Trump CIA Dir: DOJ May Charge Hillary Clinton on Russia 'Hoax'
By: calebhowe (Mediaite)
CIA Director John Ratcliffe dropped a bomb on Sunday when he clearly told Fox's Maria Bartiromo that it's possible there could be "criminal prosecution" of several high profile Democrats, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, and even Ratcliffe's own predecessor, former Obama CIA chief John Brennan.
Ratcliffe made the remarks to Bartiromo on the latest Sunday Morning Futures from Fox News, in an interview that lasted almost 12 minutes, in which the two discussed the administration's ongoing investigations into the origins of the infamous Steele Dossier, the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation, and other events related to the so-called "Russiagate" accusations made against President Donald Trump as both a 2016 presidential candidate and throughout his term in office — not to mention, the Hunter Bidenlaptop scandal.
"For a four-year period of time, the truth about the origins of the Russia collusion hoax was hidden from the American people," Ratcliffe told Bartiromo on Sunday morning. "And, unfortunately, Maria, as you recall, those same people were already at that point in time onto their next hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop. This was a month before the 2020 election."
The two discussed the evidence that Ratcliffe says he has against multiple high profile former members of the Barack Obama administration in relation to those events. President Obama has been a frequent recent target of Trump, as well as DNI Tulsi Gabbard, who recently floated a charge of "treason" against the former president.
Bartiromo asked Ratcliffe whether the statute of limitations might interfere with any possible criminal proceedings, and Ratcliffe pointed out several instances of the individuals he'd named testifying that were still within the limits.
Both Ratcliffe and Gabbard have made criminal referrals to the DOJ in recent weeks, and Bartiromo asked if there could be actual prosecutions down the line.
The CIA chief said that some evidence "hasn't come out" yet, but is going to come out, saying "the underlying intelligence that I have spent the last few months making recommendations about final declassification and sent that to the Department of Justice that will come out in the John Durham report, Classified Annex."
He said, with regard to that as a basis for potential prosecution, "what that intelligence shows, Maria, is that part of this was a Hillary Clinton plan, but part of it was an FBI plan to be an accelerant to that fake Steele Dossier, to those fake Russia collusion claims by pouring oil on the fire, by amplifying the lie and baring the truth of what Hillary Clinton was up to."
Ratcliffe also dismissed the idea that the investigations and criminal referrals are just Trump "seeking retribution."
Bartiromo pressed for clarity on the possibility of indictments and prosecutions.
"So what I think I hear you saying is there is still an opportunity for indictments, potential prosecutions, accountability from those people who may have lied under oath, like John Brennan, James Comey, and perhaps Hillary Clinton," she said.
"Well, that's why I've made the referrals that I have," Ratcliffe confirmed.
He then was even more specific, adding that the administration and the agencies involved will "continue to share the intelligence that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to make fair and just, bring fair and justice claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this stain on our country."
The allegations being made by Republicans have become controversial in the press in a way they weren't when leveled against Trump, and Sen. Lindsey Graham battled NBC's Kristen Welker over the claims about former president Obama the same day as Ratcliffe's interview on Fox News.
BARTIROMO: Look, we've all, our audience knows this thanks to you and thanks to Devin Nunes. Our audience is well aware of what took place here. But we want to see accountability. Many of the Statute of Limitations have expired. It's been almost 10 years for many of these folks who did this. But John Brennan testified to Congress, and so did Hillary Clinton, within five years. I think it was in 2020.
RATCLIFFE: That's right.
BARTIROMO: And then again in 2021. Are those statute of limitations still live? Tell me if in fact, we could see a criminal prosecution here, as you just the other day three weeks ago have in fact referred criminal referrals to the DOJ.
RATCLIFFE: Well Maria, so part of what came out last week was about how John Brennan, Clapper, Comey, they all pushed the known fake Steele dossier into intelligence community assessments and as the basis for Crossfire Hurricane and all that. But what hasn't come out yet, and what's going to come out, is the underlying intelligence that I have spent the last few months making recommendations about final declassification and sent that to the Department of Justice that will come out in the John Durham report, Classified Annex.
And what that intelligence shows, Maria, is that part of this was a Hillary Clinton plan, but part of it was an FBI plan to be an accelerant to that fake Steele Dossier, to those fake Russia collusion claims by pouring oil on the fire, by amplifying the lie and baring the truth of what Hillary Clinton was up to.
And you're right, Maria. John Brennan testified to John Durham in August of 2020. He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified before the Senate committee in September, 2020. All of that's within the last five years. And much of that testimony is frankly, completely inconsistent with what our underlying intelligence that is about to be declassified in the Durham Annex — what that reflects.
And so, you know, Pam Bondi does have a strike force. It is a different Department of Justice, a different FBI, and an opportunity to look at how these people really did conspire to run a hoax, a fraud on the American people and against Donald Trump's presidency. And so coming forward, we understand that they did this, but now we need to understand how they did.
And I think that's why you see the left losing their minds over this, Maria, saying, 'Why are you spending time? This is vindictive. You're going back, this is Donald Trump, you know, seeking retribution.' It's not. Donald Trump's election by the American people was a statement, Maria. They said to everyone: We know what you did to Donald Trump, and we re-elected him because we know this was all fake, we know it was a hoax, now we want to understand how you did it so that it can't happen again.
And that's what this declassification process that we're undergoing right now, what's going on, why it's so important, and why there can be accountability and preventability to prevent these same people that did it in 2016 with the Steele Dossier, with the Hunter Biden laptop in 2020 from doing it again in the future.
BARTIROMO: So what I think I hear you saying is there is still an opportunity for indictments, potential prosecutions, accountability from those people who may have lied under oath, like John Brennan, James Comey, and perhaps Hillary Clinton.
RATCLIFFE: Well, that's why I've made the referrals that I have, DNI Gabbard has made referrals, and why we're gonna continue to share the intelligence that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to make fair and just, bring fair and justice claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this stain on our country.
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder

The first thought that comes to mind is what did we pay John Durham for with his three year investigation of these same facts? You know, the investigation that found nothing.
Ratcliffe is the latest POS to emerge from Trumps nether regions, more than willing to prostitute his reputation in order to distract from Trumps crimes and lunacy.
You should read it again. It found rampant wrongdoing and convicted an fbi agent of forging evidence to the fisa court,
Durham investigated the "Russia hoax" for three years and indicted two people, one of them wasnt even connected to the "hoax" allegations. I believe both of them were acquitted.
What Durham learned was that you can't get a conviction in DC of anyone who does anything to Trump.
Durham did have one successful prosecution.
What happened with the lone successful case?
It was a confession. FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will pled guilty to falsifying a document used to obtain a FISA warrant on former Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page made it unnecessary for a DC jury to find him guilty. Then what happened? The DC judge in the case decided to only give him 12 months' probation with 400 hours of community service and a $100 fee. Clinesmith never served a day in jail. That judge has since become the chief judge on the DC Court and most recently became famous when the Supreme Court overturned his TRO halting Trump’s enforcement of the AEA, and the SCOTUS also declared the D.C. District of Columbia an inappropriate venue for a case in light of the convicts’ detention in Texas.
The judge's name: James Boasberg.
Statute of limitations is going to be a problem.
I wish the whole thing would go to trial, it would be yet another humiliation for trump.
With a special venue: Delray Beach Florida.
Mrs Clinton last held public office in Jan 2013, well over 12 years ago!
And?
You have to hold office to get indicted for a crime?
These people, Trump , Gabbard, Bondi, Patel, John Ratcliffe, and the rest involved in this scheme , are evil.
Often those who expose the truth and puncture cherished lies are treated as heretics by the true believers. They don’t want to know the they were lied to and are mad their myths get exposed. It explains so much of the progressives reaction to those who exposed the fake stories they need to believe are true.
You have some innocent people confused with MAGA conspiracy wackos.
The defense of your heroes is not they were right, but they lack criminal intent and just make mistakes.
That they were wrong isn't a question.
People like you act like the Steele Dossier is the be all end all of the matter. The Trump campaign was filled with cozy contacts with Russians and deserved to be investigated.
If Trump was "joking" when he asked Russia to hack Hillary Clinton, why did he do something similar two more times in 2019 and 2022 with no "humor" involved at all?
Your guy is a scumbag who deserved every bit of investigation he got, and more.
Not at all. But its a symptom of how rotten and corrupt the process was. Aren't you mad your party leaders and supposedly impartial government officials lied to you about it? That Democrats are okay with that and can't seem to fathom why being lied to might bother other people is one of the big divides in this country.
as "joking" when he asked Russia to hack Hillary Clinton,
You keep coming back to that despite being told hundreds of times that it was public knowledge the scrubbed emails Trump was talking about were not in Clinton's possession and that the FBI was trying to recover them.
You dont understand Donald Trump at all. When he wants someone to do something for him, he doesnt care at all about the details. He didnt care a lick whether or not the emails were there, he wanted Russia to embarrass Hillary Clinton and do it publicly. Same thing happened on Jan 6th. Trump was out of ammo to contest the election after he lost all the law suits and his White House lawyers told him the Eastman plan was illegal. He wanted the "protesters" on Jan 6th to do whatever they could do to keep him in office. He didnt know exactly what whatever they could might entail, and didnt care, he just wanted the result.
Trump has really nothing to do with this. His issues don't justify all the lying. The irony is that democrats inability to simply engage and attack him honestly despite all the myriad openings he gives them is why he's won twice. They've embodied everything they claim Trump is, making Trump pretty much immune to their attacks.
e didnt know exactly what whatever they could might entail, and didnt care, he just wanted the result.
Do you recognize this how you talk about getting Trump?
I am proud of the fact that I oppose everything about Trump.
The White House and its minions need to keep this floating to deflect from other issues that are more damaging to trmp than Clinton, Comey, or Brennan