maple syrup.
by the willful retention and refusal to surrender classified documents?
OMG, I know I will get hit for this but that statement is flat out fucking retarded.