╌>

US special forces soldier arrested after allegedly winning $400,000 on Maduro raid

  
Via:  John Russell  •  7 months ago  •  30 comments


US special forces soldier arrested after allegedly winning $400,000 on Maduro raid
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


A US special forces soldier involved in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was arrested for allegedly betting on that operation, netting him $400,000 in profits, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The outsized trade caught the attention of law enforcement almost immediately.

The trader opened an account in late December on Polymarket, one of the best-known prediction markets. He placed about $32,000 that Maduro would be “out” by January. The bet was a long-shot.

Shortly after it was placed, the US military launched a covert operation that extradited Maduro from the presidential palace in Caracas in an overnight capture while coming under heavy fire. Maduro was transported to New York to face federal drug-trafficking related charges. He has pleaded not guilty.

CNN   reported   last month that federal prosecutors were investigating the Maduro trade, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The chiefs of the securities and commodity fraud unit at the US attorney’s office in Manhattan met with representatives at Polymarket that month.

ABC News first reported Thursday’s arrest.

This story is breaking and will be updated.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    7 months ago

We live in a degraded country. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1    7 months ago

Its getting better all the time.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2  goose is back    7 months ago

Hmmmm...........people with inside information about the government getting rich off of it.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1  Snuffy  replied to  goose is back @2    7 months ago

Sounds like every politician ever.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  Snuffy @2.1    7 months ago

And this is bad, right?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Snuffy @2.1    7 months ago

Except Omar. S/ Her net wealth went from 30 million to 100 thousand over night.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.3  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.2    7 months ago
Her net wealth went from 30 million to 100 thousand over night.

One hell of a drunk binge.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.1    7 months ago

A soldier makes a bet on something he had intimate knowledge of via a unique wagering site. He was connected to the Maduro operation.

It does not involve stock trading. The soldier (a Master Seargeant) concealed his identity. 

The only question should be what commitment did he make as a soldier concerning the military operations he was involved in. Does anyone know?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.5  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    7 months ago

What the soldier did was wrong in many dimensions.   Your post suggests that you think otherwise.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    7 months ago
It does not involve stock trading.

Interesting point.  It will be interesting to see how the court handles it.

The soldier (a Master Seargeant) concealed his identity. 

That alone makes me think he was aware what he was doing was shady at a minimum and illegal at a max.  Again, it will be interesting to see how  the court handles this.

The only question should be what commitment did he make as a soldier concerning the military operations he was involved in. Does anyone know?

I think an important question is did he know the date or time frame of the operation before placing the bet.  I would also be interested in knowing the rules of the site that took the bet and I assume paid it out.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.7  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.5    7 months ago
What the soldier did was wrong in many dimensions.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think he crosses the line only if he reveals the operation somehow.


Your post suggests that you think otherwise.

I'm looking at it from a certain perspective. I wonder if I would have done the same.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.6    7 months ago
I think an important question is did he know the date or time frame of the operation before placing the bet.

He was part of the planning. I assume he did.


 I would also be interested in knowing the rules of the site that took the bet and I assume paid it out.

I'm not sure of the timeline, but for a while that site did not take bets from US citizens. BTW, he had to invest about $33,000 to make that score. He might have invested his lifesavings on what seemed to be a sure thing. What if the operation got cancelled?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2    7 months ago

You disapprove, right?

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.2.1  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.2    7 months ago
You disapprove, right?

What do you think?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.2  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.2.1    7 months ago

Why is it that you refuse to affirm one of the easiest questions?  

One word would have done it.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.2.3  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.2    7 months ago
One word would have done it.

OK.......I am 110% against it!  That goes for all politicians including Nancy Pelosi, do you condemn Nancy Pelosi?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.4  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.2.3    7 months ago

Yes, I have always been highly suspicious of Pelosi's use of insider information.   But there is nothing more than circumstantial evidence / optics that suggest her husband's trade decisions were made with knowledge from Pelosi.   So all we can do is speculate.

In general, there are very few federal politicians that I would consider to be honest and trustworthy.   Regardless of party.

But today, the leader of the pack —setting new records of corruption and conflicts of interest— is Trump.   And his corruption likely has encouraged substantially deeper levels of corruption in our government.   

Just nothing but good news from that abysmal human being.   So if you are truly against corruption, the main contemporary target for your criticism should be Trump.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  goose is back @2    7 months ago

Huge surprise. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3  Hal A. Lujah    7 months ago

Trump just preemptively entered the guy’s name into his presidential pardon form letter.  He likes the guy’s initiative.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.1  Snuffy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3    7 months ago

So? I wouldn't like it if he received a pardon but as the last administration showed us, the power of the Presidential pardon is practically unlimited. 

I expect the pattern to repeat with mass pardons at the end of this administration. Especially since there have been some high-ranking Democrats who have publicly stated that they will work hard to prosecute any and all Trump supporters in the current administration. 

Question asked:  democrats threaten to prosecute trump officials after term ends
AI Overview
Based on the provided search results, as of April 2026, democratic lawmakers and allies have discussed the potential prosecution of Trump family members and administration officials for alleged illegal activities and profiteering .  
original Facebook
  • Prosecution Threats:   Congressman Ted Lieu has announced that a future Democratic administration would pursue prosecution against Trump family members and officials for allegedly generating illegal income through "sweetheart deals" and crypto schemes during the second Trump presidency.
  • Corruption Allegations:   Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have claimed that Donald Trump and his family made over $9 billion during his presidency.
  • Legal Retribution & Civil Suits:   Democratic Senators have expressed concerns regarding retaliatory actions from the Trump administration, with some taking out liability insurance. Meanwhile, Democrats have threatened to sue the Trump administration over "illegal" firings of federal employees.
  • "Lock Them Up" Role Reversal:   The rhetoric surrounding the 2020 election has evolved, with some Democrats now echoing "lock him up" chants in reference to Donald Trump, arguing that no person is above prosecution if evidence is present.  
 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Snuffy @3.1    7 months ago

He shouldn't wait.  As long as the president has the power to pardon he should take advantage of it and we have no right to whine about it.  IMO many presidents have gone way past the intention of article 2 section 2 and should be changed but fat chance of that.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.1.1    7 months ago

A lot of MAGAs are under the delusion that Biden was the first to pardon cronies or family. Here is a list of Trumps pardons from his first term - some of them were donors, political allies or his inner circle flunkies

Office of the Pardon Attorney | Pardons Granted by President Donald J. Trump (2017-2021)

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    7 months ago
A lot of MAGAs are under the delusion that Biden was the first to pardon cronies or family.

I don't know anyone that thinks that. Obviously I don't believe that since I  stated "many presidents" (not to mention I am not MAGA).  I do know several misinformed progressives that believe they know what MAGAS believe.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4  charger 383    7 months ago

That is funny, a person betting on something like that deserves to loose

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
5  charger 383    7 months ago

Did his bet in any way negatively effect to operation?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1  TᵢG  replied to  charger 383 @5    7 months ago

'Could it have?' is the important question.

Let's assume this is legalized.   Now, what happens when a bunch of informed people start making bets using insider information?

First, this is patently unfair.

Second, this releases classified information, at least statistically, which could endanger the mission.

Third, this could affect how a betting soldier operates during the mission.   Rather than focusing on the mission, s/he will have a bet in mind.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  charger 383 @5    7 months ago
Did his bet in any way negatively effect to operation?

I would question if it could have effected anything in the operation.  400,000 is alot of temptation.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.2.1  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.2    7 months ago
400,000 is alot of temptation.

Indeed.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
6  charger 383    7 months ago

The movie Kelly's Heros comes to mind

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  charger 383 @6    7 months ago

Great movie.

 
 

Who is online




116 visitors