╌>

Silicon Valley railroad funding removed from coronavirus relief bill

  
Via:  Vic Eldred  •  5 years ago  •  18 comments

By:   Michael Ruiz (Fox Business)

Silicon Valley railroad funding removed from coronavirus relief bill
A controversial $100 million slated for a subterranean rail project in Silicon Valley has been removed from the House version of the latest coronavirus relief bill, according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



A controversial $100 million slated for a subterranean rail project in California's Silicon Valley has been removed from the latest coronavirus relief bill, according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office.

The money would have gone toward an expansion of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system beneath San Jose, as House Democrats had argued that transportation funding in the relief bill would support construction and transit jobs.

But critics have derided the BART expansion as Pelosi's "Subway to Nowhere."

But because it would have been a pilot project, the Senate parliamentarian concluded that it was not eligible for an exemption to be a part of the bill, according to Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill.

Similarly, $1.5 million for the slated Seaway International Bridge in GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik's district has also been removed -- the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere."

"Now that the two projects that Republicans misled the public about in the House bill have been removed, it is unclear how Republicans will justify their opposition to the American Rescue Plan, which has strong bipartisan support among the public," Hammill claimed.

The American Rescue Plan is the White House's COVID-relief legislation, which President Biden has asked the Senate to pass. It also includes a strategy for distributing coronavirus vaccines, reopening schools and sending $1,400 relief checks to eligible families.

The San Jose BART funding was approved during the Trump administration for the expedited delivery of a federal Capital Investment Grant.

The subsidy for the project, phase two of the BART expansion, was tucked into the House Transportation Committee's section of the relief bill under a provision for "all projects under section 3005(b) of Public Law 114-94 that received allocations for fiscal year 2019 and 2020" except "projects open for revenue service."

But there is only one such project that fits that definition -- the BART phase 2 extension, documents reviewed by Fox Business reveal.

A Federal Transit Administration spokesperson told Fox Business that the FTA doesn't comment on legislation that is still in Congress.

Under the distribution formula of that section of the bill, documents reviewed by Fox Business indicate that the BART project would get approximately $112 million.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

So, Let's see, the minimum wage provision is gone and now the Pelosi railroad project is gone - that leaves the money for state aid and the racial farm aid to be removed and we might just have a covid aid bill that everyone can vote for!


Trump & his supporters & I are off topic.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    5 years ago

There must be several more pounds of fatty pork in the bill that could be trimmed

Speaking of trains in California....

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    5 years ago

Have you read of the farm bill in there?

How did the media keep a lid on that one?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    5 years ago
How did the media keep a lid on that one?

They try hard to conceal, but the truth eventually leaks out

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.2    5 years ago

Greg, believe it or not it goes like this:

"The $1.9 trillion   coronavirus   stimulus package being pushed by   President Biden  puts more than $1 billion toward "socially disadvantaged" farmers and related groups — including an equity commission, agricultural training and other assistance to advance racial justice in farming.

"Socially disadvantaged" farmers are defined as those who are part of a group that has been discriminated against because of their race or ethnicity.

"By denying or delaying Black farmers the same loans, subsidies and other payments made to white farmers, USDA engaged in systematic racism that led to a dramatic decline in the number of Black farmers. This is not in dispute," John Boyd, president of the National Black Farmers Association, told Fox News in a statement."





I don't even know if that is constitutional - favoring one race over another!

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
5  Nerm_L    5 years ago

The sad thing is another package like this one will be needed this summer to stimulate the economy.  The writing is already on the wall.  That's when the pork can be packed. 

The current relief bill should be used to build bipartisanship.  Democrats are trying to reach too far, too fast.  But that's not too surprising considering who is in charge.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
6  Mark in Wyoming     5 years ago

Underground railway( subway) in cali?

 Show me someone that would use same in an earthquake prone area , and i will show you a darwin award winner.

I can just imagine it , riding along nicely on the P line , your underground and an eathquake hits ..... looks good to me.....

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
7  charger 383    5 years ago

Better use of money would be to improve dinning cars on Amtrak

 
 

Who is online