Trump's latest legal defense 'signals doubt and weakness' as Jan. 6 trial becomes reality: experts - Raw Story - Celebrating 19 Years of Independent Journalism
By: Tom Boggioni
trump changes his stories more often than he changes his lawyers...
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
A notable change in how Donald Trump describes his state of mind following the 2020 presidential election caught the attention of two legal experts who believe the former president is trying out a new legal strategy - because he knows he's in big trouble.
In a column for the Bulwark, attorney Dennis Aftergut and Amherst College professor Austin Sarat pointed out that Trump's declarative "I won the election" now includes a qualifier that he believes will get him off the hook with prosecutors as the reality of his Washington D.C. indictment sinks in.
As they explained, Trump's assertion that he won the election is belied by evidence that he was advised that he had not. One witness stated the former president once admitted, "Can you believe I lost to this effing guy?"
With that in mind, Trump has started stressing that his belief that he'd won was opinion, rather than fact. He recently protested, "I believe I won that election by many, many votes, many, many hundreds of thousands of votes. That's what I think," followed by, "That's my opinion, and it's a strong opinion. And I think it's borne out by the facts, and we'll see that."
As the two experts wrote, that likely won't fly in a courtroom either.
"Perhaps this is just another instance of Trump's doing what the late philosopher Harry Frankfurt labeled 'bullsh----ng' - where the 'goal is not to report facts' but 'rather, to shape the beliefs and attitudes of his listeners in a certain way.'"
"Facts can be verified; opinions, in contrast, are neither true nor false. They are just expressions of feelings or beliefs. They tell us about a person's state of mind. That's why Trump, presumably on the advice of the lawyers preparing him for his upcoming criminal trials, is reframing what he said and did in the aftermath of the 2020 election," they wrote.
They added, "But the 'it was just my opinion' defense won't work in court. And it signals doubt and weakness from a person who reportedly hates showing signs of vulnerability and who as a child was taught never to show it."
The authors wrote that "alternative facts or suddenly trumped-up claims about opinions won't save him," and ultimately could come back to haunt him since he looks like he is changing his story.
"Trump's change of tune will only have him looking even more like the untrustworthy person he is — the kind that juries do not hesitate to convict," they predicted.
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted. Any use of the term "Brandon", or any variation thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Tags
Who is online
45 visitors
Test
A+
his current attorneys probably consider this a retirement case/client...
I suspect they have secured a guaranteed pre-payment and are doing this strictly for the money.
I'm hip. I spent the last 25 years of employment writing construction contracts with zero wiggle room.
This is not surprising. I would hate to try to defend Trump in either the documents or the Jan 6th indictments. I do not see what they have to work with other than variants of a delusion defense and I doubt that offers any legal cover.
they're going to slow walk the entire process and bank on a hung jury by a single juror at the end.
It only takes one MAGA to derail justice.
plenty of examples of that in the last 7 years...
That old, "He did not believe what he did was illegal for him", Defense?
"Mr Trump are you able to understand the charges against you and are you capable of assisting in your own defense?"
"No, and you can't make me do anything I don't wanna Yourstupidship!"
I'm betting on the ''Look at Hillary or Hunter'' defense.
Like we see here.
A hundred times a day.
LOL, Thunder Mouth babbles again.
So he's going to use the "I didn't know armed robbery was against the law" defense?
The Pete Rose, "I never knew there was anything wrong with betting on the ballgames I are playing in", Defense...
That's some good photo shopping up there. It really does look like trmp actually wore a jumpsuit for the cameras
Nice Crocs...