╌>

Top Democrat Poised to Chair Oversight Committee Drops Blunt 2-Word Warning to Trump and GOP

  
Via:  John Russell  •  5 days ago  •  64 comments


Top Democrat Poised to Chair Oversight Committee Drops Blunt 2-Word Warning to Trump and GOP
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Mediaite by  David Gilmour

1h




ner-group-gradient-aqua.svg

Mentions: 7 persons • 2 companies




















aHR0cHM6Ly9hbTE0Lm1lZGlhaXRlLmNvbS9tZWQvY250L3VwbG9hZHMvMjAyNS8wOS9BUDI1MjA0MDE3NjMwODI5LmpwZw

Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images


Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) issued a blunt two-word warning to President Donald Trump and his Republican allies on Tuesday night after Democrats swept to major victories in the midterm elections – “LAWYER UP.”

The Democrat, who is poised to become chairman of the powerful House Oversight Committee, delivered the message as his party moved to reclaim control of Congress, setting the stage for a wave of investigations into the Trump administration.






Garcia, currently the committee’s top Democrat, released the statement after his party secured enough victories to regain the House majority. The committee has sweeping investigative powers, including the authority to summon witnesses, demand government records, and issue subpoenas.

In a November 3 interview with Punchbowl News , Garcia laid out an aggressive investigative agenda targeting Trump’s business dealings, alleged corruption within his administration, and the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.

“We’re not starting from scratch here,” Garcia said. “There’s an enormous amount of work that has happened that is public, and there’s an enormous amount of work that’s happened that we’ve been quietly working on for many months.”

Garcia said the committee would investigate the “Trump crypto schemes,” “the ‘Red Wedding’ of Don Jr. ,” and how Trump family members, including Jared Kushner , are “sitting on boards and getting contracts.”

He also promised “quick action” on an investigation into “the pay-to-play schemes and allegations around [former DHS Secretary] Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski .”

The incoming chairman said lawmakers would “launch right into having real public hearings” on the Epstein scandal that would “center the survivors.”

Garcia also warned that “anyone who has been in bed with the Trumps” would have “no choice but to respond to our questions.

Democrats will take control of House committees when the new Congress convenes in January, ending two years of Republican control over congressional investigations.

The post Top Democrat Poised to Chair Oversight Committee Drops Blunt 2-Word Warning to Trump and GOP first appeared on Mediaite .


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    5 days ago

Donald Trump, Trump Jr, Eric Trump, Jared Kushner, Todd Blanche, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, Steven Miller, Steve Witkoff, Kristi Noem, Susie Wiles, all these and more must now face serious investigation for corruption and wrong doing.  It would be a disservice to the American people to do anything less, and it would be immoral to to do anything less. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @1    5 days ago

I want to see investigations but I also want to see legislation passed to overturn the big ugly bill, restore Medicare/Medicaid and SNAP, overturn Citizens United, and end the stupid, ugly, fucking war. Oh...and end all aid to Israel. If they want bombs they can buy them with their own money

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    5 days ago
I want to see investigations but I also want to see legislation passed to overturn the big ugly bill, restore Medicare/Medicaid and SNAP, overturn Citizens United, and end the stupid, ugly, fucking war.

I want to see legislation passed to prevent any other POTUS POS from getting away with what Trump has gotten away with.

  • Remove SCOTUS given POTUS immunity from criminality.
  • Remove officials ability to trade stocks with their inside information.
  • Grant abilities to ENFORCE the Emolument Clauses in the Constitution.
  • All branch ethics laws that cover legislative, executive AND JUDICIAL branches no more accepting bribes!!!
  • Remove the ceiling for social security and medicare taxes from income.
  • TERM LIMITS for ALL!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.1    5 days ago
Remove SCOTUS given POTUS immunity from criminality.

While its semi-covered in removing POTUS immunity, I would add remove POTUS ability to pardon on their own, make all pardons require a second branch of government approval like a supermajority vote in the Senate. No more handing out pardons like Halloween candy in the Hamptons to criminals who attacked police just because they did it at the behest of the President.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.2    5 days ago
While its semi-covered in removing POTUS immunity, I would add remove POTUS ability to pardon on their own

Find some way to prevent pardons for friends and family without Congressional approval.  Also block Trump's "pay for pardon" policy.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
1.1.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.1    5 days ago

I want Americans to be able to recognize an obvious lying piece of shit lowlife thief so we never end up in this position in the first place.  It was those assholes that enabled every horrific thing Trump has done.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
1.1.5  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    23 hours ago

We will have to 'help' democrat leaders (through our calls, letters, emails, communications of all sorts) to stay on message and tasks! Trump and his cadre of MAGA supporters intend to use their distraction/distortion/explain to "me" a thousand times plus to SQUANDER AND PISS AWAY the next two years. One truly NEGATIVE effect to warn the democrats in power about is TALKING TOO MUCH on camera. . . as even a fool can discern that whatever they intentionally or unintentionally say will be fodder in 2028 ads and more importantly attempted to be used to tie democrats that speak up in courts (for two years) on a 'point of order' and such.

Democrats stay off the news channels (unless it is serious and to your proper advantage and watch what you say even when you do! Do not play any republican/conservative 'game' to get you to EXPLOIT (and 'cancel/dilute') your power in the eyes of the public. . . and Courts.

CAUTION: Trump and MAGA supporters have one more 'trick' up their sleeves: The 'one' about OVERSATURATION. 

Oversaturation. . .it got Trump on the 'outs' with the public. . . and it can do the same to democrats (if they are not wise, discerning, and disciplined for the next two years). . . that is, just like the tea-party did over Obamacare. . . they will try to drive a topic (viral) and keep it on the television screens for two years running. . . in attempt/s to keep democrats defending themselves and one issue (it will be time-consuming, eating up productive time in the offing) and WORSE - the impression to the public which won't take time to understand the 'flashes' on their television sets. . . they will just vote out of haste and confusion.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.1.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  CB @1.1.5    23 hours ago
We will have to 'help' democrat leaders (through our calls, letters, emails, communications of all sorts) to stay on message and tasks!

Agree but is seems many(if not most) politicians seem to feel they know more about what their constituents want than the ones that voted them in.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
1.1.7  CB  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.6    22 hours ago

And that is the 'fog' that needs to be brushed aside. . .as we are de facto. . . the stewards of the votes that matter (literally count/add up). . .and, more to the point. . . we just demonstrated across party lines. . . we know how to collect ourselves and vote en mass to solve problems that politicians won't (dare) touch.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2  evilone  replied to  JohnRussell @1    5 days ago

How's that going to make groceries and gas prices lower? If Dems expend all their energy on their own revenge tour they'll get voted out of office too. ...and If you think the Republicans in the Senate are going to help the House Dems in impeachment proceedings you're delusional. It's best the Dems roll up their sleeves and work at governing and passing budgets.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  evilone @1.2    5 days ago

The only drawback to relentlessly investigating the Trump administration would be that I suppose it would encourage Trump to veto legislation the new Congress sends him. In other words, in that scenario Trump is allowed to blackmail the legislature. 

There is absolutely no reason that investigating Trump would prevent passing legislation to help the people.  They can both get done , easily. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  evilone @1.2    5 days ago

Impeachment would depend on the findings.  I think it also depends on how Trump acts and behaves in the coming months. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.3  evilone  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    5 days ago
The only drawback to relentlessly investigating the Trump administration would be that I suppose it would encourage Trump to veto legislation the new Congress sends him.

He's going to try to do that regardless. Dems will have to work across the aisle to pass more than continuing resolutions and that means not making a circus out of their committee assignments. 

There is absolutely no reason that investigating Trump would prevent passing legislation to help the people.  They can both get done , easily. 

They have a majority, not a super majority and if they go in there like they do, they will fail.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.4  evilone  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.2    5 days ago
Impeachment would depend on the findings.

Impeachment is a political process.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.5  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  evilone @1.2.3    5 days ago

What you are suggesting is letting all this wrongdoing get away scot free. If the Dems dont do it in 27 they will never do it.  They wont hold hearings in 28 and after that all these people will be out of memory. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.6  evilone  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.5    5 days ago
What you are suggesting is letting all this wrongdoing get away scot free.

I'm saying the mandate from polling is the economy and ending the Iran war.

If the Dems dont do it in 27 they will never do it.  They wont hold hearings in 28 and after that all these people will be out of memory. 

They can run their investigations, announce their findings and work to pass legislation to make it harder for the next person to get away with the same bullshit. They can do that without creating a circus out of it, by dragging every member of Trump's circle into public hearings and having weekly press conferences. 

Congress can't prosecute criminally through the courts, but they can file a civil suit. If it's something so bad they think they can impeach that would be something different, but I don't think they do. Not in this political climate. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  evilone @1.2.6    5 days ago

If anyone makes a circus out of it , it will be people like Jim Jordan and other MAGA apologists in Congress that will do it.  The Trump family is making tens of millions of dollars off the Trump presidency . There is no good reason they should be allowed to get away with that. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.8  evilone  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.7    5 days ago
If anyone makes a circus out of it , it will be people like Jim Jordan and other MAGA apologists in Congress that will do it. 

We'll see.

The Trump family is making tens of millions of dollars off the Trump presidency . There is no good reason they should be allowed to get away with that. 

Again, there are ways to govern, including passing laws to close the spigots, without looking like vindictive populist politicians.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
1.2.9  Veronica  replied to  evilone @1.2    5 days ago

I cannot agree.  I want to see and believe wholeheartedly the atrocities this administration has forced upon the working and middle classes MUST be addressed.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.10  evilone  replied to  Veronica @1.2.9    5 days ago
I want to see and believe wholeheartedly the atrocities this administration has forced upon the working and middle classes MUST be addressed.

Sure... let's do Benghazi Democrat style... That will lower grocery prices. /s 

I'm not saying shit shouldn't be addressed, I'm saying let's not make retribution the centerpiece of the next two years. It didn't work for the Reps it's not going to work for the Dems. I guarantee the dems will lose independents in 28 if they do. Exit polls talked about the economy, the war and immigration. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.11  devangelical  replied to  evilone @1.2.10    5 days ago

with about 260 democratic congress persons in the house, I'm sure leadership can spare a few reps that have prosecutorial experience while the rest fix our government. after all, this current session has only worked about 70 days so far this year. not exactly a high bar to clear.

with some cooperative work on the 2027 legislative schedule, it shouldn't be that difficult for the new congress to get the country's wheels back on the road while still dealing with the criminal element in our government. I'm afraid that a slap on the wrist, a finger wagged in the face, and a stern warning not to do that anymore, isn't going to cut it. americans want to see some accountability. it can either be provided within the gov't controlled legal structure, or there's a pretty good chance it will happen spontaneously, for quite awhile. let the law run it's course.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.12  evilone  replied to  devangelical @1.2.11    4 days ago
with about 260 democratic congress persons in the house, I'm sure leadership can spare a few reps that have prosecutorial experience while the rest fix our government. after all, this current session has only worked about 70 days so far this year. not exactly a high bar to clear.

It's about perception and results. Putting Trump nutters on the news everyday won't persuade people who can't afford their medications to vote for Dems in 2028. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.13  TᵢG  replied to  evilone @1.2.12    4 days ago

Holding Trump accountable should be part while they do everything they can to address prices, healthcare, etc.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.14  devangelical  replied to  evilone @1.2.12    4 days ago

I agree, but I think with the transfusion of new women and minority representatives that multi-tasking will take place. for the next 2 years, democrats in the house and senate need to proceed without getting bogged down in republican obstruction efforts. in other words proceed as if they don't exist and schedule the work in the house accordingly. only 218 votes in the house are needed to pass legislation. a few rule changes in the senate can hamstring what's left of the maga 4th reich there. 

in the short term, the 2 most important things will be for the democrats to get organized as a governing unit with a defined agenda to hit the ground running on day one, and secondly to keep the current serving democratic members in DC engaged to thwart any 11th hour bullshit from maga republicans in the legislature, although I'm sure there will be a lot of sore losers not showing up for work or maybe a few showing up to cast retribution votes against the party of whom they may blame for their unemployment.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.15  evilone  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.13    4 days ago

I'm saying it shouldn't be turned into a circus. Issues address should be issues of substance and not just general grievances of Trump being a dick. The ballroom issue is Trump being a dick and not something Congress should spend time on vs how the IRS allowed DOGE dudes access to taxpayer data without proper vetting and oversight. 

They don't need to be holding daily press conferences on how shitty Trump is. Everyone knows it already. Let Der Emperor hang himself with his own rope on Truth Social while the Dems do the dirty work in the background. Push for responsible budgets across party lines instead of more continuing resolutions.

If Dems spend more energy on recovering lost civil rights and less on punishing Trump they'll do well in the next election. They need to win the next election to hire the next two SC justices.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.16  TᵢG  replied to  evilone @1.2.15    4 days ago

I agree.   They need to do this very carefully.

My view, though, is that it is crucial to hold Trump and his accomplices accountable.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Participates
1.2.17  Drakkonis  replied to  evilone @1.2.15    yesterday
I'm saying it shouldn't be turned into a circus.

I've been following everything you said here. I think you're completely right. What I expect though, is exactly the prediction you fear. Trump tried to BS his way through his presidency by doing things that were popular to his base. I think the Dems are going to do exactly the same thing, now that they have power. It's what they've done in the past and, likely, what Republicans will also do going forward. That is, policy will be more about making caricatures out of political opponents and getting people to focus on that rather than policies that actually help the common person. It will continue to be all torches and pitchforks. Our country seems to have taken the movie "Idiocracy" as a roadmap. I don't see anything that convinces me that it's going to change. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.18  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drakkonis @1.2.17    yesterday
more about making caricatures out of political opponents and getting people to focus on that 

First of all, if any living person deserves to be negatively caricatured it is Donald Trump. Secondly, it is entirely possible to hold Trump to account AND work on the best policies for average people. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.19  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.18    yesterday

most of maga doesn't believe their imperial POS/POTUS should be bound by the law or his oath of office ...

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.20  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.18    yesterday
Secondly, it is entirely possible to hold Trump to account AND work on the best policies for average people. 

Agree.  The question is will they do that or will it be 90% of their time going after Trump and complaining they can't get anything done in the other 10% of the time because of Trump and the Republicans.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
1.2.21  CB  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.2.20    23 hours ago

The democrats better get things done. . .or forget 2028 being a banner 'crop' year for the Democratic Party. We have seen enough of the public's 'playbook' (swapping out the two parties) to know how these things work now. Indeed, it is evident by what Trump is doing: Appointing Steven Miller as his 'firebrand' Chief of Staff. . . and Todd Blanche as his DOJ "go-between" - enforcer. . . that he plans to use the 'STIFLE CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS. . . and so they eteter be preopared to not get stuck or allow Trump to OVERSATURATE the airways for two years running!

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.22  Right Down the Center  replied to  CB @1.2.21    23 hours ago
The democrats better get things done. . .or forget 2028 being a banner 'crop' year for the Democratic Party.

Yep

We have seen enough of the public's 'playbook' (swapping out the two parties) to know how these things work now.

Yep, make promises, don't keep them and the power shifts.

Indeed, it is evident by what Trump is doing: Appointing Steven Miller as his 'firebrand' Chief of Staff. . . and Todd Blanche as his DOJ "go-between" - enforcer. . . that he plans to use the 'STIFLE CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS. . .

Maybe, but will the dems play along?

and so they eteter be preopared to not get stuck or allow Trump to OVERSATURATE the airways for two years running!

I hope you are right but I am not holding my breath.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
1.2.23  CB  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.2.22    22 hours ago

Thank you for sharing. . .we have reached a broad agreement on a matter. And it feels, well, swell.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2  devangelical    5 days ago

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3  TᵢG    5 days ago

It is important to hold people accountable.   Failing to do so just encourages more bad behavior from others down the road.   Trump has set absolutely horrible precedents.   If he is not held accountable, he has effectively lowered the bar on corruption, lawlessness, decorum, integrity, etc.

While still a long shot, impeachment of Trump should be (quietly) investigated.   It takes 2/3 of the quorum for the Senate to convict.   The low end for a quorum is 51.   So at the extreme, the Ds alone could convict Trump if the Rs were absent.

That will never happen, but following suit, with a quorum of 80, the Ds and Is alone can convict.   20 GOP senators who do not want to vote to convict can simply not attend and the conviction could happen.   Given the proof (yesterday) of how damaging Trump is to them and their party, it might just be possible that we see some GOP senators who would vote to convict.   Especially given how egregious Trump is in so many dimensions.   The case against him is stronger than any presidential impeachment case in history.

I do not see getting 13 GOP senators to vote to convict.   So with a full quorum, conviction seems very unlikely.   But given the sentiments of GOP senators, it is not necessarily out of reach.   It is something to quietly pursue.   I do not support another impeachment show.   But I would absolutely support impeachment if there is a realistic chance of conviction.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3    5 days ago

Rachel Maddow called for prosecutions. 

“Political violence is violence, which is illegal. Corruption is illegal. Conflicts of interest are illegal. Nepotism is illegal. And all of this stuff will be pursued so that it doesn’t become de facto the law of the land and the way that we conduct ourselves as a country moving forward.”

Trump pardoned more than 1,500 people involved in the Jan. 6 insurrection, which saw his supporters storm the Capitol after he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden.

Ahead of the election, voters deemed “corruption” a top issue.

It was the second-biggest issue for voters in a Harris poll for the Guardian in late October, and the top issue for respondents to a CNBC All-America Economic Survey a week earlier.

Rachel Maddow Says It’s Time for Trump ‘Crimes’ to Be Prosecuted
 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.2  Nerm_L  replied to  TᵢG @3    5 days ago
It is important to hold people accountable.   Failing to do so just encourages more bad behavior from others down the road.   Trump has set absolutely horrible precedents.   If he is not held accountable, he has effectively lowered the bar on corruption, lawlessness, decorum, integrity, etc.

Damn well better hold people accountable.  But what I am expecting is endless investigation and a whole lot of whining.  

While still a long shot, impeachment of Trump should be (quietly) investigated.   It takes 2/3 of the quorum for the Senate to convict.   The low end for a quorum is 51.   So at the extreme, the Ds alone could convict Trump if the Rs were absent.

Impeachment is the only punitive measure Congress has.  Congress is required to send criminal referrals to the Dept. of Justice which would obviously be a dead end.  The only thing Congress can do other than impeach is endlessly investigate and whine.

So, there is an expectation that Democrats will hold people accountable - but - a Democratic Congress doesn't have any way to do that.  See where this is headed?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.2.1  evilone  replied to  Nerm_L @3.2    5 days ago
The only thing Congress can do other than impeach is endlessly investigate and whine.

FYI - Congress can file civil suits.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.2.2  Nerm_L  replied to  evilone @3.2.1    5 days ago
FYI - Congress can file civil suits.

Only for injury to Congress caused by an illegal action.  And civil litigation does not impose criminal penalties.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @3.2.2    4 days ago

the executive branch usurping congressional authority and defying the separation of powers is an injury to congress ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.4  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @3    5 days ago
It is important to hold people accountable.

americans have been paying for the nixon pardon for decades ...

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4  JBB    5 days ago

original Ain't it the truth? Ain't it the truth? Ain't it the truth?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
4.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JBB @4    5 days ago

That is what people mean when the say the lesser of two evils.  They often don't wait until after an election to say it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JBB @4    5 days ago

The man whose ass Trump lusted after crying as he gave his concession speech in the Ohio senate election. 

aHR0cHM6Ly90aGVkYWlseWJlYXN0LXRoZWRhaWx5YmVhc3QtcHJvZC53ZWIuYXJjLWNkbi5uZXQvcmVzaXplci92Mi9QNE5SSjZSRzNGQjdURTVQNDc3S0pSV1ZDWS5wbmc_YXV0aD03M2FiZTNhNWI5YWQyNTg5MmY4NTA4ZmU2ZGVkNjUwY2VjNzgxOTM4ODJhYjA5ZjJiYzEwNDEzM2QyYjgyZDg3JnNtYXJ0PXRydWUmd2lkdGg9MTQ5MyZoZWlnaHQ9ODQw

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    5 days ago

His wife is thinking in that moment, "This is for the best honey, you can stop whoring yourself out to that moron now and I can stop hearing about your ass on the news every day, literally. This is what's best for our family and what I prayed for last night, thank you lord Jesus!".

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.2.1    5 days ago

good one

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    5 days ago

Remember the 2016 election and the cons made fun of the criers? hahaha

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2.4  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.3    5 days ago

I cry whenever you attempt arithmetic ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @4.2.4    4 days ago

that's a real knee slapper right there...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  seeder  JohnRussell    5 days ago
MAGA pundits are already reverting to their old scare tactics and talking points just hours after Republicans faced widespread losses in the midterm elections.

Steve Bannon, the architect behind President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, has declared, without providing evidence, that migrants are already traveling in droves to try to cross the southern border.

"They've already got caravans coming up. They're all excited down in Central America that the gates are opening again," Bannon proclaimed on his War Room show.

Migrants will soon be pouring into Texas, according to Bannon.

Guest Todd Bensman of the right-wing Heritage Foundation agreed and proclaimed that Texas, soon to be under the leadership of Democratic Gov.-elect Gina Hinojosa, will remove any type of border security.

While the Trump administration had been asserting that the southern border was entirely closed for the last two years, Bensman now claims that "the border is quiet, but it's not dead. There are still lots of runners coming across."

Steve Bannon Cooks Up New Phony Doomsday Scenario After Midterm Massacre

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @5    5 days ago

They can't help but lie with impunity

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1    5 days ago

especially when it's seasoned with racism or xenophobia ...

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
6  Veronica    5 days ago
The incoming chairman said lawmakers would “launch right into having real public hearings” on the Epstein scandal that would “center the survivors.”

I cannot wait.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  seeder  JohnRussell    5 days ago

800

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8  Sean Treacy    5 days ago

 “LAWYER UP.

Let's hope! Best thing Democrats can do is spend two years holding investigations and engaging in lawfare that ultimately accomplishes nothing (apologies to the people who will spend their life savings defending themselves in these farces).  

It's their rage and shortsightedness that will keep them from accomplishing much that can do long term damage to the country.  If Democrats wanted to actually accomplish policy goals, they could probably have Trump eating out of their hand if they just played nice. That's been obvious since he was sworn in in 2017. B

but all lawfare will accomplish is keep anything from being done, which is fine by me.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    5 days ago
all lawfare will accomplish

You're forgetting one very important fact though. The people that are going to be investigated did actually commit crimes which will be exposed.

It's hilarious to me that Republicans claimed all this supposed "lawfare" when Trump was indicted, tried and convicted of multiple felonies. His supporters screamed and yelled about it, but the fact was, he was fucking guilty and the DA proved it to a court that convicted him of felonies. Those are FACTS.

Then Trump and his miserable nut suckers screamed about how Democrats and Biden committed all these crimes and they were going to throw everyone in jail. Trump comes in, pardons a bunch of actual criminals who attacked police and vandalized the capital and then went after a bunch of Democrats and political opponents and a former FBI director with indictments and even claimed Obama was guilty of something and Biden and everyone was going to go down and the dip shit moron Trump supporters were grinning from ear to ear.

So where are the convictions? Where are all the Democrats behind bars? Why isn't Biden or Obama convicted of felonies by now? The facts show that they aren't convicted of any felonies because Republicans don't have any actual evidence of a crime no matter how much tired brain-dead bigots wish there was.

Trumps DOJ has lost so many cases, had multiple grand juries refuse to bring charges which is almost unheard of and extremely embarrassing for anyone who understands the legal system at all. Trump and his cadre of poorly educated inept deluded sycophants is shrinking by the day, I almost feel bad for the stupid shmucks and just sad losers still shilling for him.

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
8.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.1    4 days ago
The people that are going to be investigated did actually commit crimes which will be exposed.

That's fkng hilarious.  Wash and repeat nonsesne.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @8.1.1    4 days ago
That's fkng hilarious.  Wash and repeat nonsesne.  

What's hilarious are those sitting around thinking Obama is a criminal when he hasn't even been charged with any crimes (regardless of whether conservatives think his skin color makes him guilty) while they suck off their convicted felon dear Leader. Too funny.

Obama will go down in history as one of the best Presidents America has ever had, while Trump will be the shit-stained side note of what not to do for kids learning about civics. Trump will forever be remembered as the worst, the lowest IQ, the most criminal, the most corrupt President with near inhuman levels of stupidity and narcissism. And his followers will get mentioned as the even dumber bigots who enabled such a disaster.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.1.2    4 days ago

maga will forever be synonymous with moron ...

M orons  A re  G overning  A merica

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
8.1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.1.2    3 days ago
thinking Obama is a criminal

Where did I mention him?  And you expect to be taken seriously.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
8.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    4 days ago
Let's hope! Best thing Democrats can do is spend two years holding investigations and engaging in lawfare that ultimately accomplishes nothing (apologies to the people who will spend their life savings defending themselves in these farces).  

One would think that after a decade of investigations that turned up absolutely nothing they would realize they're failures.

It's not like they have the votes to get anything accomplished anyway.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @8.2    4 days ago
that turned up absolutely nothing

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

Just more hilarious lies.

The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump's behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin's aid , particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.

The report is the culmination of a bipartisan probe that produced what the committee called "the most comprehensive description to date of Russia's activities and the threat they posed." The investigation spanned more than three years as the panel's leaders said they wanted to thoroughly document the unprecedented attack on U.S. elections.

The findings, including unflinching characterizations of furtive interactions between Trump associates and Russian operatives, echo to a large degree those of special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation and appear to repudiate the Republican president's claims that the FBI had no basis to investigate whether his campaign was conspiring with Russia.

"Taken as a whole, Manafort's high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik, represented a grave counterintelligence threat ," the report says.

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election | PBS News

On top of that Trump was convicted of 34 felonies THAT STILL STAND BECAUSE THEY WERE LEGIT. How his dumb shit followers can't understand simple facts would no doubt be extremely embarrassing for them if they had even a shred of shame left. But I get it, nobody with their head firmly shoved up Trumps ass will ever admit to the facts, apparently Trump's balloon knot tightens around their necks anytime they try to extricate their craniums.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.2.2  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.2.1    4 days ago

funny how maga republicans think that if you hide or destroy the evidence of crimes, then no crimes took place ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
8.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.2.1    3 days ago
Just more hilarious lies.

And somehow it all seem to be factual.  

Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin's aid

Robert Mueller's Russia investigation

Is that from the Obama / Clinton instigated Russian Hoax?  Do better.

 
 

Who is online





86 visitors