╌>

Republican warning of 'national security threat' is about Russia wanting nuke in space: Sources - ABC News

  
Via:  John Russell  •  2 years ago  •  14 comments

By:   ABC News

Republican warning of 'national security threat' is about Russia wanting nuke in space: Sources - ABC News
The White House will meet with congressional leadership as a top Republican is requesting President Biden declassify information on a "serious national security threat"

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Lawmakers said the issue is serious but shouldn't cause immediate alarm.

ByJohn Parkinson, Luke Barr, Anne Flaherty, Luis Martinez, and Adam CarlsonFebruary 14, 2024, 2:28 PM

The White House's national security adviser said Wednesday that he had already scheduled a classified meeting with congressional leadership before a top House Republican requested that President Joe Biden "declassify all information" that relates to "serious national security threat."

Two sources familiar with deliberations on Capitol Hill said the intelligence has to do with the Russians wanting to put a nuclear weapon into space.

This is not to drop a nuclear weapon onto Earth but rather to possibly use against satellites.

"It is very concerning and very sensitive," said one source, who called it "a big deal."

While not addressing the subject matter directly, multiple members of Congress have described the issue as serious -- but nothing that should cause public alarm.

Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, was pressed several times by reporters at a White House briefing about the Republican intelligence request, but he declined to specifically say if Thursday's meeting will be to discuss that reported threat.

He also declined to provide further details about it beyond saying that, broadly, "Americans understand that there are a range of threats and challenges in the world that we are dealing with every single day," such as terrorism.

"i am confident that President Biden, in the decisions that he is taking, is going to ensure the security of the American people," Sullivan said.

Earlier on Wednesday, Rep. Mike Turner, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement that his panel had "made available to all Members of Congress information concerning a serious national security threat."

"I am requesting that President Biden declassify all information relating to this threat so that Congress, the Administration, and our allies can openly discuss the actions necessary to respond to this threat," Turner, an Ohio Republican, said.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan speaks during a press briefing at the White House in Washington, Feb. 14, 2024.Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

A letter sent to members of Congress from the two top lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee, obtained by ABC News, indicated the threat is linked to "a destabilizing foreign military capability that should be known by all Congressional Policy Makers."

Turner, the intelligence chair, said he's making information on the matter available in a secure location to all members of the House in accordance with chamber rules.

Sullivan said at the White House briefing on Wednesday that he planned to meet with lawmakers.

"I reached out earlier this week to the Gang of Eight" -- referring to the leaders of both parties in both chambers of Congress and the ranking intelligence members -- "to offer myself up for a personal briefing ... and in fact we scheduled a briefing for the four House members of the Gang of Eight tomorrow," he said.

"So I am a bit surprised that Congressman Turner came out today," he said, stressing that he was looking forward to the Thursday meeting.

He also said the White House has "has gone further and in more creative, more strategic ways dealt with the declassification of intelligence in the national interest of the United States than any administration in history. So you definitely are not going to find an unwillingness to do that."

"But just to be clear, Turner calls it an urgent matter with regard to a destabilizing foreign military capability," ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Mary Bruce asked. "Are you aware that there is an emerging serious threat here that he's referring to?"

"'I'll just say that I personally reached out to the Gang of Eight. It is highly unusual, in fact, for the national security adviser to do that. I did that to set up a meeting. ... We'll have that conversation tomorrow," Sullivan said. "I'm not gonna say anything further."

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 years ago

this story was leaked by a republican. why? 

there are likely ulterior motives. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago
there are likely ulterior motives. 

Maybe he doesn’t believe that Putin is our friend regardless of what Trump says.

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
1.2  fineline  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago

So "chatty" Turner decides to throw his two cents worth of ignorance out before the facts are disclosed to all ? Perhaps he should wait for the grown-ups to spell it out for him. Perhaps his security clearance needs review? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago
this story was leaked by a republican. why? 

He is a special Republican:

1) He heads up a committee that every member of congress listens to.

2) He is a big supporter of aid to Ukraine.

Get it?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
2  Kavika     2 years ago

Why would you need a nuke to take out a satellite? A non-nuke will do the job without the dangers of the fallout that a nuke would produce.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @2    2 years ago

It makes a spectacular light show in your back yard

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2  Snuffy  replied to  Kavika @2    2 years ago

Perhaps the use of an EMP to take out or disable a larger group of satellites?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Kavika @2    2 years ago

The EMP would destroy any satellites in range without creating a debris field.  The radiation cloud would cause premature component failures on birds not initially destroyed.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.4  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Kavika @2    2 years ago

I don't think anyone has ever set off a nuke in space , so best we have is somewhat educated guesses on the subject as to what would happen in the event.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    2 years ago

Lasers would be more likely to take out satellites than a nuke. I don't think the US has any in orbit, but they could be aimed from Earth. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 years ago

Ground/sea based lasers require high beam quality, adaptive lens to get through the atmosphere, and an advanced tracking system to point the laser at exactly the right spot.  It can only attack sensors that are in its field of view.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
4  Mark in Wyoming     2 years ago

Can't be sure but I think there is international law, if not treaties that forbid the weaponasation of space.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5  CB    2 years ago

Now it begins, space politics gone to the extreme and soon to the 'dogs.'  This is talk of taking the virginity of Space. Now that it is in the air, you can bet your second to last dollar that it will happen sooner or later. Nothing mankind can dream of can be denied 'him' over a period of time to work out the particulars—especially if funding can be found. The U.S. will find the funding if it has not started the process of space 'firing' already. Damn, future 'America,' the race to weaponize space-First-has occurred or will happen.

We can't help ourselves. . . humanity sees power. . . and 'they' want it-no matter how damaging it is.

 
 

Who is online

Snuffy


109 visitors