╌>

'Scum and traitors': Under pressure over Ukraine, Putin turns his ire on Russians

  
Via:  Kavika  •  2 years ago  •  33 comments

By:   Alexander Smith (NBC News)

'Scum and traitors': Under pressure over Ukraine, Putin turns his ire on Russians
Russian President Vladimir Putin criticized Russian oligarchs as well as "scum and traitors" who oppose his war in Ukraine.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Link copied March 17, 2022, 5:00 PM UTC By Alexander Smith

Anyone looking for signs that embattled and isolated Russia might soften its position would not have found much hope in the increasingly belligerent words of President Vladimir Putin.

With his invasion of Ukraine floundering and his economy teetering, Putin doubled down Wednesday — turning his baleful glare on Russians who are against the invasion or who sympathize with the West.

"The Russian people will always be able to distinguish true patriots from scum and traitors, and will simply spit them out like an insect in their mouth onto the pavement," he said, shoulders hunched and staring down the barrel of the camera.

It was the latest speech that has surprised and alarmed many who study Putin. He has adopted what they say is an emotional, ranting tone since he invaded Ukraine three weeks ago, a departure from the calculating persona of this former KGB officer.

"He's clearly angry, emotional and feels the need to speak in this very aggressive tone," said John Lough, an associate fellow at London's Chatham House think tank.

Lough thinks the speech was clearly aimed at Russia's elites, some of whom he believes are privately dismayed about the failure of the war and the economic backlash it has inflicted at home.

According to Lough, Putin was saying to the elites: "Don't think about having second thoughts. We're all in this together and if I go down, you go down."

Russia has embarked on a crackdown on dissent that outstrips even the norm for Putin's regime. Here, people are arrested at a protest at the Kremlin on Sunday.Getty Images

Putin touched on now-common themes, comparing the West to Nazi Germany and alleging, without evidence, that Ukraine has been committing genocide against ethnic Russians. But he adopted even more hard-line rhetoric when turning his attention to Russians themselves, whom he has subjected to a sweeping crackdown on anti-war dissent in recent weeks.

Almost 15,000 protesters have been arrested in Russia since the war began, according to OVD-Info, a human rights group based in Moscow that tracks police detentions.

Unknown thousands more have fled the country, driven away by deepening state repression of protest, independent journalism and social media, as well as a spiraling economy hit by international sanctions and mass boycotts.

The Kremlin explained Thursday that it was these people who were showing themselves to be "traitors."

"They vanish from our lives," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, according to Reuters. "Some people are leaving their posts, some are leaving their active work life, some leave the country and move to other countries. That is how this cleansing happens."

"In such difficult times," he added, "many people show their true colors."

Putin's tone contrasted with the Russian and the Ukrainian negotiating teams, which signaled tentative progress in peace talks. Some experts saw his speech as a chilling sign.

"Putin in an Orwellian way has divided the citizens of Russia into clean and unclean," Andrei Kolesnikov, a Moscow-based political analyst, said on Twitter.

Constanze Stelzenmuller, a senior fellow at the Washington think tank Brookings Institution, compared Putin's speech to Adolf Hitler's fictional tirade from the bunker in the 2004 film "Downfall," whose subtitles have generated countless memes.

"Strrronngg 'Der Untergang' vibes here," she tweeted, using the film's German title.

Biden accuses Putin of war crimes as more aid heads to Ukraine


March 17, 202202:22

Putin reserved special ire for Russian oligarchs, many of whom are Kremlin-linked billionaires who made their fortunes amid the carve-up of the former Soviet Union and now spend much of it on yachts and other luxuries in the West. Some of them have recently broken cover and distanced themselves from Putin's war.

Without naming anyone specifically, Putin referred to "national traitors" who "have villas in Miami or the French Riviera, who cannot make do without foie gras, oysters or gender freedom, as they call it" — referencing his apparent disdain for liberal values.

He criticized their "servile mentality" of being too Western "in their minds, and not here with our people and with Russia."

Putin also called for "a natural and necessary self-detoxification of society," which would "strengthen our country, our solidarity and cohesion."

Much of the rest of Putin's speech detailed the drastic economic countermeasures his government is introducing to combat sanctions and boycotts by Western governments and companies.

"Indeed, it is difficult for us at the moment," he acknowledged.

Lough, who was the first NATO official posted to Moscow in the 1990s, says his contacts there are privately conveying "surprise, shock and disbelief that Russia" is engaged in the war.

There is now an "acceptance that this is going to usher in a period of extreme isolation of Russia, as well as impoverishment and a return, frankly, to many of the features of the Soviet Union," he said.

Alexander Smith

Alexander Smith is a senior reporter for NBC News Digital based in London.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Kavika     2 years ago

Trolling, taunting, and off-topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve the continuity of this seed.

Who and what is Putin talking about. 

1. Oligarchs

2. All Russians

3. Is he losing it because the war is turning against the Russians

4. Is he losing it because the world is crushing Russia with sanctions

5. All of the above.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1  evilone  replied to  Kavika @1    2 years ago

Again no one but Putin knows what he'll do. I stopped trying to guess what he'd do when he went full invasion. There was no upside for him and now the downside is exponentially worse.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  evilone @1.1    2 years ago
There was no upside for him and now the downside is exponentially worse.

He's between a rock and a hard place. There are thousands of Russians leaving the country, some to Turkey others to Finland and beyond. There are thousands more stuck in SE Asia with money or any means to get it since all accounts and banks withdrawals have been frozen.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
1.1.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  evilone @1.1    2 years ago

I am still amazed he went ahead with the invasion. The only thing I can think is that he started believing his own bullshit. He must have truly thought that the Ukrainians would not resist or would actually welcome Russian soldiers. He must have truly thought that the West would sit idly by and do nothing. He must have truly thought that the Russian military was as good as it seemed on paper (behold the pitfall of not wanting to hear bad news or the truth). 

I have been saying since Georgia that the Russian military is a paper tiger. All they have is nukes, and the disaster in Ukraine is putting that on full display.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @1    2 years ago

he's the russian version of trumpsterism ...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  devangelical @1.2    2 years ago

His energy to virulently denounce his critics and opposition does indeed echo He Who Shall Remain A Moron. 

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
1.3  Drakkonis  replied to  Kavika @1    2 years ago

Gotta wonder when someone in his inner circle is going to decide things are getting out of hand and maybe something needs to happen. Permanent like. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
1.3.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Drakkonis @1.3    2 years ago

Hopefully soon. Every day they wait more people die. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.2  devangelical  replied to  Drakkonis @1.3    2 years ago

any nefarious political activity in russia would need the support of the military at their ICBM missile bases.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
1.3.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  devangelical @1.3.2    2 years ago

And that is what is so frustrating about all of this. The Russians could be easily handled. I admit I greatly overestimated their military power, I am sure they would be better fighting within Russian borders, but looking at it now NATO would completely fuck them up. It wouldn't even be close, I could honestly see NATO forces taking Moscow within a month.

But the fucking nukes. That is the only stopping NATO from smashing the Russians into the ground. Fucking nukes. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    2 years ago

Scum and traitors

trumpturd and putin and all their supporters and enablers.  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3  JBB    2 years ago

Screws! Slowly they twist. Turn by by turn. Inch by inch!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  JBB @3    2 years ago

I agree and those screws are getting very tight about now and are going to continue to get worse.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.1  JBB  replied to  Kavika @3.1    2 years ago

Putin's survival instinct is kicking in about now.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.2  devangelical  replied to  JBB @3.1.1    2 years ago

he's got an escape plan, if he lives that long...

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
3.1.3  bbl-1  replied to  devangelical @3.1.2    2 years ago

To Mar-a-Lago?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.4  devangelical  replied to  bbl-1 @3.1.3    2 years ago

czar-a-lardo

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4  Dismayed Patriot    2 years ago

"Putin referred to "national traitors" who "have villas in Miami or the French Riviera, who cannot make do without foie gras, oysters or gender freedom, as they call it" — referencing his apparent disdain for liberal values.

He criticized their "servile mentality" of being too Western "in their minds, and not here with our people and with Russia."

Putin also called for "a natural and necessary self-detoxification of society,"

"Putin in an Orwellian way has divided the citizens of Russia into clean and unclean,"

"They vanish from our lives," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, according to Reuters. "Some people are leaving their posts, some are leaving their active work life, some leave the country and move to other countries. That is how this cleansing happens."

It's the age old confrontation between conservative and liberal ideologies. And Putin is appealing to his white nationalist conservative base, praising them while vilifying anyone who doesn't bend to their will and accept their conservative values. And he is now signaling that there will be a cleansing, a purge of anyone disloyal to Putin from the country and, in likely tens of thousands of dissenters cases, from the planet itself. It's not only sad for all those who will suffer at the hands of such a madman, but also sad that there are those even here in the US who view such a vile sack of shit like Putin favorably and see him as a white nationalist strongman hero fighting for conservative values as Trump often pictured him. They clearly share Putin's "apparent disdain for liberal values", perhaps that's why some of them chose to share Putin's slimy lies and propaganda.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4    2 years ago
who cannot make do without foie gras, oysters or gender freedom, as they call it"

That part of this speech made me crack up. Seems that macho man Putin is afraid of foie gras, oysters and gender freedom. Gender freedom!!!!! OMG the world is falling apart if we have gender freedom.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
5  seeder  Kavika     2 years ago

From the reports/articles I've read, it seems that Putin has replaced his top general, actually, he's been arrested. 

The purge starts.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6  bbl-1    2 years ago

This is a familiar pattern.  In the closing weeks of WW2, Hitler purged his military officer corps, blamed the German people, ordered what was left untouched in Germany to be destroyed, increased the execution of 'disloyal' Germans by 10-fold and claimed that Germany failed the test given to it by God.

Appears very clearly to me that Putin is NOT savvy, brilliant or smart as so many disloyal Americans quickly clamored during the first days of his unprovoked, illegal, unjust and immoral invasion.

Navalny for president of The Russian Federation.  The Russian people are not our enemy.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
6.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  bbl-1 @6    2 years ago

I do think Putin is smart, but I think he started believing his own garbage. He purged everyone around him who was willing to tell him the truth and was left with only people who would tell him what he wanted to hear. He created a propaganda bubble for himself and really started to believe it. I honestly think he convinced himself that the Ukrainians would not resist and that this would be a sweeping Russian victory. 

Of course as soon as you step outside of the propaganda bubble alarms were blaring that this invasion was not a good idea. Sure the Ukrainians are performing much better than anyone expected and the Russians significantly worse, but everyone knew the Russians were not exactly popular in Eastern Europe and that the Ukrainians did not want to be closer with Moscow. It was obvious that any puppet government the Russians set up would be overthrown immediately and that the Russians were getting themselves into an indefinite occupation. It was obvious that the Russian military was not prepared for such an outcome (180,000 troops for a country as big as Texas and with 44 million people?!) I honestly do not know what in the fuck the Kremlin was thinking, they made the worst mistakes we did in Iraq but are much less able to deal with them.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    2 years ago

conwebwatch.tripod.com   /blog/index.blog


Not Aging Well: WND's Lively Touted Putin As Champion of 'True Human Rights'
==========================================================

wndlivelyrussia.png A lot of right-wing praise for Russian leader Vladimir Putin stopped aging well around Putin's invasion of Ukraine. But they were praising him pretty much right up until then. One example of that is Scott Lively spending a Dec. 27 WorldNetDaily   column   trying to convince us that Putin's not so bad:

But this article is not just another COVID-tyranny complaint from the aggrieved citizenry (as valid as that would be). It is a challenge to the MAGA movement to awaken to the danger of a separate class of false and manipulative propaganda most do not recognize as such: the demonization of Putin and Russia.

Some readers will blanch at that characterization and start mentally parroting all the anti-Putin and Russia talking points we've heard relentlessly since 2014. Why do some conservatives feel comfortable aligning with Obama, Clinton, Bush, Soros and the corporate media on Russia but virtually nothing else? Is it because Russia is truly still the Evil Empire of the Soviet years? Or because there really are no effective pro-Russian advocates of stature in the U.S. to counter the anti-Russian arguments of the left and the neocons?

[...]

Now, I'm not claiming Putin and Russia are faultless. No leader or nation (or political candidate) can survive scrutiny of their conduct against the standard of perfection. Maybe Putin did assassinate political rivals, or maybe that's just CIA spin or propaganda. We'll never really know, but let's just suppose it's true. Does his body count approach that of the Clintons? Is there any leader or nation today with purely clean hands in such matters? Has there been anything like honest two-sided debate on ANY of the anti-Putin, anti-Russian talking points for the conservatives to base their opinions on?

My objective here is to encourage people to ignore the talking points and simply compare Putin and Russia with Biden and the U.S. on how each handles the issues we say are important to us, most of which fall under the category of human rights.

And you know what that means: Lively is about to tout Putin as a champion of "true human rights" -- defined as hating LGBT people as much as he does:

It is with a very heavy heart as a man who loves his country that I admit today that Russia has surpassed America as a defender and protector of true human rights.

True human rights are those that have been recognized as such through the history of human civilization, not the Marxist wish list of moral, cultural and political perversions that have been aggressively forced upon the world by the United States since the Clinton administration and slammed into hyper-drive by Barack Obama. And yes, I condemn the Bush 43 administration as well, having fought an unsuccessful battle in Riga in 2007, alongside the late great Pastor Ken Hutcherson, to stop the U.S. Embassy under Bush from forcing a "Gay Pride Parade" down the throat of Latvia's 90% pro-family majority. (Trump did better than Bush, but not by much.)

Just   l ast week Putin reminded the world how a rational world leader handles cultural Marxism, saying, "I am a proponent of the traditional approach that a woman is a woman and a man is a man. … A mother is a mother, a father is a father. And I hope that our society has the internal moral protection dictated by the traditional religious denominations of the Russian Federation."

Lively then gushed over Putin's rationality on Ukraine:

He also addressed the Ukraine situation with similar rationality: "Our actions will depend not on the course of negotiations, but on the unconditional guarantee of Russia's security. We made it clear that NATO's movement to the east is unacceptable. The United States is sitting with missiles on the doorstep of our home. How would the Americans react if someone delivered missiles to the border with Canada or Mexico. And who owned California before? And Texas?" On these and many more issues, the U.S. has abandoned both rationality and respect for natural rights in favor of the naked self-interests of corrupt special interests, from "the big man" Biden who ran the Ukraine shakedown for Obama ,   all the way down to the lowliest BLM/Antifa street thugs pushing anarchy.

Lively concluded with a view of Russia that was pretty much in fantasyland even before the invasion:

From the integrity of its elections – where Putin has genuine massive popular support – to his balance of basic civil rights with legitimate state security through such means as banning George Soros' entities – to the fine-tuning of Russia's military as a fighting machine and not a laboratory for woke social experiments – Putin and the Russians have flipped the script on human rights and world leadership compared to the United States. And the MAGA patriots' failure to recognize and highlight that fact helps the Marxists tighten their grip on America. How can we stop deceived Americans from drinking the Marxist Kool-Aid on woke topics when we're drinking a different flavor of the same stuff – demonizing the people who should be our strongest international allies?

If Putin had "genuine massive popular support," why did he   poison   his biggest rival, Alexei Navalny, then   throw him in prison   on trumped-up charges? And why were last year's elections   rigged ?

Nope, Lively's Putin-love wasn't aging well when he wrote it, and now it's a total dumpster fire. Yet at the start of the invasion, Lively was still defending Putin. He ranted in his Feb. 24   column :

The corporate media are spinning this conflict as unprovoked Russian aggression, but it's really a logical Russian reaction to deliberate un-ignorable provocation by the Biden/Obama administration. Biden has created this crisis both to deflect attention from serious political trouble at home and to create a scapegoat for the "Great Collapse," which I believe is imminent.

The start of this mess was Joe Biden's sudden, arbitrary and unilateral push to fold Ukraine into NATO, essentially to put anti-Russian nukes on the Russian border. It was the political, geographical and diplomatic equivalent of the Cuban Missile Crisis in reverse, with Vladimir Putin in the role of JFK.

[...]

Setting up Russia to have essentially no choice but to respond militarily was exactly what Obama, Biden, Clinton and Soros did in 2014 with their coup to remove Ukraine's pro-Russian president and replace him with an Obama puppet. As I've said many times before, that coup – especially regarding the Crimean Peninsula and its centuries-long military importance to Russia – was the geopolitical equivalent of Russia taking Hawaii away from the U.S. We would never accept that. To protect his legitimate national interests Putin had no choice but to annex that territory, an action overwhelmingly ratified by the mostly ethnic and culturally Russian inhabitants of Crimea.

[...]

President Trump, who would never have gotten into this situation in the first place, will be the main beneficiary of this crisis IF the MAGA movement keeps its eye on the prize of retaking the country and doesn't get caught up in anti-Russian jingoism. We may see American deaths in Ukraine (where we have had Special Forces personnel all along), triggering a pre-set full-court media blitz to gin up patriotic furor amidst a call to "rally behind our president," with accusations of treason if we don't. (The antiwar movement will stay curiously silent at best, or join the war chorus at worst). We may see some sort of false flag event on our soil blamed on Russia – my best guess is a cyber attack on our energy grid in the northern states. I have argued that Obama staged the now-forgotten fake power shutdown in Vermont in 2017 as part of a plot to start a hot war with Russia during the Obama/Trump transition – so there is precedent for this.

Through all of this, never forget the blame belongs to Biden!

Lively continued giving Putin a pass in his March 1   column , while also manufacturing a conspiracy theory:

Let's leave aside the question of whether Christian Russia – which has both honored God and protected normal marriage in its new constitution – has any right to use military force to stop the Obama/Biden/Clinton/Soros-created LGBT Woke-ocracy of Ukraine from putting anti-Russian nukes on the Russian border.

Let's instead ask whether God is using Barack Obama's avatar, Joe Biden, to punish our own country. I'll answer with another question: "Politically speaking, what is the last best hope for saving America?"

Isn't it the MAGA movement?

[...]

The bottom line is this. Biden's Ukraine war and Russia scapegoating is part of a larger strategy for killing the Red Wave in 2022, and if we're not smart enough to see that and make a course correction back to unity and focus on the essentials, he/they might just pull it off.

For his March 18   column , Lively folded China into his conspiracy theory:

This next answer may shock you if you've allowed the propagandists to define reality for you, but what country represents the greatest threat to China in the world today?

It is the largely re-Christianized nation of Russia. Christianity has ever been the nemesis of Marxism, but even more importantly, Russia is by far the most significant country ever to have overthrown its Marxist government and replaced it with a Christian one (or at least heavily Christian-influenced one). That rejection of Marxism for Christianity so infuriating to the Western elites, especially on the issue of sexual morality, is the real reason we get non-stop anti-Russian dogma in our media. (Though China, like the former Soviet Union, only pushes destructive sexual perversion OUTSIDE its borders).

Today's Russian culture may still seem overly authoritarian to Americans, but to the enslaved billions of China it is a beacon of freedom whose very existence threatens Communist rule.

Who really benefits from the Ukraine war? It's not Russia, which knew it would suffer severe consequences for a preemptive attack but feared that less than NATO encirclement. It is China, who used its American puppets to create the Ukraine crisis to drive Russia, with all its vast resources and virtually uninhabited eastern lands, into it's waiting economic arms – and which eagerly hopes to re-enslave Russia's population to Marxist ideology and government.

Or, you know, Putin simply could have chosen not to invade Ukraine, which would avoided the position of having to seek help from China. But Lively doesn't seem to have considered that possibility.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @7    2 years ago
Maybe Putin did assassinate political rivals, or maybe that's just CIA spin or propaganda. We'll never really know, but let's just suppose it's true. Does his body count approach that of the Clintons? Is there any leader or nation today with purely clean hands in such matters? Has there been anything like honest two-sided debate on ANY of the anti-Putin, anti-Russian talking points for the conservatives to base their opinions on? My objective here is to encourage people to ignore the talking points and simply compare Putin and Russia with Biden and the U.S. on how each handles the issues we say are important to us, most of which fall under the category of human rights.

This is the kind of far right insanity we are dealing with. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7.2  seeder  Kavika   replied to  JohnRussell @7    2 years ago

What an asswipe, (Lively)

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8  seeder  Kavika     2 years ago

The purge spreads. 

Russian spy chief arrested, officials split over Ukraine invasion

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
8.1  Ender  replied to  Kavika @8    2 years ago

He is looking like a madman that would destroy his own country to get what he wants.

 
 
 
MonsterMash
Sophomore Quiet
8.1.1  MonsterMash  replied to  Ender @8.1    2 years ago
He is looking like a madman that would destroy his own country to get what he wants.

And the rest of the world.

In 1914, a single bullet fired into the chest of Archduke Ferdinand by a Serbian terrorist quickly and unexpectedly exploded into World War I.

The Austro-Hungarians mobilized their armies to punish Serbia. Russia mobilized armies to defend their Serb “little Slavic brother.” Germany mobilized, then France, then Britain, and by 1918 there were 40 million casualties, 15-22 million dead.

Now President Biden’s ill-conceived efforts (keeping this war going until after the mid-terms to keep Americans minds off his fuckups) to save Ukraine from Russian invasion could spark a much larger conflict, perhaps even nuclear World War III. 

If the world has a nuclear war the few that survive can blame both Putin and Biden.

The single most dangerous internal threat to Americas survival is the Progressive wing of the Democratic party.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8.1.2  seeder  Kavika   replied to  MonsterMash @8.1.1    2 years ago
Now President Biden’s ill-conceived efforts (keeping this war going until after the mid-terms to keep Americans minds off his fuckups) to save Ukraine from Russian invasion could spark a much larger conflict, perhaps even nuclear World War III. 

I'm sure that you have proof of this BS statement. So the progressive is as dangerous as Putin, it would seem that the only group more dangerous than the progressives and Putin is the right-wing POS that seems to be supporting Russia and Putin. 

Bosnia had been annexed by Austria Hungry and Ferdinand and his wife was in Saravejo inspecting the troops there and were assassinated by a Bosnian Serb.

Currently, Russia is meddling in the Balkans and Serbia is an ally of Russia and Bosnia is the center of this once again. 

History 101.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
8.1.4  Thrawn 31  replied to  MonsterMash @8.1.1    2 years ago
Now President Biden’s ill-conceived efforts (keeping this war going until after the mid-terms to keep Americans minds off his fuckups) to saveUkrainefrom Russian invasion could spark a much larger conflict, perhaps even nuclear World War III. 

Are you fucking high? So your position is that we should allow autocrats to undermine democracy around the globe? That we should do absolutely nothing to stop the erosion of democracy? Of course we were going to provide material support to the Ukrainians who are resisting an unprovoked invasion by a tyrant and an enemy of the US. In what fucking universe would you expect us to do nothing?

The only one to blame for this war is Putin, the only one to blame for the casualties and possible escalation is Putin. 

If the world has a nuclear war the few that survive can blamebothPutin and Biden.

What a bunch of horseshit. The US is not getting involved in the war beyond supplying material support and intel to the Ukrainians. Period. We will not be doing any more than we are, so any escalation is on Putin, end of story. If he decides to use nukes then the blame rests 100% on him because we will not be firing first. 

The need to shit on Biden no matter what is truly astounding. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
8.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Kavika @8.1.2    2 years ago

I'm sure that you have proof of this BS statement.

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif As if.  Maybe Lindell is keeping it safe for him.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
8.1.6  JBB  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8.1.4    2 years ago

Boll Weevils In The Cotton? Damn Joe Biden!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.7  devangelical  replied to  MonsterMash @8.1.1    2 years ago

a demonstration of projection. top 10 in the most ignorant comments that I've ever read on NT.

 
 

Who is online




99 visitors