╌>
Thomas

The Fracturing of Democracy - A Chronicle of Continuing Trauma. Part 2 A Glimmer of Hope

  
By:  Thomas  •  History Before they can rewrite it  •  4 weeks ago  •  34 comments

The Fracturing of Democracy - A Chronicle of Continuing Trauma. Part 2 A Glimmer of Hope
It is not a question of Left or Right, It is a question of Right and Wrong

Senator Cory Booker rose and spoke for over 25 hours in defense of governmental institutions, the work that they do, and the specific effects that the Trump Administration and DOGE is having on real people throughout the country as he asserts power he does not have illegally and unconstitutionally. I only watched the last hour or so, but if he had that much energy at the end, he must have been on fire at the beginning. 

This is from the final 10 hours and 30ish minutes of the speech. 

Here is an interview from right after the speech.

It is difficult to not be moved by his presentation.

I will post a link to the transcript when it is available.

Red Box Rules

Please Be Nice


 

Tags

jrBlog - desc
[]
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
1  author  Thomas    4 weeks ago

Listen from about hour 10:00 on and you will get an idea. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2  Greg Jones    4 weeks ago

His blathering BS broke Strom Thurmond's record for a filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1957.

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
2.1  author  Thomas  replied to  Greg Jones @2    4 weeks ago

All in a good day's work, I would say. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @2.1    3 weeks ago

the way a filibuster should take place ...

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
2.1.2  author  Thomas  replied to  devangelical @2.1.1    3 weeks ago

Point of clarity: This technically was not a filibuster, it was just a use of the rule that when Senator stands to speak does not have to stop speaking until he yields the floor. A filibuster is when a Senator takes the action of standing and speaking for a prolonged time in order to stop or hinder certain legislation from passing.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @2.1.2    3 weeks ago

either, or ...

maga senators would have to pull 2 shifts each and recite everything they knew to match it ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Thomas @2.1.2    3 weeks ago
A filibuster is when a Senator takes the action of standing and speaking for a prolonged time in order to stop or hinder certain legislation from passing.

Example of that would be Democrat Strom Thurmond's pathetic attempts to stop the Civil Rights Act.  

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
2.1.5  author  Thomas  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.4    3 weeks ago
Example of that would be Democrat Strom Thurmond's pathetic attempts to stop the Civil Rights Act.

Once again with the factually correct but culturally (and politically) obtuse statement. 

I just spoke to my digital friend and research assistant, ChatGPT, and Prompted, "Strom Thurmond Democrat Longest speech on senate floor until this week, politics and the southern Democrats in the 1950s and 60s views versus Democratic thought in more recent years" 

The neural-network asked, "Want to dive deeper into how the party realignment happened step-by-step, or curious how current GOP positions trace back to those Dixiecrats?” I answered affirmatively and ChatGPT had this to say:

Awesome—this is a rich and important topic, and tracing it step-by-step really brings out how much U.S. politics evolved in the 20th century. Let's break it down like a timeline and highlight how the ideological "swap" between Democrats and Republicans happened, especially in the South.

 Step-by-Step: Party Realignment in the U.S.

 Step 1: Pre-1948 — Solid South & the Old Democratic Coalition

  • After Reconstruction, the South became known as the "Solid South" — solidly Democratic.

  • This was the party of Jim Crow, segregation, and white supremacy, especially in the South.

  • Northern Democrats were more urban and working-class, including many immigrants—but the party was a broad coalition, not ideologically consistent.

  • Republicans were seen as the party of Lincoln, big business, and the North.

 Step 2: 1948 — Dixiecrats Revolt

  • President Harry Truman integrated the military and pushed for civil rights, upsetting Southern Democrats.

  • Strom Thurmond ran as a Dixiecrat (States’ Rights Party) in 1948, explicitly defending segregation.

  • This was a warning shot: the Southern wing of the Democrats was ready to split if civil rights became central.

 Step 3: 1950s–60s — Civil Rights Movement & Democratic Shift

  • Democratic Presidents JFK and LBJ began to align the party more with civil rights.

  • The Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965) were passed under Lyndon B. Johnson, who famously said:


    "We have lost the South for a generation."


  • Southern Democrats (like Thurmond) were furious. Thurmond switched to the GOP in 1964.

 Step 4: Nixon’s Southern Strategy (Late 60s–70s)

  • The Republican Party saw an opportunity.

  • Nixon and his strategist Kevin Phillips crafted the "Southern Strategy": appeal to white voters disillusioned by civil rights progress.

  • Focused on:

    • Law and order rhetoric

    • States’ rights

    • Opposition to busing and school integration

  • The GOP began winning Southern states by implicitly appealing to racial anxieties without explicitly promoting segregation.

 Step 5: Reagan Era (1980s) — Consolidation of the Shift

  • Reagan solidified the South as Republican territory.

  • Used coded language: “welfare queens,” “tax and spend liberals,” and “big government intrusion.”

  • Socially conservative values (anti-abortion, school prayer, etc.) attracted Southern whites.

  • Economically: Reagan promoted small government, low taxes, anti-union policies—very different from the old New Deal Democrats.

 Step 6: The Modern GOP & Dixiecrat Legacy

Some themes in today’s GOP echo Dixiecrat views—not in explicit segregationist terms, but in philosophy and framing:

Dixiecrats (1950s–60s)

Modern GOP

Segregation = “states' rights”

Opposition to federal oversight on education, voting

Anti-civil rights laws

Skepticism of affirmative action, DEI programs

Christian conservatism

Evangelical Christian base

Pro-rural white identity

“Real America” narrative, anti-elitism

Opposition to federal power

Anti-regulation, anti-welfare, pro-gun rights

 Summary: Not Just a Flip — A Gradual Realignment

  • It wasn’t like parties just swapped ideologies overnight.
  • It was a coalition shift: Southern white conservatives left the Democrats and joined the GOP over time.
  • Meanwhile, Black voters—who had historically been Republican—shifted to the Democrats after the civil rights era.

If you're into it, I can also show you some maps or charts of electoral shifts in the South, or go deeper into figures like Barry Goldwater, George Wallace, or the role of evangelicals in the 1980s. Just say the word.


 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.2  Tacos!  replied to  Greg Jones @2    4 weeks ago
His blathering BS

Yeah, whatever. Tell me you didn’t watch it without telling me you didn’t watch it. Knee-jerk tribalism is so overdone.

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
2.2.1  author  Thomas  replied to  Tacos! @2.2    4 weeks ago
Knee-jerk tribalism is so overdone

I wish "Knee-jerk tribalism" were over. We have a ways to go.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.2.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Tacos! @2.2    4 weeks ago

A few snippets were viewed, still the same tired progressive propaganda that said nothing and went nowhere.

The Reactions to Cory Booker's Anti-Trump Speech Were Gold

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
2.2.3  author  Thomas  replied to  Greg Jones @2.2.2    4 weeks ago

Yes, tired old propaganda like "Go out and do something!" and detailing the specifics of where the actions of the President are illegal, immoral, and unconstitutional in a way that showed that someone besides myself thinks that they are important. Congress as a whole will find itself shunted to the side if they allow the administration to continue unchecked on this illegal, immoral, and unconstitutional attempt to sunder the powers of the presidency from all real constraint. 

Trump has again violated his oath of office. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Greg Jones @2    3 weeks ago

The fact Chucky Schumer had to interrupt him to tell him he broke "the record" and the blathering ended shortly later is an indication that there was nothing really being said.  He was talking for the sake of talking.

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
3  author  Thomas    4 weeks ago

For those of you who don't have 12 to 25 hours, here is the final 10 minutes or so.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4  Tacos!    4 weeks ago

He was great. He was on topic the whole time. Clear, thoughtful, and hopefully, inspiring.

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
4.1  author  Thomas  replied to  Tacos! @4    4 weeks ago

I thought that he did really well. Lots of preparation went into his appeal to the better natures of Americans'. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5  Trout Giggles    4 weeks ago

Thanks for this article

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
6  author  Thomas    4 weeks ago

As expected, the reactionaries are calling this a non-event, not realizing that the people did not elect Trump to radically alter the face of government, they elected him because they thought he was going to bring down the cost of living. Instead, he is ensuring that the US standing in the world is deleteriously teetering through the wholesale destruction of Institutions such as USAID. His quest to commoditize the government will fail, as will he. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Thomas @6    4 weeks ago

Do you think if he had talked about DOGE before the election he might have lost? DOGE never once came up when he was campaigning. I think the American people got a bait and switch deal

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
6.1.1  author  Thomas  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    4 weeks ago

Actually, he did ramble/drone on and on about it. But he did not say that Musks procedure would be to take a wrecking ball to every government institution to hamstring it so that government cannot work as intended.. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Thomas @6.1.1    4 weeks ago

See? He droned about it. I stop listening when he repeats himself for the 3rd time

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Quiet
6.1.3  afrayedknot  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    4 weeks ago

“DOGE never once came up when he was campaigning.”

Neither did the idiocy concerning the annexation of Greenland, the Panama Canal, and Canada. We did hear incessantly about immediately ending the Ukraine conflict and lowering the price of eggs.

Now we are left with an unmitigated assault on the arts, public libraries, institutions of higher learning, private law firms, legal immigrants, health services, our long standing allies…and anything else that had  defined what made this country exceptional. 

Slash and burn. It is not governance, it is insidious, intentional destruction. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
6.1.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.3    4 weeks ago

Now we are left with an unmitigated assault on the arts, public libraries, institutions of higher learning, private law firms, legal immigrants, health services, our long standing allies

And a request to shut the hell up about the price of eggs.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  afrayedknot @6.1.3    4 weeks ago

Bait and switch. He ran on rising prices and we got more rising prices and a madman wielding a chainsaw on our government

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
6.1.6  author  Thomas  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.5    4 weeks ago

Slash and burn, bait and switch,... it is all part of the mafia conman playbook

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
6.1.7  Gsquared  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    4 weeks ago

Project 2025 came up several times during the campaign.  Trump and his propagandists consistently lied and denied even knowing anything about it.  Now, we're living it.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.2  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @6    4 weeks ago

I assure you, unamerican maga scum will be picking up the tab when the party is over ...

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
6.2.1  author  Thomas  replied to  devangelical @6.2    3 weeks ago

Hopefully so

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
7  author  Thomas    3 weeks ago

Cory Booker was talking about lots of pertinent issues. 

from ChatGPT

Senator Cory Booker's record-breaking 25-hour speech addressed several critical issues concerning the policies and actions of President Donald Trump's administration. The key topics he discussed include:
  1. Threats to Democratic Institutions: Booker expressed deep concern over what he described as the administration's "complete disregard for the rule of law, the Constitution, and the needs of the American people." He emphasized the urgency of addressing these challenges, stating that the country is in a "moral crisis" requiring immediate attention. 

  1. Proposed Cuts to Social Programs: He criticized the administration's proposals to reduce funding for essential social programs, particularly Social Security and Medicare. Booker highlighted the potential negative impact on millions of Americans who rely on these benefits.

  1. Dismantling of the Department of Education: Booker addressed efforts to dismantle the Department of Education and cut critical funding for teachers. He shared testimonials from educators and students affected by these policies, underscoring the importance of a robust public education system.

  1. Immigration Policies: He condemned the administration's immigration policies, including the deportation of participants in pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses. Booker argued that such actions undermine democratic principles and violate constitutional rights.


  1. Influence of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency: Booker raised concerns about the role of Elon Musk as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. He criticized the department's cost-cutting measures, which he claimed led to significant job losses and weakened federal agencies. 

Throughout his speech, Booker invoked the legacy of civil rights leader John Lewis, emphasizing the moral imperative to resist actions that threaten democratic values. He called on his colleagues to take a stand against policies that he believes are detrimental to the nation's well-being. 
 
 
 
CB
Professor Expert
8  CB    3 weeks ago

Wow. This is done by standing the whole time, 25 hours, without a bathroom break and limited water intake. It's a good work in the right hands! Seems it has been well received by those to whom it should matter.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
9  Kavika     3 weeks ago

Great article, his ability to hit the right points and have a lucid intelligent 25 hours is recommended for Trump who’s 2 hour rambles sound like Professor Erwin Corey on speed.

 
 
 
Thomas
PhD Guide
9.1  author  Thomas  replied to  Kavika @9    3 weeks ago

I thought that he was quite inspiring. Lucid and cogent, also. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Thomas @9.1    3 weeks ago
inspiring. Lucid and cogent

Something we haven't seen on the Republican side of the aisle for quite some time now.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.1    3 weeks ago

a definite rarity ...