'He Didn't Concede!' Dan Abrams Clashes With Jim Jordan on Trump's Election Denialism
By: Mediaite
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
NewsNation host and Mediaite founder Dan Abrams clashed with House Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) on Monday over whether he would ask former President Donald Trump to concede if he loses the 2024 election.
During an interview with Jordan on Dan Abrams Live, Abrams asked bluntly, "If Trump loses, will you tell him to concede?"
Jordan replied, "Well, he's not gonna lose, and if he loses, he will concede like he did last time."
"He didn't concede! He never conceded!" shot back Abrams, to which Jordan responded, "Power was turned over last time, for goodness sake. That's how it works! And President Trump did that. He left the White House, Joe Biden came in, and we've had three-and-a-half years of ridiculous, crazy policy."
Abrams asked again, "I'm gonna try one more time on that question. If he loses, are you going to tell him to concede?"
Jordan dodged the question for a second time, replying, "Well, if he loses, he loses, but he's not going to lose."
"There's no possible way, there's no way, no universe where he could lose?" questioned Abrams. "In a race where he's favored by about 54% at this point, there's no possible way he could lose?"
Jordan answered, "No, I mean, that could happen. I don't think it's gonna happen. I think he's going to win. That's what I'm saying. I think he's going to win, everything points to us taking back the Senate, and everything points to us increasing our majority in the House."
"If he loses. If. If," declared Abrams.
"If? Well, I'm not gonna deal in hypotheticals," said Jordan. "I'm focused on the next eight days."
After Jordan continued to dodge the question and instead champion Trump's record in office, Abrams concluded, "Alright, so you won't answer it directly, but I hear you."
Watch above via NewsNation.
Tags
Who is online
257 visitors
If Trump loses he will "burn it all down". In his mind an America without him leading it doesnt deserve to live.
You mean like this?
What part of that do you imagine was inspired by liberal policies or governance?
Has it occurred to you that events like that might actually be inspired by generations of conservatives protecting abusive police from accountability?
I never looked at it that way. Thanks for the new perspective
Nice try.....but no.
Sure. Why even consider another perspective?
With any luck Kamala will be able to turn on the light and chase the fascist cockroaches back into hiding where they can feed on each other and leave sane folk alone.
Why are all these MAGAs refusing to say Trump should concede if he loses? Because they are afraid of losing favor with the king.
Uh, I say he should concede if he loses.
But he isn't going to, so.....
I would say there is a 95% chance he wont concede. Nothing is quite 100%.
He didn't concede the last time. He will stick to his true form
Trump is entirely transactional. He will propose to concede on the condition that he serves no time in prison for his past crimes and any future ones, and that all monetary damages against him be reversed.
Pure PD and D
Perfectly Described and Damning? We finally agree!
Well, it was probably that or be arrested. I keep seeing MAGA use this talking point to get us to disregard January 6, and claim there was a peaceful transfer of power, as if Trump actually deeply respects our system or laws. But anyone with any sense knows this is bullshit. The fact that Trump didn’t have to be physically dragged out of the White House is not a legitimate point of pride.