╌>

Biden gives DOJ green light to resume Obama-era 'slush fund' payouts to liberal groups

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  3 years ago  •  4 comments

By:   Ronn Blitzer (Fox News)

Biden gives DOJ green light to resume Obama-era 'slush fund' payouts to liberal groups
No private lawyer could give away a client's settlement money, and no government lawyer may do so either.

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

President Biden plans to use the Dept. of Justice to launder public money through lobbyists to make political donations to his political allies.  No doubt the recipients of this prosecutorial largess make healthy political donations.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



President-elect Joe Biden is calling for the Justice Department to look into reinstating a controversial Obama-era practice that allowed prosecutors to make settlement agreements that resulted in defendants paying outside groups instead of victims or the government.

The Trump administration had put an end to these payments following a 2017 memo from then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions which was reflected in the Justice Department's manual.

"When the federal government settles a case against a corporate wrongdoer, any settlement funds should go first to the victims and then to the American people — not to bankroll third-party special interest groups or the political friends of whoever is in power," Sessions said in 2017.

A Republican-backed bill known as the "Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2017" would have made the practice illegal.

"Congress must permanently end the abuses Obama's Justice Department exploited to use settlements to funnel money to their liberal friends," then-Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., who sponsored the bill in the House, said in 2017.

Goodlatte's bill never became law, but the Sessions-era DOJ policy did become an official agency rule that officially went into effect in December 2020. The rule allows for limited exceptions for "an otherwise lawful payment or loan that provides restitution or compensation to a victim," situations where "a trusted third party" is needed to deliver funds due to concerns over foreign corruption, payments for legal or other professional services related to the case, and payments that are otherwise "expressly authorized" by a statute or regulation.

The rule is now part of a list of federal agency actions to be reviewed pursuant to Biden's upcoming executive order titled, "Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis."

Fox News reached out to the Biden transition team for comment, but they did not immediately respond.

Past instances of settlements involving payments to third-party groups include a $17 billion settlement agreement where Bank of America was required to pay nonprofit organizations to resolve an investigation into its role in the sale of mortgage-backed securities before the 2008 financial crisis. That agreement was struck under then-Attorney General Eric Holder's Justice Department.

In another agreement, Gibson Guitar Corp. had to contribute to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to resolve a criminal investigation into allegations it illegally imported exotic wood.

Paul Larkin, a senior legal research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, wrote in 2016 that the practice was "improper and unlawful," arguing that it was barred by the Appropriations Clause, violated ethics principles, and worked as an "end run around" the Antideficiency Act and Miscellaneous Receipts Act.

"No private lawyer could give away a client's settlement money, and no government lawyer may do so either. It is time for this unlawful practice to end," Larkin wrote.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    3 years ago

A shake-down racket that cheats victims and the public appears to be liberals' idea of justice. 

Don't worry, it's all legal.  By seeking settlements instead of judgements the money is never on the public books.  But the system is most assuredly rigged.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Nerm_L @1    3 years ago
A shake-down racket that cheats victims and the public appears to be liberals' idea of justice. 

And the slanted partisan BS just keeps flowing.

The article admits that the 2020 decision partially reinstates the third party rule - that should satisfy everyone.

But the system is most assuredly rigged.

Who were the victims in US v Gibson?  The settlement made sense as the NF&WF serves US citizens?

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Split Personality @1.1    3 years ago
And the slanted partisan BS just keeps flowing. The article admits that the 2020 decision partially reinstates the third party rule - that should satisfy everyone.

Do those third parties express their gratitude with political donations?

Who were the victims in US v Gibson?  The settlement made sense as the NF&WF serves US citizens?

The United States government enters into international agreements and treaties on behalf of the citizens of the United States.  Federal prosecutors are supposed to conduct these investigations and prosecutions on behalf of the citizens of the United States.  The citizens of the United States are injured because all citizens are required to comply with international agreements and treaties.  

Noncompliance injures all those who have been required to comply by the United States government.  That's the thesis of civil rights, isn't it?

These types of prosecutorial agreements, benefitting third parties, does not serve the citizens of the United States.  It's legal because the Federal government doesn't touch one cent of the settlement; no public funds are involved.  The money is directed toward political groups who, undoubtedly, express their gratitude with donations.

Opensecrets: National Fish & Wildlife Foundation direct donations

Opensecrets: National Fish & Wildlife Foundation lobbying profile

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

President-elect  Joe Biden  is calling for the  Justice Department  to look into reinstating a controversial Obama-era practice that allowed prosecutors to make settlement agreements that resulted in defendants paying outside groups instead of victims or the government.


How can I forget that. 

Is Biden really the one who thought of going back to that?

Could it be those around him now?

 
 

Who is online






JBB


63 visitors