╌>

Fox spent nearly 3 hours on its Viktor Shokin interview in rerun of its Ukraine disinformation campaign

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  17 comments

By:   Media Matters for America

Fox spent nearly 3 hours on its Viktor Shokin interview in rerun of its Ukraine disinformation campaign
But Shokin is simply re-upping the conspiracy theory that Hannity, Rudy Giuliani, disgraced conservative journalist John Solomon, Ukrainian pro-Russia oligarch Dmitry Firtash, and their henchmen cooked up back in 2019 to smear Joe Biden.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Written byMatt Gertz

Research contributions fromHarrison Ray & Rob Savillo

Published 08/28/23 2:00 PM EDT

Fox News is running back the Ukraine disinformation campaign that led to former President Donald Trump's first impeachment as its hosts desperately scrounge for a justification for impeaching President Joe Biden.

From Friday through Monday at noon, Fox spent 2 hours and 58 minutes teasing, airing, and analyzing an interview Brian Kilmeade conducted with Ukraine's former prosecutor general Viktor Shokin, running at least 50 segments across 19 different programs.

Biden explained during a 2018 event that Shokin's March 2016 removal from that office came after Biden had warned Ukraine's leaders during a trip to Kyiv as vice president that Shokin was insufficiently focused on fighting corruption and that if he remained in his post, the United States would not follow through on a $1 billion loan guarantee.

But Shokin alleged in the new interview, which aired Saturday, that his 2016 firing came "at the insistence of the then Vice President Biden because I was investigating Burisma," a Ukrainian energy company on whose board Hunter Biden sat. Shokin also accused Joe Biden of "a case of corruption."

On Fox, Shokin's interview has been deemed evidence that Joe Biden committed crimes. Prime-time host Sean Hannity alleged that Biden had participated in a "real bribery scandal," while contributor Gregg Jarrett told the Fox & Friends audience that it was "a case of corruption" and "a classic quid pro quo pay to play" in violation of federal law.

"Are you guys going to bring [Shokin] in and talk to him and where does this lead towards impeachment inquiry?" prime-time host Jesse Watters asked Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), a member of the House Oversight Committee, on Friday. Mace replied that "bribery is one of the bases for impeachment in this country." Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee are also reportedly interested in his testimony.

But Shokin is simply re-upping the conspiracy theory that Hannity, Rudy Giuliani, disgraced conservative journalist John Solomon, Ukrainian pro-Russia oligarch Dmitry Firtash, and their henchmen cooked up back in 2019 to smear Joe Biden. At the time, Hannity's program became a clearinghouse for dubious allegations that Biden had improperly leaned on Ukraine to fire Shokin to benefit his son's business dealings.

In reality:

  • Biden had been following the official U.S. government position that Shokin must be removed because he was "an impediment to the reform of the prosecutorial system," and the idea to push for his firing originated in the State Department, according to George Kent, who at the time was deputy chief of mission in Kyiv.
  • Shokin's office had been widely faulted by Western governments and Ukrainian anti-corruption activists for declining to prosecute corruption, and his deputy had alleged Shokin was obstructing such investigations and resigned in protest. In the months leading up to his firing, the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and the International Monetary Fund had criticized his lack of anti-corruption enforcement, while the European Union applauded his dismissal for offering a "fresh start."
  • Shokin had not been investigating Burisma at the time he was pushed out. The Burisma probe had reportedly been "shelved" under Shokin, and Hunter Biden's business partner Devon Archer testified earlier this month that Shokin's removal "was bad for Burisma because he was under control."

Fox's own internal research unit, dubbed the "Brain Room," assessed the attacks on Biden over Ukraine at the time and concluded that Hannity regulars Solomon, Giuliani, and Republican lawyers Joe diGenova and Valerie Toensing were "spreading disinformation" on the network.

But Trump, who as president watched Fox obsessively and treated Hannity as a top adviser, became fixated on the story. He eventually sought to corruptly leverage U.S. military aid to Ukraine to get that country to announce a criminal investigation into Joe Biden, at the time a candidate for president. The disclosure of that effort triggered a House impeachment inquiry; the House ultimately impeached Trump but he was acquitted by the Senate, with Fox fulfilling its role by muddying the waters and zealously defending him.

The facts haven't changed since then, but with Trump currently facing four different criminal trials Fox is desperate to find something to throw at Biden, and so the network has apparently decided to play the hits.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
The facts haven't changed since then, but with Trump currently facing four different criminal trials Fox is desperate to find something to throw at Biden, and so the network has apparently decided to play the hits.
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

www.businessinsider.com   /fbi-whistleblower-senate-judiciary-russia-giuliani-leak-trump-allies-fuks-biden-2023-8

Exclusive: A veteran FBI agent told Congress that investigations into Giuliani and other Trump allies were suppressed

Mattathias Schwartz 13-16 minutes   8/9/2023


  • An FBI veteran said his superiors suppressed investigations of Trump, Insider can exclusively reveal.
  • "Are we going to do public corruption or not?" the whistleblower said to Insider.
  • He said his boss ordered him to stop investigating Giuliani and the Trump White House.

Thanks for signing up!

Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed while you're on the go.

A veteran FBI counterintelligence agent says his supervisor told him to stop investigating Rudy Giuliani and to cut off contact with any sources who reported on corruption by associates of former President Donald Trump, according to a whistleblower complaint obtained by Insider.

The agent, who served 14 years as a special agent for the bureau, including a long stint in Russia-focussed counterintelligence, claimed in a 22-page statement that his bosses interfered with his work in "a highly suspicious suppression of investigations and intelligence-gathering" aimed at protecting "certain politically active figures and possibly also FBI agents" who were connected to Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs.

Those figures, the statement claims, explicitly included "anyone in the White House and any former or current associates of President Trump."

The statement, which was prepared for staffers of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was apparently leaked and posted in mid-July to a Substack newsletter. Insider has independently obtained a copy of the complaint and verified its authenticity but has not corroborated all of its claims.

In an interview with Insider, the whistleblower said he was motivated by a desire to improve the FBI, which he says is "essential, as imperfect as it is," because of its sweeping power to hold "policymakers accountable, whether they're on the left or the right."

"This is a decision point," he said. "Are we going to do public corruption or not?"

Insider is withholding the name of the whistleblower because he has made claims about retaliation from the FBI, where he remains an employee, and because he is now seeking whistleblower protections from Congress. 

"It's highly unfortunate that this statement wound up being leaked and published," said Scott Horton, an attorney representing the whistleblower. "We're in the preliminary stages of a confidential process. I'm unable to make any other comment." 

The whistleblower told Insider that he was finally ordered to stop investigating Giuliani and the rest of the Trump White House in August 2022, after months of what he said were persistent efforts to frustrate his work, at a meeting with three FBI supervisors at a bureau field office. Insider was able to support the agent's account of the meeting with a second source who had knowledge of what took place.

He said the meeting had been called to discuss the 14-year veteran's job performance. As one of the bureau's few Russian-speaking counterintelligence specialists, he maintained a network of overseas sources that had been utilized by agents across the country to investigate everything from money laundering to political corruption, his statement said. He said his work had been recognized with eight consecutive years of "excellent" or "outstanding" performance appraisal reports running from 2010 to 2018, and he had been tapped to help verify information obtained by investigators working for Robert Mueller during his time as special counsel.

But in the August 2022 meeting, he was called onto the carpet to discuss "performance issues and concerns" and was given suggestions for how to improve, the agent's account provided to lawmakers said. The directions he received included a strict prohibition on filing intelligence reports relating to Giuliani or any other Trump associate.

The agent said the 2022 meeting was the culmination of a yearslong effort to frustrate his investigations into potential wrongdoing by political figures in Trump's circle, stretching back to Trump's stint in the White House. He said in January 2022, he filed an internal complaint under the Whistleblower Protection Act alleging "numerous acts of intelligence suppression of my reporting related to foreign influence and the Capital riots, retaliatory acts and defamation of my own character."

In one case, the statement said, the agent developed information from confidential informants that Giuliani had done paid work for Pavel Fuks, a Ukrainian oligarch and "asset of the Russian intelligence services." (That charge was   previously reported   by Rolling Stone.) Kateryna Roshuk, a spokesperson for Fuks, noted that Fuks had done business with Giuliani's company — Giuliani Security & Safety — not Giuliani himself. "Mr. Fuks paid GSS (not Giuliani) under the contract the terms of which are confidential, including payment," she wrote. She denied that Giuliani ever lobbied for Fuks or that Fuks had paid him $300,000, allegations referred to in the whistleblower's statement.

The whistleblower also said he looked into claims that Giuliani had fraudulently raised money from investors to produce a never completed film about Joe Biden in the months before the 2020 election.

The agent's reporting on Giuliani wasn't received well in the bureau's New York field office, his statement said. "In the midst of my reporting involving Giuliani, which had previously been identified by my supervisor as 'high impact,' my management told me they received a call from a supervisor in NYFO, who they did not identify," the statement says. "This supervisor had taken issue with my reporting."

The whistleblower said he didn't know who the upset supervisor was. But he added: "The conduct of my supervisors and the timing of their actions made plain that reporting concerning Giuliani and a group of people surrounding him with existing or historical ties to the Bureau gave rise to this retaliatory action." The statement points to   Charles McGonigal, the now-indicted   former head of FBI counterintelligence in New York, as one possible source of the apparent "suppressive efforts."

Spokespeople for Giuliani and Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment; nor did attorneys representing Fuks and McGonigal.

The FBI's national press office declined to comment.

Not only did the complaint and other documents reviewed by Insider say the agent's superiors ordered him to stop working on these leads, but they also said the superiors ordered, in early 2022, that the FBI informant who had provided the best intelligence on Giuliani's activities be "closed" — cut off from further FBI contact. The statement said the order came from the FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force, a headquarters-based unit established by Director Christopher Wray in 2017 and charged with combating foreign influence. 

It remains unclear how much of the friction described by the whistleblower's statement stems from left versus right as opposed to field versus headquarters. The month the whistleblower says his bosses ordered him off Trumpworld investigations was a pivotal one for the Bureau's investigations of the former president. On August 8, their agents executed a search warrant on Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, recovering more than 100 records with classified markings that became key evidence in his first federal indictment; a special counsel-led prosecution led to a second Trump indictment in early August over efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Giuliani too was raided by the FBI, in April 2021, although   that probe concluded   without charges in late 2022. 

The agent said months before he was told to stop looking at Giuliani and the rest of Trump's circle, he met with the same high-ranking supervisor to pass on information he had received from his confidential sources about Hunter Biden and his ties to Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company that had paid Hunter Biden $83,333 a month to sit on its board. "My supervisors were delighted that I had collected this information about Burisma," the agent wrote in his statement.

But the agent said when he tried to talk about what their sources had to say about Giuliani, his boss's reaction was very different. The supervisor "forcefully interrupted" him and ended his presentation, he wrote.

The whistleblower's story offers a different perspective from the ones laid out by three other FBI whistleblowers who testified before the GOP-led Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, some of whom have admitted accepting financial support from right-wing groups. Those whistleblowers complained that the bureau was biased   against   Trump and his supporters, that the crackdown on January 6 insurrectionists went too far, and that they had faced retaliation from the bureau for their conservative views. 

In the interview with Insider, the new whistleblower said that he had approached the GOP subcommittee, led by Rep. Jim Jordan. But when the subcommittee's staff learned from the whistleblower that the Hunter Biden information had been handled appropriately, their interest dwindled, the whistleblower said.

"The FBI made a diligent attempt to run the Biden material to the ground," the whistleblower said. "It wasn't slow-played. Chairman Jordan should not be using this as an example to show that the FBI is biased against the right."

Russell Dye, a spokesperson for Jordan, denied the whistleblower's allegations that the committee was cherry-picking witnesses who claimed to be able to implicate Biden.

"We would under no circumstance ever tell a whistleblower that we weren't interested in their story," Dye said. "We have had plenty of whistleblowers come forward about issues not relating to the president," he added. Dye said the committee was still weighing what to do with the information that the whistleblower had given them.

Even before the emergence of this new whistleblower, there had been ample evidence of individual FBI agents with pro-Trump partisan sympathies. Jared Wise, an FBI supervisor who left the bureau in 2017,   now stands accused   of joining the insurrectionists on January 6, 2021, breaking into the Capitol, and shouting, "kill 'em! Kill 'em!" at rioters as they attacked the Capitol Police line.

Further up the chain of command, bureau leadership — perhaps intimidated by Trump's "deep state" rhetoric and his treatment of former senior FBI personnel such as James Comey and Peter Strzok — has resisted investigating the former president. A   Washington Post investigation   found that more than a year passed before the bureau formally opened a probe into connections between the Trump White House and the January 6 violence. Other   reporting by the Post   showed that senior FBI officials attempted to push back on plans by Justice Department prosecutors to search Mar-a-Lago without Trump's permission. Some FBI agents were reportedly satisfied by an assertion made by Trump's legal team that he'd turned over all his classified documents, and wanted to close the Mar-a-Lago government records investigation down.

The FBI is ideologically diverse and decentralized, with 35,000 employees spread out across 56 field offices from Anchorage to San Juan. The glimpse of one field office provided by the new whistleblower could be more indicative of a risk-averse bureaucracy struggling to balance its law-enforcement duties with its increasingly fragile public image than a politically motivated cover-up.

The whistleblower recounts how one of his sources, code-named Genius, won the trust of racist extremists whom the bureau investigated for their role in the January 6 violence. Genius was able to do so because he had credibility on the far-right political fringe. Nevertheless, the whistleblower claims, the FBI ordered that the source be closed, supposedly for making the same kinds of "inappropriate" comments on social media that had earned him access to some of the leaders of the insurrection.

The agent's decision to make a formal statement to Congress appears to have been a last resort. He said he previously approached the FBI's internal ombudsman with his concerns. He said in December 2021, he submitted an official whistleblower complaint to the head of his field office. Under federal law, that complaint should have protected him from internal reprisals. But his account said his superiors responded with punishments, disciplining him for errors in paperwork and reassigning him to a new post outside of his longtime area of expertise, one that required a multi-hour commute from his home.

Those experiences, he told Insider, are part of what compelled him to share what he knows with Congress, not to harm the FBI but to improve and correct public misperceptions.

"There are people in the FBI who are biased," he said. "We aren't robots. But the bureau itself has integrity. It's necessary. Despite the scars that I bear, I believe that the majority of my colleagues are doing the right thing."


This story has been updated to include a statement from a spokesperson for Pavel Fuks.

Mattathias Schwartz is Insider's chief national security correspondent. He can be reached by email at schwartz79@protonmail.com.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago
He said his boss ordered him to stop investigating Giuliani and the Trump White House.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    3 years ago
An agent turned whistle-blower claims that the Bureau was eager to investigate Hunter Biden—but protected Rudy Giuliani.

In January, 2019, information from one of Buma’s sources set in motion the Bureau’s first inquiries into potential undisclosed lobbying and tax evasion by   Hunter Biden — President Joe Biden’s   son and, at the time, a director of the Ukrainian company Burisma. Buma also played a pivotal role in a Bureau investigation into possibly illegal foreign-lobbying activity and campaign-finance violations by   Rudy Giuliani ,   former President Donald Trump’s   personal lawyer, who oversaw a sprawling effort to dig up dirt on Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian ties.

Earlier this year, Buma watched with keen interest as the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee geared up for public hearings into the Biden Administration’s alleged political “weaponizing” of the F.B.I. The Republicans claimed that the Bureau had relentlessly pursued former President Trump and his allies while neglecting leads about the Bidens. (In January, Representative Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican who chairs the committee, complained on “Meet the Press” that, although agents had “raided Trump’s home,” they hadn’t “raided Biden’s home.”) In April, Buma reached out to Jordan’s office, offering public testimony as a whistle-blower. He later gave a detailed phone interview to two former federal agents whom the committee had hired to investigate what its conservative members call “the Biden family business.”

The Republicans, however, were in no rush to publicize what Buma had to say—perhaps because his account ran against their preferred story line. Buma said that, during the Trump Administration, Bureau officials hardly covered up for the Bidens: his fellow-agents jumped on any new scrap of information about Hunter’s foreign business dealings, even though the resulting investigation never produced evidence of illegal corruption. Instead, in Buma’s telling, agency leaders had moved repeatedly to squash his investigation of possible Russian and Ukrainian ties to Giuliani. Not only did the Trump Administration Attorney General   William Barr   appear to shut down an active investigation of Giuliani in 2020; Buma has charged that, even under the Biden Administration, agency overseers seemed determined to silence some of the most important sources feeding his Giuliani reporting.

Three months after he approached the House Republicans, Buma laid out his account of events in a twenty-two-page statement, and on July 15th he presented it to the Democratic-led Senate Judiciary Committee. By mid-2020, he wrote, his reporting about Giuliani had “produced acute anxiety” within the New York and Los Angeles field offices, “coupled with an urgent desire to shut off my sources and me. . . . As their efforts to suppress this investigative work escalated, my direct management specifically told me in writing that I was no longer allowed to do any reporting related to public corruption, criminal matters, anyone in the White House, and any former or current associates of President Trump.”
 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.2  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago
ccording to a whistleblower complaint obtained by Insider.

Is this the same anonymous whistleblower that led to Trump's second impeachment? The one that probably never existed?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3  JBB    3 years ago

Russia is already openly interfering in our 2024 Presidential election to aid Trump and the gop in Congress is assisting them. Biden / Harris 2024!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1  bugsy  replied to  JBB @3    3 years ago

Your proof...

And please...only reputable sources....your feelings are not sources.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Hallux  replied to  bugsy @3.1    3 years ago
And please...only reputable sources.

Do you have a list?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Hallux @3.1.1    3 years ago

The request was not to myself.

Try and keep up. It has only been 2 posts.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @3    3 years ago

The Biden administration, the DOJ, the FBI, and several other jurisdictions are actively interfering in the 2024 election by politically prosecuting an opponent. They are setting a bad precedent that will someday come back to bite them in the assl 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4  Greg Jones    3 years ago

Biden proudly proclaimed that he had the son-of-a-bitch fired.

The whole world now knows why.

Biden should be impeached for interfering in the affairs of another country.

Evidence continues to mount daily concerning the corruption of Joe Biden and his family

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

You are ill informed. Thats doesnt stop you though. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.1  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    3 years ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.1.2  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    3 years ago

Right John.

Too bad whistleblowers have already stated Hunter made a phone call to Brandon on behalf of Burisma to get Shokin fired.

  Ukrainian prosecutor-general Viktor Shokin, who was fired after then-Vice President Joe Biden threatened to pull $1 billion in US aid, was “a threat” to natural gas company Burisma Holdings, which paid Hunter Biden up to $1 million per year, the first son’s former business partner   Devon Archer confirmed in an interview   released Friday.

“He was a threat. He ended up seizing assets of [Burisma owner] Nikolai [Zlochevsky] — a house, some cars, a couple properties. And Nikolai actually never went back to Ukraine after Shokin seized all of his assets,” Archer told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

Shokin’s office won a court order to seize Zlochevsky’s property on Feb. 2, 2016,   the Kyiv Post reported   at the time. Shokin was fired on March 29, purportedly due to his own corruption.

Archer’s remarks are significant because they contradict the position of House Democrats that Shokin was not considered a threat to Burisma — a point likely to be hotly contested if Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.)   launches an impeachment inquiry , as he said last week was becoming likely.

Archer confirmed Monday during an interview with the House Oversight Committee that Joe Biden attended  an April 2015 dinner  in Washington with Burisma board adviser Vadym Pozharskyi and that Hunter stepped away from a December 2015 meeting in Dubai to call his father, joined by both Pozharskyi and Zlochevsky. Just days before that call, Biden had  addressed  Ukraine’s parliament during a trip to Kyiv.

Biden later boasted that during the same visit, he had pressured officials to seek Shokin’s removal.

“I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” said Biden, referring to a $1 billion loan guarantee, at an event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018. “Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.”

Biden is known for factual embellishments during public remarks and his boast doesn’t neatly fit the timeline of  his known visits  to Ukraine. He did not visit in 2016, the year Shokin was fired, though he reportedly  spoke on the phone four times  in February and March 2016 with then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and once with Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk as he pushed for the prosecutor’s removal.

Hmmmm. Victor Shokin — the top Ukraine prosecutor whom then-Veep Joe Biden got fired in March 2016 for alleged malfeasance — sure was   popular with the   rest   of the Obama administration.

That love shines through in newly unearthed documents:

“We have been impressed with the ambitious reform and anti-corruption agenda of your government,” gushed the State Department’s Ukraine point person Victoria Nuland to Shokin in summer 2015. 

“Ukraine has made sufficient progress on its reform agenda to justify a third guarantee” of aid money, noted another federal functionary that October. 

So why did Biden single him out for disposal?

One thing we know: It sure did help his son Hunter.

Remember: Shokin was fired right as he was breathing down the neck of Ukrainian energy company Burisma. 

And Burisma, you’ll recall, had made ne’er-do-well Hunter a board member with a sky-high salary despite his   literal   zero experience either in global business (other than influence-peddling)   or   energy exploration and exploitation.  

Do we have to draw a picture here?

The only people that are ill informed are Democrats/leftists that still refuse to see that Brandon and his family have sold this country out repeatedly to our enemies.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

The original talking point was Burisma didn't want Shokin fired because they weren't under investigation.  Thus the Bidens did nothing wrong for taking Burisma money while Joe headed Ukranian policy and extorted Ukraine to fire Shokin.  Burisma didn't  care about it.

But the House investigators exposed that lie and proved Burisma very much wanted Shokin fired.

So now the Bidens did nothing wrong because "it was US policy anyway".

It's another non falsifiable argument from the left. Whatever the facts of the moment show, the response will always be "the Bidens did nothing wrong."

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    3 years ago

It wasnt just US policy, it was NATO and western European policy as well.  I suppose you think all the western European nations agreed to cover up Biden's crimes? 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    3 years ago

See post 4.1.2

As further proof from one of the articles.

Look: As late as   January 2016 , the CIA was dumping on claims that Shokin was crooked.

When rumors started to buzz in-country that further aid money was tied to Shokin’s ouster, the agency responded with a literal “Yikes.”

So said agency Ukraine expert   Eric Ciaramella, later adding (of a DC meeting with senior leaders from Shokin’s office): “We were super impressed with the group, and we had a two-hour discussion of their priorities and the obstacles they face.”

“Super impressed” does not sound   anywhere   close to “this guy is crooked and must go.”

Biden’s turned the tale of his move against Shokin into one of his fake tough-guy anecdotes, bragging to the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018 that on his December 2015 trip to Kyiv, “I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a b—. He got fired.”

But it sure doesn’t sound   like   anyone   else in the White House thought Shokin was corrupt.

The Obama Administration loved Shokin. 

You know who didn't love Shokin? Those who were on the take from Burisma. Bet several NATO country politicians were ecstatic to see him gone as well as Brandon/Hunter.

 
 

Who is online






110 visitors