╌>

TACO Trump Reverses Course, Directs Bondi to Produce Meaningless Epstein Files

  
Via:  John Russell  •  last year  •  14 comments


TACO Trump Reverses Course, Directs Bondi to Produce Meaningless Epstein Files
After getting hammered for a week for trying to bury files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, his “clients,” and his death, Donald Trump and GOP leaders are trying something new: to appease an enraged base, and in the face of much more meaningful measures to force transparency and accountability in the case, they are pretending to take the issue seriously… in the most worthless ways possible.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


After getting hammered for a week for trying to bury files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, his “clients,” and his death, Donald Trump and GOP leaders are trying something new: to appease an enraged base, and in the face of much more meaningful measures to force transparency and accountability in the case, they are pretending to take the issue seriously… in the most worthless ways possible.

First, let’s turn to the president.

Trump has been fielding — and fumbling — questions about his erstwhile pal all week. Furthermore, in multiple social media posts, he has insulted his most loyal supporters and tried to convince them that this Epstein thing is one big nothingburger and a “hoax.”

That hasn’t gone over well.

After all, theories about Epstein’s crimes, who else participated in them, and who helped cover them up, are at the center of MAGA orthodoxy. The fact that young girls could be groomed and trafficked to become the victims of sexual abuse at the hands of the rich and powerful, and that those elites would get away with it, is at the center of the movement’s grievances.

And while the conspiracy theorists of QAnon may have twisted the Epstein saga into some crazy tale of Democrats drinking blood and Hillary Clinton running a pedophilia ring out of the basement of a basement-less pizza restaurant, the underlying crimes are very real, as is the fact that only Epstein and his consort have been held to account in any way.

It is also undeniable that there are many links between Trump and that pair, including the fact that the current president of the United States alluded to his friend’s penchant for young women more than 20 years ago.

On Thursday, the   Wall Street Journal   uncovered another such connection and published it over Trump’s attempts to kill that story.

The paper   published an article   describing a cryptic and lewd birthday message that Trump had penned for his buddy’s 50th birthday.

Predictably, the litigious president threatened to sue the   Journal , NewsCorp, and Rupert Murdoch, who, according to a   social media post   published under Trump’s account, had promised that he would “take care of it.”

While the first post was likely not written by the president himself based on the wording, he later published another.

“The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures,” he   wrote . “I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn’t print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I’m going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper.”

While chances are that this lawsuit would result in yet another   bribe   settlement, we really hope that it goes to trial because it is time that Trump answers some questions under oath.

In any case, shortly after the initial post (the one likely not written by him), the president published one of his own that, for the first time, at least appeared to provide some of the transparency he had promised his followers.

“Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,” Trump   wrote . “This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!”

As for the “scam” and who is behind it, the president has offered many different explanations. Either the Epstein list doesn’t exist, or Democrats put it together (without ever using it against him), or it’s unimportant.

But let’s look at what Trump is promising here: First of all, the grand jury testimony that led to Epstein’s indictment is obviously about him and not others who partook in his crime. It won’t include the names of his clients, so what value will these documents really have?

Also, why just the testimony and not all available evidence?

Finally, note that, all of a sudden, Trump seems worried about “court approval.” This is the same man who is running the most lawless administration in history that does not seem to care one bit about court rulings.

Democrats immediately called him out on it.

“YOU were promised ALL of the EPSTEIN FILES. Clearly implicated in the files, Trump is telling the AG to release “pertinent” files from the “Grand Jury,”   tweeted   Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) in a direct message to the president’s reporters. “What does this bullshit mean? Trump/Bondi will bury the files and will pick and choose what doesn’t hurt Trump.”

But the president wasn’t the only one trying to mount a token effort to appease an irate MAGA base.

Down the road from the White House, House Republican leaders are worried that a   bipartisan discharge petition   is going to pass that directs Bondi to make available “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in the possession of the Department of Justice (DOJ), including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorneys’ Offices” that relate to Epstein, his confidante Ghislaine Maxwell, flight logs, the names of individuals named in connection with Epstein’s crimes, entities related to his trafficking or financial networks, immunity deals or plea bargains from anybody involved, internal DOJ documents related to charging decisions, all communications related to the destruction of evidence, and information related to Epstein’s death in prison.

In other words, this bill would force Bondi to put out a treasure trove of information, and in a searchable format.

And the discharge petition, sponsored by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA), is picking up steam. It already has enough GOP support to pass if all Democrats vote for it.

To get ahead of legislation that Republican leaders clearly want to bury, they introduced their own measure, a   non-binding   resolution   that calls on DOJ to use information related to Epstein.


Massie wasn’t having it.

“Congress thinks you’re stupid,” he   tweeted . “The rules committee passed a NON-BINDING Epstein resolution, hoping folks will accept it as real. It forces the release of NOTHING.”

The mad scramble on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue shows that both Trump and GOP leaders see this as a potentially existential crisis and are trying to get a handle of the narrative again.


Red Box Rules




Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion.





 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
let’s look at what Trump is promising here: First of all, the grand jury testimony that led to Epstein’s indictment is obviously about him and not others who partook in his crime. It won’t include the names of his clients, so what value will these documents really have?

Also, why just the testimony and not all available evidence?

Finally, note that, all of a sudden, Trump seems worried about “court approval.” This is the same man who is running the most lawless administration in history that does not seem to care one bit about court rulings.
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

and most importantly

“What does this bullshit mean? Trump/Bondi will bury the files and will pick and choose what doesn’t hurt Trump.”
 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2  devangelical    last year

oh no, the maga savior is a sexual predator. time to have him canonized as a christo-fascist saint ...

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3  Right Down the Center    last year

The Republicans hope Clinton and other Dems are on the list and The dems are hoping Trump and Republicans are on the list.  If there was a client list it means Epstein was an idiot.  If there was a client list it would have already been leaked.

This is just another political fight instead of doing the actual business of the country

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Right Down the Center @3    last year

sometimes I actually agree with you

I need more sleep

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1    last year
sometimes I actually agree with you

Please  don't do that, I may have to reevaluate my comment.  jrSmiley_4_smiley_image.png

I need more sleep

I suggest a little Maker Mark.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.1.2  Snuffy  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.1.1    last year

I suggest a little Maker Mark.

That may be ok if you are mixing with a little water or (shudder) Coke, but for straight up I prefer Jefferson's Reserve. It's a much better taste and finish.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.1.1    last year

Don't worry it really only happens once in a blue moon

I don't drink whiskey. I only drink beer

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  Snuffy @3.1.2    last year

If I do drink whiskey it's only Crown Royal with a little ginger ale. Ginger ale is the only pop I can stand

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.3    last year

Had my first Guinness on a trip to Ireland.  I am sold.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Snuffy @3.1.2    last year

Never had it.  I will put it on my list of things to try

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.1.7  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Right Down the Center @3.1.6    last year

Just dont try it in an irish car bomb ......

Guiness with baileys and a shot of jameson ....

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.8  Right Down the Center  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.1.7    last year

Interesting.  Jameson in Irish Coffee was excellent too in Ireland.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.1.9  Snuffy  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.4    last year

If I do drink whiskey it's only Crown Royal with a little ginger ale. Ginger ale is the only pop I can stand

Try Jameson Irish Whiskey with ginger ale, you might like the change. 
 
 

Who is online




90 visitors