Right Wing Commentator Says He Voted For Trump So He Wouldnt Have To Hear About People Of Color During 250th Anniversary Of Declaration Of Independence
Were Ms. Harris the President next year and progressives in charge, we would be forced to hear sob stories of the founding white slave owners while being forced to celebrate the transgender amputee midget people of color whose sacrifices made victory possible.
Cruelty is the point
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
There is also one overwhelming compelling reason to support Mr. Trump and it affected my thinking in 2024 more than anything else. Ironically, I talked about it and wrote about it the least in large part because it is not a substantive reason to support Mr. Trump. But it is my personal reason to support him over Kamala Harris. Next year will be the two-hundred-fiftieth birthday of the United States of America. Were Ms. Harris the President next year and progressives in charge, we would be forced to hear sob stories of the founding white slave owners while being forced to celebrate the transgender amputee midget people of color whose sacrifices made victory possible. Instead of praise for Jefferson, Washington Madison, Hamilton, Adams, and Franklin we’d all have to sit through insufferable lectures about the non-Jewish people of color and lesbians who built this country and how white people ruined it all. Every one of you knows this is true.
Tags
Who is online
262 visitors
There you have it, the beating heart of MAGA.
He's not wrong. Just imagine the made up fake history of the 1619 narrative blasted from the White house every day for a year. The story of America would be reduced to certain minorities ongoing struggle to overcome the worst oppression in world history.
It is the beating heart of MAGA, a refusal to see anything in American history with a clear eye. I , and people like me , can see the good and the bad and see it as true history. MAGA wants to pretend discrimination against minorities never happened.
Funny thing about history, it cant be whitewashed. If MAGA was to say they arent interested in any American history at all that would be one thing. But they like history, as long as it is the right kind.
No. What Erickson is saying, correctly, is that's the only part of American history progressives want to talk about and not even accurately at that.
Nonsense.
All histories are inaccurate which explains why 16,000 books and articles have been written about Lincoln alone. Some 24 tomes last year.
16,000 histories about Lincoln have been written because he's one of the most important humans to have ever lived. Some contain inaccuracies. Some don't.
Read them all have you?
Racism, and many other forms of sheer bigotry and he will be a MAGA hero now.