╌>

George Conway Calls Trump 'Kim Jong Loon' After Parade - Comic Sands

  
Via:  Trout Giggles  •  last year  •  44 comments

By:   Comic Sands

George Conway Calls Trump 'Kim Jong Loon' After Parade - Comic Sands
George Conway mocked Donald Trump with a new nickname, suggesting Trump wanted to be like dictator Kim Jong Un with his military parade.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Lawyer and activist George Conway mocked President Donald Trump with a new nickname suggesting Trump was trying to be like North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un by being so gung ho about his ultimately sparsely-attended military parade

The military parade was a celebration of the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary that also coincided with Trump's 79th birthday. Those who attended said it was poorly organized. It also took place against the backdrop of mass protests against the Trump administration across the country following his decision to send the National Guard and Marines into Los Angeles to curb demonstrations there.

Trump is notably vulnerable to flattery and has been criticized for cozying up to authoritarians and dictators around the world. He has previously praised Kim, the leader of one of the world's most brutal totalitarian regimes, as a "smart guy" and a "great negotiator."

So Conway's nickname for Trump proved appropriate considering Trump doesn't want to just praise Kim—he wants to be like him, a desire that the military parade showed he's just not cut out for.

Conway said:

"[Trump] tried to play Kim Jong Un for an afternoon, but he's still just Kim Jong Loon."

You can see his post below.

.@realDonaldTrump tried to play Kim Jong Un for an afternoon, but he's still just Kim Jong Loon. https://t.co/wcu4Pr8hqW
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) June 15, 2025

The nickname, people agreed, perfectly suited Trump—and they couldn't help but mock him further.

Despite shutting down large portions of central Washington, D.C., closing major roads, and reportedly costing up to $45 million, Trump's military parade was a total bust—and Conway wasn't the only prominent figure thinking it.

Earlier, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also drew comparisons between Trump and Kim, calling the military parade "Trump's low-energy Dear Leader parade."

By contrast, Clinton noted, "millions of people across the country [were] gathering peacefully" for the "No Kings" protests, which drew millions to rallies in hundreds of locations nationwide.


Red Box Rules


Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted.



 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Trout Giggles    last year

I didn't watch the parade but I did see some video of the soldiers "marching"

Back in the Dark Ages when I was in basic the TI would have had us marching far into the night if we had looked like that group. Soldiers know how to march and keep in step and how to get back in step if you fall out of it. I don't know what was wrong that day. I have speculations, tho

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1    last year
I don't know what was wrong that day

there's a lot of speculation that a number of forms of protest were exhibited by some of the military members that take their oath to defend the constitution, and not some tinpot wanna be dictator ...

not marching or walking in step, not facing the review stand when passing it. naturally, ammo was prohibited in the parade ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.1    last year

Yeah I heard that too

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Hallux  replied to  devangelical @1.1    last year

Rotten eggs are ammo?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @1.1.2    last year

too expensive to throw now. I was talking about no ammo issued to the service members, due to the maga fear of a anwar sadat redux ...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2  Split Personality  replied to  Trout Giggles @1    last year

Any military parade is supposed to be considered a formal ceremony.

While I appreciated the history lessons provided by the way the Army presented the parade as a top grade,

the participants; behaviors left a lot to be desired.  It wasn't even an acceptable dress rehearsal.

Nice day for those that braved the rain and mugginess but not worth the hype and unnecessary expense to the taxpayer 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @1.2    last year
Any military parade is supposed to be considered a formal ceremony.

Yes it is. I did my share of parades in basic and on duty

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2.2  Split Personality  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.1    last year

Thank you for your service !

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.3  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @1.2.2    last year

You're worth it.

Thank you for your service!

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2.4  Split Personality  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.3    last year

jrSmiley_16_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Freefaller
Professor Quiet
1.3  Freefaller  replied to  Trout Giggles @1    last year
I was in basic the TI would have had us marching far into the night if we had looked like that group.

I didn't see the parade or even any clips of it, but judging from the comments I gotta wonder if they practiced beforehand.  Back in my dark ages if we had a major parade coming up we would be out marching around practicing for a couple hours a day for at least a couple weeks beforehand (Gods I hated parades)

But nowadays soldiers are allowed to grow long hair, beards, wear jewelry, etc, so I suppose standards have changed

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Freefaller @1.3    last year

They have. Mr Giggles works for the DOD on the base and he tells me females are now allowed pony tails. HA! We had to have it up and your cover better fit!

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
1.3.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  Freefaller @1.3    last year

I don't know about the parade itself, but they were rehearsing the oath while my sis, SIL, and nephew were visiting DC Saturday.

The temporary fences were a pain in the behind.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.3  devangelical  replied to  sandy-2021492 @1.3.2    last year

they were necessary to keep back the throngs of non-existent parade spectators ...

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
1.3.5  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Trout Giggles @1.3.1    last year

here is the one that always gets a raised eyebrow out of me then a smirk.

hands  in pockets, somewhere there is an old retired E-8 or 9 shaking and screaming,

whats does they have in their pocketess, like Gollum in the hobbit.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.6  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @1.3.5    last year

LOL! Oh I remember that well! I was always getting screamed at for hands in my pockets. What the hell are the pockets for then?

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
1.3.7  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Trout Giggles @1.3.6    last year
What the hell are the pockets for then?

for guys , to discretely scratch our balls .

gave that answer once to a new Lt, being a freshly minted Sgt and just starting to build up some NCO crust and spent the next 3 days at a guard post next to the settling ponds for the base sewer system.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.8  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @1.3.7    last year

lol

 
 
 
Freefaller
Professor Quiet
1.3.9  Freefaller  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.3.1    last year
he tells me females are now allowed pony tails.

I'm actually ok with that, now the guys wearing ponytails I am definately not a fan of

 
 
 
Freefaller
Professor Quiet
1.3.10  Freefaller  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @1.3.7    last year
for guys , to discretely scratch our balls .

I like that, but being from Canada our excuse was because our hands were cold

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2  Dismayed Patriot    last year

Kim Jong Un and Kim Jong Loon, a love affair made in heaven!

“We went back and forth, then we fell in love, No, really! He wrote me beautiful letters. And they are great letters.” Donald J Trump

Yes, I'm sure they went back and forth, many, many times...

But seriously, how can Trump sycophants not see this? How can they be so completely blind to the clear authoritarian optics of his personal military birthday party? And it's not like Trump has even hidden his actions, he just does everything out in the open even if its unethical and possibly even illegal, and his sycophants rally around him in their defense of what previously would have been thought indefensible.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    last year

in their tiny unamerican minds, even a civil war against the libs would be justifiable ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.1    last year

They want one

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.1    last year
They want one

I do find it interesting that on the left no one is trying to force any conservatives to get gay married, get an abortion or be transgender. But on the right, they want to ban abortion, ban gay marriage, make discrimination against the lgtbq community the standard and establish what amounts to a "don't ask, don't tell" policy for white supremacists.

It's no wonder they want a civil war, they're determined to shove their self-righteousness down everyone throat and play the moral police while the rest of us are laughing at them telling them to fuck off because we don't give a fuck if they go rot in their hollars clinging to their guns and bibles as long as they're not trying to force their beliefs into our courts, schools, jobs and government.

Also, they wrongly believe they would have an advantage in a civil war because many have been stockpiling their guns and ammo for years. Of course, they also believe themselves superior to everyone else and believe their God is on their side, so they fantasize about purging this country of those they despise, which of course is what Jesus would do, right?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.2    last year
t interesting that on the left no one is trying to force any conservatives to get gay married, get an abortion or be transgender. But on the right, they want to ban abortion, ban gay marriag

Republicans control the Presidency and Congress. Haven't tried to do either.

[✘] It's no wonder they want a civil war,[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.4  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.3    last year
Republicans control the Presidency and Congress. Haven't tried to do either.

Republicans Want to Ban All Abortions, Even if It Kills Mothers - The American Prospect

Wisconsin Justices Appear Hostile to 175-Year-Old Abortion Law | State Court Report

GOP states' effort to restrict abortion pill rebuffed by appeals court | Reuters

As a Michigan Republican made his case to ban same-sex marriage, a gay Democrat stole the show • Michigan Advance

Republican state lawmakers galvanize to attack same-sex marriage | Same-sex marriage (US) | The Guardian

More Republican lawmakers call on SCOTUS to reconsider gay marriage ruling - ABC News

Meanwhile, Democrats are trying to force girls to compete against men, force schoolgirls to change and shower with men, and mutilate kids without their parents consent.

In a statement posted on their website, the district said each locker room has private changing stations available to all students, saying, "We are sensitive to the privacy needs of all of our middle school students and ensure that no student is required to change into a gym uniform for physical education class in front of others." Shepard Middle School student in Deerfield claims she had to change in front of transgender classmate; officials say untrue - ABC7 Chicago

If you believe that any kids are being "forced" to change or expose themselves in front of transgender students, YOU ARE BEING LIED TO! You are being BAMBOOZELED! MANIPULATED! DECIEVED! But I guess conservatives don't really give a fuck about that because they're just not educated enough to be able to read a fucking news story and realize "Oh, so the facts are that no one was forcing that girl to change in front of a transgender student, so what's the fucking problem?".

Democrats want a civil war

Nope.

because they can't tolerant anyone thinking differently than they do

Wrong again. Are there liberals and progressives who fight for their rights? Absolutely. Only bigoted bitch conservatives fight for the right to force their disgusting useless debased opinions on others because they think themselves "chosen" by their useless impotent unproven God.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.4    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.4    last year

thumpers are teetering on the brink of mopping out churches in biohazard suits now, afaic ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.7  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.2    last year

They forget that some of us have firearms and know how to use them

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.8  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.7    last year

oh yeah.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.9  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @2.1.8    last year

none of my guns are for any furry creatures ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.10  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.1.9    last year

I have a bb gun I would like to use on a few raccoons

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.11  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.10    last year

that won't work. I had a friend in the mountains that had a big cage in his garage up against the dog door, since the raccoons would come thru it for the dog food. he'd trap a bunch in the cage, throw a tarp over it, and run a hose from the exhaust pipe of his truck into it. 20 minutes later, they're all asleep forever. he would distribute them along the roadsides, as if they'd been hit by a car. apparently there was an endless supply ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.12  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.1.11    last year

I don't want to kill them. I want the little pricks to stay away from my bird feeders

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.13  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.12    last year

get a 3 foot piece of 1/2 inch conduit and a gross of exploding bottle rockets ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.14  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.1.13    last year

Now that sounds like fun except fireworks are illegal in my neighborhood

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.15  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.14    last year

... but burning crosses isn't?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.16  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.1.15    last year

hasn't been a cross burning in oh I don't know the last 10 years?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.17  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.16    last year

lumber and gas are too expensive, they use those propane fired metal crosses now. they're all the rage in gooberville ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2  seeder  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    last year

I was surprised to not see any articles or seeds about this farce when I came back on Monday. Not even singing praises for His Majesty's magnificent parade. I think they were as embarrassed by the spectacle as the rest of America was

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2    last year

if it was anything close to being what they were touting before it happened, it would be all over this site. the internet is loaded with video examples of it's failure. trumpski crashed the army's party and tried to make it all about himself, as usual ...

there were a number of no kings protests in the country that had more participants than trump's birthday parade had spectators ...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  devangelical @2.2.1    last year
trumpski crashed the army's party

If you think the parade was about the Army in anything but lip service you are mistaken.  Trump demanded the parade for himself and the Army was more like an invited guest that was more popular than the birthday boy.

?uuid=d0f62424-60b7-56cb-aff3-e7f752fe12de&type=primary&q=75&width=1024 D7PxbMiErCPihawDvBXRYA.jpg

250614_Trumps_Parade_t1200.jpg?57a0c2296240c280e9492005c3cad63e7cbe80f4 hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEhCK4FEIIDSFryq4qpAxMIARUAAAAAGAElAADIQj0AgKJD&rs=AOn4CLDzH3ohgqmS65aZ1VKhAs22ODrrAA

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.2    last year

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4  devangelical    last year

here's a little secret that's been known for awhile in the intelligence community and is being discussed online. the US gov't has no guaranteed methods of deterrence from the latest generation of weaponized drones. it's even worse on golf courses ...

 
 

Who is online




88 visitors