╌>

Prosecutors ask judge to issue protective order after Trump post appearing to promise revenge

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  14 comments


Prosecutors ask judge to issue protective order after Trump post appearing to promise revenge
The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in Washington to step in after he released a post online that appeared to promise revenge on anyone who goes after him.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


news.yahoo.com   /prosecutors-ask-judge-issue-protective-025850354.html

Prosecutors ask judge to issue protective order after Trump post appearing to promise revenge


ALANNA DURKIN RICHER 4-5 minutes





The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal judge overseeing the   criminal case against former President Donald Trump   in Washington to step in after he released a post online that appeared to promise revenge on anyone who goes after him.

Prosecutors asked U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to issue a protective order in the case a day after Trump pleaded not guilty to charges of   trying to overturn his 2020 election loss   and block the peaceful transition of power. The order — which is different from a so-called “gag order” — would limit what information Trump and his legal team could share publicly about the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.

Such protective orders are common in criminal cases, but prosecutors said it's “particularly important in this case” because Trump has posted on social media about "witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him."

Prosecutors pointed specifically to a post on Trump's Truth Social platform from earlier Friday in which Trump wrote, in all capital letters, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!”

Prosecutors said they are ready to hand over a "substantial" amount of evidence — “much of which includes sensitive and confidential information” — to Trump's legal team.

They told the judge that if Trump were to begin posting about grand jury transcripts or other evidence provided by the Justice Department, it could have a “harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.”

Prosecutors' proposed protective order seeks to prevent Trump and his lawyers from disclosing materials provided by the government to anyone other than people on his legal team, possible witnesses, the witnesses' lawyers or others approved by the court. It would put stricter limits on “sensitive materials,” which would include grand jury witness testimony and materials obtained through sealed search warrants.

A Trump spokesperson said in an emailed statement that the former president's post “is the definition of political speech,” and was made in response to “dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs.”

The indictment unsealed this week accuses Trump of brazenly conspiring with allies to spread falsehoods and concoct schemes intended to overturn his election loss to President Joe Biden as his   legal challenges floundered in court.

The indictment chronicles how Trump and his Republican allies, in what Smith described as an attack on a “bedrock function of the U.S. government,” repeatedly lied about the results in the two months after he lost the election and pressured his vice president,   Mike Pence , and state election officials to take action to help him cling to power.

Trump faces charges including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and conspiracy to obstruct Congress’ certification of Biden’s electoral victory.

It's the third criminal case brought this year against the   the early front-runner   in the 2024 Republican presidential primary. But it’s the first case to try to hold Trump responsible for his   efforts to remain in power   during the chaotic weeks between his election loss and the attack by his supporters on the   U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

After his court appearance on Thursday before a magistrate judge, Trump characterized the case as a “persecution” designed to hurt his 2024 presidential campaign. His legal team has described it as an attack on his right to free speech and his right to challenge an election that he believed had been stolen.

Smith has said prosecutors will seek a “speedy trial" against Trump in the election case. Judge Chutkan has ordered the government to file a brief by Thursday proposing a trial date. The first court hearing in front of Chutkan is scheduled for Aug. 28.

Trump is already scheduled to stand trial in March in the New York case stemming from   hush-money payments made during the 2016 campaign   and in May in the federal case in Florida stemming from   classified documents found at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

____



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

A lot of people dont like Keith Olbermann, but no one can bring it like he can. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

He was a damn good sportscaster, especially baseball.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Hallux  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    3 years ago

Laura Ingraham said he was a damn good lover.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @1.1.1    3 years ago

When did she tell you that?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.3  Hallux  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.2    3 years ago

Shortly before or after she and Dinesh D'Souza dumped each other.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @1.1.3    3 years ago

Celebrities sure have a large number of sexual partners.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Hallux  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1.4    3 years ago

Indeed, having 2 reeks of wanton lust.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

Bail should be revoked. Throw him in jail for a month and see if that changes his every day tune. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago

What was the amount of his bail?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    3 years ago

zero

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago
Throw him in jail for a month and see if that changes his every day tune.

Hell, 1 weekend in county lockup would kill the guy.  Nobody there will call him "Mr. President", unless it is "Mr. President, bend over and spread your cheeks."

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2    3 years ago
Hell, 1 weekend in county lockup would kill the guy. 

Why do you think that the Feds outsource jail to counties? 

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
3  Duck Hawk    3 years ago

Just throw him in confinement until his case is over. He'll just continue this shit in the hopes of getting a mistrial. PUT A GAG ORDER ON HIM.

 
 
 
TOM PA
Freshman Silent
4  TOM PA    3 years ago

I've said this before.  Detain him for no less than 5 and no more than 10 days in a hospital for psyc and physical determination to see if he can stand the rigors of all the trials and situations he's facing.  Then make the results public.  

 
 

Who is online



92 visitors