╌>

Dem Congresswoman Crockett Blisters GOP committee members

  
By:  John Russell  •  2 years ago  •  31 comments


Dem Congresswoman Crockett Blisters GOP committee members
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


This is a good one

if you dont want to watch the whole thing , skip the first minute or so


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    2 years ago
I don’t know how y’all are still standing right now because you should be quite dizzy from all the spinning that you’re constantly doing

when it comes to spinning the truth you talk about free and fair elections but you back a guy who we know tried to steal the election and this isn’t about what Democrats have to say

let me remind you for those of you that don’t know how the justice system works it’s not a matter of the president went in and indicted Trump but we are talking about grand juries

grand juries are comprised of American citizens and the people that have entered pleas of guilty that will be flipping on your leader in a minute 

they are Republicans I do want to point that out and half of them were Republicans that were handpicked by Donald Trump himself so to be clear whatever happens to your little leader it’s going to be because of the actions that he took so you can talk all you want to about how January 6 was nonsense but all of y’all were running at that time y’all were grabbing y’all’s gas mask and y’all were run to your offices cuz you didn’t know if they were coming to kill you

you should have cared that somebody was there to protect you but instead you want to play games because you found out that it was your leader that decided that he wanted to propagate an Insurrection on our country

so don’t tell me that you care about the Constitution cuz you don’t all you care about is Trump getting reelected and I’ll yield the last of my time to my leader 
 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
1.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    2 years ago

Well Ms Crockett, y’all be a blowhard.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2  Greg Jones    2 years ago

Another uneducated leftwing wacko. Reminds me of Maxine Waters.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @2    2 years ago
She graduated from   Rhodes College   in 2003 with a   Bachelor of Arts   in business administration. As an undergraduate, Crockett planned to become an   anesthesiologist   or   certified public accountant   before deciding to attend law school, a decision she made after she was the victim of a hate crime while attending college.  She later attended the  University of Houston Law Center , graduating in 2006 with a  Juris Doctor . After law school, Crockett remained in Texas and worked as a civil rights attorney.
 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    2 years ago

Perhaps she might sound like she knows what she's talking about instead of making up bullshit and looking stupid in the process.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.1    2 years ago
Perhaps she might sound like she knows what she's talking about instead of making up bullshit and looking stupid in the process.

Are you claiming that Comer has not lied about previous closed door testimony?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @2    2 years ago

Another uneducated leftwing wacko. Reminds me of Maxine Waters.

So Jim Jordan did ignore a legal subpoena...for YEARS, because you don't like her? 

Please, explain that...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @2.2    2 years ago

So it's OK for Hunter Biden to OK to ignore a subpoena?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  MrFrost @2.2    2 years ago
ordan did ignore a legal subpoena...for YEARS, because you don't like her?

no he didn't.  He Responded and the House accepted his response and moved on. 

But by all means, please provide the House's finding of contempt that would prove your point. [deleted]

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.2    2 years ago
no he didn't.

Yes, he did.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.4  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.2    2 years ago

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.5  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @2.2.1    2 years ago

So it's OK for Hunter Biden to OK to ignore a subpoena?

So it's OK for Jim Jordan to ignore a subpoena? 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2.6  Snuffy  replied to  MrFrost @2.2.4    2 years ago

You should read your own links. Your link states that Jorden was referred to the Ethics Committee but was never held in contempt of Congress. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  MrFrost @2.2.4    2 years ago

So you can't show any evidence of the House finding him in contempt for failing to respond to the subpoena. No surprise, since he did, in fact, respond to the Subpoena and the House did not cite him for contempt.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.8  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.6    2 years ago
Your link states that Jorden was referred to the Ethics Committee but was never held in contempt of Congress.

That is a long way away from him being pardoned for his transgression.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.9  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.7    2 years ago

So you can't show any evidence of the House finding him in contempt for failing to respond to the subpoena. No surprise, since he did, in fact, respond to the Subpoena and the House did not cite him for contempt.

Today’s markup is the definition of chutzpah. Three members of this panel, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, and Andy Biggs, all defied legitimate Congressional subpoenas related to their involvement in or knowledge of a violent attack on the United States Capitol meant to overturn the results of a free and fair election. When called before Congress to provide testimony on a defining moment in American history, they ran and hid. But today, they are going to vote to hold in contempt a private citizen who has offered to provide voluntary, public testimony before the Committee.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2.10  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.8    2 years ago

Please point out where anybody said Jordan was pardoned. I'm not finding that on this page.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.11  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.7    2 years ago
So you can't show any evidence of the House finding him in contempt for failing to respond to the subpoena.

When did he testify? 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.12  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.10    2 years ago
Please point out where anybody said Jordan was pardoned.

I see you are confused about my wording.  Would "excused" work better for you?  How about if I said that Jordan's refusal to cooperate with a legal subpoena has been accepted and acknowledged with no incriminations by the republican party in the House?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  author  JohnRussell    2 years ago

Jasmine Crockett smoked 'em with the truth. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @3    2 years ago

She reminded me of the teacher in Charlie Brown shows

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3    2 years ago

Trump Inc. leased Trump Tower office space and rented out Trump Hotel rooms to foriegn entities for $7.8M  What did foreign entities get for their million to Hunter?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

"White privilege"

Can racists ever make a point without making it about race? That's a challenge racist democrats can never pass.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    2 years ago

Nancy Mace brought up white privilege in this setting. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    2 years ago

Though she's as inarticulate as Nancy Mace, that is not Nancy Mace. 

I can't believe you think she actually helps you. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.1    2 years ago

Nancy Mace brought up white privilege. Maybe you didnt see the footage. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
5  Sparty On    2 years ago

White privilege is a liberal construct intended primarily for conservatives.

So Hunter is good to go ….

 
 

Who is online



Freefaller


116 visitors