The Christian right is emboldened and on the march
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The Christian right is emboldened and on the march
Beware when they speak of "tolerance."
Last Friday, the right-wing majority on the Texas board of education voted to approve new social studies standards for the state’s five million public school students.
Texas students already have the Ten Commandments posted in every classroom and schools have been allowed to replace counselors with unlicensed “chaplains.” Now the state will require Bible readings for students’ entire progression through the education system.
Members of both the Republican-controlled legislature and the board were clear that they hope to inject not just religion but as much Christianity as possible into public education.
“We’re going to stop watering down American history. We’re going to teach the truth. Our nation was founded as a Christian nation, and Texas is a Christian state,” said board member Brandon Hall, a pastor from an intensely conservative part of rural north Texas.
Trump is clowning his evangelical base
What does this less-watered-down version of American history consist of? Among other things, it is animated by the venomous hatred of Muslims that has poured over GOP politics in Texas like a plague. Lessons on the theology and historical contributions of Islam are eliminated and replaced by discussion of radical Islam and the Prophet Muhammad’s “brutal military campaigns against Jewish and Christian tribes, the normalization of slavery, and the taking of female captives as harem slaves.”
And as the Texas Tribune noted, while the prior standards said that students should learn about post-World War I racial violence “including the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and the Tulsa Race Massacre,” the new standards “instead suggested that students learn about the Klan’s ‘intolerance’ of Catholics, Jews and immigrants but did not specify Black Americans. They also changed the ‘Tulsa Race Massacre’ to the ‘Tulsa Race Riots.’”
It may not have garnered as much notice as the Bible stories, but the word “intolerance” is an important one.
Goodbye, separation of church and state
The problem with the KKK, of course, was not their inability to tolerate people of different religions and races; it was their decades-long campaign of terrorism. But the ascendant Christian nationalists in today’s Republican Party not only want credit for their willingness to tolerate at least some of those who are not like them, they claim that tolerance is the limit of what Christians should extend to everyone else.
In other words, their political vision is one in which Christians and Christian ideas rule, and all other Americans should expect no more than to be tolerated in a country that does not belong to them.
Conservative Christians unbound
It was a big week for the religious right in politics, since it also saw the Faith & Freedom Coalition’s “Road to Majority” conference in Washington.
The gathering of Christian political activists featured appearances by a parade of Republican members of the House and Senate, multiple Trump cabinet members, and the president himself. As usual, Trump’s speech rambled almost incoherently from topic to topic, but he did return multiple times to the supposed oppression of Christians, both past and future.
“These ruthless communists,” Trump said — by which he meant Democrats — “will attack all religions, but in particular, Christianity. They always do. They’re after Christianity more than any other religion. It seems to be more and more throughout the world, maybe because we’re doing so well.”
However well “we” are doing vis-a-vis “them,” in Trump’s description, the threat liberals pose to Christians is positively genocidal.
“They will close your churches in this country,” he said. “They go communist, and they’re trying to. They will kill your people. And that’s what they’re about. They want to end religion. They have to end religion because their ideology doesn’t work if you have strong religion.”
Afterward, some participants gathered in the Oval Office, where Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick — who once said “we were a nation founded upon not the words of our founders, but the words of God because He wrote the Constitution” — insisted that “the separation of church and state is not in the Constitution.”
It actually is — the First Amendment’s establishment clause and free exercise clause create that separation — but the Christian right believes it has never had a better opportunity to weave support for Christianity into all levels of government policy and make its tendentious reading of the Constitution a reality. Not only do they have a president happy to do so, but the Supreme Court has for years been waging an attack on church-state separation — as long as Christians are the ones being protected.
A long succession of cases has defined ever-more ways that Christians can exempt themselves from laws they don’t like, and required government to fund their ideas, their expression, and their institutions. With each new religious liberty case, the court makes its perspective clear: If you are a football coach who was punished for holding Christian prayers at the 50-yard-line at games you’ll find a court eager to defend your rights, but if you’re a Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were forcibly shaved by prison guards, don’t expect sympathy.
Certain that the court’s conservative supermajority will continue dismantling that wall of separation, red states are seeing how far they can push their own policies. Four states — Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas — have passed laws in the last few years requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in public school classrooms, and other states may follow. Unfortunately, there is no evidence that the posters have produced an upswing in the virtue displayed by their students. Though in fairness, it’s difficult to know whether middle schoolers in these states are now less likely than they used to be to make graven images or covet their neighbor’s wives, asses, oxen, or slaves (the coveting is all part of the Tenth Commandment).
Will Democrats become the party of faith?
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is stocked with unapologetic Christian nationalists like OMB Director Russell Vought, the architect of the administration’s dismantling of the federal government.
“Part of being a nation is a shared religious heritage. And in America, that historical heritage is, of course, Christianity,” Vought wrote in a 2021 column defending Christian nationalism. The secretary of defense has multiple Crusader tattoos, and has instituted monthly Christian prayer services featuring far-right clerics, including at least one who advocates the establishment of a Christian theocracy. Official government social media accounts regularly send out sectarian Christian messages.
And as Vice President JD Vance said at a Turning Point USA event in December, “the only thing that has truly served as an anchor of the United States of America is that we have been, and by the grace of God, we always will be, a Christian nation.”
A rejection of pluralism
What all these efforts amount to is an emphatic rejection of religious pluralism, the principle that was embedded in the founding and has defined the American religious context for 250 years.
America, today’s right says, may include people of many religions, but is fundamentally of, by, and for Christians — and only Christians. Everyone else is merely tolerated, here at the sufferance of those who believe in the country’s true religion.
It’s the same way that Vance implicitly describes immigrants and their descendants in the multiple blood-and-soil speeches he has given over the last few years, insisting that the heart of America lies not in its ideals but in those who have been here, as his family has, for multiple generations. They are the truest Americans, Vance wants us to believe, and those who came more recently can at best expect only to be tolerated.
But the whole point of establishing religious pluralism — one of the things that made the American experiment so radical in the late 18th century — was that people of various faiths would not merely be tolerated by the Protestants who ran the country. Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, or followers of any other religion — or no religion at all — would be full citizens in every sense, because the country belonged to everyone.
That may have only sometimes been true in practice. But the ideal of religious pluralism — and the labor of those who would force the country to live up to it — not only helped the country survive, it’s the primary reason why America today has higher rates of religiosity than most similar countries that watched their moribund state churches steadily lose adherents.
How MAGA learned to love Christian persecution
In August 1790, Moses Seixas, leader of the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, Rhode Island, wrote a letter to President George Washington expressing his gratitude for the Constitution which guaranteed people of all faiths an equal place in this new nation. Washington replied a few days later, reiterating to Seixas the importance of that equality, and specifically rejecting the notion of toleration.
“All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship,” Washington wrote. “It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights.”
Today, toleration is spoken of plenty, by those who view it as a generous favor they do for the Americans who do not share their beliefs. They know well that the country is growing more religiously diverse all the time; Christians now make up around 63 percent of Americans, while just a few decades ago they were over 90 percent.
So the religious right claims to be oppressed victims, while pushing harder every year to give their religion official government status. They seek the power not just to worship as they wish but to impose their beliefs on the rest of us. If only they understood what the tradition of American religious liberty is actually about.
Last Friday, the right-wing majority on the Texas board of education voted to approve new social studies standards for the state’s five million public school students.
Texas students already have the Ten Commandments posted in every classroom and schools have been allowed to replace counselors with unlicensed “chaplains.” Now the state will require Bible readings for students’ entire progression through the education system.
Members of both the Republican-controlled legislature and the board were clear that they hope to inject not just religion but as much Christianity as possible into public education.
“We’re going to stop watering down American history. We’re going to teach the truth. Our nation was founded as a Christian nation, and Texas is a Christian state,” said board member Brandon Hall, a pastor from an intensely conservative part of rural north Texas.
Trump is clowning his evangelical base
What does this less-watered-down version of American history consist of? Among other things, it is animated by the venomous hatred of Muslims that has poured over GOP politics in Texas like a plague. Lessons on the theology and historical contributions of Islam are eliminated and replaced by discussion of radical Islam and the Prophet Muhammad’s “brutal military campaigns against Jewish and Christian tribes, the normalization of slavery, and the taking of female captives as harem slaves.”
And as the Texas Tribune noted, while the prior standards said that students should learn about post-World War I racial violence “including the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and the Tulsa Race Massacre,” the new standards “instead suggested that students learn about the Klan’s ‘intolerance’ of Catholics, Jews and immigrants but did not specify Black Americans. They also changed the ‘Tulsa Race Massacre’ to the ‘Tulsa Race Riots.’”
It may not have garnered as much notice as the Bible stories, but the word “intolerance” is an important one.
Goodbye, separation of church and state
The problem with the KKK, of course, was not their inability to tolerate people of different religions and races; it was their decades-long campaign of terrorism. But the ascendant Christian nationalists in today’s Republican Party not only want credit for their willingness to tolerate at least some of those who are not like them, they claim that tolerance is the limit of what Christians should extend to everyone else.
In other words, their political vision is one in which Christians and Christian ideas rule, and all other Americans should expect no more than to be tolerated in a country that does not belong to them.
Conservative Christians unbound
It was a big week for the religious right in politics, since it also saw the Faith & Freedom Coalition’s “Road to Majority” conference in Washington.
The gathering of Christian political activists featured appearances by a parade of Republican members of the House and Senate, multiple Trump cabinet members, and the president himself. As usual, Trump’s speech rambled almost incoherently from topic to topic, but he did return multiple times to the supposed oppression of Christians, both past and future.
“These ruthless communists,” Trump said — by which he meant Democrats — “will attack all religions, but in particular, Christianity. They always do. They’re after Christianity more than any other religion. It seems to be more and more throughout the world, maybe because we’re doing so well.”
However well “we” are doing vis-a-vis “them,” in Trump’s description, the threat liberals pose to Christians is positively genocidal.
“They will close your churches in this country,” he said. “They go communist, and they’re trying to. They will kill your people. And that’s what they’re about. They want to end religion. They have to end religion because their ideology doesn’t work if you have strong religion.”
Afterward, some participants gathered in the Oval Office, where Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick — who once said “we were a nation founded upon not the words of our founders, but the words of God because He wrote the Constitution” — insisted that “the separation of church and state is not in the Constitution.”
It actually is — the First Amendment’s establishment clause and free exercise clause create that separation — but the Christian right believes it has never had a better opportunity to weave support for Christianity into all levels of government policy and make its tendentious reading of the Constitution a reality. Not only do they have a president happy to do so, but the Supreme Court has for years been waging an attack on church-state separation — as long as Christians are the ones being protected.
A long succession of cases has defined ever-more ways that Christians can exempt themselves from laws they don’t like, and required government to fund their ideas, their expression, and their institutions. With each new religious liberty case, the court makes its perspective clear: If you are a football coach who was punished for holding Christian prayers at the 50-yard-line at games you’ll find a court eager to defend your rights, but if you’re a Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were forcibly shaved by prison guards, don’t expect sympathy.
Certain that the court’s conservative supermajority will continue dismantling that wall of separation, red states are seeing how far they can push their own policies. Four states — Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas — have passed laws in the last few years requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in public school classrooms, and other states may follow. Unfortunately, there is no evidence that the posters have produced an upswing in the virtue displayed by their students. Though in fairness, it’s difficult to know whether middle schoolers in these states are now less likely than they used to be to make graven images or covet their neighbor’s wives, asses, oxen, or slaves (the coveting is all part of the Tenth Commandment).
Will Democrats become the party of faith?
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is stocked with unapologetic Christian nationalists like OMB Director Russell Vought, the architect of the administration’s dismantling of the federal government.
“Part of being a nation is a shared religious heritage. And in America, that historical heritage is, of course, Christianity,” Vought wrote in a 2021 column defending Christian nationalism. The secretary of defense has multiple Crusader tattoos, and has instituted monthly Christian prayer services featuring far-right clerics, including at least one who advocates the establishment of a Christian theocracy. Official government social media accounts regularly send out sectarian Christian messages.
And as Vice President JD Vance said at a Turning Point USA event in December, “the only thing that has truly served as an anchor of the United States of America is that we have been, and by the grace of God, we always will be, a Christian nation.”
A rejection of pluralism
What all these efforts amount to is an emphatic rejection of religious pluralism, the principle that was embedded in the founding and has defined the American religious context for 250 years.
America, today’s right says, may include people of many religions, but is fundamentally of, by, and for Christians — and only Christians. Everyone else is merely tolerated, here at the sufferance of those who believe in the country’s true religion.
It’s the same way that Vance implicitly describes immigrants and their descendants in the multiple blood-and-soil speeches he has given over the last few years, insisting that the heart of America lies not in its ideals but in those who have been here, as his family has, for multiple generations. They are the truest Americans, Vance wants us to believe, and those who came more recently can at best expect only to be tolerated.
But the whole point of establishing religious pluralism — one of the things that made the American experiment so radical in the late 18th century — was that people of various faiths would not merely be tolerated by the Protestants who ran the country. Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, or followers of any other religion — or no religion at all — would be full citizens in every sense, because the country belonged to everyone.
That may have only sometimes been true in practice. But the ideal of religious pluralism — and the labor of those who would force the country to live up to it — not only helped the country survive, it’s the primary reason why America today has higher rates of religiosity than most similar countries that watched their moribund state churches steadily lose adherents.
How MAGA learned to love Christian persecution
In August 1790, Moses Seixas, leader of the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, Rhode Island, wrote a letter to President George Washington expressing his gratitude for the Constitution which guaranteed people of all faiths an equal place in this new nation. Washington replied a few days later, reiterating to Seixas the importance of that equality, and specifically rejecting the notion of toleration.
“All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship,” Washington wrote. “It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights.”
Today, toleration is spoken of plenty, by those who view it as a generous favor they do for the Americans who do not share their beliefs. They know well that the country is growing more religiously diverse all the time; Christians now make up around 63 percent of Americans, while just a few decades ago they were over 90 percent.
So the religious right claims to be oppressed victims, while pushing harder every year to give their religion official government status. They seek the power not just to worship as they wish but to impose their beliefs on the rest of us. If only they understood what the tradition of American religious liberty is actually about.
Thanks for reading Public Notice. This post is public so feel free to share it.
We’ll be back with more tomorrow. If you appreciate today’s PN, please do your part to keep us free by signing up for a paid subscription.
Funny, I thought Madison wrote the Constitution but now I learn from Dan Patrick that God did. God didn't even write the Bible!! By the way Mr. Patrick, the Founders left England to escape religious persecution. As for JD, I can trace my ancestry back to the beginning of the US. I guess that makes me super special. I am a white woman and I reject their bigotry!! I am sick and tired of old, white men telling us that they're f*cking special and the rest of us must bow down to them.
“Intolerance is evidence of impotence.” -Aleister Crowley (1875-1947)
Tags
Who is online
105 visitors
nothing like the old tried and true red scare to bring out most of the thumper morons on the right ...
The Christian right is emboldened and on the march
Not like we haven't seen them on the march before...
Every one stay away from Texas. And if you live there, get out while you can
No... more moderates need to step up and take accountability and stop the populist hijacking of their politics.
Yeah...but if the US continues with its moderate policies (if we can get them back), Texas won;t have any choice but to secede. And to that I say...good riddance. There's nothing in TX worth saving anyway.
I lived in West TX for almost 7 years. I know what I'm talking about
Except the US isn't continuing with it's moderate policies, it's being torn in two by extreme ideologies.
I have family there and my son is talking about moving his family to the Dallas area too.
West TX isn't the ass end of the world but you drive to it from there.
of course you're right
[deleteed][✘]
They're not gonna meet Jesus.
once they realize that, it'll be too late anyway ...
I don't care whether they meet him or not, I just want them to get in line ...
All I'd like to help them do is pull their heads out of Trumps ass. After that we can work on cleaning the sticky residue their off heads, necks and faces and turning them back into patriotic Americans. I mean, my cousins in Arkansas have always been a bit slow and stuck in their ways, but they weren't such complete raging bigoted morons, or at least they didn't express that side of themselves much, until Trump came to power. Once they metaphorically 'stuffed their heads up his ass' as so many hardline rightwing Christian conservatives did, I haven't had one normal conversation with them since. And while I am ashamed of them for what they have supported and done to this nation, I would still like them back to the way they were before Trump.
theocrats, neo-nazis and white supremacists without representation in the oval office ...
Another race Communist who thinks America deserved 9/11 and who refuses to condemn the fire bombing murder of a holocaust survivor as anti semitism defeats a 30 year far left progressive and the deflection is to claim “the Christian far right is in on the march”
you almost have to admire the brazenness of the deflection. Anything to distract from seeing what the Democratic Party has become.
Why do you call the writer a race communist? Is that your new catchall insult?
Marxist, socialist, communist... it's in the right-wing populist playbook under insults for liberals. They hijacked words and ideas and use them so interchangeably they hold no meaning any more.
It word be a more meaningful insult if they actually learned the definition of the terms they throat us.
I'm still chuckling over communist fascist
Becuase that’s what they are. Pay attention to what they say:
race Communists who are obsessed with destroying capitalism and avenging their race based grievances. It’s simply short had for the woke equity fanatics.
When you call Democratic Socialists communists it totally destroys the credibility of your post. I personally think left wing populists are jumping on the democratic socialist bandwagon and are as unhinged as the MAGA right-wing populist Republicans. ...bur for god's sake use the terms properly.
DSA: we want to seize the means of production and destroy capitalism.
democrats: how dare you call them communists!
Yep... All propaganda and no credibility.
Likely would have made more sense if authoritative communist had been used .
who really wants an authoritarian government telling individuals what they can and cant do, no matter what the flavor politically is or whatever reasoning they use for being so?
it is all about power and control , and who appears to have it , and who does not .
I think this line from , the Patriot " can explain it better , should i worry about the tyrant 3000 miles away , or the 3000 tyrants one mile away ? which is actually the greater danger in reality ?
They can't though. If they did, it would ruin their attempted insult. They don't really care about the actual definitions of 'communist' or 'socialist', they just see them as insults because let's face it, education and deeper learning isn't rightwing conservatives' strong suit. They prefer regurgitating rightwing media rhetoric and of course the way they repeat it reveals them as ideal Trump supporters, that is to say, very 'poorly educated' groveling followers.
It's the educated propagandists that still just want to rage bait hyper-partisans, that really pisses me off. They can't make a cogent logical argument for the dumbshit they want so they twist it.
If I call X, a bad thing my followers will be outraged and then X will be outraged and I feel so important and powerful. /s
I know I don't want to live under any authoritative government no matter the "flavor"
... at what point is it a lost cause? he and his supporters are ideologically cornered ...
they do because they still believe they'll be unaffected, the number of maga vets used to being ordered around bear that out ...
We weren't told to blindly follow orders. But wait...I was Air Force. We were expected to use our brains. And think for ourselves. Tho there were a few officers who didn't like the enlisted to think for themselves
Lenin’s useful idiots has never been more accurate.
they litteraly tell you what they are and what they want to do and the progressive response is “propaganda”
perfect.
At conception?
MAGA 'influencers' work out of the Joseph Goebbels playbook..
Well, here is what they "literally" tell us they are:
I see nothing in their mission statement that says they " want to seize the means of production and destroy capitalism".
I see some pie in the sky desires that are never going to pass like the wealth tax, "heavily taxing inheritance", Medicare for all, universal rent control and eliminating college tuition, but I support strengthening labor laws to make it easier for workers to unionize, transitioning from fossil fuels, creating green jobs, cutting defense budgets and reducing/eliminating for-profit prisons.
It's easy for some ignorant conservatives to reduce anyone who says they're a 'socialist' to a simple uninformed stereotype, and perhaps they do so because they're either lazy or not very smart. But the reality is that both understanding the different forms that socialism can take as well as the motivations behind the people who are self-identifying as socialists can give one an actual leg to stand when attempting to be critical. Otherwise, it just makes a person look stupid.
[deleted][✘]
MAGAs dont want a better life, they want an angrier, more grievance filled life.
Anyone is free to post Republicans official position to refute any of the beliefs I may have attributed to Republicans, just as I posted the DSA's. I don't think it's going to help much because I don't believe I have falsely accused Republicans of some specific belief. It's likely you're thinking of beliefs I've attributed to 'rightwing conservative Christians' and 'rightwing Christo-fascists', and 'rightwing religious conservatives' or 'confederate loving neo-Nazi's', so if you can find an official position from those groups, or manifesto or whatever, by all means, please do post it. But I can understand the confusion since those are all groups and types of people that, at least in America today, consider themselves republicans.
But the fact is, I only posted the DSA's position in this case because you essentially asked for it. You were the one who claimed they literally said something which I literally couldn't find when I looked. Although, to be exact you said they "litteraly tell you what they are" so perhaps you were giving us a clue as to the origin of your claim.
big effing deal
What are they aware of that you feel they should not be aware of?
reality
When a white nationalist or white supremacist spends so much of their time trying to obfuscate their deep-seated racist hate and weak fearful xenophobia out of concern of being ostracized by society, there's nothing that pisses them off more than someone bringing attention to it.
True
Bingo.
Well, to be fair, they want whatever get's the billionaires more money.
I will wait for one of these leftist members post an article about the rise of Socialism in the democratic party.
When these three communists won in New York a couple of weeks ago, leftists started calling Mamdami the ‘king maker’
I guess ‘no kings’ is allowed in republican party, but the democratic party is all in for one.
Show us all that you know the difference between a communist and a social democrat. What are the defining characteristics of a social democrat and what are the defining characteristics of a communist? I will assume that by 'communist' you are referring to the meaning established by the former USSR, Chairman Mao, etc.
You are in for a long wait...mostly because they have no idea.
List them.
... stuck on stupid.
Pay attention.
The democratic socialists (now leaders of the democratic party, named Mamdami a "kingmaker"
Mamdani becomes New York's political kingmaker after stunning primary sweep
Why is your party OK with openly making kings but have poutrage over Trump who has never indicated he wants to be a king?
Your party embraced a group of people who want to abolish the police, reopen borders to anyone and everyone, close down prisons, steal private property to give to the lazy, etc, etc, etc
What 80/20 or 90/10 issue has the democratic (socialist and communist) party been on the 80 or 90 side?
he can't, it's deflection time ...
[✘]
[✘]
Not just deflection, complete bullshit time where they drag out the tire stupid claims of Democrats giving money to the 'lazy' or 'Cadillac driving welfare queens'. It's what low IQ bigots do when they get backed into a corner. And as long as you know what it is and that they're not really being hurt by anything but their own ignorance, it can be amusing to watch them bare their tiny teeth and shriek in impotence.
So prove me wrong....
Whatever you want to call them, the DSA is a party of socialists and communists. They have members that have admitted to it.
I posted a survey yesterday that showed approximately 80 percent of DSA members identify either as Maoist or Marxist, with the remainder identifying as socialist.
The end result of socialism is communism, and there a many already there.
BTW...without going strictly by feelings, point out EXACTLY why Trump is a fascist
you remember what the commies did to the nazis in WWII, right? is the bunker under the new ballroom done yet?
[✘]
Don't need to, you haven't proven you're right so there is nothing to disprove. Besides, that's like trying to catch a fart and paint it green. And frankly I'm too busy laughing at conservatives trying to catch Trumps farts so they can sniff them or save them in a jar on their doublewide's fake fireplace mantle. But you can try and prove yourself right anytime, perhaps after you get some of that "fresh air" you've been seeking off Fox News.
Every post I have made on this thread includes a fact.
Prove any of them wrong
[✘]
Fascism is an authoritarian, far-right political ideology that prioritizes the nation and race over the individual . It relies on dictatorial leadership, militant nationalism, and the forcible suppression of opposition. The term originated with Benito Mussolini in Italy and is characterized by strict societal and economic control.
White conservative Christians who believe they're superior to minority groups and religions.
How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics - Center for American Progress
The Republican Party and Racism - Democratic Erosion
The Radicalization of the Republican Party: How We Got Here
Is there any question after watching Trump supporters grovel before their criminal dear Leader?
U.S. is sliding toward authoritarianism, hundreds of scholars say : NPR
All under attack in the Trump administration.
Trump’s assault on the First Amendment | International Bar Association
Trump attacks Democrats as ‘godless communists’ in test of midterms message | Donald Trump | The Guardian
Trump urges justice department to prosecute political opponents
Trump threatens to invoke Insurrection Act to quell anti-ICE protests in Minnesota
Eight people have died in dealings with ICE so far in 2026. These are their stories | ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement) | The Guardian
Trump expands targets for possible military deployment to more Democratic-led cities | PBS News
Now I know whiny little petulant rightwing conservatives aren't actually going to read most of those links that articulate a clear and obvious movement towards fascism among rightwing conservatism, but they could. But then that would mean they were getting educated and learning things and becoming aware of reality and, eventually becoming the very thing they've been taught to hate and fear, WOKE!!!!
The idealized result of socialism per Marx is communism per Marx.
I do not believe you can, so here is your opportunity to prove otherwise.
TMI - /s
Trump said he wanted to be like Xi, president for life... Nice try.
I just did....that was easy.
I guess I missed the part where he was elected president.
funny how maga can so easily leap to the extremes when it's a democrat they're criticizing ...