╌>

MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  last year  •  203 comments

By:   Candice Ortiz (Mediaite)

MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting
Fresh off her viral tweet calling for a "national divorce," Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is proposing a voting ban on Democrats who move to red states.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


Republican thought leader, Marjorie Taylor Greene's latest plan to end American democracy.

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Candice OrtizFeb 21st, 2023, 3:35 pm Twitter share button

Fresh off her widely-panned tweet calling for a "national divorce," Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is proposing a temporary voting ban on Democrats who move to red states.

Monday, Greene sparked fury by calling for a national divorce, citing irreconcilable differences between states.


We need a national divorce.

We need to separate by red states and blue states and shrink the federal government.

Everyone I talk to says this.

From the sick and disgusting woke culture issues shoved down our throats to the Democrat's traitorous America Last policies, we are… https://t.co/Azn8YF1UUy

— Marjorie Taylor Greene (@mtgreenee) February 20, 2023

Tuesday, she appeared on The Charlie Kirk Show to elaborate on her idea and explain how she would keep red and blue states separated. A clip from their conversation began to circulate on Twitter via Jason Campbell.

"A national divorce is not a civil war. It's actually separating by red states and blue states and making state rights and state power a lot stronger than it is right now," Greene said.

"It would be shrinking the federal government, for example, we can take education. Well, if we have a national divorce, there's no need for the Department of Education. Red states and Blue States would be in control of the education in each state," she explained. Greene also tweeted out her proposal in a lengthy thread.


Thread:

Why the left and right should consider a national divorce, not a civil war but a legal agreement to separate our ideological and political disagreements by states while maintaining our legal union.

Definition of irreconcilable differences:
inability to agree on most… https://t.co/6hko0vnHbd

— Marjorie Taylor Greene (@mtgreenee) February 21, 2023

Greene suggested that for red states, parents would be in charge of the education curriculum, and "LGBTQ Woke Teachers" would be fired.

She also clarified that she was not arguing for separate nations, but rather the Department of Defense would protect national borders "so that each state could exist how it chooses to exist."

Kirk pushed back, saying, "I don't think the left would ever stop. I don't think they'll ever stop trying to invade our states or our county. So how do we stop them?"

"Well, I think that, you know, red states could choose, how they allow people to vote in their states," Greene said.

"What I think would be something that some red states could propose is, well, okay, if Democrat voters choose to flee these blue states where they cannot tolerate the living conditions, they don't want their children taught these horrible things and they really change their mind on the types of policies that they support," Greene raged.

"Well, once they move to a red state, guess what? Maybe you don't get to vote for five years," Greene concluded, suggesting to disenfranchise her fellow Americans over their political views.

"You can live there, you can work there, but you don't get to bring your values that you basically created in the blue states you came from by voting for Democrat leaders and Democrat policies," she said.

Greene previously offered a similar proposal in December 2021, writing on Twitter, "Brainwashed people that move from CA and NY really need a cooling off period."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Gsquared    last year

Certainly, this will be very popular with the MAGA cultists.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    last year

I saw this online. she's a nut case. even republicans were calling her out on what she said. here's a better idea, she and her thumper/klan pals can cash in here and go buy a shithole nation closer to africa/middle east and go live there until armageddon. besides, it's a shorter trip to the holy land for that convert or die part of their savior's return. maga geezus, prodigal son of their new lord and master, trump.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2  cjcold  replied to  Gsquared @1    last year

The problem being that most states are not all red or all blue.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.2.1  CB  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year

Exactly. And that is where the foolishness of this woman's concept kicks in to high gear. Practically-speaking, she is advocating for people to move apart and away in order to facilitate clear indication of what 'color' they represent, and then come back together in some fashion. . . wait for it. . . as willing to vote republican/conservative. She is well aware of the diabolical state of pushing people ("undesirables") out because they can't abide this policy.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Jack_TX  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year
The problem being that most states are not all red or all blue.

Yeah, but that seems like it doesn't make the top 10.

It would seem this "national divorce" would involve abolishing the current Constitution, which I'm pretty sure hasn't crossed her very feeble mind.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jack_TX @1.2.2    last year

I'm not certain she knows what the Constitution is.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.4  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.3    last year

she definitely can't spell it.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1.2.5  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @1.2.4    last year

She probably can't even spell "it".

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.6  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1.2.5    last year

her brain has obviously seceded from her skull...

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.7  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.3    last year

MTG is a racist redneck hillbilly sleaze who should never ever have been elected to any public office anywhere. She is a disgusting individual and a embarrassment to the state of Georgia and Congress!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.8  devangelical  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.7    last year

... and the republican party.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    last year

Rush Limbaugh Is Dead! He is survived by Marjorie Taylor-Greene...

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
2.1  pat wilson  replied to  JBB @2    last year

The Tonya Harding of politics.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  pat wilson @2.1    last year

LOL, ouch...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  cjcold  replied to  pat wilson @2.1    last year

Always liked Tonya. The lady could skate and had nothing to do with the Kerrigan attack. Probably, maybe.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.3  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @2.1.2    last year

substance abuse barbie...

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.4  Jack_TX  replied to  pat wilson @2.1    last year
The Tonya Harding of politics.

That seems an insult to Tonya.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.5  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @2.1.3    last year
substance abuse barbie...

The no filter Barbie.

She is now on a TV show where she is encouraged to speak candidly.

One of her cohosts is Danny Bonaduce if that tells you anything.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.6  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @2.1.5    last year

rails and shots after the show... ... probably not what you're thinking...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.7  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @2.1.5    last year

I wonder what she's doing for a living now.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.8  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @2.1.7    last year

... probably turning tricks in vegas. $500 per hour, $700 with the costume and skates on.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.9  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @2.1.8    last year

girlfriend experience/olympic girlfriend experience

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.10  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @2.1.7    last year

See 2.1.5. It was called world's dumbest videos. Cancelled in 2014.

From skating to boxing to reality TV What a renaissance girl.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.1.11  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  pat wilson @2.1    last year

Got that right!

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
2.2  al Jizzerror  replied to  JBB @2    last year
Rush Limbaugh Is Dead! He is survived by Marjorie Taylor-Greene...

MTG is also brain dead.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.2.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  al Jizzerror @2.2    last year

Maybe that's why those on the left side of the spectrum understand her, takes one to know one ......

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.2  afrayedknot  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.1    last year

“…those on the left side of the spectrum understand her,…”

Then how do those on the ‘right’ side of the spectrum excuse her? 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
2.2.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.1    last year

Hope you understand that you didn’t do yourself any favors with that comment… by extension you are saying that you support brain dead politicians. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
2.2.4  al Jizzerror  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.1    last year
takes one to know one .....

I am totally underwhelmed by your juvenile insult.

You sound like a pathetic version of Pee Wee Herman.

512

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2.2.5  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.1    last year

That's exactly why those on the "right" side of the spectrum support her.  They know she is one of them.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.2.6  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.2.3    last year

Who cares? I don't, but it does seem to me the left understands and does care,otherwise why comment. 

I do suppose those commenting are just getting their jollies and spouting off steam about things that frankly are out of their control, and have very little likelihood of happening. 

Frankly, if I WERE to support brain dead politicians? I would vote for what currently passes for both democrats and republicans today, I don't.

I will let you guess if I'm letting of steam or getting my jollies.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.2.7  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Gsquared @2.2.5    last year

Could be that's why they do.

Personally I find her entertaining, in a sick and demented way.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.2.8  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  al Jizzerror @2.2.4    last year

Hmmm, maybe I should have said birds of a feather tend to flock together

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.2.9  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  afrayedknot @2.2.2    last year

You would have to ask some one that question that

A. Supports her

B. Thinks she has anything intelligent to say 

C. Actually gives two shits about her opinion 

None of those three things apply to me,as I said she is entertaining in the reactions she can stir. 

As for some of the things she had said? Already heard and discussed that national divorce thing years ago actually,even got into some decent discussions with the ones involved (not on this site). Besides the country is already in a state of national seperation if one looks, the dividing lines are evident and obvious. One should be looking at that IMO.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
2.2.10  al Jizzerror  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.8    last year
birds of a feather tend to flock together

MYG's fucking flock is brain dead republicans (like Kevin McCarthy).

512

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
2.2.11  al Jizzerror  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.6    last year
Who cares? I don't, but it does seem to me the left understands and does care,otherwise why comment. 

YOUR comments:  2.2.1  2.2.3  2.2.6  2.2.7  2.2.8  2.2.9  

Gee, it kinda looks like YOU CARE more than "the left - otherwise why comment?"

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.2.12  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  afrayedknot @2.2.2    last year

The majority of us do not.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
2.2.13  Right Down the Center  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.9    last year
she is entertaining in the reactions she can stir. 

I see your entertaining and raise you hilarious reactions she can stir.  Personally I take what she says about as seriously as I take what Donald says, especially when he is just trying to make a few heads explode. I also don't care enough about what she says to  research what she actually said and the context of what she said when something comes from a source like mediate.

Yet the mindset of so many is if you don't share in their outrage it must be because you support her, there are no other options.  Pure comedy gold.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.14  devangelical  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.2.13    last year
when something comes from a source like mediate

yeah, you should stick with FOX to hear what you need to hear.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.15  afrayedknot  replied to  devangelical @2.2.14    last year

“…stick with FOX…”

When the CEO publicly discounts the already dubious integrity of his enterprise, what more does anyone need to dismiss them in their entirety. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.16  devangelical  replied to  afrayedknot @2.2.15    last year

I've been geeking out the last couple days on all the legal scholars talking about this on youtube. I hope rupert's self insured.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
2.2.17  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @2.2.14    last year

Don't watch fox either but stick with your bullshit, it is funny. Well actually mildly amusing and mostly boring.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
2.2.18  al Jizzerror  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.2.17    last year
mostly boring

Yes, you certainly are extremely boring.

So why are you continuing to participate?

Are you hoping for a chance to seduce Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Greene has a reputation for being a slut, so you probably believe you have a shot.

EXCLUSIVE: Embattled QAnon congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene 'openly cheated' on her husband of 25 years with a polyamorous tantric sex guru and then moved on to another affair with the manager at her gym

    • Marjorie Taylor Greene had affairs with tantric sex guru Craig Ivey and fitness gym manager Justin Tway, DailyMail.com has learned
    • The embattled Georgia congresswoman, 46, has been married to husband Perry Greene since 1995 and shares three kids with him  
    • Neither man denied the affairs when approached by DailyMail.com, but both refused to comment on their past relationships with Taylor Greene 
    • 'I have no interest in talking about anything to do with that woman. Everything with her comes to no good,' Tway, 42, said 
    • Taylor Greene had met her two lovers while working at a gym in Alpharetta, Georgia in 2012 
    • Insiders say she was so brazen about her affairs they believed her marriage was on the rocks, but it appears the couple has put her infidelity behind them 
 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
2.2.19  Right Down the Center  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.2.18    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
2.2.20  CB  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.2.19    last year

Er, I am just saying so don't 'shoot' the messenger:  "Creep out" is a state of being; a feeling; an emotion.  Conservatives around these parts are fond of writing about how logical they are and how they never EVER engage in displays of feelings. Be careful, exposing yourself!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     last year

This is one of her more bizarre comments in a long line of bizarre comments. 

She also said that democrats that move to red states should not be allowed to vote for 5 years.

To think that a nut case like her is in congress is stunning.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @3    last year

like her narcissistic mentor, she's lashing out because something else is happening. maybe she got a subpoena.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.2  cjcold  replied to  Kavika @3    last year

What about democrats that move to blue states from red states?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
3.3  Jack_TX  replied to  Kavika @3    last year
This is one of her more bizarre comments in a long line of bizarre comments. 

Oh... I dunno... just give her a few minutes.  I'm sure this will look less crazy after she says something else.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.4  Dulay  replied to  Kavika @3    last year

WAIT! Let's follow the dots here.

ALL of the top law schools, business schools and economics schools in the county are in blue states. Add MIT.

So following MTG's standard NONE of the Republicans that go to those colleges/universities will be allowed to vote. Unless of course their state allows students to use mail in ballots or they go home to vote. That eliminates a pretty good chunk of GOP votes from blue states and/or dumps GOP votes back into red states where they can do the least amount of damage. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.4.1  CB  replied to  Dulay @3.4    last year

Besides this, her proposal is ridiculously unconstitutional as the states do not have the power to 'unequal' and 'control' the vote count not even for one voting 'cycle' let alone several state and federal cycles.  Marjorie Taylor Green is one dense and yet shallow-thinking woman!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4  CB    last year

What she is doing is filed under "Crazy Like A Fox" - you better believe 'splitting' from democrats and blue states is just the tip of the iceberg of what this woman wants for this country. Playing around with this notion that states can separate themselves wholly would effectively make our federal system - detached, ungovernable, and individual states  answerable only to themselves. Moreover, it would fragment society and the share interest of the people here. That is, we would grow apart, become distant, become aliens in the same 'land.'

Majorie Taylor Greene is a fool's fool. A damnable fool. And, for this reason alone, she makes women with power look bad and worse: Dangerous.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  CB @4    last year
Marjorie Taylor Greene is a fool's fool.  A damnable fool.

That seems to be the consensus.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.2  cjcold  replied to  CB @4    last year

I believe that the word you were looking for was insane.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.1  CB  replied to  cjcold @4.2    last year

Hmm. jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.3  Jack_TX  replied to  CB @4    last year
What she is doing is filed under "Crazy Like A Fox"

What do you have against foxes?  What have they ever done to you?

- you better believe 'splitting' from democrats and blue states is just the tip of the iceberg of what this woman wants for this country.

Yes..... well... I want $50 billion and my own personal collection of Russian supermodels.  I think my goals are more likely to happen.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.3.1  cjcold  replied to  Jack_TX @4.3    last year
Russian supermodels

I want to be politically correct and have a Ukranian supermodel.

Milla Jovovich would be my choice.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.3  CB  replied to  cjcold @4.3.1    last year

Okay people, Marjorie Taylor-Greene brings a number of things and types to mind: Super(woman) model is not one of them for me. She puts me in mind of:

'Ms. Pinhead (the Monster)' 'Gryra' 'Insane Clown Posse'
a49ba6b9-110a-4fa0-9cbf-af0e7fe68c98.jpg 638412b5f3f77cafb10e549ca2bbaa3b.jpg InsaneClownPosse2016-6.jpg

 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5  bbl-1    last year

Normally Putin would be smiling by the antics of these pro-Putin nimkombots----But in all honesty I don't think Putin has much to smile about anymore.  He bought these clowns and now he's reaping what he's sown.  Which is total QAnon/American nutbagism.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  bbl-1 @5    last year

Actually, she provides exactly what Putin wants for America.  Strife and division.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  Gsquared @5.1    last year

Yes that is Putin's desire.  However, the Russian autocrat is on a short rope.  When he's gone---and that will happen---the Boeberts', Trumps', Greene and the others will be left on a life raft torn apart by patriot knives.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
6  Right Down the Center    last year

She is a hoot.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Right Down the Center @6    last year

MAGA cultists think she's just wonderful.  Normal people think she's a fascist lunatic.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
6.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gsquared @6.1    last year

I think she is a hoot. While a few people think she is wonderful I believe the majority of people barely know her or care about her at all.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
6.1.2  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.1    last year

Let's make sure that everyone knows about her.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.2    last year

her mouth is writing checks her dumb ass boss can't cash. her rhetoric of late continues to be an expensive liability to the republican party.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
6.1.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.2    last year

Good luck with that.  It is pretty hard to make people know or care about a congress person within their district much less out of their district no matter how much cable news or our friends at NT want to focus on her.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
6.1.5  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.4    last year

She is going to make sure that everyone knows about her.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
6.1.6  Jack_TX  replied to  Gsquared @6.1    last year
she's a fascist lunatic.

I'm not sure she's smart enough to be either of those.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
6.1.7  Thrawn 31  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.4    last year

She is a moron and this kind of crap is exactly why we are in such a sorry political state today. She personifies the problem.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
6.1.8  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.5    last year
She is going to make sure that everyone knows about her.

Again It is pretty hard to make people know or care about a congress person within their district much less out of their district no matter how much cable news or our friends at NT want to focus on her.  Most people don't really care and they will make their own decision if a congress person from Georgia is worth them knowing about.  Nothing MTG, you, NT or MSNBC can do about it.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
6.1.9  Right Down the Center  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6.1.7    last year

It is part of it.  Both extremes seem to be getting all the attention and everyone in the middle is being held hostage.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
6.1.10  Snuffy  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.9    last year

Agreed.  I wouldn't characterize her as a thought leader, just one of the loudest extremists on the right.  The extremists are definitely the loudest (and frequently the dumbest).

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
6.1.11  Right Down the Center  replied to  Snuffy @6.1.10    last year
The extremists are definitely the loudest (and frequently the dumbest).

And the ones that get the most cable "news" sound bytes.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1.12  cjcold  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.1    last year
or care about her at all

We care about her because she is the voice of the GOP these days.

Just like we care about the lies that Trump and Santos tell daily.

Seems the GOP gods these days are all serial liars (what else is new?)

P.S. Your "Right Down the Center" is everybody else's far right wing.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
6.1.13  Right Down the Center  replied to  cjcold @6.1.12    last year
We care about her because she is the voice of the GOP these days.

Not sure who the "we" are ( the only people that matter are the ones in her voting district) that you are speaking of but actually she is not.  She is the one MSNBC and CNN would like you to believe is the voice of the party just like fox would have people believe AOC is the voice of her party.  Both of them are rather new congress people.

Just like we care about the lies that Trump and Santos tell daily.

Yet you all seem to ignore Joe's and Karine's daily lies.

Seems the GOP gods these days are all serial liars (what else is new?)

Familiar about the glass houses saying?

P.S. Your "Right Down the Center" is everybody else's far right wing.

That would be "everybody else's" problem, not mine.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
6.1.14  Thrawn 31  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.9    last year

Oh the left has its issues with its own extremists, but they do not hold nearly the same amount of sway as dip shits like this Dee Snyder lookalike does.

Either way, my point is the kind of black and white, no compromise bullshit she spouts is the crux of our problems in this country/

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6.1.15  bbl-1  replied to  devangelical @6.1.3    last year

Greene and others like her are the greatest liability for their master of arms and words, the autocrat dictator Putin.  

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.16  CB  replied to  cjcold @6.1.12    last year

Marjorie Taylor-Greene is a woman of privilege 'hewn' from a similar cloth as former house member turned senator: Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN). These people sing the praises of conservatism and its dominion over the entirety of the country. In that fashion; Greene is listening to constituents who are 'probing' with a rationale: If you can beat liberals: Disown them.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
6.1.17  al Jizzerror  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6.1.14    last year
this Dee Snyder lookalike

Whoa!

Dee Snyder may wear a little too much makeup, butt Dee is way more attractive than fucking MTG.

512

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
6.1.18  Thrawn 31  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.1.17    last year

Wait, that was Dee Snyder at the STOU address?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1.19  cjcold  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6.1.18    last year

I thought that I'd seen that white fur stripper costume before.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.1.20  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Jack_TX @6.1.6    last year

I seriously doubt she even knows the historical definition of fascist anyway.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
7  Ender    last year

I am so sick of the Xtian nationalists.

Complete morons.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
7.1  CB  replied to  Ender @7    last year

Me too, Ender.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
8  al Jizzerror    last year

Marjorie Taylor Greene recently hosted $500/bun fund raiser.

She said the tremendous turn-out caused them to run short on buns at the weenie roast.

512

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @8    last year

those don't look like flame retardant suits...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
8.1.1  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @8.1    last year

Very well backlit for a thousand yard shot.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.2  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @8.1.1    last year

... preferably 50 cal head shots, but a 30-06 fmj will do in a pinch.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
8.1.3  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @8.1.2    last year

Have been very happy with a .338 Lapua Magnum in a Savage 110.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.4  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @8.1.3    last year

... anything that creates the desired humpty dumpty effect works.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
8.2  George  replied to  al Jizzerror @8    last year

Why are showing a picture of a standard DNC campfire meeting while posting about MTG? 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.2.1  devangelical  replied to  George @8.2    last year

that fairly recent picture is in color, which means all those unamerican scumbags in it are trumpsters...

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
8.2.2  al Jizzerror  replied to  George @8.2    last year

Nice try.

The KKK endorsed Donald Trump.

512

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
8.2.3  CB  replied to  al Jizzerror @8.2.2    last year

Wow. I don't have time right now to read this 'page' but I will when I return! :)  KKK Radio?!!  Oh my. jrSmiley_123_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
8.2.4  CB  replied to  al Jizzerror @8.2.2    last year

Boy oh boy. That is some stupid counternarrative about a country growing up to accept all its citizens (who live, move, and have their being (and give all of their essences to it)) as what they are: The reason (the ingredients) that make the United States great. These. . . racists. . .flip everything, but surely they can find 'itching ears' which only cater to themselves and see the country as created for their purposes first and foremost/alone.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
8.2.5  cjcold  replied to  George @8.2    last year

George. You continually write like a Russian speaks. Your training sucked!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.2.6  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @8.2.5    last year

her name is maggie, she looks like a potato...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9  Trout Giggles    last year

When will she go away?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
9.1  Snuffy  replied to  Trout Giggles @9    last year

It does seem rather disheartening that the GOP cannot find another candidate to go against her.  Her district is so heavily Republican that almost anybody with an R after their names could win.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
9.1.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Snuffy @9.1    last year

Greene had five Republican challengers in their 2022 primary, but she is adored by the MAGA Republican base so she won.  Whether you like it or not, she is the face of the MAGA Republican organization.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
9.1.2  Snuffy  replied to  Gsquared @9.1.1    last year

Damn.  Not living in Georgia I didn't follow her election and didn't research to see who ran against her in the primaries.  Thanks for the info.

Guess we can only hope that with the decrease in support for Trump that her support also erodes.  It gets tiring having the extremists who are so loud in Congress, we need more moderates to fix the country.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Snuffy @9.1.2    last year

She's starting to tarnish all ready. Even her biggest supporters can't support her with the "democrats shouldn't be allowed to vote" for much longer

I hope

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
9.1.4  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Snuffy @9.1.2    last year
we need more moderates to fix the country

We do, but we won't see any moderates, or fixes, coming out of the MAGA Republican organization.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
9.2  Ender  replied to  Trout Giggles @9    last year

(off topic I know, sorry G)

I just read a strange article that South Carolina wants to charge like 500 bucks for anyone that wants to live in the state.

So if someone wants to move there, will have to put down a deposit....

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
9.2.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Ender @9.2    last year

I don't see that as off topic.  It kind of fits with her proposal.  I think it's pretty interesting and definitely unconstitutional.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ender @9.2    last year

They need the dues!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
9.2.3  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Ender @9.2    last year

That would most likely be considered and construed as a poll tax,wouldn't make it through the courts.

States still do get a limited say in their own election laws, which most normally tie into residency requirements so it might be interesting to see exactly HOW this could play out.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
9.2.4  Ender  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @9.2.3    last year

Their rational was something along the lines of they would need the money for roads and such with extra traffic...

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
9.2.5  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Ender @9.2.4    last year

They could have done the same things by adding to property or sales taxes and likely it would have flown under the radar of politics.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
9.2.6  afrayedknot  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @9.2.3    last year

“States still do get a limited say in their own election laws, which most normally tie into residency requirements so it might be interesting to see exactly HOW this could play out.”

I trust this is more a cautionary tale than any sort of acceptance. That it is even a topic of discussion is frightening in implication. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.2.7  devangelical  replied to  afrayedknot @9.2.6    last year

... it's red meat for the white supremacists. they're still trying to win the war they lost almost 160 years ago.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
9.2.8  afrayedknot  replied to  devangelical @9.2.7    last year

States rights vs. the common good.

As simple and yet somehow as complex as that. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
9.2.9  cjcold  replied to  Ender @9.2    last year

So is the deposit refundable if ya can't stand it and have to bail?

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
9.3  bbl-1  replied to  Trout Giggles @9    last year

She will flee when the FSB connections are confirmed.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
9.4  cobaltblue  replied to  Trout Giggles @9    last year

When will she go away?

Don’t be too hard on MTG. She single-handily calmed down all those that were quacking in their boots on January 6 due to the Commander and Chief’s attempt to instill Marshall law. If it weren’t for the gazpacho capitol police, it could have happened. She is hoping to write an oughtobiography with Gaetz and Santos. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
9.4.1  cjcold  replied to  cobaltblue @9.4    last year
oughtobiography

As in ought to have been a pig farmer?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
9.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Trout Giggles @9    last year

Hopefully as soon as her district in Georgia wakes and finally realizes the pathetic liability they elected.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
10  Thrawn 31    last year

God what an idiot. Easily one of the worst ideas ever uttered by an, somehow, elected official. I am certain she hasn’t thought of any of the multitude of ways this would end in utter disaster for everyone.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
10.1  CB  replied to  Thrawn 31 @10    last year

There is an actual book written about the 'next step' or ultimate end to this proposal she is making. Causes me to wonder if she firing an opening 'shot' to bringing about a national 'split' over made up irreconcilable differences :

Divided We Fall: America's Secession Threat and How to Restore Our Nation

David French warns of the potential dangers to the country—and the world—if we don’t summon the courage to reconcile our political differences.

Two decades into the 21st Century, the U.S. is less united than at any time in our history since the Civil War. We are more diverse in our beliefs and culture than ever before. But red and blue states, secular and religious groups, liberal and conservative idealists, and Republican and Democratic representatives all have one thing in common: each believes their distinct cultures and liberties are being threatened by an escalating violent opposition. This polarized tribalism, espoused by the loudest, angriest fringe extremists on both the left and the right, dismisses dialogue as appeasement; if left unchecked, it could very well lead to secession.

An engaging mix of cutting edge research and fair-minded analysis, Divided We Fall is an unblinking look at the true dimensions and dangers of this widening ideological gap, and what could happen if we don't take steps toward bridging it.

French reveals chilling, plausible scenarios of how the United States could fracture into regions that will not only weaken the country but destabilize the world .

But our future is not written in stone. By implementing James Madison’s vision of pluralism—that all people have the right to form communities representing their personal values— we can prevent oppressive factions from seizing absolute power and instead maintain everyone ’s beliefs and identities across all fifty states.

Reestablishing national unity will require the bravery to commit ourselves to embracing qualities of kindness, decency, and grace towards those we disagree with ideologically. French calls on all of us to demonstrate true tolerance so we can heal the American divide. If we want to remain united, we must learn to stand together again.

        41oV6mLucqL.jpg

A most excellent read. It will frighten you at how 'simple' it is to fragment the union at this time. (It really is.)

In red:    What can happen if we split this union into halves. We fracture; the world destabilizes.

In blue:   What Greene suggests. Sounds innocent enough, when in reality, citizens caught by desire to never move far from home/birth places, a yearning to return to a 'simpler place in time,' and immigrants seeking a land where they can be taken in, will deal with oppression, authoritarianism, and missing elements of their identity and beliefs in red states!

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
10.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  CB @10.1    last year

Global economic and security collapse would be the most immediate effects, followed within a day by rampant economic catastrophe within all 50 “separate but equal” states. Then of course there would be the mass violence and ethnic cleansing as a result of the economic disaster. Jews, as always, would be the most immediate victims.

And of course this is the rosy version where various newly created terrorists groups do t start nuking formerly “American” cities with their newly aquired weapons. and yes it would happen.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
10.1.2  CB  replied to  Thrawn 31 @10.1.1    last year

United States. Superpower: A Tragic Tale.

Superpower: Swellen Head: A nation incapable of coping with its own preeminent success! A Dystopian Look! 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
10.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  CB @10.1.2    last year

[]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
10.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @10.1.3    last year

[]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
10.1.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  CB @10.1.2    last year

[]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
10.1.6  CB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @10.1.5    last year

. . . .

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
11  Tacos!    last year
"Well, once they move to a red state, guess what? Maybe you don't get to vote for five years," Greene concluded, suggesting to disenfranchise her fellow Americans over their political views.

No doubt she thinks herself very clever for coming up with this scheme. Setting aside how offended she would be if she moved to a new state and couldn’t vote, this scheme has been tried - and failed - before. 

In Dunn v Blumstein (1972), the Supreme Court held that such time of residency requirements implicated the 14th Amendment. And since the right to vote is fundamental, the state needs to show a compelling government interest to justify restrictions on it.

Generally, states can have a short residency requirement, like 30 days, to get the paperwork done properly, but longer limits that are just there to make sure a new resident assimilates or something are not allowed.

It also implicates the Right to Travel, the Privileges and Immunities Clause, and violates the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

I really feel like members of Congress have an obligation (moral, not legal) to be better informed about the Constitution they swear to protect and defend.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
11.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Tacos! @11    last year

Hah, you think for this horse’s ass that oath was anything more than just a few words she had to blurt out for the paycheck and benefits? This bitch doesn’t care about the constitution, or the country, it’s all about her.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
11.2  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Tacos! @11    last year

As I said, her proposal, if enacted into law, would be unconstitutional.

I really feel like members of Congress have an obligation (moral, not legal) to be better informed about the Constitution they swear to protect and defend.

Of course.  They have an obligation to be informed, but she is in Congress to be a disruptor and a bomb-thrower, not a legislator.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.2.1  CB  replied to  Gsquared @11.2    last year

"Disruptor" is a choice term and it is appropriate in her case. Even in Trump's case (should he get far along on his return). Such people sell themselves to constituents as "change agents" and what a change they hope to bring too! Just stunning how immoral morality can be when you are just a Machiavellian-styled rabblerouser come for the 'bang'!

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
11.2.2  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  CB @11.2.1    last year

Trump is a definite disruptor.  One description of him I've heard that is completely accurate is "chaos agent".

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.2.3  CB  replied to  Gsquared @11.2.2    last year

Indeed. It is why the republicans and conservatives desire him soooooo muchhhhh; but, it turns out he is too much a chaos agent even for the so-called, "morally superior" to bottle-up and cork! Oh boy, do politicians wish they could contain that wild 'hedon' of a man and get him to do just the dirty work they have shelved up for years!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
11.2.4  cjcold  replied to  Gsquared @11.2    last year
she is in Congress to be a

The skank is a seriously low IQ Qanon fascist.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
11.2.5  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @11.2.4    last year

long term effects of inbreeding in the antebellum south...

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
11.3  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Tacos! @11    last year

Generally, states can have a short residency requirement, like 30 days, to get the paperwork done properly, but longer limits that are just there to make sure a new resident assimilates or something are not allowed.

Very true, my state allows for 30 days to transfer a DL, one usually can provide a utility bill to prove they have an address, but, when it comes to something unrelated to voting ,. A person is not eligible to obtain either a hunting or fishing lic as a resident until they have resided in the state for 1 calendar year, so to participate in those activities in that time frame , they are considered non resident and must pay the fees for a non resident .

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
11.3.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @11.3    last year

I believe that worked for Hillary when she ran for office in the state of New York.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
11.3.2  Snuffy  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @11.3    last year

It works this way in Arizona.  When I got out of the military way back when, my state of residency was Wisconsin.  As it was January at the time, I decided that a move to Arizona would make a lot more sense.  I had the first 30 days to transfer my drivers license which was no problem, but I had to live in state for a year before I could claim in-state tuition in order to go to college.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
11.3.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Snuffy @11.3.2    last year

I never had that problem. As a Arizona resident from the get go, I kept my AZ driver's licence the entire 20 years I was in the military and always claimed AZ as my home of residence.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
12  Hal A. Lujah    last year

Why stop there?  Why not put Dems in forced labor reeducation camps when they flee blue states?  Feed them gruel made with tainted creek water and force them to make videos admitting to their past support of commie democrat positions.  If it doesn’t fix them after five years then they might just have to accidentally fall out of windows of tall buildings.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
12.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @12    last year

Way to think outside the box but I am not so sure it is a good idea to give her any more ideas than she already has.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
12.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Right Down the Center @12.1    last year

As extremely limited as her brain is I am sure she has already jerked off to the thought of reeducation camps, if not outright mass executions.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
12.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Thrawn 31 @12.1.1    last year

she has to jerk off. all her old gym-rat studs disappeared after she sold her cross-fit gym.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
12.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  devangelical @12.1.2    last year

Well to be fair I’d say the reassignment surgery was a failure. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
12.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Thrawn 31 @12.1.1    last year

[]

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
12.1.5  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @12.1.4    last year

Thrawn engaged in a euphemism. You wouldn't understand.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
12.1.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @12.1.5    last year

[]

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
12.1.7  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @12.1.6    last year

And, as I predicted, you do not understand...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
12.1.8  devangelical  replied to  Thrawn 31 @12.1.3    last year

raw dogging mtg to get out of paying the gym membership fee for the month was a bit much.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
12.1.9  al Jizzerror  replied to  devangelical @12.1.8    last year
raw dogging mtg

OMG!

Thanx to that disgusting image, I had to use one of the new barf bags I got at Walmart.

512

I always keep a box of them handy when there is an MTG article.

Now I'll make you look at her weird fucking feet.

512

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
12.1.10  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @12.1.9    last year

considering what comes out of her mouth, can you imagine what she's put into it?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
12.1.11  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @12.1.10    last year

... besides the entire free dumb cockless.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
12.1.12  Thrawn 31  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @12.1.4    last year

A figure of speech on my part of course. Never actually took it to the place you did, apparently you have some things to work out.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
12.1.13  Thrawn 31  replied to  devangelical @12.1.8    last year

Dude, that’s disgusting. Not even George Santos would do that for a vote.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.1.14  cjcold  replied to  Thrawn 31 @12.1.1    last year

A friend told me that she masturbates with a 12" Obama shaped dildo.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
12.1.15  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @12.1.14    last year

How is Obama shaped?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.1.16  cjcold  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @12.1.15    last year

Haven't seen it. Don't want to.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
12.1.17  al Jizzerror  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @12.1.15    last year
How is Obama shaped?

Kinda like this only bigger:

512

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
12.1.18  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  al Jizzerror @12.1.17    last year

My, what big feet he has.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
12.1.19  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @12.1.16    last year

Your friend isn't very descriptive.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
12.1.20  Trout Giggles  replied to  al Jizzerror @12.1.17    last year

Now that's disgusting!

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
13  Drinker of the Wry    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
13.1  devangelical  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @13    last year

LOL

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
14  cobaltblue    last year

The widely reported war of words in the ladies room between Boebert and mtg  began because Boebert finally told mtg that when people were saying "what an ass" as mtg passed, it was not because they were admiring her derriere.  

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
14.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @14    last year
in the ladies room

MTG takes on all cummers at the glory hole.

512

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
14.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  al Jizzerror @14.1    last year

Fuck MGT but thats a bit much dude. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
14.1.2  CB  replied to  Thrawn 31 @14.1.1    last year

It is as crude as a gloryhole! And I do think it is a bit much too, friend Al Jizzerror.  And yet, what Marjorie Taylor-Greene is after is worst than well,. . . that. This woman is setting a 'platform' for dangerous setbacks in our society and death of liberals from her perspective as a conservative willing to carry a gun and alienate others not ready and willing to swear to her cause.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
14.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  al Jizzerror @14.1    last year

Sorry for my earlier criticism, apparently this is totally cool,  yes MGT is a total cum guzzling slut and should sue whoever did "her" reassignment surgery.

Pretty sure she needs to get back to Frankenstein's lab cuz I am sure his other project has an appointment and is upset that she is running late.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
14.1.4  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @14.1    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
14.1.5  cjcold  replied to  Thrawn 31 @14.1.1    last year

Yep. Screw that meme! It almost makes her look likable.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
14.1.6  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @14.1.5    last year

I would've thought her complexion to be a lot better after that regimen hundreds of times...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
15  Kavika     last year

332572436_2210580755790815_3931385562497826153_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5cd70e&_nc_ohc=H5ah1MFDnq4AX_uUqG0&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-1.xx&oh=00_AfAOy5Oml1REsXmUz7737qOSzCyns5ap_zDPAa9jvSvf4w&oe=63FCF44F

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
15.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @15    last year

yikes. ... and we're still well under 100 IQ points combined.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
15.2  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @15    last year

the entire "woodwind" section of the trump 2024 orchestra...

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
15.2.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  devangelical @15.2    last year
the entire "woodwind" section

Cool.

I wasn't aware that "dickolos" are considered "woodwinds."

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
15.2.2  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @15.2.1    last year

yup, those and skin flutes...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
15.2.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @15.2.2    last year

[]

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
16  cobaltblue    last year

546b1e530dd7bdf6b4a8470544407f79.jpg

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
16.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @16    last year

512

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
16.2  cjcold  replied to  cobaltblue @16    last year

Stop that! 

I got a headache just trying to think that through!

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
17  cobaltblue    last year

2056730.jpg

Happy Friday everyone!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
17.1  CB  replied to  cobaltblue @17    last year

Happy Friday, Cobaltblue! :)

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
17.2  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @17    last year

Marjorie Taylor Greene is stupid as FU Q .

512

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
17.2.2  JBB  replied to  al Jizzerror @17.2    last year

original

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
17.2.3  cjcold  replied to  JBB @17.2.2    last year

How is it that all of the GOP spokesfolk these days are insane?

The serial liar Trump seems to breed them. 

Much like cockroaches they just won't go away.

Sad how many Republican babies had to survive on lead based paint chips. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
17.2.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @17.2.3    last year
The serial liar Trump seems to breed them. 

You think that he has more than 5 kids?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
17.2.5  cjcold  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @17.2.4    last year

Due to his proclivity for "grabbing pussy" it wouldn't surprise me.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
17.2.6  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @17.2.5    last year

not to mention any his sired fetus' that conveniently went away in the 1st & 2nd trimester...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
18  Kavika     last year

Marjorie Taylor Greene Mocked for Tweeting '6 Billion' Crossed U.S. Border

Seems that neither math nor reality are her strong suits.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
18.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @18    last year

And now I just feel sorry for her. She can't even exaggerate right

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
18.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @18.1    last year

she is exactly the type of elected official that trumpsters want to idolize...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
19  seeder  Gsquared    last year

ZAP!!!

800

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
19.1  cjcold  replied to  Gsquared @19    last year
ZAP!!!

If only it were that easy.

Divorcing America from Trump type fascism will be a long hard process.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
19.1.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  cjcold @19.1    last year

Unfortunately, you are correct.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
19.1.2  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @19.1    last year

just digging a hole in the desert that will fit 25 million trumpsters will be a huge undertaking... /s

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
19.1.3  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @19.1.2    last year
just digging a hole

No worries. It's already dug. Just a little corner of the Grand Canyon should be sufficient for all. 

Lure them in with a promise of free MAGA swag and then blow the rims.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
19.1.4  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @19.1.3    last year

that's just one more thing the anti-environment party would want to dig up there...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
19.1.5  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @19.1.4    last year

a couple dozen large woodchippers is probably the best solution...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
19.1.6  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @19.1.5    last year

We still have to operate under the laws of thermodynamics.

Trash compaction just makes for a smaller footprint.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
20  al Jizzerror    last year

512

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
20.1  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @20    last year

the conservative xtian poster girl...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
20.2  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  al Jizzerror @20    last year

That's funny.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
20.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @20.2    last year

she's an example of the new leadership republicans are talking about...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
20.3  CB  replied to  al Jizzerror @20    last year

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif   Oh boy! That's still 'rich' the third-time around! jrSmiley_12_smiley_image.gif

 
 

Who is online








JohnRussell
Drinker of the Wry


90 visitors