╌>

University of Cincinnati student alleges professor failed her project for using the term 'biological women'

  
Via:  Texan1211  •  11 months ago  •  45 comments

By:   Richard Pollina (New York Post)

University of Cincinnati student alleges professor failed her project for using the term 'biological women'
Olivia Krolczyk, 20, A sophomore at the University of Cincinnati says despite her professor for Women's Gender Studies in Pop Culture class calling her project "a solid proposal," she still recieved a zero.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Richard Pollina

Back to Reading June 5, 20236:50amUpdatedJune 5, 202310:00am

A sophomore at the University of Cincinnati claims that her professor gave her a zero on a college project for using the term "biological women."

Olivia Krolczyk, 20, said the professor for her Women's Gender Studies in Pop Culture class failed her for using the "exclusionary" term despite admitting that she submitted a "solid proposal," the student told The Post.

The course instructed students to pick a topic related to feminism, with Krolczyk choosing to research the changes female athletes have experienced throughout history and the rights and opportunities they have been awarded and fought for in athletics.

Her project discussed things from the first woman to compete in the Olympic Games to the fight that female athletes like Riley Gaines are making for proposed changes to Title IX.

The chemistry major said her project ended by sharing how "these rights and opportunities are being threatened by allowing men to compete in women's sports."

The professor wrote in the comment for the failed mark that the term "biological women" was forbidden in the class.

Krolczyk, who hasn't identified the professor for fear she may be subjected to online harassment, first made the claim in a now-viral TikTok, which has been viewed more than 2.5 million times.

The clip shares an apparent photo of the zero grade and the professor's comment, which reads, "Olivia, this is a solid proposal. However, the terms 'biological women' are exclusionary and are not allowed in this course as they further reinforce heteronormativity."

"The final grade is based on the very few assignments we have, adding up to 200 total points. All grades relating to this specific project add up to 100 points, which is half of my grade," Krolczyk told The Post.

"The project in general was very broad and the students had a lot of freedom to pick a topic."

Krolczyk, who competed in cross-country and track throughout high school and the beginning of her college career, says more students should challenge the rhetoric being forced by their professors.Olivia Krolczyk

The undergrad — who competed in cross-country and track throughout high school and the beginning of her college career before transferring to the University of Cincinnati — said she followed the professor's instructions to a tee, including using three sources from the class and formatting the paper to the teacher's requirements.

"The directions for the assignment in which I received a zero on specifically state, 'This exercise is developmental. Thoughtful proposals submitted on time will receive full credit.' I turned in my assignment on time and I can guarantee 100% that my proposal was extremely thoughtful," she insisted.

Krolczyk also said she had contacted the university's Gender Equality office, which told her it would have a different professor review and grade her work — but she has yet to see her grade change nearly two weeks later.

The student also claims this was not the first time she's run into issues with this professor.

Krolczyk said she was rebuked when she pushed back during a class discussion and argued that generalizing all white men as having privilege is "not fair."

"She commented that something along the lines of it being necessary and important to recognize privilege and oppression. I was docked on my grade," the student alleged.

The University of Cincinnati said the matter is being reviewed through its established policies and processes.

The Post has reached out to the professor for comment.

Krolczyk said she's expressing and standing up for her and other students' right to practice free speech on campus by posting the TikTok.TikTok/oliveviewsSince posting the video, Krolczyk has said hundreds of other students have reached out about similar struggles they've had with educators.TikTok/oliveviews

Krolczyk said she decided to speak out because she feels "the issue is not being taken seriously" by the university.

"Standing up for free speech in education is more important. If we as a student body take action instead of conforming to the professor's ideology, we can hopefully start changing our universities back to a place where stating simple biology isn't punished and conflicting opinions are encouraged," she told The Post.

The Ohio native also claims hundreds of other students across the nation have contacted her about similar occurrences since she shared her video on TikTok.

"I can confidently say within my university and many across the country, dissenting opinions are frowned upon and the views of the professors are affecting their abilities to teach," she proclaimed.

"Regardless of what the course is, and what the assignment is, a professor assigning a zero on something that was turned in on time and is of high academic value is extreme."

Krolczkyk said political ideologies being injected into universities is turning young Americans off wanting to go.

"There are more and more people avoiding college, or finding the cheapest possible options simply because universities are losing their respect as educators and are building the reputation as indoctrinators of 'wokeness,'" she said.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Texan1211    11 months ago

Funny--"biological women" would probably be acceptable in a different class, but not for this one?

THIS is the type of idiocy that frustrates sane people.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
1.1  mocowgirl  replied to  Texan1211 @1    11 months ago

This is ridiculous.  Woman or man should not have to be prefaced by biological.

Castrated human males are eunuchs.

Taking chemicals does not make a male grow a uterus and ovaries. nor make a female grow a penis and testicles.  The chemicals are as synthethic as the plastic surgeries involved to mimic nature.  Nature that made a "mistake" according to people who have problems that I would never wish on anyone.  

I don't what the answers are, but I do know the solutions don't involve penalizing women.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  mocowgirl @1.1    11 months ago
Woman or man should not have to be prefaced by biological.

They shouldn't have to be prefaced by anything.  If one was born a male, they are male.  If one is born female, they are female.  

I don't what the answers are, but I do know the solutions don't involve penalizing women.

I have a feeling that this would have been penalized regardless of the gender of the person writing it.  The "professor" has an agenda and this went against that.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.2  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  mocowgirl @1.1    11 months ago
Woman or man should not have to be prefaced by biological.

True, but lots of people now feel otherwise for some reason or another.

Seems like women are destined to be the victims just for the sake of making some people feel better about themselves and science and common sense be damned.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.2    11 months ago

Pretty sure that this is just another fake story from the NYP.

The New York Post is known for this sort of thingy.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.4  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @1.1.3    11 months ago
Pretty sure that this is just another fake story from the NYP.

Well, all you have to do is PROVE it.

Can you do that or are you trolling?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  mocowgirl @1.1    11 months ago

How are women being penalized?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
1.1.7  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @1.1.3    11 months ago
Pretty sure that this is just another fake story from the NYP.

Exactly, Olivia Krolczyk is obviously a made up name.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.6    11 months ago

Somebody didn't read the article (or the header).

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.9  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.8    11 months ago
Somebody didn't read the article (or the header).

Clearly, but then again we know not everyone reads links and articles.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.10  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.9    11 months ago

Then those very people will make moronic comments throughout.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.11  Jack_TX  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.5    11 months ago

I get that it's been reported everywhere.  But it's all the same story about "girl says something in a TikTok video".

So there needs to be at least some consideration for the idea that she's making it up.

That should be balanced with consideration for the idea that she's not making it up. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @1    11 months ago

Good for Olivia, I hope she takes that university

to the cleaners!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2  Jeremy Retired in NC    11 months ago

So this persona is a "professor" yet stupid enough to play the woke game.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    11 months ago
So this persona is a "professor" yet stupid enough to play the woke game. 

I would be willing to bet that the professor was one of those fond of saying "follow the science" when it comes to other topics!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1    11 months ago

I think that's a safe bet.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Texan1211    11 months ago
Women's Gender Studies in Pop Culture

So why would "biological women" be forbidden on a class ABOUT women?

Is the class really about transgenders?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.1  George  replied to  Texan1211 @3    11 months ago
Women's Gender Studies in Pop Culture
So why would "biological women" be forbidden on a class ABOUT women?

You missed the key term, "in Pop Culture" to the woke left in academia, real women have penis's now. the others are just birthing people.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4  seeder  Texan1211    11 months ago

Isn't it odd how far apart things have become.

In this case, a student gets a zero for the use of a single term the professor didn't like.  

In another case, high school students are getting a mark of 50% for not turning in or doing any work at all.

Sure sounds like the high school is bound and determined to give the kids tools to surely not succeed in college if they have a professor like this one!

Such is the state of education in America today.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
4.1  mocowgirl  replied to  Texan1211 @4    11 months ago
Such is the state of education in America today.

Yep.  Universities are turning out ad execs who use males to promote female products.  And even menstrual products are now being marketed to "bodies with female sex organs".  This is insane.  

Megyn Kelly slams Always for referring to women as 'bodies with female sex organs' | Daily Mail Online

Conservative podcaster and pundit   Megyn Kelly   tore into Always, the feminine hygiene product company, for   referring to women as 'bodies with female sex organs.'

She slammed the company for its pamphlet titled, 'Always' Puberty and Confidence Guide for Parents and Carers,' which refers to developing young women as 'young people with female sex organs.'

The company failed to use the words 'girls' and 'daughters' in the guide, instead using 'young people' and 'child.'

and it appears the film "Idiocracy" was prophecy.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  mocowgirl @4.1    11 months ago

Much ado about nothing - probably bogus like someone said above

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.2  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.1    11 months ago
Much ado about nothing - probably bogus like someone said above

They were quite obviously wrong, and you choose to go along with it?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.3  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  mocowgirl @4.1    11 months ago
And even menstrual products are now being marketed to "bodies with female sex organs".  This is insane.  

Of course it is insane.

What is so disheartening about it all is the number of people who don't think this is insane.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.2    11 months ago

a nothingberder

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.5  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.4    11 months ago
a nothingberder

Then why do you and others work so damn hard defending this shit?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5  Ronin2    11 months ago
"Olivia, this is a solid proposal. However, the terms 'biological women' are exclusionary and are not allowed in this course as they further reinforce heteronormativity."

"H eteronormativity"?

.

Heteronormativity is what makes heterosexuality seem coherent, natural and privileged. It involves the assumption that everyone is ‘naturally’ heterosexual, and that heterosexuality is an ideal, superior to homosexuality or bisexuality.

The professor should write herself up for using that term. It is derogatory of heterosexuals- and assumes they are all the same.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    11 months ago

She committed heresy against the state religion. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7  Tacos!    11 months ago

I would hope that there’s more to this, but the reality is there are some crazy people working as professors in colleges all over the country. I’d say they’re a tiny percentage, but they do exist.

A project that is about research and calls for an opinion should be graded primarily on the quality of the work done and not the viewpoint of the student. Even in some scenario I can’t imagine, where the professor doesn’t like the student’s viewpoint and the grade is impacted, there shouldn’t be a zero for legitimate work. Only something like plagiarism or incomplete/missing work would justify that.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
7.1  mocowgirl  replied to  Tacos! @7    11 months ago
I would hope that there’s more to this, but the reality is there are some crazy people working as professors in colleges all over the country. I’d say they’re a tiny percentage, but they do exist.

There are some crazy people and there are people with or easily swayed by political/religious/societal agenda in complete disregard to science or reality.

There has to be a sane world somewhere between the extreme fringes where people who don't know male from female and the people who believe that Satan is making their son a homosexual and perform an exorcism in his bedroom.  

The people, exorcising demons and crying over legalizing gay marriage in the videos at the link below, are living in a fantasy world that has nothing in common with known reality.

Missouri congresswoman's gay nephew says his parents hired an 'exorcist' | Daily Mail Online

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
7.2  evilone  replied to  Tacos! @7    11 months ago
Even in some scenario I can’t imagine, where the professor doesn’t like the student’s viewpoint and the grade is impacted, there shouldn’t be a zero for legitimate work. Only something like plagiarism or incomplete/missing work would justify that.

Yup, and are processes to have work like this reassessed when a student feels wronged by their professor. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  evilone @7.2    11 months ago
Yup, and are processes to have work like this reassessed when a student feels wronged by their professor.

The student has tried to employ those processes.

To no avail as of yet.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
7.2.2  evilone  replied to  Texan1211 @7.2.1    11 months ago
The student has tried to employ those processes.

Then a reasonable conclusion is they deserve the grade they got.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.3  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  evilone @7.2.2    11 months ago
Then a reasonable conclusion is they deserve the grade they got.

"Krolczyk also said she had contacted the university's Gender Equality office, which told her it would have a different professor review and grade her work — but she has yet to see her grade change nearly two weeks later."

Note it doesn't say they have regraded her paper.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
7.2.4  evilone  replied to  Texan1211 @7.2.3    11 months ago
...a different professor review and grade her work — but she has yet to see her grade change nearly two weeks later."

So it's in process then, and we shouldn't' all get our knickers twisted?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.5  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  evilone @7.2.4    11 months ago

I was merely informing you that the student is going through the process that you brought up.

From your comment, it wasn't apparent you read that in the story.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
7.2.6  evilone  replied to  Texan1211 @7.2.5    11 months ago
I was merely informing you...

Yeah. I got that. Thank you. Since it's in process I don't need to get outraged about one entitled girl's butthurt feelings.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
8  Right Down the Center    11 months ago

I hope there is a lawsuit and the teacher is shitcanned after the college pays a nice settlement(assuming claim is proven true).  They should check and make sure the professor does not have a machete before they go to interview her.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
8.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Right Down the Center @8    11 months ago

“…make sure the professor does not have a machete…”

…whatever point you were hoping to make is rendered moot with such ridiculousness. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.1.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @8.1    11 months ago

"Lighten up, Francis".

It was a joke, one you obviously didn't care for.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
8.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  afrayedknot @8.1    11 months ago

I guess the reference was lost on you.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.1.3  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  Right Down the Center @8.1.2    11 months ago
I guess the reference was lost on you

Maybe they aren't always current on news.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
8.1.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Texan1211 @8.1.3    11 months ago
Maybe they aren't always current on news.

Or have a reaaaaaally short memory.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
9  George    11 months ago

A Giant  FUCK YOU!!!!  to the original professor.

College student gets A in class after allegedly receiving zero on proposal for using term ‘biological women’

College student gets A in class after allegedly receiving zero on proposal for using term ‘biological women’ | Fox News

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
9.1  seeder  Texan1211  replied to  George @9    11 months ago

love this news!

Liberals may become apoplectic!

 
 

Who is online



97 visitors