Crisis in Texas -
By: Steve Schmidt
I was thinking about Wilmer McLean while reading about the escalating stand off between Texas and the United States government at Eagle Pass, Texas, following a U.S. Supreme Court decision. The decision made clear that the state of Texas does not have the lawful authority to occupy the international border and refuse access to U.S. Border Patrol.
There is a great deal of loose talk about civil war in America, and there has been for some time. In fact, there will be a movie imagining the future conflict released later this year called "Civil War." Here's the trailer for it:
It seems that civil war is never far from the imaginations of some Americans. Here is a story of 21st century Americans taking time out of their busy schedules to fetishize the Confederacy by wearing the uniform of the slave republic, while cheering for the South. Of course, the cause of the war was singular — slavery — but that seems to matter little, as does the deaths of 850,000 people. It may be lost on millions of Americans, but when Nazi Germany needed a foundational basis for laws that would strip human beings of citizenship and establish a legal basis for their subjugation, they turned to the American South for inspiration. It may also be lost on millions of Americans that nearly 200,000 Black men wore the blue uniform of the US Army during the Civil War. Black men and white officers serving with them were summarily executed by the Confederate Army during the war, which was filled with racial atrocities by units that killed with the same glee as Einsatzgruppen killers in Europe 80 years later.
Here are the words of Alexander Stephens, the Confederate vice president, making clear that the cause was slavery. It is referred to as the "Cornerstone" speech:
The new Constitution has put at rest forever all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institutions-African slavery as it exists among us-the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson, in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the "rock upon which the old Union would split." He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old Constitution were, that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with; but the general opinion of the men of that day was, that, somehow or other, in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the Constitution, was the prevailing idea at the time. The Constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly used against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the idea of a Government built upon it-when the "storm came and the wind blew, it fell."
Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and moral condition. [Applause.] This, our new Government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It is so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago. Those at the North who still cling to these errors with a zeal above knowledge, we justly denominate fanatics. All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind; from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity. One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is, forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics: their conclusions are right if their premises are. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights, with the white man…. I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the Northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery; that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle-a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of man. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds we should succeed, and that he and his associates in their crusade against our institutions would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as well as in physics and mechanics, I admitted, but told him it was he and those acting with him who were warring against a principle. They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.
In the conflict thus far, success has been on our side, complete throughout the length and breadth of the Confederate States. It is upon this, as I have stated, our social fabric is firmly planted; and I cannot permit myself to doubt the ultimate success of a full recognition of this principle throughout the civilized and enlightened world.
As I have stated, the truth of this principle may be slow in development, as all truths are, and ever have been, in the various branches of science. It was so with the principles announced by Galileo-it was so with Adam Smith and his principles of political economy. It was so with Harvey, and his theory of the circulation of the blood. It is stated that not a single one of the medical profession, living at the time of the announcement of the truths made by him, admitted them. Now, they are universally acknowledged. May we not therefore look with confidence to the ultimate universal acknowledgment of the truths upon which our system rests? It is the first Government ever instituted upon principles in strict conformity to nature, and the ordination of Providence, in furnishing the materials of human society. Many Governments have been founded upon the principles of certain classes; but the classes thus enslaved, were of the same race, and in violation of the laws of nature. Our system commits no such violation of nature's laws. The negro by nature, or by the curse against Canaan, is fitted for that condition which he occupies in our system. The architect, in the construction of buildings, lays the foundation with the proper material-the granite-then comes the brick or the marble. The substratum of our society is made of the material fitted by nature for it, and by experience we know that it is the best, not only for the superior but for the inferior race, that it should be so. It is, indeed, in conformity with the Creator. It is not for us to inquire into the wisdom of His ordinances or to question them. For His own purposes He has made one race to differ from another, as He has made "one star to differ from another in glory."
The great objects of humanity are best attained, when conformed to his laws and degrees, in the formation of Governments as well as in all things else. Our Confederacy is founded upon principles in strict conformity with these laws. This stone which was rejected by the first builders "is become the chief stone of the corner" in our new edifice.
Of course, the trigger for the war was the attack on Fort Sumter and the United States Army by the state of South Carolina on April 12-13, 1861. What followed was the war that everyone involved thought would be very brief. It happened in Manassas, Virginia, and all of Washington society travelled to watch it as a social event. The armies met
on the property around Mr. McLean's farm. After a spasm of bloodshed that shocked the spectators, the defeated Union Army straggled to Washington, DC. The Confederacy had won its first battle, and Wilmer McClean uprooted his family, and moved to a quiet corner of southwestern Virginia, far from the war's front lines.
Every white supremacist in the country who venerates the defeated slave republic, celebrates the lost cause and has fantasies about a 21st century civil war, has imagined how it will start. Some of those malignant fantasies manifested as books, like the racist "Turner Diaries" that inspired Timothy McVeigh's act of mass murder. Every 21st century confederate with dreams of concentration camps, mass deportations, and lusts for retribution against dissent and punishment for political opponents is tuned into what is happening in Eagle Pass, Texas. Are you?
Did you know about the "Army of God," which is forming and heading to the border, believing the end times are nigh? By the way, did you know that the English translation of Hezbollah is "Army of God?"
Did you know that the governor of Oklahoma speculated about the moment when Texans and Americans will point weapons at one another? Did you know that he was imagining the moment when Texas National Guard, joined by Oklahoma National Guard, would level weapons at federal officers under orders from Governor Greg Abbott? Did you know that he talked about the violence in exactly the same manner that 19th century secessionists did?
Did you know that 25 other MAGA/GOP governors are jumping on board the bandwagon? Did you know that the governor of Idaho is flirting with the idea of deploying his National Guard to Texas in defiance of the U.S. Supreme Court?
How many more MAGA/GOP governors are salivating to take part in this performance theater, and gain Trump's favor?
Does the Biden White House have any appreciation whatsoever about what is happening, and where this is going?
There is an old saying that has enormous import at this early stage, though it is completely obvious. It is difficult to actualize in any environment where consensus, caution, bureaucracy and thick bubbles of insularity are at play. The saying is an oldie, but a goodie: "nip it in the bud."
What happens when federal and red state National Guards square off and raise weapons at one another?
What happens when the first shot is fired?
President Biden must act decisively in this moment against the accumulation of bad faith and extremism that has accumulated without response under the political, moral and un-American corruption of men like Greg Abbott and Ken Paxton. This issue cannot be ignored or neglected. It should be perfectly clear by now that Donald Trump is cheering for the chaos because it is an element of his demagoguery. He is running to restore order out of the madness he has created — just like Adolf Hitler succeeded in doing between 1928 and 1932 Germany.
Soon, heavily armed trucker convoys will arrive in Eagle Pass. President Biden needs to get control of this situation ASAP before it becomes his version of the Iranian hostage crisis. There should be no doubt about this issue to destroy his candidacy. It is growing worse by the hour, and now the extremists are making their move. This is a cancer that should not be allowed to metastasize.
The Warning with Steve Schmidt is a reader-supported publication.

Border Patrol Union - NBPC
@BPUnion
Rank-and file BP agents are not going to start arresting TX NG members for following their LAWFUL orders. That's fake news.
TX NG and rank-and-file BP agents work together and respect each other's jobs. Period. If TX NG members have LAWFUL orders, then they have to carry out those orders.
TX NG members realize that rank-and-file BP agents have their orders as well. Lawful orders, no matter how unpopular or distasteful amongst rank-and-file agents, must be followed. Unlawful orders (as determined by competent legal counsel and not what some outhouse lawyer behind a keyboard says) will not be followed.
Rank-and-file BP agents appreciate and respect what TX has been doing to defend their state in the midst of this catastrophe that the Biden Admin has unleashed on America.
We want to be perfectly clear, there is no fight between rank-and-file BP agents and the TX NG, Gov. Abott, or TX DPS. It may make flashy headlines, but it simply isn't true.
1:03 PM · Jan 26, 2024
·
589.3K
Views
Far right nutcases, conspiracy theorists, violent anti-government fantasists, and white supremacists now have a new uniting cause - INDEPENDENCE FOR TEXAS !
“INDEPENDENCE FOR TEXAS !”
Just secede already. We’d all be better off.
Yawn, oh pardon me.
Take Our Border Back: Americans Announce Multi-State Convoy to …
Web Jan 22, 2024 · The rallies will be held in Eagle Pass , Texas, Yuma, Arizona, and San Ysidro, California, on Feb. 3. Welcome to the Take Our Border Back Southern Border Convoy Main …
Some supporters of a far-right convoy headed to the Texas border …
Web Jan. 31, 2024, 11:34 AM PST. By Ryan J. Reilly and Brandy Zadrozny. WASHINGTON — Some supporters of a trucker convoy of self-described patriots headed toward the U.S. border …
"The Supreme Court blocked me, but it didn’t stop me."
Little on the nose for Abbot to be so public and open about defying the Supreme Court.
This is a cancer that should not be allowed to metastasize.
Biden has not only been allowing it to metastasize since he took office, he's been giving it steroids to try and make it grow even quicker.
www.mysanantonio.com /news/local/article/texas-border-standoff-secession-18637914.php
Texas standoff sparks calls for secession and fears of violence
Robert Downen and Uriel J. García 12-15 minutes 1/30/2024
In Texas, the report found , overt extremists and neo-Nazis such as the Aryan Freedom Network are similarly capitalizing on the controversy, with one group calling for “white men” to “join the resistance at the border.”
Daniel Miller felt encouraged last week, as fears of a new civil war trended online and a coalition of powerful Republicans coalesced behind Gov. Greg Abbott ’s standoff with the Biden administration.
As the longtime leader of Texas’ quixotic secessionist movement , Miller has for decades argued that Texas is in a stranglehold by the federal government that, eventually, would prompt enough popular support for a vote to leave the union . The past week only reinforced that belief.
"It validates and confirms the position we've had all along, which is that if Texas ever wants to truly secure its border … the only way we’re going to do it is as an independent and self-governing nation,” Miller said in an interview.
At issue is the 47-acre Shelby Park in Eagle Pass , where Texas has for months been laying concertina wire along the Rio Grande to prevent migrants from crossing. In a 5-4 decision early last week, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the Biden administration , allowing U.S. Border Patrol agents to cut the wire to apprehend people who had crossed the river.
The narrowly written decision — which didn’t speak to whether the state had to stop laying new concertina wire — has emboldened Abbott, who vowed to continue his fight against the high court and federal government, citing Texas’ right to defend itself from what he claims is an “invasion” of migrants.
By week’s end — and as the Texas National Guard and state troopers continued to roll out wire and stifle federal agents’ access to much of the park — Abbott’s defiant calls were backed by 25 Republican governors, former President Donald Trump, U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson and nearly all of Texas’ congressional delegation.
The calls for Texas to defend itself and defy the federal government have set fire to a long simmering fight over states’ rights, emboldening right-wing figures small and large, from secessionists like Miller to far-right militias and a convoy of protesters from across the country that are currently en route to the border. This week, the Texas Military Department — which oversees the Texas state and national guard — also began flying the “ Come and Take It ” flag from the Battle of Gonzales outside its Austin headquarters .
“Everyone in power, from the White House, to the hedge fund managers, to the Supreme Court of the United States has decided to destroy the country by allowing it to be invaded,” former Fox News star Tucker Carlson wrote last week to his 11.3 million followers on X, formerly known as Twitter. “That leaves the population to defend itself. Where are the men of Texas? Why aren’t they protecting their state and the nation?”
The standoff comes amid a recent and growing acceptance of political violence: October polling from the Public Religion Research Institute found that nearly 1 in 4 Americans agree that “patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country,” up from 15 percent in 2021, when the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection prompted PRRI to begin asking the question.
Roughly one-third of Republicans and white evangelical Protestants agreed with that sentiment, compared to 13% of independents and 7% of Democrats.
The “invasion” legal theory
At the core of the Eagle Pass dispute is a term with a recent, violent history: “ Invasion. ”
To justify Texas’ legal position, Abbott and others have claimed that the state faces an “invasion” of migrants that has been aided and abetted by the Biden administration. Thus, they argue, Texas has the right to supersede the federal government’s Constitutionally outlined immigration powers in order to defend itself.
The once-fringe theory has long been derided by legal experts and constitutional scholars who say it would effectively destroy the federal system and allow states to wantonly use “invasion” declarations to ignore federal law. And federal judges have similarly shot down the idea, with one recently calling Texas’ argument “breathtaking.”
Adriel Orozco, senior policy counsel at the American Immigration Council, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit advocacy organization, said that Abbott is not the first politician to describe the number of migrants arriving at the border as an invasion. He added that Abbott is blurring the line between political rhetoric and factual legal basis.
“Unfortunately, the word invasion has been used historically against migrants to justify stricter immigration laws,” Orozco said. “It appears that Gov. Abbott is more interested in scoring political points than understanding what an invasion is under the Constitution.”
Immigration rights groups have similarly warned that framing immigrants as part of an invasion will inevitably lead to border vigilantism and violence, and that such rhetoric reinforces core tenets of “great replacement theory” — a foundational ideology of white supremacists that falsely claims there is an intentional, sometimes Jewish-driven , effort to replace white people through immigration, the LGBTQ+ community, interracial marriage and diversity initiatives.
The San Marcos man who pleaded guilty in April to setting fire to an Austin synagogue railed about Jews and “ invaders ” in his journals; and the North Texas gunman who murdered 22 people at an El Paso WalMart in 2019 was driven by his belief that Mexicans were invading the border.
After the El Paso shooting, Abbott vowed to stop using “invasion” rhetoric, but resumed using the term as he ramped up his criticism of the Biden administration and faced well-funded, anti-immigration primary challengers in 2022.
By then, immigration hawks had begun to coalesce around the idea of declaring an “invasion” that would allow Texas to further ramp up its immigration enforcement. In 2021, former officials from the Department of Homeland Security under Trump argued that Abbott should declare Texas was under invasion and “exercise every option available” at the border — and let the Supreme Court decide what’s legal.
“Abbott should be resolved to do everything that is constitutionally permissible,” they wrote. “That may take him into some gray areas, like using state officials to enforce portions of immigration law not in clear contravention of federal law. The governor has an obligation to exercise every option available.”
But perhaps no one has been more important to the spread of the “invasion” legal theory than officials in Kinney County, a 3,000-person county along the border. In 2021, Kinney County Attorney Brent Smith — who Miller said has served as a policy adviser for his secessionist group — penned a letter arguing that Texas was being “invaded by thousands each day” and should invoke “invasion” clauses of the U.S. Constitution to justify defending itself.
He and other officials began calling on other counties to make “invasion” declarations. It wasn’t long before the idea took hold: A May 2021 “border crisis rally” drew some 200 attendees as well as speeches from, among others: the sheriff of nearby Goliad County, who claimed there was a “Marxist invasion” underway; then-state Rep. Bryan Slaton, an immigration hawk who proposed a constitutional referendum on secession not long before being expelled from the Texas House for unrelated reasons; and Bianca Gracia , a current Texas House candidate and collaborator of Enrique Tarrio, the Proud Boys leader who was sentenced to 22 years in prison for his leading role in the Jan. 6, 2021 U.S. Capitol insurrection.
Other “border invasion” events in Kinney County featured Attorney General Ken Paxton and Maria Espinoza, whose “ Remembrance Project ” frequently depicts immigrants as rapists or murderers.
In October 2021, militia members began patrolling in Kinney County, citing an “invasion” that they believed was part of a conspiracy to turn Texas blue. And in December 2021, Lucas Denney, a North Texas militia leader and Proud Boys collaborator who was later sentenced for his role in the Jan. 6 riots, was arrested at a property owned by the family of Smith, the Kinney County attorney.
In November 2022, after months of prodding from critics to his right, Abbott finally invoked the “invasion” clause, saying in a letter to Biden that Texas had no choice but to protect itself. Texas’ legal arguments have been routinely slapped down by courts and federal judges who note that states have no right to declare “invasions.”
That hasn’t deterred major figures on the right, many of whom have called for Abbott to simply ignore the conservative-dominated U.S. Supreme Court if it doesn’t rule in Texas’ favor — to tell the court to “go to hell,” asU.S. Rep. Chip Roy , R-Texas, suggested.
“If the Supreme Court wants to ignore that truth, which a slim majority did …Texas leaders still have the duty to defend their people,” Roy said on Fox News last week. “It's like, if someone's breaking into your house, and the court says, 'Oh, sorry. You can't defend yourself.’ What do you tell the court? You tell the court to go to hell, you defend yourself and then figure it out later."
Others have noted that, in his response to the ruling, Abbott argued that the “federal government has broken the compact between the United States and the states” — language that some have argued echoes Texas’ 1861 declaration of secession over slavery. Abbott, who was in India for most of last week, has not responded to those accusations and did not respond to a request for comment for this story.
Since then, chatter about a looming conflict has continued to spread.
“What is this going to turn into, a civil war?” Fox News host Maria Bartiromo asked Lt. Gov Dan Patrick over the weekend. “You’ve got Texas rights vs. federal rights, both sides with guns.”
Patrick responded: “We believe, constitutionally, we are right. We have a right to defend our citizens. We have a right to defend this country.”
After the Supreme Court decision last week, U.S. Rep. Clay Higgins, R-Louisiana, said that the “feds are staging a civil war and Texas should stand their ground” — a post that was shared and celebrated widely in far-right online communities, including those that were integral to the planning of “stop the steal” protests in the lead up to the Jan. 6 riot.
And earlier this week, Rep. Keith Self , R-McKinney, announced that he would rally in Eagle Pass with a so-called “Take Back Our Border” convoy that is traveling to the border in California, Texas and Arizona this week. The Texas leg of the caravan is also scheduled to meet at a Dripping Springs distillery owned by Phil Waldron, a retired army colonel who played a key role in Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election.
The organizers of the convoy have said they plan to peacefully protest, though social media chats set up for the group have been replete with references to “1776” and discussions about arriving armed and prepared for potential violence.
“There is a point where we are going to have to get our hands dirty,” one member reportedly wrote.
They aren’t the only ones preparing for potential violence: A Tuesday report by the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism found that transnational far-right groups have also used the standoff to rail against immigrants and proliferate baseless conspiracy theories about the “intentional displacement of whites.”
In Texas, the report found , overt extremists and neo-Nazis such as the Aryan Freedom Network are similarly capitalizing on the controversy, with one group calling for “white men” to “join the resistance at the border.”
We can’t wait to welcome you to downtown Austin Sept. 5-7 for the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival! Join us at Texas’ breakout politics and policy event as we dig into the 2024 elections, state and national politics, the state of democracy, and so much more.
When tickets go on sale this spring, Tribune members will save big. Donate to join or renew today.
Leftists praying for another civil war; and doing everything in their demented minds to try and provoke one.
Tell Brandon to STFU and do his job enforcing our borders and immigration laws as written and the problem goes away.
Also, Democrats/leftists need to stop caring more about Ukraine's borders than our own.
See number 7 below
I would have read it all but I couldn't get past "This border “crisis” is manufactured." Does it mention why the dems and biden sat on (and continue to sit on) HR-2?
Brandon fighting hard to make sure the Southern border is wide open; and illegals can enter freely into this country. The drug cartels, gun runners, and sex traffickers all thank him.
By Brandon who has done everything in his power since taking office to destroy our borders and immigration laws.
The Republican House already passed their border security and immigration bill. Republicans in the Senate are trying to bring it to the floor for a vote; but Schumer is blocking it. There is no other bill; except the rumblings of one that Establishment Republicans and Democrats are supposedly working on in the Senate- which will be DOA in the House.
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-backs-senate-companion-to-house-passed-secure-the-border-act#:~:text=Ted%20Cruz%20(R%2DTexas),to%20protect%20our%20national%20security.
Fuck Ukraine aid. Why do Brandon/Democrats care more about Ukraine's borders than our own. The goal in Ukraine was to remove Russia as a military threat. That goal was accomplished long ago. Yet leftists still want billions in US tax payer money to flow to the corrupt fascist government in Ukraine.
What do you call Brandon not enforcing our borders and ignoring our immigration laws? He and Democrats are trying to break the system in order to get amnesty for all of the illegal immigrants they allowed in. Since their effort to nationalize election laws failed. Sorry, no California, Michigan, or Pennsylvania Democrat BS where people (including those who cannot vote) count more than US voters.
What rules has Brandon played by- his own? Brandon doesn't have a fucking Bill. They haven't released the Senate negotiated bill text. Suing border states who have suffered the most due to Brandon's blatant lawlessness for trying to protect themselves is not showing restraint.
How many times has Brandon defied the Supreme Court?
Democrats believe laws and court rulings only apply to Republicans/Conservatives.
Brandon is not following the US Constitution- which both the National Guard and Airborne are sworn to uphold. Trying to use the US military against state law enforcement, NG, and any civilians that might join them is a sure way to start a Civil War.
Why are leftists trying to start another Civil War? Afraid Brandon can't win in 2024; and want martial law declared so he can stay in office?
I don't know about other Governors, but Arizona's asked that her troops be federalized, but Uncle Joe is moving kinda slow.
Dear President Biden,
As Governor of Arizona, I write to you with an urgent request regarding our southern border and to express my deep concern for the situation that has been created by the closure of the Lukeville Port of Entry. For far too long, Arizona has continued to bear the burden of federal inaction in managing our southern border. The recent decision to close the Lukeville Port of Entry has led to an unmitigated humanitarian crisis in the area and has put Arizona's safety and commerce at risk. Our ports of entry are essential to our state and our country's economy, and it is vital that they be properly staffed and resourced to continue to fuel economic growth in the state.
Of the approximately 2,500 National Guard members currently on federal active duty orders on the southern border, 243 are already in the Tucson Sector and can be reassigned to reopen the Lukeville Port of Entry. I request that you do so immediately. Further, to the extent it is necessary, I am requesting that additional National Guard members currently on federal active duty orders be reassigned to Arizona to assist U.S. Customs and Border Protection to reopen the Lukeville Port of Entry. With this additional manpower, I am confident you will have the resources necessary to continue trade and tourism through the port while keeping Arizona communities safe.
The safety of our citizens and the prosperity of our economy are intertwined, and I firmly believe that this decision will allow us to secure Arizona's ports of entry and alleviate the burden on our border communities.
Additionally, due to the federal government's failure to secure our border, the State of Arizona has spent $512,529,333 on border operations including migrant transportation, drug interdiction, and law enforcement. Pursuant to Section 26-105(E) of the Arizona Revised Statutes, I am requesting the federal government reimburse the state for these expenses. I anticipate coordination between our offices to secure these funds. I look forward to your prompt response on the above matters.
Sincerely,
Katie Hobbs Governor
State of Arizona
1700 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, PHOENIX, Arizona 85007
602-542-4331 • www.azgovernor.gov