╌>

July 14, 2026 - by Heather Cox Richardson

  
Via:  Thomas  •  4 months ago  •  7 comments

By:   Heather Cox Richardson

July 14, 2026 - by Heather Cox Richardson
In August 1870 a U.S.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads

We go through these cycles where we (the people of the United States) let powerful and monied interests run free and physically destroy what is common to all of us.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Heather Cox Richardson    Jul 15, 2026

In August 1870 a U.S. exploring expedition headed out from Montana toward the Yellowstone River into land the U.S. government had recognized as belonging to different Indigenous tribes.

By October the men had reached the Yellowstone, where they reported they had "found abundance of game and trout, hot springs of five or six different kinds…basaltic columns of enormous size," and a waterfall that must, they wrote, "be in form, color and surroundings one of the most glorious objects on the American Continent." On the strength of their widely reprinted reports, the secretary of the interior sent out an official surveying team under geologist Ferdinand V. Hayden. With it went photographer William Henry Jackson and fine artist Thomas Moran.

Banker and railroad baron Jay Cooke had arranged for Moran to join the expedition. In 1871 the popular magazine Scribner's Monthly published the surveyor's report along with Moran's drawings and a promise that Cooke's Northern Pacific Railroad would soon lay tracks to enable tourists to see the great natural wonders of the West.

But by 1871, Americans had begun to turn against the railroads, seeing them as big businesses monopolizing American resources at the expense of ordinary Americans. When Hayden called on Congress to pass a law setting the area around Yellowstone aside as a public park, two Republicans—Senator Samuel Pomeroy of Kansas and Delegate William H. Clagett of Montana—introduced bills to protect Yellowstone in a natural state and provide against "wanton destruction of the fish and game…or destruction for the purposes of merchandise or profit."

The House Committee on Public Lands praised Yellowstone Valley's beauty and warned that "persons are now waiting for the spring…to enter in and take possession of these remarkable curiosities, to make merchandise of these bountiful specimens, to fence in these rare wonders so as to charge visitors a fee, as is now done at Niagara Falls, for the sight of that which ought to be as free as the air or water." It warned that "the vandals who are now waiting to enter into this wonderland will, in a single season, despoil, beyond recovery, these remarkable curiosities which have required all the cunning skill of nature thousands of years to prepare."

The New York Times got behind the idea that saving Yellowstone for the people was the responsibility of the federal government, saying that if businesses "should be strictly shut out, it will remain a place which we can proudly show to the benighted European as a proof of what nature—under a republican form of government—can accomplish in the great West."

On March 1, 1872, President U.S. Grant, a Republican, signed the bill making Yellowstone a national park.

The impulse to protect natural resources from those who would plunder them for profit expanded 18 years later, when the federal government stepped in to protect Yosemite. In June 1864, Congress had passed and President Abraham Lincoln signed a law giving to the state of California the Yosemite Valley and nearby Mariposa Big Tree Grove "upon the express conditions that the premises shall be held for public use, resort and recreation."

But by 1890 it was clear that under state management the property had been largely turned over to timber companies, sheep-herding enterprises, and tourist businesses with state contracts. Naturalist John Muir warned in the Century magazine: "Ax and plow, hogs and horses, have long been and are still busy in Yosemite's gardens and groves. All that is accessible and destructible is rapidly being destroyed." Congress passed a law making the land around the state property in Yosemite a national park area, and the United States military began to manage the area.

The next year, in March 1891, Congress gave the president power to "set apart and reserve…as public reservations" land that bore at least some timber, whether or not that timber was of any commercial value. Under this General Revision Act, also known as the Forest Reserve Act, Republican president Benjamin Harrison set aside timberland adjacent to Yellowstone National Park and south of Yosemite National Park. By September 1893, about 17 million acres of land had been put into forest reserves. Those who objected to this policy, according to Century , were "men [who] wish to get at it and make it earn something for them."

Presidents of both parties continued to protect American lands, but in the late nineteenth century it was New York Republican politician Theodore Roosevelt who most dramatically expanded the effort to keep western lands from the hands of those who wanted only their timber and minerals.

Roosevelt was concerned that moneygrubbing was eroding the character of the nation, and he believed that western land nurtured the independence and community that he worried was disappearing in the East. During his presidency, which stretched from 1901 to 1909, Roosevelt protected 141 million acres of forest and established five new national parks.

More powerfully, he used the 1906 Antiquities Act, which Congress had passed to stop the looting and sale of Indigenous objects and sites, to protect land. The Antiquities Act allowed presidents to protect areas of historic, cultural, or scientific interest. Before the law was a year old, Roosevelt had created four national monuments: Devils Tower in Wyoming, El Morro in New Mexico, and Montezuma Castle and Petrified Forest in Arizona.

In 1908, Roosevelt used the Antiquities Act to protect the Grand Canyon.

Since then, presidents of both parties have protected American lands. President Jimmy Carter rivaled Roosevelt's protection of land when he protected more than 100 million acres in Alaska from oil development. Carter's secretary of the interior, Cecil D. Andrus, saw himself as a practical man trying to balance the needs of business and environmental needs but seemed to think business interests had become too powerful: "The domination of the department by mining, oil, timber, grazing and other interests is over."

In fact, the fight over the public lands was not ending; it was entering a new phase. Since the 1980s, Republicans have pushed to reopen public lands to resource development, maintaining even today that Democrats have hampered oil production although under President Joe Biden it reached an all-time high.

President Donald Trump pushed to return public lands to private hands during his first term. On April 26, 2017, Trump signed an executive order—Executive Order 13792—directing his secretary of the interior, Ryan Zinke, to review designations of 22 national monuments greater than 100,000 acres, made since 1996. He then ordered the largest national monument reduction in U.S. history, slashing the size of Utah's Bears Ears National Monument by 85%—a goal of uranium-mining interests—and that of Utah's Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument by about half, favoring coal interests.

"No one better values the splendor of Utah more than you do," Trump told cheering supporters. "And no one knows better how to use it."

In March 2021, shortly after he took office, President Biden announced a new initiative to protect 30% of U.S. land, fresh water, and oceans areas by 2030, a plan popularly known as 30 by 30. Also in March 2021, Supreme Court chief justice John Roberts urged opponents of land protection to push back against the Antiquities Act, saying the broad protection of lands presidents have established under it is an abuse of power.

In October 2021, President Biden restored Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante to their original size. "Today's announcement is not just about national monuments," Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, a member of New Mexico's Laguna Pueblo, said at the ceremony. "It's about this administration centering the voices of Indigenous people and affirming the shared stewardship of this landscape with tribal nations."

In 2022, nearly 312 million people visited the country's national parks and monuments, supporting 378,400 jobs and spending $23.9 billion in communities within 60 miles of a park. This amounted to a $50.3 billion benefit to the nation's economy.

But Project 2025, the blueprint for the second Trump presidency, called for significant increases in drilling for oil and gas and removing land from federal protection and opening it to private development. As Roberts urged, Project 2025 promised to seek a Supreme Court ruling that would permit it to reduce the size of national monuments, saying a second Trump administration "must seek repeal of the Antiquities Act of 1906."

Shortly after retaking office, Trump declared a "national energy emergency," and yesterday he signed two proclamations. One will shrink Bears Ears National Monument by 91%, and the other will shrink Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument by about 90%—even more than the reductions of his first term. Together, they remove nearly three million acres (1.2 million hectares) from monument protection.

In his newsletter, outdoor writer Wes Siler suggests that Trump's proclamations are an effort "to trigger a case that will allow the far-right justices he's appointed to the Supreme Court to massively reduce the scope of the Antiquities Act, or eliminate it altogether."

—

Notes:

https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/historyculture/historic-tribes.htm

https://www.usgs.gov/observatories/yvo/news/land-burning-ground-history-and-traditions-indigenous-people-yellowstone

https://www.politico.com/story/2009/06/june-30-1864-lincoln-creates-yosemite-park-024332

https://njdigitalhistory.org/TR-national-parks/index.php/why-is-conservation-important/forest-reserve-act/

https://www.nps.gov/subjects/archeology/antiquities-act.htm

https://www.nps.gov/thrb/learn/historyculture/trandthenpsystem.htm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/02/21/jimmy-carter-environment-energy-alaska/

https://www.nytimes.com/1977/05/08/archives/a-new-environment-at-interior-cecil-andrus-is-trying-to-turn-things.html

https://legacy-assets.eenews.net/open_files/assets/2021/03/22/document_gw_18.pdf

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/national/bears-ears/

https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/haines1/index.htm

"Amateur Management of the Yosemite Scenery," Century 40 (September 1890): 797.

"Attacks upon Public Parks," Century 43 (January 1892): 473-475.

https://www.nrdc.org/bio/helen-oshea/biden-administration-lays-out-30x30-vision-conserve-nature

https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/biden-fully-restores-bears-ears-and-grand-staircase-escalante-national-monuments

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61545

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/05/01/2017-08908/review-of-designations-under-the-antiquities-act

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/12/04/567803476/trump-dramatically-shrinks-2-utah-national-monuments

https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/national-park-visitation-sets-new-record-as-economic-engines.htm

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/13/trump-cuts-national-monuments-utah

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/what-to-know-about-trump-shrinking-2-national-monuments-in-utah


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©

 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Thomas    4 months ago

It is really nice that President Trump knew nothing about Project 2025 /s

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Thomas @1    4 months ago

nope! not a thing

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @1    4 months ago

I don't think the elimination or reduction in size of areas set aside for the public and turning them over to capitalists is such a good idea. don't some of these people that utilize these recreation areas own high powered rifles with scopes?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    4 months ago
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone
They paved paradise, put up a parking lot
-
joni mitchell
 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    4 months ago
in March 2021, Supreme Court chief justice John Roberts urged opponents of land protection to push back against the Antiquities Act, saying the broad protection of lands presidents have established under it is an abuse of power.

Should he be allowed to do that? Isn't his job to uphold the COTUS and interpret it within meaningful reason?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1  evilone  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    4 months ago
Should he be allowed to do that?

He can speak his personal opinion, he shouldn't rule by it.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.2  seeder  Thomas  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    4 months ago
in March 2021, Supreme Court chief justice John Roberts urged opponents of land protection to push back against the Antiquities Act, saying the broad protection of lands presidents have established under it is an abuse of power.

Should he be allowed to do that? Isn't his job to uphold the COTUS and interpret it within meaningful reason?

Allowed to opine is the American Way, especially since the context for his giving the opinion was in the service of his duties as a Supreme Court Justice (Note that he did not have to give the statement). Here is a link to the explanation of why they did not hear the case. And here is some context (Scroll down to "SLIGHTLY OFF TOPIC: Chief Justice Roberts Invites Antiquities Act Challenges".)

Per ChatGPT:

No. He did not have to make the statement.

The Supreme Court simply denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, meaning it declined to hear the case. That required no explanation. Roberts voluntarily added a separate “statement respecting the denial of certiorari.” No other justice joined it, and it had no precedential or binding legal effect.

He was permitted to do that, and justices sometimes use such statements to explain why a case was rejected or to identify an issue they might consider in a better case. But Roberts went further than merely explaining the denial. He criticized the modern use of the Antiquities Act and explicitly pointed to other pending cases as possible “better opportunities” to address it.

So TG’s underlying suspicion is not baseless. Roberts was not merely performing an unavoidable judicial duty. He chose to publish a nonbinding statement signaling receptiveness to future challenges . Whether that was improper or pretextual is a judgment, but it was certainly deliberate and unnecessary to the disposition of the case.
 
 

Who is online




86 visitors