╌>

US to provide additional $4.5 billion to keep Ukrainian government operating | The Hill

  
Via:  Jeremy in NC  •  2 years ago  •  13 comments

By:   Tobias Burns (The Hill)

US to provide additional $4.5 billion to keep Ukrainian government operating | The Hill
The U.S. is sending out an additional $4.5 billion in aid to the government of Ukraine, bringing the total amount of budgetary support to the country since it was invaded by Russia to $8.5 billion, the Treasury Department said Monday. The funds will help keep the Ukrainian government afloat as it seeks to withstand the…

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America

The U.S. is sending out an additional $4.5 billion in aid to the government of Ukraine, bringing the total amount of budgetary support to the country since it was invaded by Russia to $8.5 billion, the Treasury Department said Monday.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The U.S. is sending out an additional $4.5 billion in aid to the government of Ukraine, bringing the total amount of budgetary support to the country since it was invaded by Russia to $8.5 billion, the Treasury Department said Monday.

The funds will help keep the Ukrainian government afloat as it seeks to withstand the large-scale Russian military campaign that's now approaching its sixth month. The first payment of $3 billion from the $4.5 billion is scheduled to go out later this month.

The Treasury will administer the funds along with the U.S. Agency for International Development and the money will go to essential services like paying government salaries, keeping hospitals and schools operating, and distributing humanitarian supplies.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in a statement that the announcement shows President Biden's commitment to Ukraine, "including through $8.5 billion in budgetary support which is helping Ukraine's government keep hospitals, schools, and other critical government services for the people of Ukraine."

The department said there were mechanisms in place to make sure that the funding, which was approved by Congress, would be used only for its intended purposes.

"Robust safeguards put in place by the World Bank, coupled with U.S.-funded, expert third-party oversight embedded within the Ukrainian government, ensure accountability and transparency in the use of these funds," the Treasury said in a statement.

The $4.5 billion represents the fifth disbursement from the U.S. directly to the Ukrainian government budget. The U.S. sent $1 billion through the World Bank in April and May, $1.3 billion in June, and another $1.7 billion in July.

The Treasury is also releasing $335 million to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to help with Ukraine's energy and food security as part of the country's efforts to rebuild from the war.

The money will go to supporting infrastructure in transport and logistics as well as some direct financing for the agricultural sector and exporters. It will also go to cities and towns that are dealing with issues related to internally displaced persons and other vulnerable populations.

Monday's announcement from the Treasury came the same day as the Department of Defense said the U.S. would send an additional $1 billion "to meet Ukraine's critical security and defense needs" in the form of additional ammunition, weapons and equipment to be sent to Ukraine.

The defense package included mortars, javelin missile systems, Claymore anti-personnel mines, artillery ammunition, ammunition for artillery rocket systems, surface-to-air missile munitions, C-4 explosives, and medical supplies, according to the Pentagon.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 years ago

So the Biden Dumpster Fire is sending even more money out of the country that taxpayers will have to pay.

Tell me again, how does this help the United States?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    2 years ago

It does make you wonder if the 8.5 billion was spent on feeding the hungry, housing the homeless and mental health help for those that need it in the US...................................

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1    2 years ago

Imagine how much insulin we could buy with that money.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    2 years ago
"Tell me again, how does this help the United States?"

Continuing to fund Ukraine just enough to keep the war going without an end in sight is good for the economy of the USA - liquid natural gas can be sold to Europe, and the American arms manufacturers' wildest dreams have come true.  After all, Americans don't need the necessities that those billions can pay for.  There used to be an expression "What's good for General Bullmoose is good for the USA" and that's been adapted by America and reworded as "What's good for the USA is required by the rest of the world."

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1.2    2 years ago

You are funny.

liquid natural gas can be sold to Europe,

We can't produce enough to supply ourselves much the less Europe.

and the American arms manufacturers' wildest dreams have come true.

US arms manufacturers are not selling anything to Ukraine. Again, this is the US government giving all of these billions in money and arms to Ukraine.

 After all, Americans don't need the necessities that those billions can pay for. 

Where you are wrong is thinking the government was ever going to spend that money on US citizens to begin with. If it wasn't being used for Ukraine- it wouldn't be getting used.

There used to be an expression "What's good for General Bullmoose is good for the USA" and that's been adapted by America and reworded as "What's good for the USA is required by the rest of the world."

Please site the references for this quote. I would go with "What is good for US politicians is bad for everyone else."

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.2.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2.1    2 years ago
"You are funny."

Thank you, I'm glad you appreciate my humour.  We can sure all use a few laughs these days.

"We can't produce enough [LNG] to supply ourselves much the less Europe."

US commits to additional LNG supplies for Europe - Energy Voice

.

› ... › us- biden - europe an- lng
.
"Mar 25, 2022 · The US and its partners will send an additional 15 billion cubic metres of LNG to Europe this year, US President Joe Biden has said. The president made the commitment following..."

Foreign producers have to be paid - and America will buy it to give to Europe.

"US arms manufacturers are not selling anything to Ukraine. Again, this is the US government giving all of these billions in money and arms to Ukraine."

You mean the arms manufacturers are charitable enterprises and what's being sent to Ukraine are donations?

625210a9a310fd2bec81e835.jpeg

"Where you are wrong is thinking the government was ever going to spend that money on US citizens to begin with. If it wasn't being used for Ukraine- it wouldn't be getting used."

Not even to reduce the monstrous deficit?  Wow.  So much money it isn't even being used even though there's about a half a million Americans sleeping under bridges?   I had no idea America had so much money they could buy the loyalty of other countries with it.  s/

"Please site the references for this quote."

I made up the second one to illustrate American hegemony.  As for the General Bullmoose one...

"General Bullmoose: Al Capp created General Bullmoose in June 1953 as the epitome of a ruthless capitalist. Bullmoose’s motto “What’s good for General Bullmoose is good for the USA!” was adapted by Capp from a statement made by Charles E. Wilson, the former head of General Motors and Secretary of Defense under President Dwight Eisenhower. In 1952 Wilson told a Senate subcommittee, “What is good for the country is good for General Motors, and what’s good for General Motors is good for the country.” Li’l Abner became embroiled in many implausible but hilarious adventures with the cold-hearted Bullmoose over the years."

As I say to my movie quiz participants, "I'm glad you had fun with it."

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
1.3  squiggy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    2 years ago

Wait til you see the bill for Taiwan - the folks we have an obligation to.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
1.3.1  afrayedknot  replied to  squiggy @1.3    2 years ago

Can you give us the cost of freedom…here, there, or everywhere?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.2  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  squiggy @1.3    2 years ago

did you see where South Korea told Pelosi they wouldn't defend Taiwan?

Looks like Pelosi's vacation didn't amount to much.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2  Nerm_L    2 years ago

So far Congress has approved at least $54 billion in aid.  (There was a $14 billion package approved in March and another $40 billion package approved in May.)    

That may not include the cost of troop deployments to NATO countries, humanitarian relief for displaced Ukrainians, or US operations to support Ukraine (like intelligence gathering).  At the present rate of spending, the annual expenditures on the Ukrainian war will exceed the planned annual expenditures in Biden's Inflation Reduction Act.  Maybe that's why Democrats need big tax increases.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Nerm_L @2    2 years ago
At the present rate of spending, the annual expenditures on the Ukrainian war will exceed the planned annual expenditures in Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. 

That would explain the tax hikes in Bidens trainwreck act.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1.1  Nerm_L  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1    2 years ago
That would explain the tax hikes in Bidens trainwreck act.

Well, if history is a guide then we only have another 9 1/2 years to go in Ukraine.  At this rate of expenditure the price tag will be at least $540 billion over ten years.  Biden's Inflation Reduction Act(?) is $740 billion over ten years.  Kinda puts things in perspective, doesn't it?

 
 

Who is online


JBB


50 visitors