╌>

PolitiFact | Debunking false claims from former Lt. Gen. McInerney on the Capitol riot, COVID-19, election fraud

  
Via:  Trout Giggles  •  3 years ago  •  12 comments

By:   Ann Vandersteel (politifact)

PolitiFact | Debunking false claims from former Lt. Gen. McInerney on the Capitol riot, COVID-19, election fraud
In a video viewed tens of thousands of times on Facebook, a retired Air Force officer makes a slew of inaccurate and bas

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


I guess old soldiers don't die...they just turn into conspiracy nutters

There's some fun stuff in here, kids


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


In a video viewed tens of thousands of times on Facebook, a retired Air Force officer makes a slew of inaccurate and baseless claims about everything from the Capitol insurrection to the coronavirus pandemic.

The video, one of hundreds we found on Facebook, shows former Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney speaking to a group of eight un-masked people as classical music plays in the background.

Over 19 minutes, McInerney — a former Fox News analyst and military adviser for the Trump campaign — spins a conspiracy theory that claims Democrats coordinated with the Chinese government to create COVID-19 and commit voter fraud to oust President Donald Trump. As a result, he said, Trump is using the aftermath of the Capitol insurrection to pursue justice.

Screen_Shot_2021-01-12_at_18.41.03.png

(Screenshot from CrowdTangle)

The location and source of the video is unclear, but the earliest version we could find was published Jan. 8, 2021, on YouTube by Ann Vandersteel, who has previously promoted the Pizzagate conspiracy theory (an earlier version of QAnon). From there, it was copied to other YouTube channels and promoted on Twitter, Facebook and Parler, before the platform was taken offline.

PolitiFact debunked several of the false claims McInerney made during the video. We reached out to McInerney through his company YottaStor for a comment, but we haven't heard back.

Claim: 'COVID-19 was a biological attack on the world … it was a direct attack on the election and they knew what was going to happen'

McInerney's claim is one of the longest-running falsehoods about the pandemic. The scientific community and international public health organizations have said the coronavirus emerged from bats and later jumped to humans.

Scientists worldwide have publicly shared the genetic makeup of the coronavirus thousands of times. If the virus had been altered, there would be evidence in its genome data. But there isn't.

Claim: 'A program called Hammer and Scorecard (was) going to be used as a cyber warfare tool to change the voting — and it did'

Pants on Fire!

Since Election Day, Trump fans have spread a conspiracy theory that says a CIA package of computer programs hacked into the 2020 presidential election results. The theory claims one program, called Hammer, cracks into protected networks, while another, called Scorecard, changed vote totals.

RELATED: Debunking the 'Hammer and Scorecard' election fraud conspiracy theory

Chris Krebs, former head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said in a Nov. 7 tweet that the theory was "nonsense." One of the main promoters of Hammer and Scorecard was a discredited military contractor who claimed to have created the programs.

There is no evidence of voter fraud affecting the outcome of the 2020 election. Election officials in every state said there was no sign of significant voter fraud.

Claim: 'The attack on the Capitol was done by antifa'

Pants on Fire!

After Trump supporters breached the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, social media users and allies of the president claimed antifa, a loose coalition of left-wing activists, was to blame. But specificindividuals who were rumored to be antifa activists don't actually support the movement, and a report that claimed a facial recognition firm had identified members of the movement was later corrected.

Meanwhile, plans to "storm the Capitol" were drawn up in the open on social media forums and pro-Trump websites. Video and photographsfrom Washington show people wearing and waving Trump-branded hats, T-shirts and flags. Some rioters celebrated their participation or live-streamed the events, including a West Virginia GOP lawmaker.

On Jan. 8, FBI assistant director Steven D'Antuono said in a press briefing that the agency has "no indication" that antifa played a role in the riot.

Claim: 'I got (a) call Tuesday night at 11:30 that the ISI from Pakistan was now in the voting machines in Georgia'

There is no evidence that a foreign country hacked voting machines in Georgia.

In November, the state's top elections official ordered an audit of a random sample of voting machines to determine whether any had been hacked or tampered with. The audit found "no sign of foul play."

RELATED: Here's why Georgia's Republican officials are confident in their presidential election results

Georgia also conducted two recounts — including one conducted by hand — that reaffirmed Biden's victory. The secretary of state's office hasdebunked other claims that people were able to hack into Georgia's voting systems.

Claim: An Italian military satellite was 'changing votes' in the 2020 election

Fact-checkers Lead Stories and USA Today debunked this conspiracy theory.

The theory goes like this: An employee in the U.S. embassy in Rome worked with a board member of Leonardo, a defense contractor, to commit voter fraud in the 2020 election. Leonardo used a military satellite to change votes from Trump to Biden in key battleground states.

Those claims are baseless.

Federal and state officials have said there is no evidence that voting systems were breached during the 2020 election, or that voter fraud affected the outcome. CISA said on its rumor control page that bad actors would not be able to change election results without being caught.

Claim: In Georgia, 'cases underneath the table' at a voting center were evidence of voter fraud

This is wrong — we rated a similar claim False.

The video McInerney referenced was introduced by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and his team during a Dec. 3 hearing with Georgia state legislators. At the time, social media posts claimed the footage showed election workers at State Farm Arena in Atlanta illegally counting suitcases filled with ballots after observers left the room.

But that wasn't the case, said Gabriel Sterling, Georgia's voting system implementation manager.

"The 90 second video of election workers at State Farm arena, purporting to show fraud was watched in its entirety (hours) by @GaSecofState investigators," Sterling tweeted, linking to a fact-check from Lead Stories. "Shows normal ballot processing."

In reality, the video showed workers processing ballots in standard containers while observers were still in the room. Georgia officials said no one was told to leave; some observers exited after election workers had finished their jobs.

Claim: 'There was some people in there that was special forces mixed with antifa and they took her (House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's) laptop and they have that data'

McInerney is wrong about antifa, and he is also wrong to say that the U.S. Army Special Forces took a laptop with incriminating information about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi from her office during the Capitol riot.

Agence France-Presse debunked the claim in a Jan. 12 fact-check. Spokespeople for the U.S. Special Operations Command and the U.S. Army Special Operations Command told the outlet that they had no information about such an incident.

PolitiFact confirmed that a laptop was stolen from a conference room in the Capitol, but Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said that the laptop was only used for presentations.

RELATED: Fact-checking claims about the Insurrection Act, martial law after Capitol riot


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Trout Giggles    3 years ago

trolling, taunting, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1    3 years ago

these old war horses that have turned into storm troopers need to be called back to active duty, busted down to buck private, and then dishonorably discharged for reneging on their oaths to defend the constitution.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 years ago

The man is in his 80's. I think it's time he was moved to the nearest VA facility and left to ride out the rest of his years

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.1    3 years ago

fuck him. put a parachute on him, hand him a rifle, and throw his maga ass out the back of a C130 somewhere over afghanistan.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.1.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 years ago

Flynn should be returned to active duty and then court martialed as a traitor.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2  Ender    3 years ago

The people in trump world lie?

I am shocked I tell ya!

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
3  Veronica    3 years ago

Just sittin here shakin my headjrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     3 years ago

Sadly, this is what is offered as a retired general officer.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Silent
5  mocowgirl    3 years ago

Confirmation bias is part of our DNA.  We are literally born to take a side and defend it until we die.  Facts only exist to support our side.  Everything else is a damned lie and must be challenged or ignored.

Below is a really good article about why people rarely change their minds and can't be "proven" wrong by someone else's facts.

Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorker

As everyone who’s followed the research—or even occasionally picked up a copy of   Psychology Today —knows, any graduate student with a clipboard can demonstrate that reasonable-seeming people are often totally irrational. Rarely has this insight seemed more relevant than it does right now. Still, an essential puzzle remains: How did we come to be this way?

In a new book, “The Enigma of Reason” (Harvard), the cognitive scientists Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber take a stab at answering this question. Mercier, who works at a French research institute in Lyon, and Sperber, now based at the Central European University, in Budapest, point out that reason is an evolved trait, like bipedalism or three-color vision. It emerged on the savannas of Africa, and has to be understood in that context.
 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Silent
5.1  mocowgirl  replied to  mocowgirl @5    3 years ago

I found the above article when reading a news article today that had some Elon Musk quotes that I suspect many people with be unhappy with. 

Maybe our species will evolve to be less tribal and less combative if societies become more financially equal, but as long as people have to fight for their survival, I suspect that they will continue to support the herd where they feel supported and have the best chance of survival.  I don't know the stats, but it seems that most immigrants (throughout the world) prefer to try to reform the society of their birth country instead of adapting to society of their chosen new country.

Elon Musk thinks you should die (msn.com)

"I am not aware of any secret technology to combat aging," Musk said during an interview this week at the Wall Street Journal's CEO Council Summit.

Moreover, even if humans could live much longer, Musk said that wouldn't be such a good thing for human society on the whole.

"It is important for us to die because most of the time people don't change their mind, they just die," he said. "If you live forever, we might become a very ossified society where new ideas cannot succeed."

The concept that people don't change their minds, even when provided with factual evidence to the contrary, has been   repeatedly confirmed in studies across the last 50 years . Therefore, Musk argued, if people were to live longer or become immortal, it could have a detrimental effect on society — where ideas stagnate and fester rather than being evolved or overtaken by succeeding generations of people.

This isn't the first time Musk has gone after aging populations' impact on everyone else: He   recently argued for age limits on holding public office , and echoed those sentiments during the WSJ conference.

"I am not poking fun at aging," he said. "I am saying we've got people in very important positions that have to make decisions that are critical to the security of the country, then they need to have sufficient presence of mind and cognitive ability to make those decisions well. Because the whole country is depending on them."

The current US president, for instance, is 79 years old and was born during World War II. The last US president left office at age 74.

In Musk's opinion, neither man would've been able to hold office as they're both over the age of 70.
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  mocowgirl @5.1    3 years ago

Musk wants no one to be able to hold office after the age of 70.  I think that is why he is talking about the need for people to die. 

Of course people will die whether Musk or anyone else wants them to or not, unless he is talking about encouraging people to kill themselves. 

I dont pay much attention to anything the guy says. 

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Silent
5.1.2  mocowgirl  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    3 years ago
I think that is why he is talking about the need for people to die. 

I will take Musk at his word and believe that he believes that it is crucial for societies to evolve instead of becoming stagnant or even devolving because of too many people voting to try to force the world back into something similar to what they view as more secure regardless of how abusive those decades were to women and minorities.

 

 
 

Who is online




453 visitors